Maryland Question 3, Civil Jury Trials Amendment (2022)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Maryland Question 3
Flag of Maryland.png
Election date
November 8, 2022
Topic
Civil and criminal trials
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

Maryland Question 3, the Civil Jury Trials Amendment, was on the ballot in Maryland as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 8, 2022.[1] The ballot measure was approved.

A "yes" vote supported amending the state constitution to increase from $15,000 to $25,000 the minimum amount in controversy that guarantees a right to a jury trial in civil cases.

A "no" vote opposed amending the state constitution to increase from $15,000 to $25,000 the minimum amount in controversy that guarantees a right to a jury trial in civil cases.


Election results

Maryland Question 3

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

1,132,822 62.51%
No 679,451 37.49%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

What did Amendment 3 change about civil proceedings?

See also: Text of measure

Question 3 amended the Maryland Declaration of Rights to increase from $15,000 to $25,000 the minimum amount in controversy that guarantees a right to a jury trial in civil cases. At the time of the election, the legislature could limit the right to trial by a jury when the amount in controversy was less than $15,000.[2]

When was the minimum amount guarantee established?

See also: Background

In 1992, voters approved Question 3 and Question 4, which established a $5,000 minimum in controversies to guarantee a right to a jury trial for civil proceedings. This amount was increased to $10,000 in 2006 when voters approved Question 3. In 2010, voters approved Question 2, which increased the minimum amount from $10,000 to $15,000.

Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title was as follows:[3]

Authorizing the General Assembly to enact legislation that limits the right to a jury trial in a civil proceeding to those proceedings in which the amount in controversy exceeds $25,000, excluding attorney's fees if attorney's fees are recoverable in the proceeding. Under current law, the amount in controversy must exceed $15,000 before a party to a proceeding may demand a jury trial. In cases where the amount in controversy does not exceed this threshold amount, a judge, rather than a jury, determines the verdict.

(Amending Maryland Declaration of Rights - Articles 5(a) and 23)

[ ] For the Constitutional Amendment

[ ] Against the Constitutional Amendment[4]

Constitutional changes

See also: Declaration of Rights

The measure amended Articles 5 and 23 of the Declaration of Rights of the Maryland Constitution. The following underlined text was added, and struck-through text was deleted:[2] Note: Use your mouse to scroll over the text below to see the full text.

Text of Article 5: (a)

(1) That the Inhabitants of Maryland are entitled to the Common Law of England, and the trial by Jury, according to the course of that Law, and to the benefit of such of the English statutes as existed on the Fourth day of July, seventeen hundred and seventy-six; and which, by experience, have been found applicable to their local and other circumstances, and have been introduced, used and practiced by the Courts of Law or Equity; and also of all Acts of Assembly in force on the first day of June, eighteen hundred and sixty-seven; except such as may have since expired, or may be inconsistent with the provisions of this Constitution; subject, nevertheless, to the revision of, and amendment or repeal by, the Legislature of this State. And the Inhabitants of Maryland are also entitled to all property derived to them from, or under the Charter granted by His Majesty Charles the First to Caecilius Calvert, Baron of Baltimore.

(2) Legislation may be enacted that limits the right to trial by jury in civil proceedings to those proceedings in which the amount in controversy exceeds $15,000$25,000.

(b) The parties to any civil proceeding in which the right to a jury trial is preserved are entitled to a trial by jury of at least 6 jurors.

(c) That notwithstanding the Common Law of England, nothing in this Constitution prohibits trial by jury of less than 12 jurors in any civil proceeding in which the right to a jury trial is preserved.

Text of Article 23: In the trial of all criminal cases, the Jury shall be the Judges of Law, as well as of fact, except that the Court may pass upon the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction.

The right of trial by Jury of all issues of fact in civil proceedings in the several Courts of Law in this State, where the amount in controversy exceeds the sum of $15,000$25,000, shall be inviolably preserved.[4]

Full text

The full text of the amendment can be found here.

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2022

Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.

The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 14, and the FRE is 32. The word count for the ballot title is 90.


Support

Supporters

Officials

Organizations

  • Maryland Association for Justice
  • Maryland State Bar Association

Arguments

  • Richard A. Montgomery III, director of Legislative & Governmental Relations for the Maryland State Bar Association: "The MSBA has found that civil claims with lower amounts in controversy cannot be litigated economically in the circuit courts. Generally, when those claims require testimony by medical experts, the high costs of those expert witnesses, as well as the expansive discovery in the circuit court combine make such cases unduly expensive to pursue. The result is that often plaintiffs with smaller claims face unfairly high barriers to justice. Given the ever increasing costs associated with asserting medical claims, we believe the time has come to adjust the amount in controversy thresholds."


Opposition

Opponents

Organizations

  • American Property Casualty Insurance Association Political Action Committee (Insuring America PAC)
  • Maryland Association of Mutual Insurance Companies
  • Maryland Defense Counsel
  • National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies PAC

Arguments

  • Maryland Defense Counsel (MDC): "MDC opposes Senate Bill 669 and Senate Bill 670’s proposed curtailment of the right to trial by jury which has been a staple of the Constitutional rights of the citizens of Maryland since the adoption of the Maryland Constitution. At common law, there was no minimum amount for jury trials. ... The net effect of the doubling of the minimum amount of jury trials in Maryland would be discriminatory, not associated with justice for all, but justice for some."
  • Robert F. Glass, president of Maryland Association of Mutual Insurance Companies: "The enactment of this legislation would deprive many defendants in civil actions of the ability to remove an action from the District Court to the Circuit Court, where appropriate rules of discovery would be available. ... We should also note that, in the majority of states, no threshold of any kind exists. Among those states that have thresholds, Maryland is an outlier, with one of the highest thresholds in the Nation. Increasing the threshold now –doubling it – would only upset this balance without a demonstrated need."
  • Andrew Kirkner of National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies: "SB 669 and SB 670 would have a significant impact on all individual defendants, but the effects will be exacerbated in the insurance context. The increased jury threshold is likely to increase insurance costs for individual policyholders as insurer defendants will be unable to thoroughly investigate and defend questionable claims and have these claims adjudicated by a jury."

Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Maryland ballot measures

Ballotpedia has not identified any committees registered in support of or opposition to Question 3.[5]

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00


Media editorials

See also: 2022 ballot measure media endorsements

Ballotpedia identified the following media editorial boards as taking positions on the measure.

Ballotpedia lists the positions of media editorial boards that support or oppose ballot measures. This does not include opinion pieces from individuals or groups that do not represent the official position of a newspaper or media outlet. Ballotpedia includes editorials from newspapers and outlets based on circulation and readership, political coverage within a state, and length of publication. You can share media editorial board endorsements with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Support

You can share campaign information or arguments, along with source links for this information, at editor@ballotpedia.org

Opposition

  • Baltimore Sun Editorial Board: "Question 3. Against. ... The Maryland Defense Counsel is opposed to the amendment, pointing out that it curtails the right to a trial by jury at the circuit court level, where the rules allow parties to seek more information from one another than in district court, and that no strong case has been made for the change. We agree."


Background

Trial courts in Maryland

Circuit courts

See also: Maryland Circuit Courts

The Maryland Circuit Courts have jurisdiction over criminal and civil cases, including juvenile and other family law cases such as divorce, custody, and child support. Circuit courts also hear cases concerning domestic violence. The circuit courts are where jury trials are held, though cases may be decided by bench trial. At the time of the election, the amount in controversy of a civil case had to be greater than $15,000 to qualify for a jury trial. These courts hear appeals from the district courts, orphan's court, and some administrative agencies.[6]

The circuit courts are divided into eight circuits with one court in each of Maryland's 23 counties, and one in Baltimore City.[6]

The map below shows each of those circuits by county.

Maryland Circuit Court

District courts

See also: Maryland District Courts

Created in 1971, the Maryland District Court, a statewide court, has jurisdiction over all landlord-tenant cases, replevin actions (to seek the return of property), motor vehicle violations, misdemeanors, and certain felonies. In civil cases, the court has exclusive jurisdiction in claims of $5,000 or less, and concurrent jurisdiction with the circuit courts in claims for amounts totaling more than $5,000 but less than $30,000. In criminal cases, the court has concurrent jurisdiction with the circuit courts when the penalty may be confinement for 3 years or more, or a fine of $2,500 or more, and certain felony offenses. The district court does not conduct jury trials.[7][8][9]

The District Court is headquartered in Annapolis. The court has 33 locations in 12 districts. Judges are selected by the Governor and confirmed by the State Senate.[8]

Ballot measures that limited the right to a trial in civil proceedings in Maryland

In 1992, Maryland voters approved Question 3 and Question 4, which were the same question mistakenly referred to the ballot twice by the state legislature. The ballot measures provided that the right to a jury trial in civil proceedings is limited to proceedings where the amount in controversy exceeds $5,000. Both questions were approved with over 70% of the vote.

In 2006, Maryland voters decided on a similar amendment increasing the minimum amount in controversy from $5,000 to $10,000. It was approved by a margin of 66.9% to 33.1%. In 2010, voters approved Question 2 increasing the minimum amount in controversy for jury trials to the current amount of $15,000. Question 2 was approved by a margin of 65.6% to 34.4%.

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Maryland Constitution

To put a legislatively referred constitutional amendment before voters, a 60% vote is required in both the Maryland State Senate and the Maryland House of Representatives.

Question 3 was introduced as Senate Bill 669 (SB 669) on February 3, 2021, by Senator Jeff Waldstreicher (D). It was approved in the state Senate in a vote of 43-4 on March 16, 2021. On April 10, 2021, the state House passed an amended version of the bill in a vote of 100-35 with six not voting or absent. On April 12, the state Senate concurred with the amendments in a vote of 45-1 with one not voting.[1]

Vote in the Maryland House of Representatives
April 10, 2021
Requirement: Three-fifths (60 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 85  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total100356
Total percent70.92%24.82%4.26%
Democrat9405
Republican6351

Vote in the Maryland State Senate
April 12, 2021
Requirement: Three-fifths (60 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 29  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total4511
Total percent95.74%2.13%2.13%
Democrat3200
Republican1311

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Maryland

See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Maryland.

How to vote in Maryland


See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Maryland State Legislature, "Overview of SB 669," accessed March 17, 2021
  2. 2.0 2.1 Maryland State Legislature, "Text of SB 669," accessed March 17, 2021
  3. Marlyand.gov, "Ballot titles," accessed August 11, 2022
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  5. Maryland.gov, "Campaign finance," accessed March 29, 2022
  6. 6.0 6.1 Maryland Courts, "Circuit Courts," accessed March 17, 2021
  7. Maryland Courts, "District Court of Maryland," accessed March 17, 2021
  8. 8.0 8.1 Maryland Courts, "About District Court," accessed March 17, 2021
  9. Maryland Manual On-Line: A Guide to Maryland & Its Government, "District Court of Maryland," accessed March 17, 2021
  10. Maryland State Board of Elections, "Rules and Information for Voters," accessed April 18, 2023
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 Maryland State Board of Elections, "Introduction," accessed April 18, 2023
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 NCSL, "State Profiles: Elections," accessed August 25, 2024
  13. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  14. Maryland Attorney General, "Voting FAQ," accessed April 13, 2023