lynx   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i3p263-d1577327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Agricultural Machinery Services on Food Loss at the Producer Level: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Xu

    (College of Economics and Management, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China)

  • Jie Lyu

    (College of Economics and Management, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China)

  • Dandan Yuan

    (College of Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China)

  • Guanqiu Yin

    (College of Economics and Management, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China)

  • Junyan Zhang

    (College of Economics and Management, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China)

Abstract
Reducing food loss can improve environmental sustainability, resource use, and food security. Agricultural machinery services have considerable advantages in enhancing the adaptability and competitiveness of farms, but little is known about its potential for addressing food loss. Here, this work attempts to reveal a strong yet under-discussed connection between agricultural machinery services and food loss. Using survey data covering 483 corn farmers in the Heilongjiang, Jilin, and Liaoning provinces of China from October to December 2024, this study examined the extent to which participation in agricultural machinery services reduced food loss. Our results confirmed the existence of this significant causal effect and estimated 0.864% and 0.862% reductions in weight and value losses in response to a 1% increase in the purchase of agricultural machinery services. The possible mechanisms driving this relationship, including factor allocation optimization and technology introduction, were further verified. A variety of robustness tests were conducted to validate the strength and reliability of the empirical results and address endogeneity issues. Also, to better contextualize the heterogeneous effects of agricultural machinery services on food loss, the differences across production links, land fragmentation, and service quality were explored. By highlighting the important roles of agricultural machinery services in reducing food loss, our analysis contributed to contemporary debates about the long-term linkage between the wide popularization of agricultural machinery services and achieving food security, particularly providing insights for developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Xu & Jie Lyu & Dandan Yuan & Guanqiu Yin & Junyan Zhang, 2025. "The Impact of Agricultural Machinery Services on Food Loss at the Producer Level: Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:263-:d:1577327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/3/263/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/3/263/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sheng, Yu & Chancellor, Will, 2019. "Exploring the relationship between farm size and productivity: Evidence from the Australian grains industry," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 196-204.
    2. Lulu Wang & Jie Lyu & Junyan Zhang, 2024. "Explicating the Role of Agricultural Socialized Services on Chemical Fertilizer Use Reduction: Evidence from China Using a Double Machine Learning Model," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Changhai Luo & Jingping Chen & Shuxia Guo & Xiaofei An & Yanxin Yin & Changkai Wen & Huaiyu Liu & Zhijun Meng & Chunjiang Zhao, 2022. "Development and Application of a Remote Monitoring System for Agricultural Machinery Operation in Conservation Tillage," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, September.
    4. Alberto Abadie & David Drukker & Jane Leber Herr & Guido W. Imbens, 2004. "Implementing matching estimators for average treatment effects in Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 4(3), pages 290-311, September.
    5. Schmitt, Jonas & Offermann, Frank & Söder, Mareike & Frühauf, Cathleen & Finger, Robert, 2022. "Extreme weather events cause significant crop yield losses at the farm level in German agriculture," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    6. Meiling Cui & Yang Guo & Jiwei Chen, 2023. "Influence of Transfer Plot Area and Location on Chemical Input Reduction in Agricultural Production: Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, September.
    7. Anriquez, Gustavo & Foster, William & Ortega, Jorge & Santos Rocha, Jozimo, 2021. "In search of economically significant food losses: Evidence from Tunisia and Egypt," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    8. Zhang, Xiaobo & Yang, Jin & Reardon, Thomas, 2020. "Mechanization outsourcing clusters and division of labor in Chinese agriculture," IFPRI book chapters, in: An evolving paradigm of agricultural mechanization development: How much can Africa learn from Asia?, chapter 2, pages 71-96, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. Tasso Adamopoulos & Loren Brandt & Jessica Leight & Diego Restuccia, 2022. "Misallocation, Selection, and Productivity: A Quantitative Analysis With Panel Data From China," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(3), pages 1261-1282, May.
    10. Qian, Long & Lu, Hua & Gao, Qiang & Lu, Hualiang, 2022. "Household-owned farm machinery vs. outsourced machinery services: The impact of agricultural mechanization on the land leasing behavior of relatively large-scale farmers in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    11. Hailan Qiu & Mingrui Feng & Yiming Chi & Mingzhong Luo, 2023. "Agricultural Machinery Socialization Service Adoption, Risks, and Relative Poverty of Farmers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Julian Parfitt & Tim Croker & Anna Brockhaus, 2021. "Global Food Loss and Waste in Primary Production: A Reassessment of Its Scale and Significance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-24, November.
    13. Qiao, Fangbin, 2017. "Increasing wage, mechanization, and agriculture production in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 249-260.
    14. Awudu Abdulai, 2023. "Information acquisition and the adoption of improved crop varieties," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(4), pages 1049-1062, August.
    15. Meng Meng & Leng Yu & Xiaohua Yu, 2024. "Machinery structure, machinery subsidies, and agricultural productivity: Evidence from China," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(2), pages 223-246, March.
    16. Paudel, Gokul P. & KC, Dilli Bahadur & Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Khanal, Narayan P. & Justice, Scott E. & McDonald, Andrew J., 2019. "Smallholder farmers' willingness to pay for scale-appropriate farm mechanization: Evidence from the mid-hills of Nepal," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    17. Delgado, Luciana & Schuster, Monica & Torero, Maximo, 2021. "Quantity and quality food losses across the value Chain: A Comparative analysis," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    18. Xi Yu & Xiyang Yin & Yuying Liu & Dongmei Li, 2021. "Do Agricultural Machinery Services Facilitate Land Transfer? Evidence from Rice Farmers in Sichuan Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, April.
    19. Fabi, Carola & Cachia, Franck & Conforti, Piero & English, Alicia & Rosero Moncayo, José, 2021. "Improving data on food losses and waste: From theory to practice," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiang Li & Xiaoqin Guo, 2023. "Can Policy Promote Agricultural Service Outsourcing? Quasi-Natural Experimental Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Lewei Chen & Zongyi Zhang & Hongbo Li & Xinpu Zhang, 2023. "Maintenance Skill Training Gives Agricultural Socialized Service Providers More Advantages," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Cao, Yueming & Bai, Yunli & Zhang, Linxiu, 2024. "Do the types of agricultural socialized services and their diverse suppliers matter to farmland renting in rural China?," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. Zhang, Cheng & Nie, Kunxi & Zhu, Yueji, 2024. "Participation in land rental and labor markets and agricultural economic performance of banana farmers in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    5. Qian, Long & Lu, Hua & Gao, Qiang & Lu, Hualiang, 2022. "Household-owned farm machinery vs. outsourced machinery services: The impact of agricultural mechanization on the land leasing behavior of relatively large-scale farmers in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    6. Meng Qu & Kai Zhao & Renhui Zhang & Yuan Gao & Jing Wang, 2022. "Divergence between Willingness and Behavior of Farmers to Purchase Socialized Agricultural Services: From a Heterogeneity Perspective of Land Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, July.
    7. Yuan Hu & Ziyang Zhou & Li Zhou & Caiming Liu, 2024. "Self-Owned or Outsourced? The Impact of Farm Machinery Adoption Decisions on Chinese Farm Households’ Operating Income," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, October.
    8. Yingyu Zhu & Junmiao Deng & Menghan Wang & Yuanchang Tan & Wei Yao & Yan Zhang, 2022. "Can Agricultural Productive Services Promote Agricultural Environmental Efficiency in China?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Yangxiao Lu & Suhao Wei, 2024. "Outsourcing of Agricultural Machinery Operation Services and the Sustainability of Farmland Transfer Market: Promoting or Inhibiting?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Liu, Yan & Heerink, Nico & Li, Fan & Shi, Xiaoping, 2022. "Do agricultural machinery services promote village farmland rental markets? Theory and evidence from a case study in the North China plain," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    11. Aragón, Fernando M. & Restuccia, Diego & Rud, Juan Pablo, 2022. "Are small farms really more productive than large farms?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    12. Xuelan Li & Rui Guan, 2023. "How Does Agricultural Mechanization Service Affect Agricultural Green Transformation in China?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-23, January.
    13. Aryal, Jeetendra Prakash & Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Thapa, Ganesh & Simtowe, Franklin, 2021. "Mechanisation of small-scale farms in South Asia: Empirical evidence derived from farm households survey," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    14. Ping Xue & Xinru Han & Yongchun Wang & Xiudong Wang, 2022. "Can Agricultural Machinery Harvesting Services Reduce Cropland Abandonment? Evidence from Rural China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, June.
    15. Jiquan Peng & Zihao Zhao & Lili Chen, 2022. "The Impact of High-Standard Farmland Construction Policy on Rural Poverty in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    16. Idelphonse O. Saliou & Afio Zannou & Augustin K. N. Aoudji & Albert N. Honlonkou, 2020. "Drivers of Mechanization in Cotton Production in Benin, West Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, November.
    17. Heng Zhang & Xiangyu Guo, 2024. "Farmland Rental Market, Outsourcing Services Market and Agricultural Green Productivity: Implications for Multiple Forms of Large-Scale Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, May.
    18. Yi Liu & Hanyue Wang & Chongxu Liu & Mengding Li & Dingde Xu, 2024. "The Impact of Outsourcing Service Adoption on Pesticide Application Reduction from the Perspective of the Principal–Agent Theory: An Empirical Study from Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-15, November.
    19. Shichao Yuan & Jian Wang, 2022. "Involution Effect: Does China’s Rural Land Transfer Market Still Have Efficiency?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Meili Huan & Fengxia Dong & Liang Chi, 2022. "Mechanization services, factor allocation, and farm efficiency: Evidence from China," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 1618-1639, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:263-:d:1577327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.
    Лучший частный хостинг