lynx   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/rissri/vhtml10.3280-riss2022-002012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the economic sectors? sustainability of the Kyrgyz Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Ainagul T. Mamyralieva
  • Aziza B. Karbekova
  • Gulchehra B. Abdyrahmanova
Abstract
The relevance of the study is due to the need to study economic growth, taking in-to account the interaction of macroeconomic parameters under the influence of internal and external conditions, the development of new theoretical and method-ological foundations for research and solving the problems faced by the Kyrgyz Republic in the context of the globalization of the world economy. The purpose of the study is to develop the methodology of econometric modelling of the econom-ic dynamics of the interaction of macroeconomic parameters and to create eco-nomic and mathematical tools for analysis, forecasting and making recommenda-tions for the economic policy of the government of the country aimed at creating conditions for sustainable growth of the Kyrgyz economy. For the sustainable de-velopment of Kyrgyzstan with a transitional economy, it is necessary to identify existing trends in the development of production factors and compliance with global trends and requirements of the scientific and technological revolution to en-sure the well-being of the state. It is necessary to answer the question of how to identify positive trends and overcome negative ones, how the globalisation of the development of the world economy affects the development of Kyrgyzstan and the productivity of production factors. On the basis of the proposed research methodology, the development of economic sectors is analysed, which allows ob-taining quantitative estimates of the impact of macroeconomic parameters of economic growth, taking into account interchangeability and complementarity in the sustainable development of the state.

Suggested Citation

  • Ainagul T. Mamyralieva & Aziza B. Karbekova & Gulchehra B. Abdyrahmanova, 2022. "Analysis of the economic sectors? sustainability of the Kyrgyz Republic," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2), pages 185-204.
    • Handle: RePEc:fan:rissri:v:html10.3280/riss2022-002012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=72493&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Growiec, Jakub & Mućk, Jakub, 2020. "Isoelastic Elasticity Of Substitution Production Functions," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(7), pages 1597-1634, October.
    2. Hu, Yingyao & Huang, Guofang & Sasaki, Yuya, 2020. "Estimating production functions with robustness against errors in the proxy variables," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 215(2), pages 375-398.
    3. Yongzhong Jiang & Valerii Havrysh & Oleksandr Klymchuk & Vitalii Nitsenko & Tomas Balezentis & Dalia Streimikiene, 2019. "Utilization of Crop Residue for Power Generation: The Case of Ukraine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Andrei Polbin & Sergey Drobyshevsky, 2014. "Developing a Dynamic Stochastic Model of General Equilibrium for the Russian Economy," Research Paper Series, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 166P, pages 156-156.
    5. Link, Albert N. & van Hasselt, Martijn, 2019. "A public sector knowledge production function," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 64-66.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohsen Jamali & Esmaeil Bakhshandeh & Mohammad Yaghoubi Khanghahi & Carmine Crecchio, 2021. "Metadata Analysis to Evaluate Environmental Impacts of Wheat Residues Burning on Soil Quality in Developing and Developed Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Valerii Havrysh & Antonina Kalinichenko & Grzegorz Mentel & Tadeusz Olejarz, 2020. "Commercial Biogas Plants: Lessons for Ukraine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    3. Albert N. Link & John T. Scott, 2019. "The economic benefits of technology transfer from U.S. federal laboratories," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 1416-1426, October.
    4. Katarzyna Chudy-Laskowska & Tomasz Pisula & Mirosław Liana & László Vasa, 2020. "Taxonomic Analysis of the Diversity in the Level of Wind Energy Development in European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Alina Zh. Sakun & Kateryna A. Pylypenko & Svitlana V. Skrypnyk & Oleksandr S. Prystemskyi & Inesa V. Shepel, 2022. "Accounting and analytical space of providing the depreciation policy of Ukrainian enterprises," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2), pages 247-270.
    6. Manuel Arellano & Stéphane Bonhomme, 2017. "Nonlinear Panel Data Methods for Dynamic Heterogeneous Agent Models," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 9(1), pages 471-496, September.
    7. Idrisov, Georgy & Kazakova, Maria & Polbin, Andrey, 2015. "A theoretical interpretation of the oil prices impact on economic growth in contemporary Russia," Russian Journal of Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(3), pages 257-272.
    8. Dmitry Kreptsev & Sergei Seleznev, 2017. "DSGE Model of the Russian Economy with the Banking Sector," Bank of Russia Working Paper Series wps27, Bank of Russia.
    9. Albert N. Link & John T. Scott, 2021. "Scientific publications at U.S. federal research laboratories," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(3), pages 2227-2248, March.
    10. Cicowiez, Martin & Lofgren, Hans, 2019. "Asymmetric Armington Model: Method and Application," Conference papers 333079, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    11. Kalaj, Jozefina & Rogger, Daniel & Somani, Ravi, 2022. "Bureaucrat time-use: Evidence from a survey experiment," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    12. Growiec, Jakub, 2018. "Factor-specific technology choice," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1-14.
    13. Tong Li & Yuya Sasaki, 2017. "Constructive Identification of Heterogeneous Elasticities in the Cobb-Douglas Production Function," Papers 1711.10031, arXiv.org.
    14. Siniša Škrbić & Aleksandar Ašonja & Radivoj Prodanović & Vladica Ristić & Goran Stevanović & Miroslav Vulić & Zoran Janković & Adriana Radosavac & Saša Igić, 2020. "Analysis of Plant-Production-Obtained Biomass in Function of Sustainable Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-14, July.
    15. Hu, Yingyao & Huang, Guofang & Sasaki, Yuya, 2020. "Estimating production functions with robustness against errors in the proxy variables," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 215(2), pages 375-398.
    16. Ziran Ding & Jose Garcia‐Louzao & Valentin Jouvanceau, 2025. "The dynamics of product and labour market power: Evidence from Lithuania," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 165-194, January.
    17. Daniel A. Ackerberg & Kevin Caves & Garth Frazer, 2015. "Identification Properties of Recent Production Function Estimators," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 83, pages 2411-2451, November.
    18. Nobuya Fukugawa, 2019. "Determinants and impacts of public agricultural research: product-level evidence from agricultural Kohsetsushi in Japan," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(3), pages 1475-1498, September.
    19. Sammar Z Allam, 2022. "De-carbonized energy initiative with bio-cell-distributed stations using GIS geodesic tools towards circular economy," Energy & Environment, , vol. 33(3), pages 562-581, May.
    20. Mike G. Tsionas & Subal C. Kumbhakar, 2023. "Productivity and Performance: A GMM approach," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 85(2), pages 331-344, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:rissri:v:html10.3280/riss2022-002012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=168 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.
    Лучший частный хостинг