lynx   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v239y2025i1p207-221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the effectiveness of standards application to threshold setting in vibration condition monitoring in industrial machinery

Author

Listed:
  • Cristiana Delprete
  • Chiara Gastaldi
Abstract
One of the goals of Industry 4.0 is to minimize unplanned maintenance emergencies and to leverage the efficiency of condition-based, just-in-time labor and repairs. Achieving the benefits of predictive maintenance via an Industry 4.0-style plant requires not only a data capture ecosystem, but also reference values to inform the monitoring system. Effectively estimating the values of monitoring thresholds is not an easy task, especially in those cases where the manufacturer does not provide data, or the machine is not new but the monitoring system has just been installed, therefore a measurement history is not yet available. The purpose of the present work is assess, through the analysis of two separate test cases, whether the monitoring thresholds suggested by different internationally recognized standards may serve as effective starting values in a vibration-based condition monitoring system. While general agreement on the order of magnitude of the thresholds is present in all cases, the differences between the standards allow for conclusions to be drawn on the most convenient format and processing technique to handle the data and to assess the most/least conservative standards. This paper constitutes, to the authors knowledge, the only systematic study in which the recommendations of all available international standards for vibration monitoring of non-rotating parts are applied to the same test cases and compared.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristiana Delprete & Chiara Gastaldi, 2025. "On the effectiveness of standards application to threshold setting in vibration condition monitoring in industrial machinery," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 239(1), pages 207-221, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:239:y:2025:i:1:p:207-221
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X231218363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X231218363
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X231218363?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:239:y:2025:i:1:p:207-221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.
    Лучший частный хостинг