lynx   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v80y2025i1p11-16..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subjective Memory Complaints and the Effect of a Multidomain Lifestyle Intervention on Cognition: The FINGER Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Laura VaskivuoLic
  • Laura Hokkanen
  • Esko Levälahti
  • Tuomo Hänninen
  • Riitta Antikainen
  • Lars Bäckman
  • Tiina Laatikainen
  • Teemu Paajanen
  • Anna Stigsdotter Neely
  • Timo Strandberg
  • Jaakko Tuomilehto
  • Hilkka Soininen
  • Miia Kivipelto
  • Tiia Ngandu
Abstract
ObjectivesOlder people reporting subjective memory complaints (SMCs) may have a greater risk of cognitive decline. Multidomain lifestyle interventions are a promising strategy for the prevention of cognitive decline. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the presence of SMCs affects the efficacy of a 2-year multidomain lifestyle intervention on cognition.MethodsThis study is part of the Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER) project. Participants (a subsample of 568 individuals, baseline age 60-77 years) were randomized (1:1) to receive a 2-year multidomain lifestyle intervention group including dietary advice, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk management, or regular health advice control group. Cognitive performance was assessed at baseline and at 1- and 2-year visits, using a neuropsychological test battery, including tests assessing memory, executive functions, and processing speed. Participants rated the frequency of SMCs using the Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire.ResultsHaving more retrospective SMCs was linked to a less favorable cognitive trajectory over 2 years. The difference between the intervention and control groups in annual change in tested memory performance was 0.077 (95% CI, 0.008–0.146) among those reporting more retrospective SMCs and −0.011 (−0.074 to 0.053) among those with less SMCs; interaction effect p = .019. No other interactions between SMCs and intervention allocation were observed.DiscussionA lifestyle intervention may be beneficial for older adults with and without SMCs. Persons having more retrospective SMCs may benefit more from the intervention regarding memory functioning.Clinical Trials Registration Number:NCT01041989

Suggested Citation

  • Laura VaskivuoLic & Laura Hokkanen & Esko Levälahti & Tuomo Hänninen & Riitta Antikainen & Lars Bäckman & Tiina Laatikainen & Teemu Paajanen & Anna Stigsdotter Neely & Timo Strandberg & Jaakko Tuomile, 2025. "Subjective Memory Complaints and the Effect of a Multidomain Lifestyle Intervention on Cognition: The FINGER Trial," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 80(1), pages 11-16.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:1:p:11-16.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbae179
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:1:p:11-16.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.
    Лучший частный хостинг