lynx   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/gunwpe/0633.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Pioneers’ Arguments for Formulating Economic Problems Mathematically

Author

Listed:
  • Sandelin, Bo

    (Department of Economics, School of Business, Economics and Law, Göteborg University)

Abstract
The nineteenth century pioneers in formulating economic problems mathematically often felt that they needed to explain their reasons for using mathematics. We will look at the arguments of Cournot, Thünen, Gossen, Jevons, Walras, Edgeworth, Marshall, Fisher, Wicksell, and Pareto. Three main arguments can be found: First, mathematics provides greater clarity of presentation, secondly, economics is fundamentally similar to the mathematical natural sciences, especially physics, and third, mathematics can help economists themselves to control the reasoning in their analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandelin, Bo, 2015. "The Pioneers’ Arguments for Formulating Economic Problems Mathematically," Working Papers in Economics 633, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2077/40891
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Groenewegen, 1995. "A SOARING EAGLE: Alfred Marshall 1842–1924," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 193.
    2. Reghinos D. Theocharis, 1993. "The Development of Mathematical Economics," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-12992-8, December.
    3. Turk, Michael H., 2012. "The Mathematical Turn In Economics: Walras, The French Mathematicians, And The Road Not Taken," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(2), pages 149-167, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vlassis Missos, 2020. "Mathematical Analysis as a Source of Mainstream Economic Ideology," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 9(1), pages 72-95, July.
    2. Michal Brzezinski, 2010. "Marshall in Poland," Chapters, in: Tiziano Raffaelli & Giacomo Becattini & Katia Caldari & Marco Dardi (ed.), The Impact of Alfred Marshall’s Ideas, chapter 11, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Robert B. Ekelund Jr & Robert F. Hébert, 2002. "Retrospectives: The Origins of Neoclassical Microeconomics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 16(3), pages 197-215, Summer.
    4. Neil Hart, 2003. "Marshall’s Dilemma: Equilibrium versus Evolution," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 1139-1160, December.
    5. Richard Nielsen & Felipe Massa, 2013. "Reintegrating Ethics and Institutional Theories," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 135-147, June.
    6. Francisco Louca, 1999. "The econometric challenge to Keynes: arguments and contradictions in the early debates about a late issue," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 404-438.
    7. Filippo Pietrini, 2025. "The Dissemination of Marx in England: a Quantitative Assessment," Working Papers - Economics wp2025_01.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    8. Geoffrey C. Harcourt, 2016. "Reflections on Keynes's Essays in Biography," Discussion Papers 2016-10A, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    9. Joseph Persky, 2017. "Producer co-operatives in nineteenth-century British economic thought," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 319-340, March.
    10. Katia Caldari & Fabio Masini, 2011. "Pigouvian versus Marshallian tax: market failure, public intervention and the problem of externalities," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 715-732, December.
    11. Carlo Cristiano, 2010. "Marshall at Cambridge," Chapters, in: Tiziano Raffaelli & Giacomo Becattini & Katia Caldari & Marco Dardi (ed.), The Impact of Alfred Marshall’s Ideas, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Arnold Heertje, 2010. "Alfred Marshall and Economic Theory in Holland," Chapters, in: Tiziano Raffaelli & Giacomo Becattini & Katia Caldari & Marco Dardi (ed.), The Impact of Alfred Marshall’s Ideas, chapter 14, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Mark Donoghue, 1999. "One step ahead: Thornton versus Longe," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 22-33.
    14. Michael S. Lawlor, 2012. "John Maynard Keynes," Chapters, in: Jan Toporowski & Jo Michell (ed.), Handbook of Critical Issues in Finance, chapter 26, pages i-ii, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Luca Zamparelli, 2009. "Average cost and marginal cost pricing in Marshall: Textual analysis and interpretation," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 665-694.
    16. Correa Romar, 2015. "The Coordination Problem in the Stockholm School," Journal of Heterodox Economics, Sciendo, vol. 2(2), pages 138-150, December.
    17. Drakopoulos, Stavros A., 2014. "Mainstream Aversion to Economic Methodology and the Scientific Ideal of Physics," MPRA Paper 57222, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. JE King, 2018. "Book review: Alex Millmow, A History of Australasian Economic Thought," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 29(2), pages 266-268, June.
    19. Stavros A. Drakopoulos, 2024. "Value Judgements, Positivism and Utility Comparisons in Economics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(3), pages 423-437, January.
    20. Arrigo Opocher, 2010. "The future of the working classes: a comparison between J.S. Mill and A. Marshall," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 229-253.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • C00 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jessica Oscarsson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/naiguse.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.
    Лучший частный хостинг