Arizona 1984 ballot measures
In 1984, voters decided on 15 statewide ballot measures in Arizona on November 6.
- Ten of the measures were legislatively referred constitutional amendments.
- Three of the measures were legislatively referred state statutes.
- One of the measures was an initiated constitutional amendment.
- One of the measures was a legislatively referred state statute.
- Voters approved one (1%) and rejected 13 (99%) measures.
On the ballot
November 6, 1984
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposition 100 | Elections | Provide for the classification of initiatives and referendums as Initiative Petitions and require them to be filed six months prior to the election |
|
353,835 (40%) |
528,151 (60%) |
|
Proposition 101 | Administration; Budgets | Allow the state legislature to provide by law for expenditures and appropriations of federal fund money |
|
350,744 (40%) |
532,309 (60%) |
|
Proposition 102 | Labor | Prohibit strikes by public employees and prohibit binding arbitration over employment issues |
|
397,439 (44%) |
501,745 (56%) |
|
Proposition 103 | Judiciary | Provide for jurors of superior court civil cases to be selected from the body of the county |
|
337,187 (38%) |
545,197 (62%) |
|
Proposition 104 | Administration; Business | Provide for the increase in membership of the Corporation Commission and the prescription of methods for the integration and termination of members |
|
291,622 (34%) |
575,301 (66%) |
|
Proposition 105 | Administration; Business | Permit the legislature to transfer duties of approving the formation of corporations and the sale of securities to other state agencies |
|
326,630 (38%) |
526,439 (62%) |
|
Proposition 106 | Administration; Business | Provide for the expansion of the Corporation Commission and the provision of staggering terms for the two new commissioners |
|
375,809 (50%) |
378,857 (50%) |
|
Proposition 107 | Administration; Business | Provide for the repeal of the requirement that the Corporation Commission use the fair value method to determine a utility rate base |
|
356,570 (45%) |
430,363 (55%) |
|
Proposition 108 | Administration; Taxes | Provide for the establishment of a State Revenue Commission |
|
356,570 (45%) |
430,363 (55%) |
|
Proposition 109 | Administration; Healthcare | Provide the legislature with the authority to impose limits on hospital revenues from rates |
|
385,724 (43%) |
511,013 (57%) |
|
Proposition 110 | Healthcare; Business | Provide for the authorization of the legislature to regulate healthcare institutions affected by a vital public interest |
|
372,879 (41%) |
547,279 (59%) |
|
Proposition 200 | Administration; Healthcare | Provide for the establishment of the Arizona Health Care Authority with the power to regulate hospital pricing |
|
375,982 (40%) |
553,676 (60%) |
|
Proposition 300 | Wages; Labor | Prohibit regulation that requires public works contracts exceeding $1,000 to pay all laborers the prevailing wage for similar work |
|
398,051 (51%) |
386,479 (49%) |
|
Proposition 301 | Administration; Healthcare; Business | Provide for the containment of healthcare costs until 1986 by promoting competition and limiting increases in healthcare rates |
|
397,463 (49%) |
420,162 (51%) |
|
Proposition 302 | Administration; Healthcare; Business | Provide a variety of rules and regulations to limit the inflation of hospital prices and expansion from 1986 through 1990 |
|
432,913 (49%) |
444,651 (51%) |
See also
- Laws governing the initiative process in Arizona
- List of Arizona ballot measures
- 1984 ballot measures
External links
State of Arizona Phoenix (capital) | |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |