Topics and participation in the CNN Republican debate (March 2016)
Ballotpedia's scope changes periodically, and this article type is no longer actively created or maintained. If you would like to help our coverage grow, consider donating to Ballotpedia.
Ballotpedia's scope changes periodically, and this article type is no longer actively created or maintained. If you would like to help our coverage grow, consider donating to Ballotpedia.
Date: November 8, 2016 |
Winner: Donald Trump (R) Hillary Clinton (D) • Jill Stein (G) • Gary Johnson (L) • Vice presidential candidates |
Important dates • Nominating process • Ballotpedia's 2016 Battleground Poll • Polls • Debates • Presidential election by state • Ratings and scorecards |
2028 • 2024 • 2020 • 2016 Have you subscribed yet?
Join the hundreds of thousands of readers trusting Ballotpedia to keep them up to date with the latest political news. Sign up for the Daily Brew.
|
This article analyzes the central themes of the twelfth Republican presidential debate held on March 10, 2016, in Miami, Florida. The transcript prepared by The Washington Post was used to measure candidate participation and audience engagement.[1] Footage from the debate was consulted where there were ambiguities in the text.
To compare the statistics of this debate to those of the previous Republican debate, see the analysis of the FNC debate held on March 3, 2016.
Segments
Including opening and closing statements, this debate featured 20 unique discussion segments covering immigration, the economy, education, foreign affairs and the Republican Party These discussion segments were measured by any shift in the theme of a discussion prompted by one of the moderators: Jake Tapper, Dana Bash, Hugh Hewitt and Stephen Dinan.
- Opening statements
- Trade agreements
- H-1B visa program and foreign workers
- Common Core
- Sustainability of Social Security
- Republican Party and tariffs
- Islam and the United States
- Ethics of targeting terrorists' families
- Israeli-Palestinian conflict
- Ground strategy in Syria and Iraq
- Department of Veterans Affairs and benefits for veterans
- U.S.-Cuba relations
- Climate change
- Perception of the United States abroad
- Authoritarian governments
- Violence at Donald Trump's rallies
- Pathway to Republican nomination and the Republican National Convention
- Donald Trump's self-funded campaign
- Political flexibility
- Closing statements
Approximately one-third of the discussion segments related to foreign affairs and national security. One-fourth of the discussion segments related to Trump's campaign and Republican Party politics.
Participants
Overall participation
Participation in a discussion segment was defined as a substantive comment related to the discussion segment's topic. Jokes and attempts to gain permission from a moderator to speak were not considered participatory speech acts. In some instances, candidates who participated in a discussion segment diverted from the prompted topic.
Candidate participation by behavior
Participation in the debate was also measured by the candidate's behavior at the start of each discussion segment. This study considered whether a candidate was initially prompted by a moderator to speak during a discussion segment or whether he or she independently engaged in the discussion segment by interrupting another candidate or calling on the moderator for permission to speak. A candidate's conduct after they joined a discussion segment was not considered.
For the first time in a Republican debate, none of the candidates interjected himself into a discussion segment. Trump commented on this courtesy, saying, "We're all in this together. We're going to come up with solutions. We're going to find the answers to things. And so far I cannot believe how civil it's been up here."[1]
Candidate participation by speaking order
This study also calculated the number of times a candidate spoke first, second, third, or fourth during a discussion segment, whether prompted by a moderator with a question or invitation to rebut or by interjection.
Trump was called on to speak first or second more frequently than any other candidate.
Candidate participation by speaking time
According to speaking time estimates from NPR, Trump spoke the longest, registering 27.4 minutes on the clock. Kasich spoke for the least amount of time at 18.8 minutes.[2]
Candidate participation by speaking rate
Each candidate's speaking rate was calculated by dividing the total word count of the candidate's speech during the debate with his speaking time as measured by NPR. As in previous debates, Rubio spoke quicker than his peers at 231 words per minute.
Audience engagement
Audience engagement was measured by noting applause, cheering or laughter in The Washington Post's transcript. Footage from the debate was consulted when the text was ambiguous about to whom the audience was responding.
Trump and Rubio tied for the most the most positive engagement from the live audience with 30 instances each.
The discussion segments on the sustainability of Social Security and the pathway to the Republican nomination produced the most live audience engagement overall.
Candidate analysis
|
|
|
|
See also
- Presidential candidates, 2016
- Presidential election, 2016/Polls
- 2016 presidential candidate ratings and scorecards
- Presidential election, 2016/Straw polls
Footnotes
|