Shawnee Mission School District elections (2015)

2017 →
2015 Shawnee Mission School District Elections
General Election date:
April 7, 2015
Table of Contents
About the district Method of election Elections What was at stake? Key deadlines Additional elections External links
See also
Kansas Shawnee Mission School District Johnson County, Kansas ballot measures Local ballot measures, Kansas

Four seats on the Shawnee Mission School District Board of Education were up for election on April 7, 2015. Position 1 incumbent Sara Goodburn, Position 3 incumbent Deb Zila, Position 5 incumbent Patty Mach and at-large Position 7 incumbent Joan Leavens were up for re-election.

Goodburn defeated challenger Mark Ellis. The district has faced some controversy regarding the middle school sex education curriculum, which led Ellis to run in the 2015 election.

Leavens was the only incumbent not to file for the election. Elizabeth Rulo and Brad Stratton ran for the open at-large seat, with Stratton defeating Rulo. Zila and Mach won re-election unopposed.

The 2015 election marked the last spring election for school boards statewide. House Bill 2104 was signed into law by Governor of Kansas Sam Brownback (R) on June 8, 2015. Another bill, Senate Bill 171, originally proposed moving the school board elections to November of even-numbered years, in line with statewide general elections, and would have made all school boards into partisan offices.

HB 2104 did not change the nonpartisan nature of the boards, but it did move their general elections to November of odd-numbered years. A number of school boards across the state opposed the more drastic changes proposed by SB 171, particularly the possibility of partisan elections.

Election changes were not the only point of contention between the state government and Kansas school boards in 2015; all districts also had to adapt to changes in state funding for education due to budget shortfalls.

Income tax reductions in 2012 and 2013 championed by Brownback were blamed by some as the cause of the state's financial woes and, therefore, the reason cuts to education spending were considered. Supporters of the changes emphasized the state's decade-old education funding formula as being the real reason a funding overhaul was necessary. Regardless of the cause, legislation was passed issuing block grants to public school districts while legislators debated how to replace the repealed 1995 funding formula.

One of the six candidates in this election participated in Ballotpedia's 2015 survey of school board candidates.

See also: What was at stake in the 2015 Shawnee Mission School District elections?

About the district

See also: Shawnee Mission School District, Kansas

Shawnee Mission School District is located in Johnson County, Kan.

Shawnee Mission School District is located in Johnson County in northeastern Kansas. The county seat of Johnson County is Olathe. Johnson County was home to an estimated 566,933 residents in 2013, according to the United States Census Bureau. Shawnee Mission School District was the third-largest school district by enrollment in Kansas and served 27,760 students in the 2011-2012 school year.

Demographics

Johnson County outperformed the rest of Kansas in terms of higher education achievement in 2013. The United States Census Bureau found that 51.7 percent of Johnson County residents aged 25 years and older had attained a bachelor's degree compared to 30.3 percent for Kansas as a whole. The median household income in Johnson County was $74,717 compared to $51,332 for the state of Kansas. The poverty rate in Johnson County was 6.5 percent compared to 13.7 percent for the entire state.

Racial Demographics, 2013
Race	Johnson County (%)	Kansas (%)
White	87.8	87.1
Black or African American	4.9	6.2
American Indian and Alaska Native	0.4	1.2
Asian	4.6	2.7
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander	0.0	0.1
Two or More Races	2.3	2.7
Hispanic or Latino	7.4	11.2

Presidential Voting Pattern, Johnson County
Year	Republican Vote	Democratic Vote
2012	158,401	110526
2008	152,627	127,091
2004	158,103	97,866
2000	129,965	79,118

Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here.

Voter and candidate information

The Shawnee Mission Board of Education is composed of seven members who are elected to four-year terms. Either three or four seats are up for regular election at each time. There are three districts which each have two representatives on the board, and the seventh member is elected at-large. Both District 1 seats, one District 2 seat and the at-large position were up for election in 2015.

House Bill 2104 made this the last election for the district to be held in the spring of an odd-numbered year. Signed into law by Governor of Kansas Sam Brownback (R) on June 8, 2015, the law changed school board election dates to November of odd-numbered years.

Candidates had to file a petition containing 50 signatures or pay a filing fee of $5 by January 27, 2015. If more than three candidates had filed for any one position up for election, a primary election would have been held on March 3, 2015. The general election was April 7, 2015.

Voters had to register by March 17, 2015, in order to vote in the general election.

Position 1

Sara Goodburn		Mark Ellis
	Incumbent, member from 2011-2015		Sales consultant Veteran, U.S. Army

Position 3

Deb Zila
	Incumbent, member from 2007-2015

Position 5

Patty Mach
	Incumbent, member from 2007-2015 J.D., Washington University B.A., University of Kansas Retired attorney

Position 7 (At-large)

Elizabeth Rulo		Brad Stratton
			B.S., Emporia State University President and CEO, Overland Park Wealth Management

Election results

Position 1

Shawnee Mission School District, Position 1 General Election, 4-year term, 2015
Party		Candidate	Vote %	Votes
	Nonpartisan	Sara Goodburn Incumbent	53.7%	2,060
	Nonpartisan	Mark Ellis	38%	1,457
	Nonpartisan	Write-in votes	8.2%	316
Total Votes				3,833
Source: Johnson County Election Office, "Election Summary Report 2015 Spring General," April 13, 2015

Position 3

Shawnee Mission School District, Position 3 General Election, 4-year term, 2015
Party		Candidate	Vote %	Votes
	Nonpartisan	Deb Zila Incumbent	97.4%	2,093
	Nonpartisan	Write-in votes	2.6%	56
Total Votes				2,149
Source: Johnson County Election Office, "Election Summary Report 2015 Spring General," April 13, 2015

Position 5

Shawnee Mission School District, Position 5 General Election, 4-year term, 2015
Party		Candidate	Vote %	Votes
	Nonpartisan	Patty Mach Incumbent	98.3%	3,271
	Nonpartisan	Write-in votes	1.7%	57
Total Votes				3,328
Source: Johnson County Election Office, "Election Summary Report 2015 Spring General," April 13, 2015

Position 7, at-large

Shawnee Mission School District, At-Large Position 7 General Election, 4-year term, 2015
Party		Candidate	Vote %	Votes
	Nonpartisan	Brad Stratton	65.5%	9,604
	Nonpartisan	Elizabeth Rulo	33%	4,830
	Nonpartisan	Write-in votes	1.5%	218
Total Votes				14,652
Source: Johnson County Election Office, "Election Summary Report 2015 Spring General," April 13, 2015

Endorsements

Position 1 incumbent Sara Goodburn and Position 7 candidate Brad Stratton were endorsed by MainPAC, NEA-Shawnee Mission and The Kansas City Star.

Campaign finance

See also: List of school board campaign finance deadlines in 2015

Candidates received a total of $13,312.57 and spent a total of $8,750.22 in this election, according to the Johnson County Election Office. The contributions totals in this section include in-kind contributions.

Candidates who intended to receive or expend less than $500.00 in their campaign were allowed to file a K.S.A. 25-904(a) form called an "Affidavit of Exemption" attesting to those intentions. Candidates' contributions to their own campaigns were included in those limits. If a candidate subsequently exceeded these limits after filing as exempt, he or she would be required to comply with the reporting requirements from that point forward.

Candidate	Contributions	Expenditures	Cash on hand
Position 1
Sara Goodburn	$2,529.57	$2,529.57	$0.00
Mark Ellis	$5,713.00	$3,112.98	$2,600.02
Position 3
Deb Zila	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
Position 5
Patty Mach	Filed Affidavit of Exemption		$0.00
Position 7 (At-large)
Elizabeth Rulo	Filed Affidavit of Exemption		$0.00
Brad Stratton	$5,070.00	$3,107.67	$1,962.33

Past elections

Information about earlier elections can be found by clicking [show] at the right.

2013 Position 2 Shawnee Mission School District, Position 2 General Election, 4-year term, 2013 Party Candidate Vote % Votes      Nonpartisan Donna Bysfield Incumbent 98.7% 2,665      Nonpartisan Write-in votes 1.3% 36 Total Votes 2,701 Source: Johnson County Elections, "Election Summary Report 2013 Spring General," April 8, 2013 Position 4 Shawnee Mission School District, Position 4 General Election, 4-year term, 2013 Party Candidate Vote % Votes      Nonpartisan Craig K. Denny Incumbent 99.1% 1,500      Nonpartisan Write-in votes 0.9% 13 Total Votes 1,513 Source: Johnson County Elections, "Election Summary Report 2013 Spring General," April 8, 2013 Position 6, at-large Shawnee Mission School District, Position 6 At-Large General Election, 4-year term, 2013 Party Candidate Vote % Votes      Nonpartisan Cindy Neighbor Incumbent 59.7% 8,452      Nonpartisan Mark Read 40.2% 5,684      Nonpartisan Write-in votes 0.1% 16 Total Votes 14,152 Source: Johnson County Elections, "Election Summary Report 2013 Spring General," April 8, 2013 2011 Position 1 Shawnee Mission School District, Position 1 General Election, 4-year term, 2011 Party Candidate Vote % Votes      Nonpartisan Sara Goodburn 56.1% 1,769      Nonpartisan Timothy A. Doerr 26.7% 842      Nonpartisan Wayne Edward Hodges 17.2% 542      Nonpartisan Write-in votes 0.1% 3 Total Votes 3,156 Source: Johnson County Elections, "Election Summary Report 2011 Spring General," April 11, 2011 Position 3 Shawnee Mission School District, Position 3 General Election, 4-year term, 2011 Party Candidate Vote % Votes      Nonpartisan Deb Zila Incumbent 57.3% 1,566      Nonpartisan Joshua McCray 23.9% 655      Nonpartisan Lani Kirsch 18.6% 509      Nonpartisan Write-in votes 0.2% 5 Total Votes 2,735 Source: Johnson County Elections, "Election Summary Report 2011 Spring General," April 11, 2011 Position 5 Shawnee Mission School District, Position 5 General Election, 4-year term, 2011 Party Candidate Vote % Votes      Nonpartisan Patty Mach Incumbent 57.5% 1,513      Nonpartisan Angela Jeppesen 27.5% 724      Nonpartisan Charles Jean-Baptiste 14.9% 391      Nonpartisan Write-in votes 0.1% 3 Total Votes 2,631 Source: Johnson County Elections, "Election Summary Report 2011 Spring General," April 11, 2011 Position 7, at-large Shawnee Mission School District, Position 7 At-Large General Election, 4-year term, 2011 Party Candidate Vote % Votes      Nonpartisan Joan Leavens 40.4% 6,755      Nonpartisan Bart Altenbernd 36.5% 6,109      Nonpartisan John W. St. Clair Jr. 22.9% 3,834      Nonpartisan Write-in votes 0.1% 25 Total Votes 16,723 Source: Johnson County Elections, "Election Summary Report 2011 Spring General," April 11, 2011 Shawnee Mission School District, Position 7 At-Large Primary Election, 4-year term, 2011 Party Candidate Vote % Votes      Nonpartisan Joan Leavens 35.1% 2,974      Nonpartisan Bart Altenbernd 28.1% 2,383      Nonpartisan John W. St. Clair Jr. 24.4% 2,071      Nonpartisan Mark Anderson 12.4% 1,054 Total Votes 8,482 Source: Johnson County Elections, "Election Summary Report 2011 Spring General," April 11, 2011

What was at stake?

2015

A guaranteed two incumbents returned and one newcomer joined the school board in the 2015 election. Two incumbents ran unopposed, and the Position 7 race only saw newcomers file to fill the open seat. The Position 1 race featured the only incumbent to face a challenger in the election. Ultimately, the board would gain either three returning incumbents and one newcomer or two of each, depending on the outcome of the Position 1 contest.

The district has been dealing with a debate of the use of certain materials in its middle school sex education curriculum. Additionally, Shawnee Mission School District, like the rest of Kansas' public schools, saw funding changes from the state in early 2015. Additionally, its election system changed from a spring cycle to a fall system.

Issues in the election

Sex education curriculum controversy

In early 2014, Mark Ellis questioned the school district's sex education curriculum after his daughter brought home a picture of a poster that was part of the curriculum at Hocker Grove Middle School. At the top of the poster, the question "“How Do People Express Their Sexual Feelings?" was written and beneath it the following actions were listed: oral sex, sexual fantasy, caressing, anal sex, dancing, massage, masturbation, holding hands, talking, cuddling on the couch, hugging, touching each other's genitals, kissing, vaginal intercourse, saying "I like you" and grinding. Ellis contacted the school's principal regarding the material, and stated later in an interview, “It upsets me. And again, it goes back to who approved this? You know this had to pass through enough hands that someone should have said, ‘Wait a minute, these are 13-year-old kids, we do not need to be this in-depth with this sexual education type of program.’”

Other district parents supported the use of the materials. Jennifer Wantland, whose daughter attended the class that discussed the poster, said of the issue, "In a classroom-like setting, if it's educational, absolutely. She needs to know the correct terms. My opinion on this is we need to stop living in a 1950s dreamland, honestly. We can't be leading our children into this world with blinders on."

District spokeswoman Leigh Anne Neal stated that the poster was part of the district's middle school health and science materials, but it was meant to be part of a lesson, saying, “Without the context of teacher-led discussion, I could see that there might be some cause for concern." District Superintendent Dr. Jim Hinson later suspended the use of the curriculum, which came from the "Making A Difference" supplemental instructional resource. Hinson sent the following message to district parents and guardians:

“	This week, the district’s health curriculum related to human sexuality has been in the news. Concerns were expressed over a poster that was hanging in a classroom at a middle school that was part of a supplemental instructional resource. We recognize that there is a broad range of opinion regarding how this type of information should be shared, and it is important that parents are informed regarding instruction in their child’s classroom. As this time, the district has suspended the use of the Making A Difference instructional resource supplement pending a detailed review of the material. In Shawnee Mission, parents may review curricular materials. The district honors parent requests for non-participation for their child during the human sexuality-instruction. Parents may contact their child’s teacher to review curriculum and instructional materials, and consent for non-participation forms may be requested from the school principal. Our goal is to effectively communicate with parents on sensitive issues, so that parents are able to make informed decisions that are in the best interest of their child.	”
—Jim Hinson, Superintendent of SMSD (2015)

Ellis has pointed to the sex education curriculum as one of his motivations for running for the school board, saying on his Facebook campaign page, "Due to the events that transpired last year in the Shawnee Mission School district regarding the controversial Sex Ed program, and due to new findings this year regarding budgeting I have decided to run for a seat on the School Board."

Issues in the district

State education funding changes

See also: Kansas state budget and finances

A looming state budget deficit of $600 million led the state legislature to approve a block-grant funding system to replace the state's public school funding formula. Governor of Kansas Sam Brownback (R) had proposed that $44.5 million be cut from state funding for education to make up for budgetary shortcomings on February 5, 2015.

Cuts proposed by governor

Gov. Sam Brownback (R)

Of the total cuts Brownback suggested, $28 million would have come from elementary and secondary education funding, while another $16 million would have been taken from higher education funding. The Shawnee Mission School District was poised to lose about $1.4 million as a result of the cuts.

Critics of Brownback pointed to his campaign promises supporting education in 2013. Kansas State Senate Minority Leader Anthony Hensley (D-19) called the move, “just another deception [Brownbeck] put upon the voters of Kansas." Brownback's spokesperson, however, has stated that the governor “has consistently maintained that the education funding formula is broken and reform is needed to ensure more money goes to the classroom to benefit Kansas students."

Income taxes blamed and defended
Some blamed the income tax reductions signed into law by the governor for the significant shortfall looming for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2015. Income tax cuts were championed by Brownback and passed by the Legislature in 2012 and 2013. In 2015, the state had to reassess its spending and consider new forms of revenue. Possible revenue sources that were considered included raising taxes on cigarettes and alcohol or changing tax assessments for farmland, gasoline, and sales and passive income. In 2013, the state collected $2.96 billion in individual income taxes, which made up 38.80 percent of the state's tax collections.

Brownback defended the income tax cuts and pushed for consumption taxes to replace lost funds in April 2015. “I still want to get away from the income tax. Over time, I would like to see us move toward the consumption basket of taxes," he stated at that time. He also voiced support for a higher sales tax. The governor remained vague about exactly which consumption taxes might be used but noted his support for tax increases on cigarettes and alcohol.

At the same time, Brownback responded to criticisms over the fact that he shared budget information prior to the legislative session with David Kensinger, his former chief of staff and current lobbyist for Reynolds American tobacco company. Brownback defended the move, saying, “What I try to do is get as much input from people as possible. I’ve tried to operate most of my public career in trying to solicit lots of input. I wish he wasn’t lobbying for that group. He’s free to do what he’s doing.”

Legislative response
In response to Brownback's proposal, the Kansas State Legislature outlined a plan in March 2015 to fund public schools with block grants for two years while they rewrite the school funding formula. According to The Kansas City Star, the block grants would provide an increase of more than $4.2 billion for the 2016-2017 school year, which would represent a 9 percent increase from the 2013-2014 allocations. Additionally, the block grants would return the 2014-2015 district allocations to the amounts they were set at before Brownback announced his planned budget cuts. Whether or not these funds actually indicate an increase in classroom spending and how the Legislature would pay for the increase in funding remained unclear as of the bill's introduction.

Democratic legislators criticized the bill, arguing that the majority of the additional funding would go toward retirement and meeting the requirements of a 2014 Kansas Supreme Court ruling mandating more funding for schools. Sen. Hensley argued, "Their proposal does not do what they claim it’s going to do. It does not allocate $300 million in new money, nor does it put more money into the classroom.”

Sen. Susan Wagle (R-30)

In a 64 to 57 vote on March 13, 2015, the House of Representatives approved Senate Bill 7, a plan to overhaul the state's 13-year-old school finance system. State law required at least 63 votes in favor of the measure for it to pass the House. The bill was immediately moved back to the Senate. This prevented any motions to reconsider the House vote. On March 16, 2015, the Senate approved the revised bill 25 to 14. Because the bill sent back from the House had been a Senate bill with additions from the House, senators only had to vote yes or no to the House revisions and were not able to offer amendments. The bill was signed into law by Brownbeck on March 25, 2015.

The approved bill replaced the current system with block grants for two years while the funding formula is overhauled. Republican leaders argued that the state's funding formula, which is based on a per-pupil formula and includes weighting for bilingual and low-income students, was broken. Senate President Susan Wagle (R-30), who voted in favor of the old formula in 1992 and in favor of SB 7, said, "We are no longer talking about student outcomes and student achievement. We’re fighting for money."

Sen. Tom Holland (D-3)

Not all of her colleagues agreed that SB 7 was a solution to education funding woes. Some senators objected to how quickly the bill was passed and to the lack of discussion before the final Senate vote on the matter. Sen. Tom Holland (D-3) voted against the measure and said:

“	While Charles and David Koch may have won this particular battle, Kansas families can at least take some small measure of comfort in knowing that our Kansas courts — as yet uncorrupted by the supply-side ideology cancer that has metastasized Kansas’ legislative and executive branches of government — that they are keeping a watchful eye on this Legislature’s actions.	”
—Sen. Tom Holland (D-3) (2015)

Judicial response
Holland was referencing judicial action taken the same day the House passed SB 7, when a three-judge district court panel ordered the reopening of a school funding lawsuit that had been settled in 2014. The lawsuit was settled after the Legislature equalized funding between districts through increased allocations, but the new court order reopened the equity portion of the case. It also added new state officials to the list of defendants in the case, including the state treasurer and revisor of statutes. The panel announced that it might issue temporary orders blocking the recent legislative action if necessary "to preserve the status quo and to assure the availability of relief, if any, that might be accorded should the Court deem relief warranted.”

Election date changes

Early legislative action in 2015 could have made all Kansas school board elections into partisan races held in November of even-numbered years. Those changes were not approved, but a smaller change was signed into law on June 8, 2015; House Bill 2104 changed all school board election dates to November of odd-numbered years.

HB 2104
HB 2104 was introduced to the Kansas House of Representatives on January 23, 2015, and sponsored by the House Elections Committee. The house approved the measure 69 to 54 on February 26, 2015. Following the withdrawal of a similar senate bill, HB 2104 was approved by the senate by a vote of 28 to 12.

The portion of the Conference Committee Report of the bill relating to the election date changes states:

“	The bill would move all elections for office holders of local governments currently held in the spring of odd-numbered years to the fall of odd-numbered years, with one exception (described below). In general, the elections would remain nonpartisan, although a city could choose to make its elections partisan. Sections to be added to the law, Sections 7, 8, and 13 through 16, would be cited as the Help Kansas Vote Act. Beginning in 2017, the election dates for the specified units of local government would mirror the election dates for the elections held in even-numbered years. That is, the primary election would be held on the first Tuesday in August, and the general election would be held on the Tuesday following the first Monday in November. The elections, to be administered by the county election officers, would be consolidated into one ballot, which would be prescribed by the Secretary of State through rules and regulations. Those entities currently with district method elective offices (i.e., cities and school districts) would retain that authority.	”
—HB 2104 Conference Committee Report (2015)

SB 171

Sen. Mitch Holmes (R-33) introduced SB 171 on February 9, 2015.

On February 9, 2015, Sen. Mitch Holmes (R-33) introduced Senate Bill 171 to the Ethics, Elections and Local Government Committee. The bill, as it was initially introduced, would have moved school board and other local elections to November in even-numbered years, in addition to changing school boards from their current nonpartisan status by requiring candidates to declare party affiliations.

Supporters claimed that moving the school board elections to a date when there are more elections would increase voter turnout for such races as well as reduce the costs of printing the number of current ballot variations. Others questioned whether or not a move would actually improve turnout, as it would place school board elections on an already lengthy ballot.

The bill was amended before being approved 21 to 18 by the Senate on February 26, 2015. The approved version would move school board and other local elections to the November general election date in odd-numbered years. It removed the language that would have made those elections partisan. During the debate of the revised version, Holmes expressed frustration with the resistance to moving local elections. He argued that such a move would increase voter turnout and bring greater transparency to local government, saying that such offices are "elected on a day that nobody notices."

Holmes also argued that the disproportionately white city council of Ferguson, Mo., was caused by holding off-year elections and postulated that "minorities vote better in on-cycle elections than off-cycle elections." Sen. Oletha Faust-Goudeau (D-29), the first African American woman elected to the State Senate and one of the two African American members of the body, dismissed this argument, saying, “I don’t live in Ferguson. I don’t know anybody who lived there. ... We’re here in Kansas."

On March 4, 2015, the revised Senate bill was introduced in the House of Representatives. The House Elections Committee recommended the revised bill be approved with some amendments regarding date changes in the law on March 19, 2015. The measure was withdrawn from the Senate calendar shortly thereafter.

Ballotpedia survey responses

One of the six candidates in this election participated in Ballotpedia's 2015 survey of school board candidates as of February 17, 2015. The following sections display the responses to the survey questions from Position 7 candidate Brad Stratton.

Top priorities

Brad Stratton

When asked what his top priorities would be if elected, Stratton stated:

“	The Shawnee Mission School District has delivered excellent learning and education to students for many decades. My priority is to see that the district is moving forward, staying ahead of the curve and not resting on past successes. Additionally, I will work toward fostering a culture of effective and efficient delivery of top quality education through a combination of high quality educators and state of the art technology.	”
—Brad Stratton (2015)

Ranking the issues

The candidate was asked to rank the following issues by importance in the school district, with 1 being the most important and 7 being the least important. This table can be sorted to display the candidate's rankings from most to least important:

Issue importance ranking
Issue	Position 7
Stratton's ranking
Balancing or maintaining the district's budget	1
Closing the achievement gap	3
Expanding arts education	6
Expanding career-technical education	4
Expanding school choice options	7
Improving college readiness	2
Improving education for special needs students	5

Positions on the issues

The candidate was asked to answer 10 multiple choice and short answer questions from Ballotpedia regarding significant issues in education and the school district. Brad Stratton's full survey responses can be read here.

Key deadlines

The following were the key deadlines for the 2015 Kansas school board election cycle:

Deadline	Event
January 27, 2015	Candidate filing deadline
March 17, 2015	Voter registration deadline
March 28, 2015	In-person advance voting begins
April 2, 2015	Last campaign finance deadline before the election
April 7, 2015	Election Day
May 7, 2015	Last campaign finance deadline for the election cycle
July 1, 2015	Election winners begin terms

Additional elections on the ballot

See also: Kansas elections, 2015

The general election for county, municipal and other local offices was also April 7, 2015. The election included races for Mayor and Council Members of Shawnee, Johnson County Community College Trustees and Water District Board Members.

Recent news

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Shawnee Mission School District Kansas. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

Shawnee Mission School District elections (2015) - Google News

See also

Shawnee Mission School District	Kansas	School Boards
List of school districts in Kansas	Kansas school board elections, 2015 Public education in Kansas Local ballot measures, Kansas	School board elections, 2015 School board elections, 2014 School board election data analysis, 2015 School board election data analysis, 2014

External links

Suggest a link

• Shawnee Mission School District
• Johnson County Election Office