Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
School board authority in Mississippi
Education Policy | |
---|---|
Education policy topics | |
• Overview of trends in K-12 curricula development • Impact of school choice on rural school districts • Local school board authority across the 50 states • State policies on cellphone use in K-12 public schools • School choice in the United States • School choice glossary
| |
Other policy areas | |
Click here for coverage of other policy areas on Ballotpedia |
Mississippi state law makes school boards responsible for governing and managing public school districts in the state. This article details the powers and duties Mississippi law grants to school boards for governing school districts and the constraints on that authority with regard to certain topics.
Types of legal and contractual constraints on school board authority
This page presents the results from Ballotpedia research on school board authority and constraints on that authority in all 50 states as of 2024. School board authority comes from state constitutions and state statutes and can be interpreted or specified by state regulations or court decisions. In addition to authority over district budgets, the selection of a superintendent, and administrative responsibilities, school boards have varying levels of authority over district policy on other topics depending on the state and district.
There are several sources of legal and contractual constraints on school board policy-making authority which also vary by state or by district.
- State laws commonly restrict or mandate school board policies on certain topics.
- Parents' Bills of Rights, which at least 26 states have in statute to some degree, limit the policies school boards are allowed to pass.
- State rules, guidance, and funding incentives can constrain, mandate, or influence school board policies. These include regulation from state education commissions and superintendents, executive orders from governors, or grant conditions.
- Federal and state court rulings can dictate whether or not school district policies are compatible with state law or federal law.
- The federal government, largely through its Department of Education, can promulgate regulations or guidance that influence district policy or make funding contingent on certain policies.
- Collective bargaining agreements between school districts and teacher unions can create contractual constraints on the policies school boards can pass.
- State school board associations can influence school board policy or, in some cases. enter into contracts with school boards that can limit school board policy.
This page features the following sections:
- Mississippi law on school boards' authority over district policy. This section features the statutes in Mississippi law that establish, enable, or define local school district boards.
- Constraints on Mississippi school boards' authority. This section provides an overview of constraints on the school boards' authority in Mississippi. It contains information on the constraints by the following topics:
- Collective bargaining agreements
- Parents' bill of rights
- How does Mississippi compare to other states?
- Noteworthy Events. This section tracks noteworthy events related to school boards' authority in Mississippi.
School board authority over district policy in Mississippi
Enabling or authorizing statute for the boards of school districts in Mississippi
- See also: Enabling statute
Mississippi Statute § 37-5-1 creates county school boards and gives them authority to operate according to state law. Mississippi Code § 37-6-7 mandates that all school districts be governed by such a school board:[1][2]
|
Mississippi school boards' powers and duties
Mississippi public school boards of directors are given 54 specific duties and powers to administer the public schools in Mississippi. In addition to budget-related and fiscal duties, school property and facilities management, and administrative responsibilities, the specific powers and duties include:
- choosing courses of study and textbooks for the schools,
- introducing art, music, manual training, and other special subjects at the board's discretion,
- joining school board associations and other organizations if the board so chooses, and
- entering partnerships with entities, organizations and corporations that the board thinks will benefit the school district.
The list of powers and duties school district boards are charged with appears in Mississippi Code § 37-7-301 and are as follows:[4]
|
Constraints on Mississippi school boards' authority
This section tracks constraints on school boards specific to Mississippi as of September 2024. It features constraints on school boards' authority from state law, collective bargaining agreements, and Parents' Bills of Rights.
Constraint on Mississippi school boards' authority by topic
This section features constraints on Mississippi school boards' authority on policies related to the following topics:
Curriculum requirements
Mississippi requires the following specific topics to be included in each district's curriculum:[5][6][7][8][9][10]
- the US flag and the Mississippi flag,
- cursive reading and writing,
- health education,
- career education,
- abstinence-only or abstinence-plus education or sexual risk avoidance education, and
- computer science.
Curriculum restrictions
Mississippi law prohibits instruction in public schools regarding critical race theory and instruction in divisive concepts as defined by Mississippi law:[11][12][13]
“ |
§ 37-13-2 (1) No public institution of higher learning, community/junior college, school district or public school, including public charter schools, shall direct or otherwise compel students to personally affirm, adopt or adhere to any of the following tenets: (a) That any sex, race, ethnicity, religion or national origin is inherently superior or inferior; or (b) That individuals should be adversely treated on the basis of their sex, race, ethnicity, religion or national origin. (2) No public institution of higher learning, community/junior college, school district or public school, including public charter schools, shall make a distinction or classification of students based on account of race, provided that nothing in this subsection shall be construed to prohibit the required collection or reporting of demographic information by such schools or institutions. (3) No public institution of higher learning, community/junior college, school district or public school, including public charter schools, shall teach a course of instruction or unit of study that directs or otherwise compels students to personally affirm, adopt or adhere to any of the tenets identified in subsection (1)(a) and (b) of this section. (4) No funds shall be expended by the State Department of Education, any entity under the Department of Education's jurisdiction or purview, a school district, public charter school, community/junior college, the Mississippi Community College Board, the Board of Trustees of State Institutions of Higher Learning or a public institution of higher learning for any purpose that would violate the provisions of this section. (5) The provisions of this section shall be severable, and if any provision of this section or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this section. ...
(a) Establish or maintain a diversity, equity and inclusion office as defined in subsection (1)(b) of this section; (b) Engage in divisive concepts as defined in Section 2(d) and (e) of this act;[14] (c) Hire or assign faculty, staff or employee of the institution, college or public school or contract with a third party to perform the duties of a diversity, equity and inclusion office; (d) Require, request, or consider diversity statements or similar materials from job applicants as part of the hiring process, contract renewal process, evaluation or promotion process; (e) Give preference based on race, sex, color or national origin to an applicant for employment, or when awarding a contract at the institution, college or public school; (f) Maintain any programs, including academic programs or courses, or offices that promote diversity, equity and inclusion, endorse divisive concepts or concepts promoting transgender ideology, gender-neutral pronouns, deconstruction of heteronormativity, gender theory, sexual privilege or any related formulation of these concepts; (g) Require, as a condition of enrolling at, accepting employment with, or being awarded a contract at an institution, college or public school, or as a requirement of continuing enrollment, employment or contractual obligation at an institution, college or public school, any person to participate in diversity, equity and inclusion training; (h) Penalize or discriminate against a student, employee, faculty, staff or contractor on the basis of his or her refusal to support, believe, endorse, embrace, confess, act upon or otherwise assent to a diversity, equity or inclusion concept as set forth in this section; and (i) Require any "diversity training" as defined in Section 2 or any other policies or procedures that result in any formal or informal education, seminars, workshops or institutional program that focus on increasing awareness or understanding of issues related to race, sex, color, gender identity, sexual orientation or national origin.[15] [3] |
” |
Book bans, removals, and restrictions
Mississippi school boards do not have the authority to remove books from school libraries. County library commissions, consisting of the county superintendent and two first grade teachers of the superintendent's choosing, are responsible for creating a list of approved books for the school libraries in the county. This is described in Mississippi Code § 37-55-1:[17]
|
Case law:
The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed local school boards' authority to remove school books in Island Trees Sch. Dist. v. Pico by Pico in 1982 but held that school library books are distinct from curricular books, which school boards have more authority to regulate. The ruling held that school boards are charged with inculcating community values and may make curricular decisions accordingly. In Zykan v. Warsaw Community School Corp. in 1980, the Supreme Court held that school boards had discretionary power over curriculum, textbooks, and other educational matters but could not impose religious creeds or "permanently the student’s ability to investigate matters that arise in the natural course of intellectual inquiry,” according to the opinion.[18][19][20]
Parental notification
Mississippi requires parental notification in the following circumstances:[22]
- their student has been expelled for criminal activity,
- a parent's presence is requested at a conference regarding destructive acts their student has committed against school property or persons,
- a parent's presence is requested at a conference regarding disruptive behavior their student has exhibited during class,
- their student has been involved in a bullying incident,
- the parent's student is truant,
- the principal or superintendent has removed their student from school and is evaluating them for placement in an alternative school program, and
- physical restraint has been used against their student.
Case law: The United States Supreme Court ruled in Mahmoud v. Taylor on June 27, 2025, that Montgomery County Board of Education's introduction of LGBTQ+ related storybooks, along with its decision to withhold opt outs, placed an unconstitutional burden on the parents’ rights to the free exercise of their religion.[23]
Discipline
Mississippi is one of 47 states that gives school boards authority over district disciplinary policy.
The text of Mississippi Code § 37-11-55 is as follows:[24]
|
School board elections
- See also: Rules governing school board election dates and timing in Mississippi, How does Mississippi compare to other states on school board authority over election timing?
Mississippi is one of 42 states in which school boards do not have authority over the timing of school board elections because state or municipal laws determine school board election dates.
Click here to read about the laws governing school board elections in Mississippi.
Public school choice and open enrollment
- See also: School choice in Mississippi
Mississippi state law allows for two school districts to enter into an agreement permitting a student to transfer from one district to the other on a case-by-case basis:[26]
|
Charter schools
- See also: Charter schools in Mississippi, How does Mississippi compare to other states on school board authority over charter schools?
Mississippi is one of 10 states that do not give local school boards any authority over whether charter schools are issued in their district.
According to Mississippi Code § 37-28-7, the Mississippi Charter School Authorizer Board, which is a state agency, is the only entity with the authority to authorize charter schools.[27]
|
Cellphone bans
Mississippi is one of 16 states that do not have statewide laws or policies regarding cellphone use in K-12 classrooms.
Collective bargaining agreements
Teacher union collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) can constrain school board authority. Teacher CBAs are agreements between a school district and a teachers’ union to establish rights and other contract details for public school employees. CBAs do not have the force of law, but are contractually binding for a set period of time. Within the time set out in the agreement, the school board must comply with the stipulations that were agreed to in the contract. In this way, CBAs can constrain school board authority by giving teachers authority over curriculum, prohibiting school boards from banning books, and establishing certain student or parental rights. They can also determine rights and protections for educators, and conditions for students (such as required recess periods or the amount of standardized testing), among other provisions.
CBAs vary greatly within and across states in size, topics covered, and constraints they put on school boards. Not all states allow teachers to bargain collectively. As of January 2022, 35 states and the District of Columbia guaranteed K-12 teachers some right to bargain collectively, and six states prohibited public-sector employee collective bargaining by law, which includes public school teachers. The other nine states have no statewide bargaining framework, but local jurisdictions within these states can grant bargaining rights if they choose.[28][29]
Mississippi school boards are not legally allowed to engage in collective bargaining agreements with school employees.[30]
Parents' bill of rights
Mississippi is one of 24 states that does not have a statewide Parents' Bill of Rights.
How does Mississippi compare to other states?
This section compares Mississippi's school board authority and constraints with those of other states on select topics. These topics include authority over discipline policy, school board election timing, charter schools, cellphone use policy, as well as constraints on school boards' authority from Parents' Bills of Rights.
Book bans, removals, and restrictions
Twenty-four (24) states have no laws regulating the curation of school library books. Twenty-six (26) states, however, have passed laws restricting school board authority over school library book curation. These laws typically fall into one of the following categories:
- Ten states require school boards to develop a policy for the removal of books, including creating a way for the public to challenge school library books.
- Eight states prohibit school boards from removing books on the grounds that they represent specific ideologies or perspectives.
- Six states prohibit books if they contain specific material, including sexual content or anything deemed harmful to minors.
- Five states require school boards to establish local boards to review challenges to library books.
- Two states require school boards to allow parents to view a catalogue of books.
Some states have adopted multiple types of these policies.
Discipline
- School boards in 47 states have authority over disciplinary policy in their district.
- School boards in two states have authority over disciplinary policy for specific circumstances, such as suspension, expulsion, or bullying.
- Individual schools in one state create their own disciplinary policy.
See also
- Local school board authority across the 50 states
- K-12 curriculum authority, requirements, and statutes in the states
- State policies on cellphone use in K-12 public schools
- Rules governing school board election dates and timing
- Charter schools
- School choice
- Parents' Bill of Rights in education
- Ballotpedia:Index of Contents
- Support our work
Footnotes
- ↑ Justia Law, "MS Code § 37-5-1 (2024)," March 27, 2025
- ↑ Justia Law, "MS Code § 37-6-7 (2024)," March 27, 2025
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Find Law, "Mississippi Code Title 37. Education § 37-7-301," March 28, 2025
- ↑ Justia Law, "MS Code § 37-13-5 (2024)," March 28, 2025
- ↑ Justia Law, "MS Code § 37-13-10 (2024)," March 28, 2025
- ↑ Justia Law, "MS Code § 37-13-21 (2024)," March 28, 2025
- ↑ Justia Law, "MS Code § 37-13-60 (2024)," March 28, 2025
- ↑ Justia Law, "MS Code § 37-13-171 (2024)," March 28, 2025
- ↑ Justia Law, "MS Code § 37-13-207 (2024)," March 28, 2025
- ↑ Justia Law, "MS Code § 37-13-2 (2024)," March 28, 2025
- ↑ Legiscan, "Mississippi House Bill 1193," accessed July 9, 2025
- ↑ United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Judge Henry Wingate issued an injunction on the enforcement of parts of Mississippi House Bill (HB) 1193 on August 18, 2025, blocking the prohibition on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives and instruction in K-12 public and charter schools. The injunction blocks the enforcement of parts of the law while litigation continues.
- ↑ (e) State law defines divisive concepts as: (i) One (1) race, sex, color, or national origin is inherently superior to another race or sex; (ii) An individual, by virtue of his or her race, sex, color, national origin, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously; (iii) An individual should be discriminated against or treated adversely solely because of their race, sex, color, or national origin; (iv) Members of one (1) race, one (1) sex, one (1) color, one (1) national origin cannot and should not attempt to treat others without respect to race, color, national origin or sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, or national origin; (v) An individual's moral character is necessarily determined by his or her race, color, sex, or national origin; (vi) An individual, by virtue of his or her race, color, sex or national origin, bears responsibility for actions committed in the past by other members of any class listed herein; (vii) An individual should feel discomfort, guilt, anguish or any other form of psychological distress on account of his or her race, color, sex, or national origin; or (viii) Meritocracy or traits such as hard work ethic are racist or sexist, or were created by a particular class to oppress another class.
- ↑ United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Judge Henry Wingate issued an injunction on the enforcement of parts of Mississippi House Bill (HB) 1193 on August 18, 2025, blocking the prohibition on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives and instruction in K-12 public and charter schools. The injunction blocks the enforcement of parts of the law while litigation continues.
- ↑ The White House, "Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling," accessed March 14, 2025
- ↑ Justia Law, "MS Code § 37-55-1 (2020)," March 28, 2025
- ↑ Education Law Center, Pennsylvania, "Challenging book bans: What can you do," September 18, 2024
- ↑ Law.Justia.com, "Island Trees Sch. Dist. v. Pico by Pico, 457 U.S. 853 (1982)," September 18, 2024
- ↑ Law.Justia.com, "Zykan v. Warsaw Community School Corp., 631 F.2d 1300 (7th Cir. 1980)," October 11, 2024
- ↑ U.S. Department of Education, "U.S. Department of Education Ends Biden’s Book Ban Hoax," accessed January 28, 2025
- ↑ National Center on Safe Supportive Learning Environments, "Mississippi School Discipline Laws & Regulations: Parental Notification," March 28, 2025
- ↑ The United States Supreme Court, "Mahmoud et al. v. Taylor et al." accessed July 7, 2025
- ↑ Justia Law, "MS Code § 37-11-55 (2020)," March 28, 2025
- ↑ The White House, "Reinstating Common Sense School Discipline Policies," April 30, 2025
- ↑ Justia Law, "MS Code § 37-15-31 (2020)," March 28, 2025
- ↑ Justia Law, "MS Code § 37-28-7 (2020)," March 28, 2025
- ↑ National Education Association, "Collective Bargaining: What it is and How it Works", accessed October 3, 2024.
- ↑ National Education Association, "The Benefits of Collective Bargaining in Education", accessed October 3, 2024
- ↑ National Education Association, "The Benefits of COLLECTIVE BARGAINING in Public Education," accessed March 27, 2025
- ↑ National Center for Education Statistics, "Percentage of public schools with various safety and security measures: Selected school years, 1999-2000 through 2021-22," accessed August 8, 2024
- ↑ Clarion Ledger, "Mississippi DEI ban blocked by federal judge. Will IHL walk back its new campus policies?" accessed August 27, 2025
- ↑ Legiscan, "Mississippi House Bill 1193," accessed July 9, 2025
- ↑ CNN, "Mississippi governor signs into law prohibition on schools teaching critical race theory," March 14, 2022
- ↑ Mississippi Legislature, "Senate Bill 2113," accessed March 30, 2022
- ↑ Mississippi Free Press, "Gov. Reeves Claims Critical Race Theory 'Humiliates' WHite People At Bill Signing," March 14, 2022
- ↑ Legiscan.com, "MS SB 2339," June 6, 2024