Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

Rhode Island Question 1, Name Change Amendment (2020)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Rhode Island Question 1
Flag of Rhode Island.gif
Election date
November 3, 2020
Topic
Constitutional language
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature


Rhode Island Question 1, the Name Change Amendment, was on the ballot in Rhode Island as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 3, 2020.[1][2] It was approved.

A "yes" vote supported amending the Rhode Island Constitution to remove "Providence Plantations" from the official state name in the Preamble, Article III (Oath of Officers), and Article IX (Commissions).

A "no" vote opposed amending the Rhode Island Constitution and maintains the official full state name as the "State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations."


Election results

Rhode Island Question 1

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

247,261 53.12%
No 218,175 46.88%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

How did Question 1 change the state's official name?

See also: Text of measure and Official state name removed from government documents

Question 1 removed "Providence Plantations" from official state name references in the Preamble, Article III, and Article IX of the Rhode Island Constitution. The official name at the time of the election was the "State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations."[2]

Other government officials have already removed "Plantations" from state and local documents. On June 19, 2020, the mayor of Providence, Jorge Elorza (D), signed an executive order that removed "Plantations" from city documents and oath ceremonies. On June 22, 2020, Rhode Island Governor Gina Raimondo (D) issued an executive order that removed "Plantations" from all documents and stationery used by her office. She also ordered that all executive agencies under the governor's control remove "Plantations" from agency stationery, electronic letterhead, pay stubs, and all other mediums of communication.[3][4]

Have there been other efforts in the past to change the official state name?

See also: Question 1 (2010)

Voters defeated Rhode Island Name Change Amendment, Question 1, in 2010 with 77.9 percent of voters deciding against the change. Question 1 was introduced by Representatives Joseph Almeida (D), Anastasia Williams (D), and Grace Diaz (D) on February 4, 2009. The measure would have changed the state's official name from "State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations" to "Rhode Island."[5]

How did Question 1 get placed on the ballot?

See also: Path to the ballot

Two versions of the amendment were introduced. Senate Resolution 2902 (S 2902) was introduced on June 17, 2020, by Sen. Harold Metts (D), Sen. Sandra Cano (D), Sen. Ana Quezada (D), Sen. Dominick Ruggerio (D), and Sen. Maryellen Goodwin (D). On June 18, 2020, the state Senate passed S 2902 in a vote of 38-0. House Resolution 8077 (HR 8077) was sponsored in the state House by Democratic Representatives Anastasia Williams, Joseph Almeida, Joseph Solomon Jr., Karen Alzate, and Raymond Hull. On July 16, the Rhode Island House of Representatives passed the measure in a vote of 69-1 with five not voting. On the same day, the state Senate concurred on HR 8077.[1]

Text of the measure

Ballot question

The ballot question for Question 1 was as follows:

Approval of the amendment to the Title, Preamble, Section 3 of Article III, and Section 8 of Article IX of the Rhode Island Constitution set forth below will have the effect of changing the official name of the State from 'State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations' to 'State of Rhode Island':

[ ] Approve

[ ] Reject[6]

Constitutional changes

See also: Preamble, Article III, and Article IX of the Rhode Island Constitution

Question 1 amended the Preamble, section 3 of Article III, and section 8 of Article IX of the Rhode Island Constitution. The following underlined text was added, and struck-through text was deleted:[2]

Text of Preamble:

We, the people of this State which state shall henceforth be known as the state of Rhode Islandthe State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, grateful to Almighty God for the civil and religious liberty which He hath so long permitted us to enjoy, and looking to Him for a blessing upon our endeavors to secure and to transmit the same, unimpaired, to succeeding generations, do ordain and establish this Constitution of government.


Article III Text of Section 3: Oath of General Officers

All general officers shall take the following engagement before they act in their respective offices, to wit: You being by the free vote of the electors of this state of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, elected unto the place of do solemnly swear (or, affirm) to be true and faithful unto this state, and to support the Constitution of this state and of the United States; that you will faithfully and impartially discharge all the duties of your aforesaid office to the best of your abilities, according to law: So help you God. Or: This affirmation you make and give upon the peril of the penalty of perjury.

Article IX Text of Section 8: Commissions

All commissions shall be in the name and by authority of the State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations; shall be sealed with the state seal, signed by the governor, and attested by the secretary. [6]

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2020
Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.


The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 10, and the FRE is 53. The word count for the ballot title is 52, and the estimated reading time is 13 seconds.


Support

Yes on 1 RI (2020).png

Vote Yes on 1 led the campaign in support of Question 1.[7]

Supporters

Officials

Arguments

  • Senator Harold Metts (D): "Rhode Island built its economy on being a leader in the slave trade in colonial times. This old, festering wound still needs healing. We aren’t proud of that history, and we must stop glorifying a word that is inescapably associated with that terrible past."
  • Representative Anastasia Williams (D): "When you have more than 10,000 Rhode Islanders showing up in a pandemic for a march calling for an end to police brutality and to affirm that Black Lives Matter, we can take this ugly, painful word out of the name of our beautiful state. We have genuine work ahead of us to bring about true equality and justice for all. We are collectively taking this step as an inclusive symbol to demonstrate that we are all Rhode Islanders. Period."
  • Paul Kelly (D), former Rhode Island state senator: "The urgency back when I was majority leader in the Senate wasn’t as acute as it is today. To say it doesn’t matter, well, things like this do matter. And I think the leaders of this [Black Lives Matter] movement are saying if you really want change and want to do something that is historic in any way, well, this is one of them."

Campaign advertisements

The following video was released by Yes on 1:[8]

Title: "Why I'm Voting Yes on 1 - Iasha Hall"
Title: "Why I'm Voting Yes on 1 - Diane Barense"
Title: "Why I'm Voting Yes on 1 - Harry Edmonds"

Opposition

If you are aware of any opponents or opposing arguments, please send an email with a link to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Opponents

Officials

Individuals

Arguments

  • Lincoln Almond (R), former Rhode Island governor: "It’s part of our history. It has nothing to do with anything negative unless you want to make it that. ... Once you go down the road, there is an awful lot to eliminate."
  • Patrick Conley, a Rhode Island historian: "I can understand why some people in the spirit of the times would want to delete that [word], but history is history, and I see no reason to rewrite it."
  • Brian Stinson, historian: "Those seeking to shorten the state’s name have no documentation to support their case. This misguided initiative is based on myth, not fact. Falsely and mistakenly linking “plantation” with slavery in Rhode Island could wipe out the accomplishments of founders Roger Williams and John Clarke and shred one of the most important pieces of our state’s history, which – when true and accurate – should be shared by all. In this case, the name had nothing to do with slavery – period."


Other opinions

  • Ashley Stokes, a Rhode Island resident and activist said, "I would be very disappointed that the focus becomes removing a word ... but a year or two from now we have done absolutely nothing to add the contributions of African Americans to the curriculums of Rhode Island schools, or corrected the injustices of our criminal justice system."[9]

Campaign finance

The campaign finance information on this page reflects the most recent scheduled reports that Ballotpedia has processed, which covered through December 1, 2020.


See also: Campaign finance requirements for Rhode Island ballot measures

There were two ballot committee registered in support of Question 1: Rhode Island United and Remove Plantations Rhode Island. The committees reported over $111,000 in contributions.[10]

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $108,934.00 $2,354.56 $111,288.56 $110,563.98 $112,918.54
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total $108,934.00 $2,354.56 $111,288.56 $110,563.98 $112,918.54

Support

The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committee in support of Question 1.[10]

Committees in support of Question 1
Committee Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Rhode Island United $108,294.00 $420.58 $108,714.58 $107,990.00 $108,410.58
Remove Plantations Rhode Island $640.00 $1,933.98 $2,573.98 $2,573.98 $4,507.96
Total $108,934.00 $2,354.56 $111,288.56 $110,563.98 $112,918.54

Donors

The following table shows the top donors to the support committees.[10]

Donor Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions
Rhode Island Foundation $75,000.00 $0.00 $75,000.00
Kate Ramstad $15,000.00 $0.00 $15,000.00
Friends of Gina Raimondo $5,000.00 $0.00 $5,000.00
Pannone, Lopes, Devereaux & O'Gara, LLC $2,500.00 $0.00 $2,500.00
RI AFL-CIO $2,000.00 $0.00 $2,000.00

Opposition

Ballotpedia did not identify any committees registered in opposition to Question 1.

Methodology

To read Ballotpedia's methodology for covering ballot measure campaign finance information, click here.

Background

Rhode Island Question 1, Name Change Amendment (2010)

See also: Rhode Island Question 1, Name Change Amendment (2010)

Question 1 was introduced by Representatives Joseph Almeida (D), Anastasia Williams (D), and Grace Diaz (D) on February 4, 2009. The measure would have changed the state's official name from "State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations" to "Rhode Island." It was defeated with 77.9 percent of the vote.[5][11]

Representative Joseph Almeida, who sponsored the bill, said at the time, "It's high time for us to recognize that slavery happened on plantations in Rhode Island and decide that we don't want that chapter of our history to be a proud part of our name." Keith Stokes, former executive director for the Rhode Island Economic Council, who traced his ancestry to African slaves brought to colonial Newport in the 17th century, opposed the measure. Stokes said that changing the name would be “at best historical revisionism and at worst downright censorship. I strongly urge Rhode Islanders to reject any effort to rewrite Rhode Island history by eliminating 'plantations' from our official state name. We learn more by looking at ourselves honestly in the clear light of day than we do by hiding or uselessly trying to erase our past.”[12][13][14]

George Floyd's death and protests

See also: Changes to policing policy in the states and 100 largest cities, 2020

On May 25, 2020, Minneapolis, Minnesota, police officers arrested George Floyd, a Black man, after receiving a call that he had made a purchase with a counterfeit $20 bill.[15] Floyd died after one officer, Derek Chauvin, arrived at the scene and pressed his knee onto Floyd's neck as Floyd laid face-down on the street in handcuffs.[16] Both the Hennepin County Medical Examiner and an independent autopsy conducted by Floyd's family ruled Floyd's death as a homicide stemming from the incident.[17]

After the killing of George Floyd on May 25, 2020, protests against racism and the debate about confederate flags, symbols, and statues resurfaced. In Mississippi, the state legislature passed House Bill 1796, which removed the state flag's official status and established the Commission to Redesign the Mississippi State Flag. The committee was established to design a new state flag to be voted on by Mississippi voters at the November 2020 election.[18]

Official state name removed from government documents

On June 19, 2020, the mayor of Providence, Jorge Elorza (D), signed an executive order that removed "Plantations" from city documents and oath ceremonies. In a statement regarding the order, Mayor Elorza said, "I firmly believe that in order to truly say we are an inclusive and kind city, we must commit to an active, anti-racist stance at every level in our city. Though this does not correct generations of pain and violence against our Black and Indigenous residents, this Juneteenth we can take this step to build a better, brighter future together. I want to thank the community members that led this work and that continue to raise their voices in our city and across the country, demanding change."[3]

On June 22, 2020, Rhode Island Governor Gina Raimondo (D) issued an executive order that removed "Plantations" from all documents and stationery used by her office. She also ordered that all executive agencies under the governor's control remove "Plantations" from agency stationery, electronic letterhead, pay stubs, and all other mediums of communication.[4]

Official state name changes

As of August 2020, no state had ever voted on changing its name without some change in territory involved, such as the statehood of West Virginia. In 1949 and 1989, the North Dakota Legislature tried to pass a resolution to remove "North" from the state's official name, but both resolutions did not pass the state legislature.[19]

Ballot measures in Rhode Island

Rhode Island does not allow the initiative and referendum process. The Rhode Island State Legislature can refer constitutional amendments, statutes, and bond issues to the ballot for voter consideration.

A total of 75 measures appeared on statewide ballots between 1995 and 2018. Between 1995 and 2018, 82.67 percent (62 of 75) of statewide ballots were approved by voters, and 17.33 percent (13 of 75) were defeated.

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Rhode Island Constitution

To put a legislatively referred constitutional amendment before voters, a simple majority vote is required in both the Rhode Island State Senate and the Rhode Island House of Representatives.

Two versions of the amendment were introduced. Senate Resolution 2902 (S 2902) was introduced on June 17, 2020, by Sen. Harold Metts (D), Sen. Sandra Cano (D), Sen. Ana Quezada (D), Sen. Dominick Ruggerio (D), and Sen. Maryellen Goodwin (D). On June 18, 2020, the state Senate passed S 2902 in a vote of 38-0. House Resolution 8077 (HR 8077) was sponsored in the state House by Democratic Representatives Anastasia Williams, Joseph Almeida, Joseph Solomon Jr., Karen Alzate, and Raymond Hull. On July 16, the Rhode Island House of Representatives passed the measure in a vote of 69-1 with five not voting. On the same day, the state Senate concurred on HR 8077.[1]

Vote in the Rhode Island State Senate
June 18, 2020
Requirement: Simple majority vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 20  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total3800
Total percent100%0%0%
Democrat3300
Republican500

Vote in the Rhode Island House of Representatives
July 16, 2020
Requirement: Simple majority vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 38  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total6915
Total percent92.0%1.3%6.7%
Democrat6204
Republican711

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Rhode Island

Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Rhode Island.

See also

External links

Support

Opposition

Submit links to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Rhode Island State Legislature, "Senate Resolution 2902," accessed June 19, 2020
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Rhode Island Legislature, "Full Text of Senate Resolution 2902," accessed June 19, 2020
  3. 3.0 3.1 City of Providence, "Mayor Elorza Announces Removal of “Plantations” from City Documents and Oath Ceremonies," June 19, 2020
  4. 4.0 4.1 Office of the Rhode Island Governor, "Executive Order 20-48," June 22, 2020
  5. 5.0 5.1 Rhode Island General Assembly, "2009 H 5291," accessed July 27, 2020
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  7. Yes on 1, "Home, " accessed October 13, 2020
  8. YouTube, "Yes on 1," accessed October 27, 2020
  9. Providence Journal, "The state is changing. Will its name follow? The details of a 20-year debate over ‘and Providence Plantations’," July 31, 2020
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 Rhode Island Board of Elections, "Campaign Finance Portal," accessed July 27, 2020
  11. The Rhode Show, "The Buzz: Should RI change it's name?" June 30, 2009
  12. Eyes of Glory, August 22, 2010
  13. Inform.com, "Rhode Island debates changing state name," accessed October 14, 2010
  14. The Huffington Post, "Rhode Island Slavery Legacy Prompting Name Change," June 25, 2009
  15. Washington Post, "The death of George Floyd: What video and other records show about his final minutes," May 30, 2020
  16. The New York Times, "8 Minutes and 46 Seconds: How George Floyd Was Killed in Police Custody," May 31, 2020
  17. USA Today, "Medical examiner and family-commissioned autopsy agree: George Floyd's death was a homicide," June 1, 2020
  18. Mississippi State Legislature, "House Bill 1796," accessed June 29, 2020
  19. State Symbols USA, "Origin of 'North Dakota,'" accessed August 3, 2020
  20. Rhode Island Department of State, "Election Day Voting Hours," accessed September 24, 2024
  21. 21.0 21.1 21.2 Rhode Island Department of State, "Register to Vote," accessed April 18, 2023
  22. Providence Journal, “Raimondo signs automatic voter registration bill into law,” August 1, 2017
  23. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."