REESE, ADMINISTRATRIX, v. PHILADELPHIA AND READING RAILWAY COMPANY (1915)
REESE, ADMINISTRATRIX, v. PHILADELPHIA AND READING RAILWAY COMPANY |
---|
Term: 1915 |
Important Dates |
Argued: December 1, 1915 |
Decided: December 20, 1915 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
6-2 |
Majority |
William Rufus Day • Oliver Wendell Holmes • Joseph McKenna • James Clark McReynolds • Willis Van Devanter • Edward Douglass White |
Dissenting |
Charles Evans Hughes • Mahlon Pitney |
REESE, ADMINISTRATRIX, v. PHILADELPHIA AND READING RAILWAY COMPANY is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on December 20, 1915. The case was argued before the court on December 1, 1915.
In a 6-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Pennsylvania Eastern U.S. District Court.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Sufficiency of evidence: typically in the context of a jury's determination of compensation for injury or death
- Petitioner: Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Railroad
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 239 U.S. 463
- How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Edward Douglass White
- Who wrote the majority opinion: James Clark McReynolds
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes
|