Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
North Dakota State Senate elections, 2018
- General election: Nov. 6
- Voter registration deadline: N/A (no formal registration process)
- Early voting: Sept. 27 - Nov. 5
- Absentee voting deadline: Postmark Nov. 5
- Online registration: N/A
- Same-day registration: N/A
- Voter ID: ID required
- Poll times: Varies according to the size of the precinct
2020 →
← 2016
|
|
2018 North Dakota Senate elections | |
---|---|
General | November 6, 2018 |
Primary | June 12, 2018 |
Past election results |
2016・2014・2012・2010・2008 2006・2004・2002・2000 |
2018 elections | |
---|---|
Choose a chamber below: | |
Republicans held their supermajority in the 2018 elections for North Dakota State Senate, winning 18 seats to Democrats' 6 and establishing a 37-10 majority. Twenty-four seats out of the chamber's 47 seats were up for election. At the time of the election, Republicans held a 38-9 majority.
The Republican Party maintained its trifecta in North Dakota in 2018 by holding its majorities in the state Senate and House. The governor's office, held by Doug Burgum (R), was not up for election.
Because state senators in North Dakota serve four-year terms, winning candidates in the 2018 election served through 2022 and played a role in North Dakota's redistricting process—the drawing of boundary lines for congressional and state legislative districts. Read more below.
The North Dakota State Senate was one of 87 state legislative chambers with elections in 2018. There are 99 chambers throughout the country.
North Dakota state senators serve staggered, four-year terms and half of the Senate is up for election every two years.
For more information about the Democratic primary, click here.
For more information about the Republican primary, click here
Post-election analysis
- See also: State legislative elections, 2018
The Republican Party maintained supermajority status in both chambers of the North Dakota Legislative Assembly in the 2018 election. In the state Senate, 24 out of 47 seats were up for election. The Republican North Dakota State Senate supermajority was reduced from 38-9 to 37-10. One Republican incumbent was defeated in the general election.
The North Dakota House of Representatives held elections for 48 out of 94 seats. The Republican majority in the House of Representatives was reduced from 80-13 to 79-15. One seat was vacant before the election. One Republican incumbent was defeated in the primary and three Republican incumbents were defeated in the general election.
National background
On November 6, 2018, 87 of the nation's 99 state legislative chambers held regularly scheduled elections for 6,073 of 7,383 total seats, meaning that nearly 82 percent of all state legislative seats were up for election.
- Entering the 2018 election, Democrats held 42.6 percent, Republicans held 56.8 percent, and independents and other parties held 0.6 percent of the seats up for regular election.
- Following the 2018 election, Democrats held 47.3 percent, Republicans held 52.3 percent, and independents and other parties held 0.4 percent of the seats up for regular election.
- A total of 469 incumbents were defeated over the course of the election cycle, with roughly one-third of them defeated in the primary.
Want more information?
- Incumbents defeated in 2018's state legislative elections
- 2018 election analysis: Partisan balance of state legislative chambers
- 2018 election analysis: Number of state legislators by party
- 2018 election analysis: State legislative supermajorities
Candidates
General election candidates
North Dakota State Senate elections, 2018 |
|||
|
|||
Office | Other | ||
District 1 |
|
|
|
District 3 |
|
Andrew Maragos (Independent) |
|
District 5 |
|
|
|
District 7 |
|
|
|
District 9 |
|
||
District 11 |
|
|
|
District 13 |
|
|
|
District 15 |
|
|
|
District 17 |
|
|
|
District 19 |
|
||
District 21 |
|
||
District 23 |
|
|
|
District 25 |
|
|
|
District 27 |
|
||
District 29 |
|
|
|
District 31 |
|
|
|
District 33 |
|
||
District 35 |
|
|
|
District 37 |
|
|
|
District 39 |
|
||
District 41 |
|
|
|
District 43 |
Lonnie Laffen (i) |
|
|
District 45 |
|
|
|
District 47 |
|
Primary election candidates
The candidate list below is based on a candidate filing list provided by the North Dakota Secretary of State on April 10, 2018.[1] (I) denotes an incumbent.
Margins of victory
A margin of victory (MOV) analysis for the 2018 North Dakota State Senate races is presented in this section. MOV represents the percentage of total votes that separated the winner and the second-place finisher. For example, if the winner of a race received 47 percent of the vote and the second-place finisher received 45 percent of the vote, the MOV is 2 percent.
The table below presents the following figures for each party:
- Elections won
- Elections won by less than 10 percentage points
- Elections won without opposition
- Average margin of victory[2]
North Dakota State Senate: 2018 Margin of Victory Analysis | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Elections won | Elections won by less than 10% | Unopposed elections | Average margin of victory[2] |
Total |
The margin of victory in each race is presented below. The list is sorted from the closest MOV to the largest (including unopposed races).
Seats flipped
The below map displays each seat in the North Dakota State Senate which changed partisan hands as a result of the 2018 elections, shaded according to the partisan affiliation of the winner in 2018. Hover over a shaded district for more information.
State legislative seats flipped in 2018, North Dakota State Senate | |||
---|---|---|---|
District | Incumbent | 2018 winner | Direction of flip |
North Dakota State Senate District 43 | R to D |
Incumbents retiring
Five incumbents did not run for re-election in 2018.[3] Those incumbents were:
Name | Party | Office |
---|---|---|
Tom Campbell | Senate District 19 | |
Carolyn Nelson | Senate District 21 | |
Jon Casper | Senate District 27 | |
Bill Bowman | Senate District 39 | |
Ralph Kilzer | Senate District 47 |
Process to become a candidate
For party candidates
See statutes: Chapter 16.1-11, Section 6 of the North Dakota Century Code
A candidate seeking the nomination of a recognized political party can submit a petition/certificate of nomination, an affidavit of candidacy, and a statement of interests in order to have his or her name printed on the primary ballot. A petition/certificate of nomination must include the following information:[4]
- the candidate's name, post office address, and telephone number
- the title of the office being sought
- the name of the party the candidate seeks to represent
For statewide partisan offices (including congressional offices), petitions must contain signatures equaling 3 percent of the total number of votes cast for the party's candidate for the same office in the last general election. No more than 300 signatures, however, may be required for such offices.[4][5][6]
For state legislative offices, petitions must contain signatures equaling least 1 percent of the total resident population of the legislative district according to the most recent federal census.[7]
In addition to petitions/certificates of nomination, candidates must also file affidavits of candidacy, which require basic information about the candidate. Any candidate for state executive or legislative office (excluding federal candidates) must also file a statement of interests, which details the candidate's sources of income and any businesses or organizations in which he or she has a financial or fiduciary responsibility.[8][9][10]
Candidates for federal, statewide executive, or state legislative office must file the aforementioned paperwork with the North Dakota Secretary of State by 4:00 p.m. on the 64th day before the election.[4][7][6]
For independent candidates
See statutes: Chapter 16.1-12 of the North Dakota Century Code
Independent candidates petition for placement on the general election ballot. Like party candidates, an independent candidate must file a petition/certificate of nomination, an affidavit of candidacy, and a statement of interests. Signature requirements for independent candidates differ from those to which party candidates are held. Signature requirements for independent candidates are summarized in the table below.[11]
Independent candidate signature requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Office | Required signatures | |
Governor United States Senator United States Representative Secretary of State of North Dakota Attorney General of North Dakota Agriculture Commissioner Tax Commissioner Public Service Commissioner |
1,000 | |
North Dakota Legislative Assembly | At least 2 percent of the resident population of the district according to the most recent decennial federal census, but no more than 300 signatures may be required |
Completed filing paperwork must be submitted to the North Dakota Secretary of State office by 4:00 p.m. on the 64th day before the general election.[7][6][12]
For write-in candidates
In order to have his or her votes tallied, a write-in candidate for federal, statewide, or state legislative office must submit a certificate of write-in candidacy to the North Dakota Secretary of State. Certificates for federal and statewide candidates are due by 4:00 p.m. on the 21st day prior to the election. Certificates for state legislative candidates are due by 4:00 p.m. on the fourth day prior to the election. The certificate must include the candidate's name, address, and office being sought. Along with this form, the candidate must also submit a statement of interests (the same as that submitted by party and independent candidates).[7][6][13][14]</ref>
Qualifications
Article 4, Section 5 of the North Dakota Constitution states: State Senators and Representatives must be, on the day of the election, qualified voters in the district from which they are chosen and a resident of the state for one year preceding election to office.
Salaries and per diem
- See also: Comparison of state legislative salaries
State legislative salaries, 2024[15] | |
---|---|
Salary | Per diem |
$592/month | $213/day |
When sworn in
North Dakota legislators assume office December 1st.[16]
North Dakota political history
Party control
2018
In the 2018 elections, Republicans maintained their majority in the North Dakota State Senate.
North Dakota State Senate | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | As of November 6, 2018 | After November 7, 2018 | |
Democratic Party | 9 | 10 | |
Republican Party | 38 | 37 | |
Total | 47 | 47 |
2016
In the 2016 elections, Republicans maintained their majority in the North Dakota State Senate. Republicans gained six seats in the election.
North Dakota State Senate | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | As of November 7, 2016 | After November 8, 2016 | |
Democratic Party | 15 | 9 | |
Republican Party | 32 | 38 | |
Total | 47 | 47 |
Trifectas
A state government trifecta is a term that describes single-party government, when one political party holds the governor's office and has majorities in both chambers of the legislature in a state government. Republicans in North Dakota held a state government trifecta for 23 years between 1992 to 2017.
North Dakota Party Control: 1992-2024
No Democratic trifectas • Thirty-one years of Republican trifectas
Scroll left and right on the table below to view more years.
Year | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Governor | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
Senate | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
House | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
Wave election analysis
- See also: Wave elections (1918-2016)
The term wave election is frequently used to describe an election cycle in which one party makes significant electoral gains. How many seats would Republicans have had to lose for the 2018 midterm election to be considered a wave election?
Ballotpedia examined the results of the 50 election cycles that occurred between 1918 and 2016—spanning from President Woodrow Wilson's (D) second midterm in 1918 to Donald Trump's (R) first presidential election in 2016. We define wave elections as the 20 percent of elections in that period resulting in the greatest seat swings against the president's party.
Applying this definition to state legislative elections, we found that Republicans needed to lose 494 seats for 2018 to qualify as a wave election.
The chart below shows the number of seats the president's party lost in the 10 state legislative waves from 1918 to 2016. Click here to read the full report.
State legislative wave elections | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | President | Party | Election type | State legislative seats change | Elections analyzed[17] | |
1932 | Hoover | R | Presidential | -1,022 | 7,365 | |
1922 | Harding | R | First midterm | -907 | 6,907 | |
1966 | Johnson | D | First midterm[18] | -782 | 7,561 | |
1938 | Roosevelt | D | Second midterm | -769 | 7,179 | |
1958 | Eisenhower | R | Second midterm | -702 | 7,627 | |
2010 | Obama | D | First midterm | -702 | 7,306 | |
1974 | Ford | R | Second midterm[19] | -695 | 7,481 | |
1920 | Wilson | D | Presidential | -654 | 6,835 | |
1930 | Hoover | R | Presidential | -640 | 7,361 | |
1954 | Eisenhower | R | First midterm | -494 | 7,513 |
Competitiveness
Every year, Ballotpedia uses official candidate lists from each state to examine the competitiveness of every state legislative race in the country. Nationally, there has been a steady decline in electoral competitiveness since 2010. Most notable is that the number of districts with general election competition has dropped by more than 10 percent.
Results from 2016
Click here to read the full study »
Historical context
Uncontested elections: In 2014, 32.8 percent of Americans lived in states with an uncontested state senate election. Similarly, 40.4 percent of Americans lived in states with uncontested house elections. Primary elections were uncontested even more frequently, with 61 percent of people living in states with no contested primaries. Uncontested elections often occur in locations that are so politically one-sided that the result of an election would be a foregone conclusion regardless of whether it was contested or not.
Open seats: In most cases, an incumbent will run for re-election, which decreases the number of open seats available. In 2014, 83 percent of the 6,057 seats up for election saw the incumbent running for re-election. The states that impose term limits on their legislatures typically see a higher percentage of open seats in a given year because a portion of incumbents in each election are forced to leave office. Overall, the number of open seats decreased from 2012 to 2014, dropping from 21.2 percent in 2012 to 17.0 percent in 2014.
Incumbent win rates: Ballotpedia's competitiveness analysis of elections between 1972 and 2014 documented the high propensity for incumbents to win re-election in state legislative elections. In fact, since 1972, the win rate for incumbents had not dropped below 90 percent—with the exception of 1974, when 88 percent of incumbents were re-elected to their seats. Perhaps most importantly, the win rate for incumbents generally increased over time. In 2014, 96.5 percent of incumbents were able to retain their seats. Common convention holds that incumbents are able to leverage their office to maintain their seat. However, the high incumbent win rate may actually be a result of incumbents being more likely to hold seats in districts that are considered safe for their party.
Marginal primaries: Often, competitiveness is measured by examining the rate of elections that have been won by amounts that are considered marginal (5 percent or less). During the 2014 election, 90.1 percent of primary and general election races were won by margins higher than 5 percent. Interestingly, it is usually the case that only one of the two races—primary or general—will be competitive at a time. This means that if a district's general election is competitive, typically one or more of the district's primaries were won by more than 5 percent. The reverse is also true: If a district sees a competitive primary, it is unlikely that the general election for that district will be won by less than 5 percent. Primaries often see very low voter turnout in comparison to general elections. In 2014, there were only 27 million voters for state legislative primaries, but approximately 107 million voters for the state legislative general elections.
Redistricting in North Dakota
- See also: Redistricting in North Dakota
Because state senators in North Dakota serve four-year terms, winning candidates in the 2018 election served through 2022 and played a role in North Dakota's redistricting process—the drawing of boundary lines for congressional and state legislative districts. Prior to 2020-2021, redistricting last took place in North Dakota from 2010-2011.
State process
Because North Dakota has only one congressional district, congressional redistricting is not necessary. The state legislature draws state legislative district boundaries. State legislative district lines are subject to veto by the governor.[20]
The North Dakota Constitution requires that state legislative districts be "compact and contiguous."[20][21]
Pivot Counties
- See also: Pivot Counties by state
Four of 53 North Dakota counties—7.5 percent—are Pivot Counties. Pivot Counties are counties that voted for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012 and for Donald Trump (R) in 2016. Altogether, the nation had 206 Pivot Counties, with most being concentrated in upper midwestern and northeastern states.
Counties won by Trump in 2016 and Obama in 2012 and 2008 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | Trump margin of victory in 2016 | Obama margin of victory in 2012 | Obama margin of victory in 2008 | ||||
Benson County, North Dakota | 4.33% | 17.01% | 33.53% | ||||
Ransom County, North Dakota | 15.77% | 13.77% | 15.33% | ||||
Sargent County, North Dakota | 19.73% | 9.77% | 17.49% | ||||
Steele County, North Dakota | 17.72% | 1.92% | 20.35% |
In the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump (R) won North Dakota with 63 percent of the vote. Hillary Clinton (D) received 27.2 percent. In presidential elections between 1892 and 2016, North Dakota voted Republican 81.25 percent of the time and Democratic 15.6 percent of the time. In the five presidential elections between 2000 and 2016, North Dakota voted Republican all five times.[22]
Presidential results by legislative district
The following table details results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections by state Senate districts in North Dakota. Click [show] to expand the table. The "Obama," "Romney," "Clinton," and "Trump" columns describe the percent of the vote each presidential candidate received in the district. The "2012 Margin" and "2016 Margin" columns describe the margin of victory between the two presidential candidates in those years. The "Party Control" column notes which party held that seat heading into the 2018 general election. Data on the results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections broken down by state legislative districts was compiled by Daily Kos.[23][24]
In 2012, Barack Obama (D) won eight out of 47 state Senate districts in North Dakota with an average margin of victory of 13.9 points. In 2016, Hillary Clinton (D) won four out of 47 state Senate districts in North Dakota with an average margin of victory of 10.7 points. |
In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won 39 out of 47 state Senate districts in North Dakota with an average margin of victory of 25.1 points. In 2016, Donald Trump (R) won 43 out of 47 state Senate districts in North Dakota with an average margin of victory of 38.9 points. Trump won five districts controlled by Democrats heading into the 2018 elections. |
2016 presidential results by state Senate District | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Obama | Romney | 2012 Margin | Clinton | Trump | 2016 Margin | Party Control |
1 | 25.25% | 72.44% | R+47.2 | 15.70% | 77.60% | R+61.9 | R |
2 | 23.50% | 74.04% | R+50.5 | 12.81% | 81.65% | R+68.8 | R |
3 | 34.53% | 62.62% | R+28.1 | 20.28% | 69.79% | R+49.5 | R |
4 | 44.65% | 53.30% | R+8.7 | 31.23% | 62.19% | R+31 | R |
5 | 35.04% | 62.99% | R+27.9 | 25.32% | 65.85% | R+40.5 | R |
6 | 33.60% | 64.02% | R+30.4 | 19.03% | 73.86% | R+54.8 | R |
7 | 28.93% | 68.80% | R+39.9 | 18.95% | 74.05% | R+55.1 | R |
8 | 28.39% | 69.14% | R+40.7 | 16.17% | 78.39% | R+62.2 | R |
9 | 73.98% | 24.10% | D+49.9 | 57.16% | 33.14% | D+24 | D |
10 | 40.63% | 56.80% | R+16.2 | 23.79% | 68.63% | R+44.8 | R |
11 | 54.52% | 42.92% | D+11.6 | 47.09% | 42.67% | D+4.4 | D |
12 | 40.44% | 56.89% | R+16.5 | 28.16% | 63.38% | R+35.2 | D |
13 | 45.20% | 52.76% | R+7.6 | 36.60% | 54.96% | R+18.4 | R |
14 | 30.67% | 67.01% | R+36.3 | 19.04% | 74.40% | R+55.4 | R |
15 | 43.56% | 53.45% | R+9.9 | 28.47% | 62.14% | R+33.7 | R |
16 | 50.78% | 45.95% | D+4.8 | 40.22% | 49.41% | R+9.2 | R |
17 | 43.28% | 54.92% | R+11.6 | 36.93% | 56.05% | R+19.1 | R |
18 | 55.25% | 41.99% | D+13.3 | 39.68% | 50.13% | R+10.4 | R |
19 | 38.30% | 59.10% | R+20.8 | 23.98% | 68.23% | R+44.3 | R |
20 | 43.84% | 53.94% | R+10.1 | 28.99% | 61.73% | R+32.7 | R |
21 | 58.10% | 37.73% | D+20.4 | 49.24% | 38.72% | D+10.5 | D |
22 | 39.93% | 57.89% | R+18 | 30.35% | 60.24% | R+29.9 | R |
23 | 48.91% | 48.94% | R+0 | 34.28% | 57.80% | R+23.5 | D |
24 | 45.51% | 52.18% | R+6.7 | 30.90% | 59.19% | R+28.3 | D |
25 | 41.58% | 56.58% | R+15 | 27.20% | 64.26% | R+37.1 | R |
26 | 47.28% | 50.58% | R+3.3 | 30.77% | 59.94% | R+29.2 | D |
27 | 43.92% | 53.66% | R+9.7 | 38.23% | 51.62% | R+13.4 | R |
28 | 25.69% | 71.88% | R+46.2 | 14.18% | 80.31% | R+66.1 | R |
29 | 34.32% | 63.27% | R+28.9 | 20.98% | 72.76% | R+51.8 | R |
30 | 34.36% | 63.38% | R+29 | 23.14% | 69.35% | R+46.2 | R |
31 | 37.63% | 60.06% | R+22.4 | 24.35% | 68.30% | R+44 | R |
32 | 37.65% | 59.45% | R+21.8 | 26.56% | 64.60% | R+38 | R |
33 | 26.89% | 70.44% | R+43.6 | 13.37% | 81.32% | R+68 | R |
34 | 36.69% | 60.28% | R+23.6 | 23.55% | 67.65% | R+44.1 | R |
35 | 37.72% | 59.56% | R+21.8 | 29.88% | 60.59% | R+30.7 | D |
36 | 21.01% | 77.00% | R+56 | 11.33% | 83.81% | R+72.5 | R |
37 | 26.51% | 71.55% | R+45 | 16.67% | 77.64% | R+61 | R |
38 | 30.15% | 67.72% | R+37.6 | 19.59% | 72.28% | R+52.7 | R |
39 | 19.92% | 78.02% | R+58.1 | 11.09% | 83.49% | R+72.4 | R |
40 | 35.42% | 61.14% | R+25.7 | 25.35% | 63.05% | R+37.7 | R |
41 | 42.55% | 55.38% | R+12.8 | 39.53% | 51.32% | R+11.8 | R |
42 | 49.85% | 46.46% | D+3.4 | 39.58% | 49.50% | R+9.9 | R |
43 | 49.24% | 48.50% | D+0.7 | 41.62% | 50.35% | R+8.7 | R |
44 | 52.26% | 44.96% | D+7.3 | 46.38% | 42.62% | D+3.8 | D |
45 | 44.75% | 52.72% | R+8 | 35.95% | 54.29% | R+18.3 | R |
46 | 45.62% | 52.35% | R+6.7 | 41.96% | 49.55% | R+7.6 | R |
47 | 30.74% | 67.39% | R+36.7 | 25.59% | 67.63% | R+42 | R |
Total | 38.92% | 58.66% | R+19.7 | 27.74% | 64.15% | R+36.4 | - |
Source: Daily Kos |
See also
- North Dakota State Senate
- North Dakota State Legislature
- State legislative elections, 2018
- North Dakota state legislative Democratic primaries, 2018
- North Dakota state legislative Republican primaries, 2018
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ North Dakota Secretary of State, "2018 Primary Election Contest/Candidate List," accessed April 10, 2018
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Excludes unopposed elections
- ↑ Ballotpedia defines an incumbent as retiring if the incumbent did not file for office or filed for office but withdrew, was disqualified, or otherwise left a race in a manner other than losing the primary, primary runoff, or convention. If an incumbent runs as a write-in candidate, Ballotpedia does not consider them to be retiring. If an incumbent runs in the same chamber for a different seat, Ballotpedia does not consider them to be retiring.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 North Dakota Century Code, "Chapter 16.1-11, Section 6," accessed April 24, 2025
- ↑ North Dakota Secretary of State, "Running for Partisan Statewide Executive Office," accessed April 24, 2025
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 North Dakota Secretary of State, "Running for U.S. Congress," accessed April 24, 2025
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 North Dakota Secretary of State, "Running for the ND Legislature," accessed April 24, 2025
- ↑ North Dakota Secretary of State, "Affidavit of Candidacy," accessed April 24, 2025
- ↑ North Dakota Secretary of State, "Statement of Interests," accessed April 24, 2025
- ↑ North Dakota Century Code, "Chapter 16.1-11, Section 10," accessed April 24, 2025
- ↑ North Dakota Century Code, "Chapter 16.1-12, Section 02," accessed April 24, 2025
- ↑ North Dakota Century Code, "Chapter 16.1-12, Section 4," accessed April 24, 2025
- ↑ North Dakota Century Code, "Chapter 16.1-12, Section 2.2," accessed April 24, 2025
- ↑ North Dakota Secretary of State, "Certificate of Write-in Candidacy," accessed April 24, 2025
- ↑ National Conference of State Legislatures, "2024 Legislator Compensation," August 21, 2024
- ↑ North Dakota Constitution, "Article IV, Section 7," accessed February 12, 2021
- ↑ The number of state legislative seats available for analysis varied, with as many as 7,795 and as few as 6,835.
- ↑ Lyndon Johnson's (D) first term began in November 1963 after the death of President John F. Kennedy (D), who was first elected in 1960. Before Johnson had his first midterm in 1966, he was re-elected president in 1964.
- ↑ Gerald Ford's (R) first term began in August 1974 following the resignation of President Richard Nixon (R), who was first elected in 1968 and was re-elected in 1972. Because Ford only served for two full months before facing the electorate, this election is classified as Nixon's second midterm.
- ↑ 20.0 20.1 All About Redistricting, 'North Dakota," accessed April 22, 2015
- ↑ North Dakota Constitution, "Article IV, Section 2," accessed April 22, 2015
- ↑ 270towin.com, "North Dakota," accessed June 29, 2017
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' statewide election results by congressional and legislative districts," July 9, 2013
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' 2016 presidential results for congressional and legislative districts," February 6, 2017