2014 ballot measure petition signature costs
The "Cost-Per-Required-Signature" (CPRS) for 2014's certified citizen initiatives and veto referendums averaged from $1.05 in Massachusetts to $6.44 in Missouri.
This Ballotpedia report is an in-depth look at the initiatives that qualified for the 2014 ballot. This includes a review of thirty-five citizen initiatives and five veto referendums in 15 states.
In 2014, 616 citizen's initiatives were proposed. However, only 40 made the ballot. 2014's numbers are down significantly from 2012. In 2012, 550 initiatives were proposed, yet 61 made the ballot.
The cost-per-required-signature compares the amount of money spent on the petition drives for those initiatives that did pay money to circulators to the number of signatures the state requires for an initiative to make the ballot. For more information about this report and how it is compiled, see this page.
In 2014, although state averages ranged from $1.05 to $6.44, individual measures cost 24 cents on the low-end and up to $8.36 per signature collected.[1]
The highest CPRS in 2012 was $10.86 for California Proposition 30. In 2013, Ballotpedia estimated the CPRS for Colorado Amendment 66, an income tax increase for education, at between $8.18 and $11.47. In 2014, the highest CPRS was $8.36 for Oregon Measure 92.
All calculations are only as accurate as the data made available through state campaign finance websites.
Not all initiative efforts were run by paid petition-signature collectors. Some ballot measure supporters opted to use volunteers. This resulted in a $0 CPRS which is reflected in the charts below with a hyphen or dash. Additionally, some initiative efforts likely used a combination approach where they used both paid petition-signature collectors and volunteers. This approach reduces the overall CPRS.
Some states do not allow for payment per signature collected. Of those that prohibit the practice, the following states qualified measures for the 2014 ballot: Colorado, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oregon and South Dakota. Both North Dakota and South Dakota initiatives resulted in a CPRS of $0.
The remaining states did incur costs for their initiative petition circulation efforts, according to campaign finance reports. The following report does not imply that payment per signature occurred or that the CPRS reflects the payment amount. Pay-per-signature is only one way of compensating signature-gatherers who collect signatures to qualify ballot initiatives for the ballot. Expenditures on which this report is based may include paid staff to organize the petition drive, compensation for paid staff in the form of bonuses or paying the circulators by the hour.
Editor's note: Data was compiled on October 1, 2014. Most signature-gathering expenditures should have been made and reported by this date, but any expenditures relating to signature gathering made after this date are not reflected.
Overview
QUICK STATISTICS:
- Approximately $16,899,427 was identified as having been spent on petition signature gathering.
- An average of $3 was spent per required signature for all initiatives based on available data.
- The state with the highest CPRS in 2014 was Missouri, with an average cost of $6.44 per required signature. Missouri only has one initiative on the ballot.
- The state with the lowest CPRS in 2014 was Massachusetts, with an average cost of $1.05 per required signature.
Editor's note: In light of complexities calculating Nevada Question 3's CPRS, that state and measure were not included in the rankings below. Nevada might have had the lowest average, but because of uncertainties based on how the signature expenses were reported, we can only assign a range -- $0.59 - $8.92 -- in Nevada.[2]
Table 1: Overview Summary of Results | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | # of Initiatives | Initiative CPRS Range | Average CPRS | ||||||
No Data | < $2 | $2 - $4 | $4 - $6 | $6 - $8 | $8 - $10 | ||||
Alaska | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | $1.67 | |
Arkansas | 2 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | $1.23 | |
California | 4 | - | - | 3 | 1 | - | - | $3.92 | |
Colorado | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | - | - | - | $1.37 | |
Florida | 2 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | $1.49 | |
Maine | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | $1.36 | |
Massachusetts | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | $1.05 | |
Michigan | 2 | - | - | 2 | - | - | - | $2.53 | |
Missouri | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | $6.44 | |
Nebraska | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | $4.49 | |
Nevada | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
North Dakota | 4 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | $0 | |
Oregon | 5 | - | - | 1 | 2 | - | 2 | $5.83 | |
South Dakota | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | $0 | |
Washington | 3 | - | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | $2.67 | |
40 | 12 | 7 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 2 | $2.27[3] |
State by state
The following 15 states had initiatives, veto referendums, or both on the ballot in 2014. Tables 2A through 2N below present individual CPRS data for all initiatives in 2014.
Alaska
- See also: Alaska signature requirements and Alaska 2014 ballot measures
Table 2A: Alaska CPRS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ballot measure | Subject | Signature collection company | Cost | Signatures required | CPRS |
Ballot Measure 1 | Taxes | $44,004[4] | 30,169 | $1.46 | |
Ballot Measure 2 | Marijuana | --[4] | 30,169 | -- | |
Ballot Measure 3 | Min Wage | $64,000[4] | 30,169 | $2.12 | |
Ballot Measure 4 | Business | $93,000[4] | 30,169 | $3.08 | |
TOTAL: | $201,000 | 120,676 | $1.67 |
Disclaimer:
- No CPRS data was identified for Measure 2.[4]
- Alaska does not prohibit paying circulators by the signature, but caps their pay at $1 per signature. This report does not imply that payment per signature occurred or that the CPRS is the amount paid to signature gatherers. See: Laws governing the initiative process in Alaska.
Arkansas
- See also: Arkansas signature requirements and Arkansas 2014 ballot measures
Table 2B: Arkansas CPRS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ballot measure | Subject | Signature collection company | Cost | Signatures required | CPRS |
Issue 4 | Alcohol | National Ballot Access | $173,553[5] | 78,133 | $2.22 |
Issue 5 | Min Wage | -- | 62,507 | -- | |
TOTAL: | $173,553 | 140,640 | $1.23 |
Disclaimer:
- Issue 5's ballot question committee, Give Arkansas a Raise, paid Southern Strategies $6,000 for consulting in 2014. However, no expenditures were explicitly classified as being used for signature gathering.[6]
California
Table 2C: California CPRS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ballot measure | Subject | Signature collection company | Cost | Signatures required | CPRS |
Proposition 45 | Insurance | Kimball Petition Management | $1,728,998[7] | 504,760 | $3.43 |
Proposition 46 | Healthcare | Kimball Petition Management | $1,692,673[8] | 504,760 | $3.35 |
Proposition 47 | Trials | PCI Consultants, Inc. | $1,847,882[9] | 504,760 | $3.66 |
Proposition 48 | Gambling | Arno Political Consultants and The Monaco Group | $2,636,173[10] | 504,760 | $5.22 |
TOTAL: | $7,905,726 | 2,019,040 | $3.92 |
Colorado
- See also: Colorado signature requirements and Colorado 2014 ballot measures
Table 2D: Colorado CPRS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ballot measure | Subject | Signature collection company | Cost | Signatures required | CPRS |
Amendment 67 | Abortion | --[11] | 86,105 | -- | |
Amendment 68 | Gambling | PCI Consultants, Inc. | $132,943[12] | 86,105 | $1.54 |
Proposition 104 | Gov't Acc | Kennedy Enterprise LLC | $253,564[13] | 86,105 | $2.94 |
Proposition 105 | Business | $85,111[14] | 86,105 | $0.99 | |
TOTAL: | $471,618 | 344,420 | $1.37 |
Disclaimer:
- Amendment 67 did not have any expenditures explicitly for signature gathering purposes.[11]
- Amendment 68's total signature cost is only for expenditures explicitly labeled as being for "petition signature gathering." However, Coloradans for Better Schools, Inc. made several other payments to PCI Consultants, Inc. and two other companies that include signature gathering in their services: Amplified Strategies and Winner & Mandabach Campaigns. The total expenditures to these three companies was $828,946.92, which would have made for a CPRS of $9.63.[12]
- Proposition 104's signature collection was paid for by the Independence Institute in the form of non-monetary contributions.[13]
- Proposition 105 did not utilize any signature collection companies, but rather paid individuals for collecting signatures.[14]
- Colorado law restricts per-signature pay to 20 percent or less of a circulator's compensation. This report does not imply that payment per signature occurred or that the CPRS is the amount paid to signature gatherers. See: Laws governing the initiative process in Colorado.
Florida
- See also: Florida signature requirements and Florida 2014 ballot measures
Table 2E: Florida CPRS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ballot measure | Subject | Signature collection company | Cost | Signatures required | CPRS |
Amendment 1 | Environment | PCI Consultants, Inc. | $1,507,968[15] | 683,149 | $2.21 |
Amendment 2 | Marijuana | National Voter Outreach | $522,257[15] | 683,149 | $0.76 |
TOTAL: | $2,030,225 | 1,366,298 | $1.49 |
Disclaimer:
- Both Amendment 1 and Amendment 2's total signature costs include expenditures explicitly classified as “petitions,” “petition fees,” “petition gatherers,” “petition signatures,” "signatures" and “petition submissions.”[15]
- Amendment 1 primarily used PCI Consultants, Inc. However, Active Root Consultants, Inc. was also hired to collect signatures. The company was paid $1,000.[15]
Maine
- See also: Maine signature requirements and Maine 2014 ballot measures
Table 2F: Maine CPRS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ballot measure | Subject | Signature collection company | Cost | Signatures required | CPRS |
Question 1 | Hunting | PCI Consultants, Inc. | $77,720[16] | 57,277 | $1.36 |
TOTAL: | $77,720 | 57,277 | $1.36 |
Massachusetts
Table 2G: Massachusetts CPRS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ballot measure | Subject | Signature collection company | Cost | Signatures required | CPRS |
Question 1 | Taxes | --[17] | 80,396 | -- | |
Question 2 | Environment | $145,000[18] | 80,396 | $1.80 | |
Question 3 | Gambling | $191,712[19] | 80,396 | $2.38 | |
Question 4 | Labor | --[20] | 80,396 | -- | |
TOTAL: | $336,712 | 321,584 | $1.05 |
Disclaimer:
- Question 1's sponsoring committee did not explicitly spend any money on signature gathering.[17]
- For Question 3, Spoonworks, Inc. and Madison Group, Inc. were hired to collect signatures. However, Spoonworks, Inc. received the vast majority of total payments for signature gathering. The business was paid $188,800, whereas Madison Group, Inc. received $2,912.[19]
- Raise Up Massachusetts, the sponsoring committee for Question 4, gathered signatures for two initiatives. Besides Question 4, the group collected signatures for a Minimum Wage Increase Initiative. It's impossible to determine what expenditures went towards what initiative. Furthermore, the campaign did not explicitly spend any money on signature gathering, but did spend money on field organizing and field consulting. These expenditures may or may not include signature gathering.[20] For these reasons, the data was not included in this report.
Michigan
- See also: Michigan signature requirements and Michigan 2014 ballot measures
Table 2H: Michigan CPRS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ballot measure | Subject | Signature collection company | Cost | Signatures required | CPRS |
Proposal 1 | Hunting | PCI Consultants, Inc. | $364,229[21] | 161,304 | $2.26 |
Proposal 2 | Hunting | PCI Consultants, Inc. | $452,539[21] | 161,304 | $2.81 |
TOTAL: | $816,768 | 322,608 | $2.53 |
Missouri
- See also: Missouri signature requirements and Missouri 2014 ballot measures
Table 2I: Missouri CPRS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ballot measure | Subject | Signature collection company | Cost | Signatures required | CPRS |
Amendment 3 | Labor | National Petition Management and Ozark Strategic Solutions | $1,015,592[22][23][24] | 157,788 | $6.44 |
TOTAL: | $1,015,592 | 157,788 | $6.44 |
Nebraska
- See also: Nebraska signature requirements and Nebraska 2014 ballot measures
Table 2J: Nebraska CPRS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ballot measure | Subject | Signature collection company | Cost | Signatures required | CPRS |
Minimum Wage Increase | Min Wage | FieldWorks, LLC | $360,955[25] | 80,386 | $4.49 |
TOTAL: | $360,955 | 80,386 | $4.49 |
Disclaimer:
- Nebraska bans paying circulators by the signature. The law was challenged in 2011 in Bernbeck v. Gale, but the ban was not overturned. This report does not imply that payment per signature occurred or that the CPRS is the amount paid to signature gatherers. See: Laws governing the initiative process in Nebraska.
Nevada
- See also: Nevada signature requirements and Nevada 2014 ballot measures
Table 2K: Nevada CPRS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ballot measure | Subject | Signature collection company | Cost | Signatures required | CPRS |
Question 3 | Taxes | Organized Karma | $43,000-$644,961[26] | 72,324 | $0.59-$8.92 |
TOTAL: | $43,000-$644,961 | 72,324 | $0.59-$8.92 |
Disclaimer:
- Question 3's The Education Initiative PAC hired Organized Karma to collect signatures. While Organized Karma received $644,961 from the PAC, only $43,000 was used explicitly for "temporary workers." Organized Karma offers a variety of campaign and political consulting services, including canvassing. Because the services are so varied and in-kind reporting descriptions were not specific to signature gathering efforts the final figure could be anywhere between $43,000 and $644,961. The CPRS could be between $0.59 and $8.92.[26]
North Dakota
Table 2L: North Dakota CPRS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ballot measure | Subject | Signature collection company | Cost | Signatures required | CPRS |
Parental Rights Initiative | Custody | --[27] | 13,452 | -- | |
Pharmacy Ownership Initiative | Business | --[28] | 13,452 | -- | |
School Year Begins After Labor Day Initiative | Education | --[29] | 13,452 | -- | |
Clean Water, Wildlife and Parks Amendment | Environment | --[30] | 26,904 | ||
TOTAL: | $0 | 67,260 | $0 |
Disclaimer:
- The North Dakota Parental Rights Initiative's initiated measure committee, North Dakota Shared Parenting Initiative, did not report any expenditures related to signature gathering.[27]
- The North Dakota Pharmacy Ownership Initiative's initiated measure committee, Committee to Qualify the Lower Pharmacy Prices Initiative, did not report any expenditures related to signature gathering.[28]
- The School Year Begins After Labor Day Initiative's initiated measure committee, Start ND School After Labor Day, reported $2,250 in expenditures. However, the campaign finance disclosure forms are not detailed enough to distinguish what expenditures, if any, were signature collection costs.[29]
- The North Dakota Clean Water, Wildlife and Parks Amendment's initiated measure committee, Clean Water, Wildlife, and Parks Sponsoring Committee, did not report any expenditures related to signature gathering.[30]
- North Dakota does not permit paying circulators by the signature. This report does not imply that payment per signature occurred or that the CPRS is the amount paid to signature gatherers. See: Laws governing the initiative process in North Dakota.
Oregon
- See also: Oregon signature requirements and Oregon 2014 ballot measures
Table 2M: Oregon CPRS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ballot measure | Subject | Signature collection company | Cost | Signatures required | CPRS |
Measure 88 | Immigration | The Signature Gathering Co. of Oregon | $123,646[31][32] | 58,142 | $2.13 |
Measure 89 | Constitutional Rights | Encore Political Services, NW Democracy Resources, Boly:Welch and The Signature Gathering Co. of Oregon | $515,853[33] | 116,284 | $4.44 |
Measure 90 | Elections | Silver Bullet, LLC | $459,961[34] | 87,213 | $5.27 |
Measure 91 | Marijuana | NW Democracy Resources | $713,864[35] | 87,213 | $8.19 |
Measure 92 | Business | FieldWorks, LLC | $729,220[36] | 87,213 | $8.36 |
TOTAL: | $2,542,544 | 436,065 | $5.83 |
Disclaimer:
- Oregon bans paying petition circulators by the signature. This report does not imply that payment per signature occurred or that the CPRS is the amount paid to signature gatherers. See: Laws governing the initiative process in Oregon.
South Dakota
Table 2N: South Dakota CPRS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ballot measure | Subject | Signature collection company | Cost | Signatures required | CPRS |
Initiated Measure 17 | Insurance | --[37] | 15,854 | -- | |
Initiated Measure 18 | Min Wage | --[38] | 15,854 | -- | |
TOTAL: | $0 | 31,708 | $0 |
Disclaimer:
- Initiative Measure 17's ballot measure committee, Patient Choice for South Dakota, paid $225,534 for consulting in 2013. South Dakota campaign finance disclosure forms are not detailed enough to distinguish what, if any, of this was spent on petition circulation.[37]
- Initiated Measure 18's ballot measure committee, Raise South Dakota, did not report any expenditures.[38]
- South Dakota does not permit paying circulators by the signature. However, state law explicitly permits employers to set minimum gathering requirements and pay discretionary bonuses based on productivity. This report does not imply that payment per signature occurred or that the CPRS is the amount paid to signature gatherers. See: Laws governing the initiative process in South Dakota.
Washington
Table 2O: Washington CPRS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ballot measure | Subject | Signature collection company | Cost | Signatures required | CPRS |
Initiative 591 | Firearms | Citizens Solutions LLC and Democracy Workshop | $625,937[39] | 246,372 | $2.54 |
Initiative 594 | Firearms | PCI Consultants, Inc. | $686,252[40] | 246,372 | $2.79 |
Initiative 1351 | Education | PCI Consultants, Inc. | $58,375[41] | 246,372 | $0.24 |
TOTAL: | $1,370,564 | 739,116 | $1.85 |
Most expensive breakdown
Editor's note: In light of complexities calculating Nevada Question 3's CPRS that state and measure were not included in the rankings below. Nevada might have had the lowest average, but because of uncertainties based on how the signature expenses were reported, we can only assign a range -- $0.59 - $8.92 -- in Nevada.[2]
By CPRS
Table 3A below indicates which individual initiative in each state spent the most per signature.
Table 3A: Most expensive initiative per state by CPRS | |||
---|---|---|---|
State | Most expensive | CPRS | Signature collection company |
Alaska | Ballot Measure 4 | $3.08 | - |
Arkansas | Issue 4 | $2.22 | National Ballot Access |
California | Proposition 48 | $5.22 | Arno Political Consultants and The Monaco Group |
Colorado | Proposition 104 | $2.94 | Kennedy Enterprise LLC |
Florida | Amendment 1 | $2.21 | PCI Consultants, Inc. |
Maine | Question 1 | $1.36 | PCI Consultants, Inc. |
Massachusetts | Question 3 | $2.38 | Spoonworks, Inc. and Madison Group, Inc. |
Michigan | Proposal 2 | $2.81 | PCI Consultants, Inc. |
Missouri | Amendment 3 | $6.44 | National Petition Management and Ozark Strategic Solutions |
Nebraska | Initiative 425 | $4.49 | FieldWorks, LLC |
North Dakota | |||
Oregon | Measure 92 | $8.36 | FieldWorks, LLC |
South Dakota | |||
Washington | Initiative 594 | $2.79 | PCI Consultants, Inc. |
By total cost
Table 3B below presents the most expensive initiative by total amount spent on a petition drive by state.
Table 3B: Most expensive initiative per state by total cost | |||
---|---|---|---|
State | Most expensive | Amount | Signature collection company |
Alaska | Ballot Measure 4 | $93,000 | -- |
Arkansas | Issue 4 | $173,553 | National Ballot Access |
California | Proposition 48 | $2,636,173 | Arno Political Consultants and The Monaco Group |
Colorado | Proposition 104 | $253,564 | Kennedy Enterprise LLC |
Florida | Amendment 1 | $1,507,968 | PCI Consultants, Inc. |
Maine | Question 1 | $77,720 | PCI Consultants, Inc. |
Massachusetts | Question 3 | $191,712 | Spoonworks, Inc. and Madison Group, Inc. |
Michigan | Proposal 2 | $452,539 | PCI Consultants, Inc. |
Missouri | Amendment 3 | $1,015,592 | National Petition Management and Ozark Strategic Solutions |
Nebraska | Initiative 425 | $360,955 | FieldWorks, LLC |
North Dakota | |||
Oregon | Measure 92 | $729,220 | FieldWorks, LLC |
South Dakota | |||
Washington | Initiative 594 | $686,252 | PCI Consultants, Inc. |
Cost per signature rankings
Table 4 below presents a ranking of initiatives, from highest to lowest, by the cost-per-required-signatures. Initiatives that did not hire petition drive companies were not included in this chart.
QUICK STATISTICS:
- Of the top ten highest initiative CPRS', Oregon had four, California had four, Missouri had one and Nebraska had one.
- Oregon Measure 92, also known as the Mandatory Labeling of GMOs Initiative, had the highest CPRS in 2014.
- Washington Initiative 1351, also known as the Class Size Reduction Measure, had the lowest CPRS in 2014.
Editor's note: In light of complexities calculating Nevada Question 3's CPRS that state and measure were not included in the rankings below. Nevada might have had the lowest average, but because of uncertainties based on how the signature expenses were reported, we can only assign a range -- $0.59 - $8.92 -- in Nevada.[2]
Table 4: Initiatives ranked by CPRS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rank | CPRS | State | Measure | Topic | Signature collection company |
1 | $8.36 | Oregon | Measure 92 | Business | FieldWorks, LLC |
2 | $8.19 | Oregon | Measure 91 | Marijuana | NW Democracy Resources |
3 | $6.44 | Missouri | Amendment 3 | Labor | National Petition Management and Ozark Strategic Solutions |
4 | $5.27 | Oregon | Measure 90 | Elections | Silver Bullet, LLC |
5 | $5.22 | California | Proposition 48 | Gambling | Arno Political Consultants and The Monaco Group |
6 | $4.49 | Nebraska | Initiative 425 | Min Wage | FieldWorks, LLC |
7 | $4.44 | Oregon | Measure 89 | Constitutional Rights | Encore Political Services, NW Democracy Resources, Boly:Welch and The Signature Gathering Co. of Oregon |
8 | $3.66 | California | Proposition 47 | Trials | PCI Consultants, Inc. |
9 | $3.43 | California | Proposition 45 | Insurance | Kimball Petition Management |
10 | $3.35 | California | Proposition 46 | Healthcare | Kimball Petition Management |
11 | $2.94 | Colorado | Proposition 104 | Gov't Acc | Kennedy Enterprise LLC |
12 | $2.81 | Michigan | Proposal 2 | Hunting | PCI Consultants, Inc. |
13 | $2.79 | Washington | Initiative 594 | Firearms | PCI Consultants, Inc. |
14 | $2.54 | Washington | Initiative 591 | Firearms | Citizens Solutions LLC and Democracy Workshop |
15 | $2.38 | Massachusetts | Question 3 | Gambling | Spoonworks, Inc. and Madison Group, Inc. |
16 | $2.26 | Michigan | Proposal 1 | Hunting | PCI Consultants, Inc. |
17 | $2.22 | Arkansas | Issue 4 | Alcohol | National Ballot Access |
18 | $2.21 | Florida | Amendment 1 | Environment | PCI Consultants, Inc. |
19 | $2.13 | Oregon | Measure 88 | Immigration | The Signature Gathering Co. of Oregon |
20 | $1.80 | Massachusetts | Question 2 | Environment | Spoonworks, Inc. |
21 | $1.54 | Colorado | Amendment 68 | Gambling | PCI Consultants, Inc. |
22 | $1.36 | Maine | Question 1 | Hunting | PCI Consultants, Inc. |
23 | $0.76 | Florida | Amendment 2 | Marijuana | National Voter Outreach |
24 | $0.24 | Washington | Initiative 1351 | Education | PCI Consultants, Inc. |
Signature collection company breakdown
Table 5 below presents a breakdown of the main signature collection companies used by all initiatives in 2014.
QUICK STATISTICS:
- PCI Consultants, Inc. was hired for the most petition drives and in the most number of states.
- The signature collection company with the highest average CPRS was National Petition Management.
- The signature collection company with the lowest average CPRS was Organized Karma.
Editor's note: In light of complexities calculating Nevada Question 3's CPRS that state and measure were not included in the rankings below. Nevada might have had the lowest average, but because of uncertainties based on how the signature expenses were reported, we can only assign a range -- $0.59 - $8.92 -- in Nevada.[2]
Table 5: CPRS breakdown by petition management company | |||
---|---|---|---|
Signature collection company | # of petition drives managed | Average CPRS | States involved |
PCI Consultants, Inc. | 8 | $2.11 | California, Colorado, Florida, Maine, Michigan, Washington |
FieldWorks, LLC | 2 | $6.43 | Nebraska, Oregon |
Kimball Petition Management | 2 | $3.39 | California |
The Signature Gathering Co. of Oregon | 2 | $3.29 | Oregon |
Spoonworks, Inc. | 2 | $2.09 | Massachusetts |
NW Democracy Resources | 2 | $6.32 | Oregon |
Arno Political Consultants | 1 | $5.22 | California |
Boly:Welch | 1 | $4.44 | Oregon |
Citizens Solutions LLC | 1 | $2.54 | Washington |
Democracy Workshop | 1 | $2.54 | Washington |
Encore Political Services | 1 | $4.44 | Oregon |
Kennedy Enterprises LLC | 1 | $2.94 | Colorado |
Madison Group, Inc. | 1 | $2.38 | Massachusetts |
The Monaco Group | 1 | $5.22 | California |
National Ballot Access | 1 | $2.22 | Arkansas |
National Petition Management | 1 | $6.44 | Missouri |
National Voter Outreach | 1 | $0.76 | Florida |
Ozark Strategic Solutions | 1 | $6.44 | Missouri |
Silver Bullet, LLC | 1 | $5.27 | Oregon |
Category breakdowns
Table 6 below presents a breakdown of initiatives by political issue. Only political issue categories where initiative campaigns paid for signature collection were included in this table.
QUICK STATISTICS:
- The most common issues were business regulation and minimum wage.
- Issues related to labor had the highest average CPRS in 2014. The CPRS was $6.44.
- Issues related to education had the lowest average CPRS in 2014 at $0.24.
Table 6: CPRS breakdown by topic | ||
---|---|---|
Political topic | Number of initiatives relating to topic | Average CPRS |
Business | 4 | $4.14 |
Min Wage | 4 | $2.20 |
Environment | 3 | $2.01 |
Gambling | 3 | $3.05 |
Hunting | 3 | $2.14 |
Marijuana | 3 | $2.98 |
Taxes | 3 | $1.03 |
Education | 2 | $0.24 |
Firearms | 2 | $2.67 |
Insurance | 2 | $3.43 |
Labor | 2 | $6.44 |
Alcohol | 1 | $2.22 |
Constitutional Rights | 1 | $4.44 |
Elections | 1 | $5.27 |
Gov't Acc | 1 | $2.94 |
Healthcare | 1 | $3.35 |
Immigration | 1 | $2.13 |
Trials | 1 | $3.66 |
Methodology
This analysis uses the following general methodology:
- All data are compiled from data made available through each state's respective campaign finance website.
- Individual initiative data are obtained from available reports from the main committee believed to have been in charge of the petition effort.
- All costs that could be directly related to petitions, including petition gathering and petition printing, were accumulated. When a petition company is used, the company is listed even though all costs may not be directly associated.
- All averages are calculated using only available data. When an initiative did not have available data, it was excluded from such calculations.
- All averages are averages of totals, not averages of averages.
See also
Ballot measures
CPRS
- 2013 ballot measure petition signature costs
- 2012 ballot measure petition signature costs
- 2010 ballot measure petition signature costs
Footnotes
- ↑ Note that when the average cost per signature is as low as 24 cents, the explanation is generally that volunteers collected signatures, thus reducing the overall cost of the signatures. Paid petition-signature collectors generally charge a minimum of $1.00 or more per signature, depending on a number of circumstances. The company they work for usually also charges additional fees to the political group sponsoring the initiative, leading to overall CPRS figures that are closer to an average range of $4.00 per signature, according to reports in recent years.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Question 3's The Education Initiative PAC hired Organized Karma to collect signatures. While Organized Karma received $644,961 from the PAC, only $43,000 was used explicitly for "temporary workers." Organized Karma offers a variety of campaign and political consulting services, including canvassing. Because the services are so varied and in-kind reporting descriptions were not specific to signature gathering efforts the final figure could be anywhere between $43,000 and $644,961. The CPRS could be between $0.59 and $8.92.
- ↑ The average displayed here represents the CPRS totals for all states divided by 15 states. If states with $0 CPRS are removed (3 states), the average is $2.84.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Alaska Department of Administration, "Campaign Disclosure Forms," accessed September 3, 2014
- ↑ Arkansas Ethics Commission, "Let Arkansas Decide," accessed September 3, 2014
- ↑ Arkansas Ethics Commission, "Give Arkansas a Raise," accessed October 1, 2014
- ↑ California Secretary of State, "Consumer Watchdog Campaign - Yes on 45, A Coalition of Consumer Advocates, Attorneys, Policyholders, and Nurses," accessed September 3, 2014
- ↑ California Secretary of State, "Yes on Prop. 46, Your Neighbors for Patient Safety," accessed September 3, 2014
- ↑ California Secretary of State, "Yes on Prop. 47, Californians for Safe Neighborhoods and Schools," accessed September 3, 2014
- ↑ California Secretary of State, "No On Prop. 48 - Keep Vegas-Style Casinos Out Of Neighborhoods, A Project Of Stand Up For California," accessed September 3, 2014
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Colorado Secretary of State, "TRACER Committee Information: A Voice for Brady," accessed September 3, 2014
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 Colorado Secretary of State, "TRACER Committee Information: Coloradans for Better Schools, Inc.," accessed September 3, 2014
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 Colorado Secretary of State, "TRACER Committee Information: Sunshine on Government," accessed September 3, 2014
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 Colorado Secretary of State, "TRACER Committee Information: Right to Know Colorado GMO," accessed September 3, 2014
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 Florida Division of Elections, "Campaign Finance Database - Expenditures Records," accessed September 3, 2014
- ↑ Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics & Election Practices, "Mainers for Fair Bear Hunting Committee Information," accessed August 29, 2014
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 Massachusetts Office of Campaign & Political Finance, "Committee to Tank the Automatic Gas Tax Hikes Reports," accessed September 15, 2014
- ↑ Massachusetts Office of Campaign & Political Finance, "Coalition for an Updated Bottle Bill Reports," accessed September 15, 2014
- ↑ 19.0 19.1 Massachusetts Office of Campaign & Political Finance, "Repeal the Casino Deal Committee Reports," accessed September 15, 2014
- ↑ 20.0 20.1 Massachusetts Office of Campaign & Political Finance, "Raise Up Massachusetts Reports," accessed September 15, 2014
- ↑ 21.0 21.1 Michigan Secretary of State, "Keep Michigan Wolves Protected Committee Statement," accessed September 4, 2014
- ↑ Missouri Ethics Commission, “Teachgreat.org January 2014 Quarterly Report," accessed September 4, 2014
- ↑ Missouri Ethics Commission, "Teachgreat.org April 2014 Quarterly Report," accessed September 4, 2014
- ↑ Missouri Ethics Commission, "Teachgreat.org Amended July 2014 Quarterly Report," accessed September 4, 2014
- ↑ Nebraska Accountability and Disclosure Commission, "Nebraskans for Better Wages Campaign Statements," accessed September 4, 2014
- ↑ 26.0 26.1 Nevada Secretary of State, "The Education Initiative PAC Campaign Reporting," accessed September 4, 2014
- ↑ 27.0 27.1 North Dakota Secretary of State, "North Dakota Shared Parenting Initiative Campaign Finance," accessed September 4, 2014
- ↑ 28.0 28.1 North Dakota Secretary of State, "Committee to Qualify the Lower Pharmacy Prices Initiative," accessed September 4, 2014
- ↑ 29.0 29.1 North Dakota Secretary of State, "Start ND School After Labor Day," accessed September 8, 2014
- ↑ 30.0 30.1 North Dakota Secretary of State, "Clean Water, Wildlife, and Parks Sponsoring Committee," accessed September 8, 2014
- ↑ Oregon Secretary of State, "Oregonians for Immigration Reform Political Action Committee Expenditures," accessed September 4, 2014
- ↑ Oregon Secretary of State, "Protect Oregon Driver Licenses," accessed September 8, 2014
- ↑ Oregon Secretary of State, "Vote Equal Rights Amendment for Women Committee Expenditures," accessed September 4, 2014
- ↑ Oregon Secretary of State, "Every Oregon Voter Counts Expenditures," accessed September 4, 2014
- ↑ Oregon Secretary of State, "New Approach Oregon Expenditures," accessed September 4, 2014
- ↑ Oregon Secretary of State, "Oregon GMO Right to Know Expenditures," accessed September 4, 2014
- ↑ 37.0 37.1 North Dakota Secretary of State, "Patient Choice for South Dakota Campaign Reports," accessed September 4, 2014
- ↑ 38.0 38.1 South Dakota Secretary of State, "Raise South Dakota Campaign Reports," accessed September 4, 2014
- ↑ Washington Public Disclosure Commission, "Protect Our Gun Rights Expenditures," accessed August 29, 2014
- ↑ Washington Public Disclosure Commission, "WA Alliance for Gun Responsibility Expenditures," accessed August 29, 2014
- ↑ Washington Public Disclosure Commission, "Class Size Counts Expenditures," accessed September 4, 2014