lynx   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Congressional Budget Resolutions: Historical Information

The Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (Titles I-IX of P.L. 93-344, as amended; 2 U.S.C. 601-688) provides for the annual adoption of a concurrent resolution on the budget each year. The congressional budget resolution represents a budget plan for the upcoming fiscal year and at least the following four fiscal years. As a concurrent resolution, it is not presented to the President for his signature and thus does not become law. Instead, when adopted by Congress, the budget resolution serves as an agreement between the House and Senate on a congressional budget plan. As such, it provides the framework for subsequent legislative action on budget matters during each congressional session.

In 32 of the 41 years under the Budget Act, Congress adopted at least one budget resolution for the fiscal year beginning in such year. Congress did not complete action on a budget resolution for nine fiscal years, most recently for FY2015. A second budget resolution for a fiscal year was adopted in each of the first seven years, and a third budget resolution was adopted in one year (for FY1977). Since 1982, Congress has considered only one budget resolution for each fiscal year. Congress initially was required to cover only the upcoming fiscal year in the budget resolution, but over the years Congress has expanded this time frame. Currently, the budget resolution must include at least five fiscal years.

The budget resolution may include budget reconciliation directives instructing one or more committees to recommend legislative changes to meet the direct spending and revenue levels included in the budget resolution. In the past 41 years, Congress included budget reconciliation directives in 22 budget resolutions. Such directives have resulted in 24 budget reconciliation measures and the enactment of 20 of them. (Four budget reconciliation measures have been vetoed.)

The House has considered and adopted fewer amendments to the budget resolution than the Senate. For the last three decades, the House has considered the budget resolutions under special rules that generally have made in order only amendments in the nature of a substitute. Since 1983, the House typically has considered between three and seven such amendments to the budget resolution each year, rejecting all but two of these. In contrast, during the period between 1975 and 2015, the Senate considered an average of almost 54 amendments per budget resolution, agreeing to an average of about 31 of these.

The Budget Act sets April 15 as a target date for completing action on the annual budget resolution. (Prior to 1986, the date was May 15.) During the past 41 years, when Congress has completed action on a budget resolution, Congress adopted the budget resolution by the target date only six times, most recently in 2003 with the FY2004 budget resolution. Budget resolutions have been adopted an average of almost 36 days after the target date.

This report will be updated as warranted.

Congressional Budget Resolutions: Historical Information

November 16, 2015 (RL30297)
Jump to Main Text of Report

Contents

Tables

Summary

The Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (Titles I-IX of P.L. 93-344, as amended; 2 U.S.C. 601-688) provides for the annual adoption of a concurrent resolution on the budget each year. The congressional budget resolution represents a budget plan for the upcoming fiscal year and at least the following four fiscal years. As a concurrent resolution, it is not presented to the President for his signature and thus does not become law. Instead, when adopted by Congress, the budget resolution serves as an agreement between the House and Senate on a congressional budget plan. As such, it provides the framework for subsequent legislative action on budget matters during each congressional session.

In 32 of the 41 years under the Budget Act, Congress adopted at least one budget resolution for the fiscal year beginning in such year. Congress did not complete action on a budget resolution for nine fiscal years, most recently for FY2015. A second budget resolution for a fiscal year was adopted in each of the first seven years, and a third budget resolution was adopted in one year (for FY1977). Since 1982, Congress has considered only one budget resolution for each fiscal year. Congress initially was required to cover only the upcoming fiscal year in the budget resolution, but over the years Congress has expanded this time frame. Currently, the budget resolution must include at least five fiscal years.

The budget resolution may include budget reconciliation directives instructing one or more committees to recommend legislative changes to meet the direct spending and revenue levels included in the budget resolution. In the past 41 years, Congress included budget reconciliation directives in 22 budget resolutions. Such directives have resulted in 24 budget reconciliation measures and the enactment of 20 of them. (Four budget reconciliation measures have been vetoed.)

The House has considered and adopted fewer amendments to the budget resolution than the Senate. For the last three decades, the House has considered the budget resolutions under special rules that generally have made in order only amendments in the nature of a substitute. Since 1983, the House typically has considered between three and seven such amendments to the budget resolution each year, rejecting all but two of these. In contrast, during the period between 1975 and 2015, the Senate considered an average of almost 54 amendments per budget resolution, agreeing to an average of about 31 of these.

The Budget Act sets April 15 as a target date for completing action on the annual budget resolution. (Prior to 1986, the date was May 15.) During the past 41 years, when Congress has completed action on a budget resolution, Congress adopted the budget resolution by the target date only six times, most recently in 2003 with the FY2004 budget resolution. Budget resolutions have been adopted an average of almost 36 days after the target date.

This report will be updated as warranted.


Congressional Budget Resolutions: Historical Information

Introduction

The Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (Titles I-IX of P.L. 93-344, as amended; 2 U.S.C. 601-688; hereafter referred to as the "Budget Act") provides for the annual adoption of a concurrent resolution on the budget each year. The congressional budget resolution represents a budget plan for the upcoming fiscal year and at least the following four fiscal years. As a concurrent resolution, it is not presented to the President for his signature and thus does not become law. Instead, when adopted by Congress, the budget resolution serves as an agreement between the House and Senate on a congressional budget plan. As such, it provides the framework for subsequent legislative action on the annual appropriations bills, revenue measures, reconciliation legislation, and any other budgetary legislation. While the programmatic assumptions (i.e., the specific mix of revenue and spending policies that are assumed within the budget levels) are not binding, the totals and committee spending allocations may be enforced through points of order and through the budget reconciliation process (explained below).

This report provides current and historical information on the budget resolution. It provides a list of the budget resolutions adopted and rejected by Congress since implementation of the Budget Act, including the U.S. Statutes-at-Large citations and committee report numbers, and describes their formulation and content. The report provides a table of selected optional components, a list of the budget reconciliation measures developed pursuant to directives contained in budget resolutions, and information on the number of years covered by budget resolutions. It also provides information on the consideration and adoption of budget resolutions, including an identification of the House special rules that provided for consideration of budget resolutions, the amendments in the nature of a substitute to the budget resolution considered in the House, the number and disposition of House and Senate amendments to budget resolutions, and dates of House and Senate action on budget resolutions.

Congress has modified the congressional budget process several times since it was first established in 1974. The Appendix identifies laws, budget resolutions, and other resolutions that modified the procedures and requirements pertaining to the development, content, and consideration of the budget resolution.

As originally enacted, the Budget Act provided for the annual adoption of two budget resolutions for each year.1 The first budget resolution, adopted in the spring, set nonbinding "targets" to guide the consideration of budgetary legislation. The second budget resolution, adopted in the fall (about two weeks before the beginning of the fiscal year), was intended to provide Congress, after considering and possibly completing action on specific budgetary legislation, the opportunity to either reaffirm or revise the budget levels in the first budget resolution. Additional budget resolutions, or revisions to the previous one, could be (and still can be) adopted at any time.

The Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Title II of P.L. 99-177, 99 Stat. 1038-1101; hereafter referred to as the "Deficit Control Act") eliminated the requirement for a second budget resolution beginning in 1986 (for the FY1987 budget resolution). For several preceding years, for FY1983-FY1986, Congress did not adopt a second budget resolution but instead included a provision in the first budget resolution that made the spending and revenue totals in it binding automatically as of the beginning of the fiscal year.

During the 41 years under the Budget Act (1975 to the present), Congress has completed action on 40 budget resolutions, including in some years multiple budget resolutions for a single fiscal year. In 32 of the 41 years, Congress adopted at least one budget resolution for the fiscal year.2 Congress did not complete action on a budget resolution for nine fiscal years, most recently for FY2015.3 Congress also adopted a second budget resolution in seven of the 41 years.4 In 1977, Congress adopted a third budget resolution for FY1977, further revising the budget levels that fiscal year.

Table 1 lists all budget resolutions adopted by Congress, with the House and Senate votes on initial passage and adoption of the conference report. It also includes, in italics, budget resolutions reported or considered in one chamber but not the other for those fiscal years that Congress did not complete action on a budget resolution. The U.S. Statutes-at-Large citations for budget resolutions adopted by Congress are listed in Table 2. (Although concurrent resolutions such as budget resolutions have no statutory authority, they are compiled in a special section of the U.S. Statutes-at-Large.) Table 3 lists the budget resolutions rejected in the House. No budget resolutions have been rejected in the Senate; however, the Senate rejected several motions to proceed to different budget resolutions in 2011 and 2012.

Table 1. Congressional Budget Resolutions

Congress

Fiscal Year

Budget Resolution
(Companion Measure)
a

Typea

Initial Passage

Conference Report

 

 

 

 

House Vote

Senate Vote

House Vote

Senate Vote

94th

1976

H.Con.Res. 218 (S.Con.Res. 32)

first

200-196

69-22

230-193

voice

 

 

H.Con.Res. 466 (S.Con.Res. 76)

second

225-191

69-23

189-187

74-19

 

1977

S.Con.Res. 109 (H.Con.Res. 611)

first

221-155

62-22

224-170

65-29

 

 

S.Con.Res. 139 (H.Con.Res. 728)

second

227-151

55-23

234-143

66-20

95th

 

S.Con.Res. 10 (H.Con.Res. 110)

third

239-169

72-20

226-173

voice

 

1978

S.Con.Res. 19 (H.Con.Res. 214)

first

213-179

56-31

221-177

54-23

 

 

H.Con.Res. 341 (S.Con.Res. 43)

second

199-188

63-21

215-187

68-21

 

1979

S.Con.Res. 80 (H.Con.Res. 559)

first

201-197

64-27

201-198

voice

 

 

H.Con.Res. 683 (S.Con.Res. 104)

second

217-178

56-18

225-162

47-7

96th

1980

H.Con.Res. 107 (S.Con.Res. 22)

first

220-184

64-20

202-196

72-17

 

 

S.Con.Res. 53 (H.Con.Res. 186)b

second

206-186

57-20

 

1981

H.Con.Res. 307 (S.Con.Res. 86)

first

225-193c
241-174

68-28

205-195

61-26

 

 

H.Con.Res. 448 (S.Con.Res. 119)

second

203-191

48-46

voice

50-38

97th

1982

H.Con.Res. 115 (S.Con.Res. 19)

first

270-154

78-20

244-155

76-20

 

 

S.Con.Res. 50 (H.Con.Res. 230)d

second

206-200

49-48

 

1983

S.Con.Res. 92 (H.Con.Res. 352)

219-206

49-43

210-208

51-45

98th

1984

H.Con.Res. 91 (S.Con.Res. 27)

229-196

50-49

239-186

51-43

 

1985

H.Con.Res. 280 (S.Con.Res. 106)

250-168

41-34

232-162

voice

99th

1986

S.Con.Res. 32 (H.Con.Res. 152)

258-170

voice

309-119

67-32

 

1987

S.Con.Res. 120 (H.Con.Res. 337)

245-179

70-25

333-43

voice

100th

1988

H.Con.Res. 93 (S.Con.Res. 49)

voice

56-42

215-201

53-46

 

1989

H.Con.Res. 268 (S.Con.Res. 113)

319-102

69-26

201-181

58-29

101st

1990

H.Con.Res. 106 (S.Con.Res. 30)

263-157

68-31

241-185

63-37

 

1991

H.Con.Res. 310 (S.Con.Res. 110)

218-208

voice

250-164

66-33

102nd

1992

H.Con.Res. 121 (S.Con.Res. 29)

261-163

voice

239-181

57-41

 

1993

H.Con.Res. 287 (S.Con.Res. 106)

215-201e
224-191

voice

209-207

52-41

103rd

1994

H.Con.Res. 64 (S.Con.Res. 18)

243-183

54-45

240-184

55-45

 

1995

H.Con.Res. 218 (S.Con.Res. 63)

223-175

57-40

220-183

53-46

104th

1996

H.Con.Res. 67 (S.Con.Res. 13)

238-193

57-42

239-194

54-46

 

1997

H.Con.Res. 178 (S.Con.Res. 57)

226-195

53-46

216-211

53-46

105th

1998

H.Con.Res. 84 (S.Con.Res. 27)

333-99

78-22

327-97

76-22

 

1999f

H.Con.Res. 284 (S.Con.Res. 86)

216-204

57-41

106th

2000

H.Con.Res. 68 (S.Con.Res. 20)

221-208

55-44

220-208

54-44

 

2001

H.Con.Res. 290 (S.Con.Res. 101)

211-207

51-45

220-208

50-48

107th

2002

H.Con.Res. 83 (no companion measure)g

222-205

63-35

221-207

53-47

 

2003h

H.Con.Res. 353 (S.Con.Res. 100)

221-209

108th

2004

H.Con.Res. 95 (S.Con.Res. 23)

215-212

56-44

216-211

51-50

 

2005i

S.Con.Res. 95 (H.Con.Res. 393)

215-212

51-45

216-213

109th

2006

H.Con.Res. 95 (S.Con.Res. 18)

218-214

51-49

214-211

52-47

 

2007j

H.Con.Res. 376 (S.Con.Res. 83)

218-210

51-49

110th

2008

S.Con.Res. 21 (H.Con.Res. 99)

216-210

52-47

214-209

52-40

 

2009

S.Con.Res. 70 (H.Con.Res. 312)

212-207

51-44

214-210

48-45

111th

2010

S.Con.Res. 13 (H.Con.Res. 85)

233-196

55-43

233-193

53-43

 

2011k

S.Con.Res. 60 (no companion measure)

112th

2012l

H.Con.Res. 34 (no companion measure)

235-193

 

2013m

H.Con.Res. 112 (no companion measure)

228-191

113th

2014n

S.Con.Res. 8 (H.Con.Res. 25)

221-207

50-49

 

2015o

H.Con.Res. 96 (no companion measure)

219-205

114th

2016

S.Con.Res. 11 (H.Con.Res. 27)

228-199

52-46

226-197

51-48

Source: Legislative Information System (LIS).

Notes: Congress did not complete action on the budget resolutions for the fiscal years in italics; for those years, the concurrent resolution listed was reported by the applicable budget committee and/or was considered by the applicable chamber.

a. For purposes of this table, "type" refers to whether the budget resolution was the first, second, or third for the fiscal year. Originally, the Budget Act provided for the annual adoption of two budget resolutions for a fiscal year and the option of additional budget resolutions. In 1985, the act was amended to eliminate the second budget resolution; the option of additional budget resolutions remains.

b. The House rejected its version of the budget resolution (see Table 3 of this report) and adopted the Senate's version of the budget resolution; no conference report was necessary.

c. The question was divided, with separate votes on Sections 1-5 and 7 and on Section 6 (revised FY1980 budget resolution).

d. The House laid its version of the budget resolution on the table by unanimous consent and adopted the Senate's version of the budget resolution; no conference report was necessary.

e. The question was divided, with separate votes on Sections 1, 2, and 4 and on Section 3 (revised the spending and revenue levels if certain legislation was not enacted into law before conferees on the budget resolution were appointed).

f. Congress did not complete action on the budget resolution for FY1999. In the absence of such budget resolution, the House agreed to H.Res. 477 on June 19, 1998, and H.Res. 5 on January 6, 1999, which provided that, among other things, the House-adopted FY1999 budget resolution (H.Con.Res. 284, 105th Congress) shall have "force and effect" as if it were adopted by Congress. Likewise, the Senate agreed to S.Res. 209 on April 2, 1998, and S.Res. 312 on October 21, 1998, which set forth budget levels enforceable as if they were included in a budget resolution agreed to by Congress.

g. The Senate Budget Committee did not mark up or report a budget resolution for FY2002. Instead, the Senate considered the House-passed budget resolution after the Senate Budget Committee was discharged from its consideration.

h. Congress did not complete action on the budget resolution for FY2003. In the absence of such budget resolution, the House agreed to H.Res. 428 on May 22, 2002, and H.Res. 5 on January 7, 2003, which provided that, among other things, the House-adopted FY2003 budget resolution (H.Con.Res. 353, 107th Congress) shall have "force and effect" as if it were adopted by Congress. The Senate did not take similar action in relation to the FY2003 budget resolution.

i. Congress did not complete action on the budget resolution for FY2005. As indicated, the House agreed to the conference report to S.Con.Res. 95 (H.Rept. 108-498), but the Senate never considered it. In the absence of Senate action, the House agreed to H.Res. 649 (108th Congress) on May 19, 2004, and H.Res. 5 (109th Congress) on January 4, 2005, which provided that, among other things, the conference report to S.Con.Res. 95 (H.Rept. 108-498) shall have "force and effect" as if it was adopted by Congress. As for the Senate, Section 14007 of the Defense Appropriations Act, 2005 (P.L. 108-287), enacted on August 5, 2004, established enforceable FY2005 spending allocations for the Senate Appropriations Committee.

j. Congress did not complete action on the budget resolution for FY2007. In the absence of such budget resolution, the House agreed to H.Res. 818, which provided that, among other things, the House-adopted FY2007 budget resolution (H.Con.Res. 376, 109th Congress) shall have "force and effect" as if it were adopted by Congress. As for the Senate, Section 7035 of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (P.L. 109-234), enacted on June 15, 2006, established enforceable FY2007 spending allocations for the Senate Appropriations Committee.

k. Congress did not complete action on the budget resolution for FY2011. In the absence of such budget resolution, the House agreed to a "budget enforcement resolution" (H.Res. 1493) on July 1, 2010, which provided through the end of the 111th Congress enforceable spending levels for FY2011, among other provisions. At the beginning of the 112th Congress, the House adopted a separate order in H.Res. 5 (Section 3(b)) that provided for the enforcement of budget levels submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the chair of the House Budget Committee (HBC); in addition, on January 25, 2011, the House adopted H.Res. 38, directing the HBC chair to submit such allocations that assume "non-security spending at fiscal year 2008 levels or less." The Senate did not take similar action in relation to the FY2011 budget resolution.

l. Congress did not complete action on the budget resolution for FY2012. In the absence of such budget resolution, the House agreed to H.Res. 287 (112th Congress) on June 1, 2012, which provided that, among other things, the House-adopted FY2012 budget resolution (H.Con.Res. 34) shall have "force and effect" as if it were adopted by Congress. As for the Senate, Section 106 of the Budget Control Act of 2011 (P.L. 112-25), enacted on August 2, 2011, provided for enforceable budget levels as an alternative to a FY2012 budget resolution.

m. Congress did not complete action on the budget resolution for FY2013. In the absence of such budget resolution, the House agreed to H.Res. 614 (112th Congress) on June 1, 2012 (amended by H.Res. 643 on May 8, 2012), and H.Res. 5 (113th Congress) on January 3, 2013, which provided that, among other things, the House-adopted FY2013 budget resolution (H.Con.Res. 112) shall have "force and effect" as if it were adopted by Congress. As for the Senate, Section 106 of the Budget Control Act of 2011 (P.L. 112-25), enacted on August 2, 2011, provided for enforceable budget levels as an alternative to a FY2013 budget resolution.

n. Congress did not complete action on the budget resolution for FY2014. In lieu of such budget resolution, Subtitle B, Title I, of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (BBA, Div. A of P.L. 113-67), enacted on December 26, 2013, provided for enforceable budget levels and other procedural provisions as an alternative to a FY2014 budget resolution. Prior to the enactment of the BBA, the House agreed to H.Res. 243 (113th Congress) on June 4, 2013, which provided that, among other things, the House-adopted FY2014 budget resolution (H.Con.Res. 25) shall have "force and effect" as if it were adopted by Congress. The Senate had not taken any similar action prior to the enactment of the BBA.

o. Congress did not complete action on the budget resolution for FY2015. In lieu of such budget resolution, Subtitle B, Title I, of the BBA of 2013 provided for enforceable budget levels and other procedural provisions as an alternative to a FY2015 budget resolution.

Table 2. U.S. Statutes-at-Large Citations of Budget Resolutions

Congress

Fiscal Year

Typea

Budget Resolution

U.S. Statutes-at-Large Citation

94th

1976

first
second

H.Con.Res. 218
H.Con.Res. 466

89 Stat. 1197-1198
89 Stat. 1209-1210

 

1977

first
second

S.Con.Res. 109
S.Con.Res. 139

90 Stat. 3029-3030
90 Stat. 3044-3045

95th

1977

third

S.Con.Res. 10

91 Stat. 1666-1667

 

1978

first
second

S.Con.Res. 19
H.Con.Res. 341

91 Stat. 1670-1673
91 Stat. 1683-1684

 

1979

first
second

S.Con.Res. 80
H.Con.Res. 683

92 Stat. 3870-3872
92 Stat. 3878-3879

96th

1980

first
second

H.Con.Res. 107
S.Con.Res. 53

93 Stat. 1413-1416
93 Stat. 1428-1433

 

1981

first
second

H.Con.Res. 307
H.Con.Res. 448

94 Stat. 3655-3668
94 Stat. 3680-3688

97th

1982

first
second

H.Con.Res. 115
S.Con.Res. 50

95 Stat. 1743-1759
95 Stat. 1778

 

1983

S.Con.Res. 92

96 Stat. 2647-2661

98th

1984

H.Con.Res. 91

97 Stat. 1501-1523

 

1985

H.Con.Res. 280

98 Stat. 3484-3498

99th

1986

S.Con.Res. 32

99 Stat. 1941-1959

 

1987

S.Con.Res. 120

100 Stat. 4354-4370

100th

1988

H.Con.Res. 93

101 Stat. 1986-2003

 

1989

H.Con.Res. 268

102 Stat. 4875-4886

101st

1990

H.Con.Res. 106

103 Stat. 2540-2554

 

1991

H.Con.Res. 310

104 Stat. 5163-5181

102nd

1992

H.Con.Res. 121

105 Stat. 2414-2433

 

1993

H.Con.Res. 287

106 Stat. 5165-5189

103rd

1994

H.Con.Res. 64

107 Stat. 2508-2538

 

1995

H.Con.Res. 218

108 Stat. 5075-5103

104th

1996

H.Con.Res. 67

109 Stat. 996-1030

 

1997

H.Con.Res. 178

110 Stat. 4434-4482

105th

1998

H.Con.Res. 84

111 Stat. 2710-2760

 

1999

106th

2000

H.Con.Res. 68

113 Stat. 1968-1999

 

2001

H.Con.Res. 290

114 Stat. 3139-3173

107th

2002

H.Con.Res. 83

115 Stat. 2486-2516

 

2003

108th

2004

H.Con.Res. 95

117 Stat. 2910-2942

 

2005

109th

2006

H.Con.Res. 95

119 Stat. 3633-3658

 

2007

110th

2008

S.Con.Res. 21

121 Stat. 2590-2633

 

2009

S.Con.Res. 70

122 Stat. 5143-5190

111th

2010

S.Con.Res. 13

123 Stat. 3506-3550

 

2011

112th

2012

 

2013

113th

2014

 

2015

114th

2016

S.Con.Res. 11

Not available

Source: U.S. Statutes-at-Large, various volumes.

Notes: Although concurrent resolutions such as budget resolutions have no statutory authority, they are compiled in a special section of the U.S. Statutes-at-Large. In this table, no U.S. Statutes-at-Large citation indicates that Congress did not complete action the budget resolution for that fiscal year.

a. For purposes of this table, "type" refers to whether the budget resolution was the first, second, or third for the fiscal year. Originally, the Budget Act provided for the annual adoption of two budget resolutions for a fiscal year and the option of additional budget resolutions. In 1985, the act was amended to eliminate the second budget resolution; the option of additional budget resolutions remains.

Table 3. Budget Resolutions Rejected in the House

Congress

Fiscal Year

Budget Resolution

Date

Vote

95th

1978

H.Con.Res. 195

04-27-1977

84-320

96th

1980

H.Con.Res. 186a

09-19-1979

192-213

97th

1983

H.Con.Res. 345

05-27-1982

159-265

99th

1987

H.Con.Res. 296

03-13-1986

12-312

101st

1991

H.Con.Res. 310
(conf. rept.)b

10-05-1990

179-254

104th

1996

H.Con.Res. 122

12-19-1995

0-412

Source: Legislative Information System (LIS).

Notes: All budget resolutions listed were first budget resolutions, except for FY1980, which was a second budget resolution. The Senate has not rejected a budget resolution; however, the Senate rejected several motions to proceed to different budget resolutions in 2011 and 2012.

a. The House subsequently adopted the Senate's version of the second budget resolution for FY1980 (S.Con.Res. 53).

b. After this conference report (H.Rept. 101-802) was rejected, another conference report to H.Con.Res. 310 (H.Rept. 101-820) was agreed to on October 8, 1990, by a vote of 250-164.

Development and Content of the Budget Resolution

Development of the Budget Resolution

Following the submission of the President's budget in January or February, Congress begins developing its budget resolution. The House and Senate Budget Committees are responsible for developing and reporting the budget resolution.

Within six weeks after the President's budget submission, each House and Senate committee is required to submit its "views and estimates" relating to budget matters under its jurisdiction to its Budget Committee (Section 301(d) of the Budget Act). These views and estimates, often submitted in the form of a letter to the chair and ranking Member of the Budget Committee, typically include comments on the President's budget proposals and estimates of the budgetary impact of any legislation likely to be considered during the current session of Congress. The Budget Committees are not bound by these recommendations. The views and estimates often are printed in the committee report accompanying the resolution in the Senate or compiled in a separate committee print in the House.

The budget resolution was designed to provide a framework to make budget decisions, leaving specific program determinations to the Appropriations Committees and other committees with spending and revenue jurisdiction. In many instances, however, particular program changes are considered when formulating the budget resolution. Program assumptions sometimes are referred to in the reports of the Budget Committees or may be discussed during floor action. Although these program changes are not binding, committees may be strongly influenced by these recommendations when formulating appropriations bills, reconciliation measures, or other budgetary legislation.

Table 4 provides a list of the House, Senate, and conference reports to first budget resolutions reported or considered in either chamber.

Table 4. Committee Reports to Budget Resolutions

Fiscal Year

Budget Resolution (Companion Measure)

House Report

Senate
Report/Print

Conference Report(s)

1976

H.Con.Res. 218
S.Con.Res. 32

H.Rept. 94-145

S.Rept. 94-77

H.Rept. 94-198
S.Rept. 94-113

1977

S.Con.Res. 109
(H.Con.Res. 611)

H.Rept. 94-1030

S.Rept. 94-731

H.Rept. 94-1108
S.Rept. 94-805

1978

S.Con.Res. 19
(H.Con.Res. 214)

H.Rept. 95-239

S.Rept. 95-90

H.Rept. 95-291
S.Rept. 95-134

1979

S.Con.Res. 80
(H.Con.Res. 559)

H.Rept. 95-1055

S.Rept. 95-739

H.Rept. 95-1173
S.Rept. 95-866

1980

H.Con.Res. 107
(S.Con.Res. 22)

H.Rept. 96-95

S.Rept. 96-68

H.Rept. 96-211
S.Rept. 96-192

1981

H.Con.Res. 307
(S.Con.Res. 86)

H.Rept. 96-857

S.Rept. 96-654

H.Rept. 96-1051
S.Rept. 96-792

1982

H.Con.Res. 115
(S.Con.Res. 19)

H.Rept. 97-23

S.Rept. 97-49

H.Rept. 97-46
S.Rept. 97-86

1983

S.Con.Res. 92
(H.Con.Res. 352)

H.Rept. 97-597

S.Rept. 97-385

H.Rept. 97-614
S.Rept. 97-478

1984

H.Con.Res. 91
(S.Con.Res. 27)

H.Rept. 98-41

S.Rept. 98-63

H.Rept. 98-248
S.Rept. 98-155

1985

H.Con.Res. 280
(S.Con.Res. 106)

[none]

S.Rept. 98-399

H.Rept. 98-1079

1986

S.Con.Res. 32
(H.Con.Res. 152)

H.Rept. 99-133

S.Rept. 99-15

H.Rept. 99-249

1987

S.Con.Res. 120
(H.Con.Res. 337)

H.Rept. 99-598

S.Rept. 99-264

H.Rept. 99-664

1988

H.Con.Res. 93
(S.Con.Res. 49)

[none]

[none]

H.Rept. 100-175
S.Rept. 100-76

1989

H.Con.Res. 268
(S.Con.Res. 113)

H.Rept. 100-523

S.Rept. 100-311

H.Rept. 100-658

1990

H.Con.Res. 106
(S.Con.Res. 30)

H.Rept. 101-42

S.Rept. 101-20

H.Rept. 101-50

1991

H.Con.Res. 310
(S.Con.Res. 110)

H.Rept. 101-455

[none]

H.Rept. 101-820

1992

H.Con.Res. 121
(S.Con.Res. 29)

H.Rept. 102-32

S.Rept. 102-40

H.Rept. 102-69

1993

H.Con.Res. 287
(S.Con.Res. 106)

H.Rept. 102-450

[none]

H.Rept. 102-529

1994

H.Con.Res. 64
(S.Con.Res. 18)

H.Rept. 103-31

S.Rept. 103-19

H.Rept. 103-48

1995

H.Con.Res. 218
(S.Con.Res. 63)

H.Rept. 103-428

S.Rept. 103-238

H.Rept. 103-490

1996

H.Con.Res. 67
(S.Con.Res. 13)

H.Rept. 104-120

S.Rept. 104-82

H.Rept. 104-159

1997

H.Con.Res. 178
(S.Con.Res. 57)

H.Rept. 104-575

S.Rept. 104-271

H.Rept. 104-612

1998

H.Con.Res. 84
(S.Con.Res. 27)

H.Rept. 105-100

[none]

H.Rept. 105-116

1999

H.Con.Res. 284
(S.Con.Res. 86)

H.Rept. 105-555

S.Rept. 105-170

2000

H.Con.Res. 68
(S.Con.Res. 20)

H.Rept. 106-73

S.Rept. 106-27

H.Rept. 106-91

2001

H.Con.Res. 290
(S.Con.Res. 101)

H.Rept. 106-530

S.Rept. 106-251

H.Rept. 106-577

2002

H.Con.Res. 83
(no companion measure)a

H.Rept. 107-26

[none]

H.Rept. 107-60

2003

H.Con.Res. 353
(S.Con.Res. 100)

H.Rept. 107-376

S.Rept. 107-141

2004

H.Con.Res. 95
(S.Con.Res. 23)

H.Rept. 108-37

S.Prt. 108-19

H.Rept. 108-71

2005

S.Con.Res. 95
(H.Con.Res. 393)

H.Rept. 108-441

S.Prt. 108-365

H.Rept. 108-498

2006

H.Con.Res. 95
(S.Con.Res. 18)

H.Rept. 109-17

S.Prt. 109-18

H.Rept. 109-62

2007

H.Con.Res. 376
(S.Con.Res. 83)

H.Rept. 109-402

S.Prt. 109-57

2008

S.Con.Res. 21
(H.Con.Res. 99)

H.Rept. 110-69

S.Prt. 110-19

H.Rept. 110-153

2009

S.Con.Res. 70
(H.Con.Res. 312)

H.Rept. 110-543

S.Prt. 110-39

H.Rept. 110-659

2010

S.Con.Res. 13
(H.Con.Res. 85)

H.Rept. 111-60

S.Prt. 111-16

H.Rept. 111-89

2011

S.Con.Res. 60
(no companion measure)

S.Prt. 111-45

2012

H.Con.Res. 34
(no companion measure)

H.Rept. 112-58

2013

H.Con.Res. 112
(no companion measure)

H.Rept. 112-421

2014

S.Con.Res. 8
(H.Con.Res. 25)

H.Rept. 113-17

S.Prt. 113-12

2015

H.Con.Res. 96
(no companion measure)

H.Rept. 113-403

2016

S.Con.Res. 11
(H.Con.Res. 27)

H.Rept. 114-47

S.Prt. 114-14

H.Rept. 114-96

Source: Legislative Information System (LIS).

Notes: This list includes first budget resolutions only. In this table, no conference report listed indicates that Congress did not complete action on the budget resolution for that fiscal year.

a. The Senate Budget Committee did not mark up or report a budget resolution for FY2002. Instead, after the Senate began consideration of the House-passed budget resolution, the SBC chair offered an amendment in the nature of a substitute.

Content of the Budget Resolution

Section 301(a) of the Budget Act requires that the budget resolution include the following matters for the upcoming fiscal year and at least the ensuing four fiscal years:

  • Aggregate levels of new budget authority, outlays, the budget surplus or deficit, and the public debt;
  • Aggregate levels of federal revenues and the amount, if any, by which the aggregate levels of federal revenues should be increased or decreased by legislative action;
  • Amounts of new budget authority and outlays for each of the major functional categories; and
  • For purposes of Senate enforcement procedures, Social Security outlays and revenues (although these amounts are not included in the budget surplus or deficit totals due to their off-budget status).

Originally, the Budget Act mandated that budget resolutions cover only the upcoming fiscal year beginning on October 1 (referred to as the budget year). A desire to use the budget resolution as a tool for budget planning and other factors prompted Congress to expand this time frame to include the upcoming fiscal year as well as the two ensuing fiscal years. Congress used the authority provided by the elastic clause of the Budget Act to adopt three-year budget resolutions for the period covering the second budget resolution for FY1980 through the FY1986 budget resolution. The practice of including three fiscal years was formalized by the 1985 Deficit Control Act.

The Budget Enforcement Act (BEA) of 1990 (Title XIII of P.L. 101-508, Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, 104 Stat. 1388-573-1388 through 630) temporarily extended to five fiscal years the period the budget resolution is required to cover. The 1990 BEA provision originally covered five-year periods beginning in FY1991 and continuing through FY1995; this provision was extended to cover the FY1996 through FY1998 budget resolutions in 1993 (Title XIV of P.L. 103-66, Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, 107 Stat. 683-685). As an integral part of Congress's goal of achieving a balanced budget by FY2002, the FY1996 and FY1997 budget resolutions covered seven and six fiscal years, respectively. The Budget Enforcement Act of 1997 (Title X of P.L. 105-33, Balanced Budget Act of 1997, 111 Stat. 677-712) amended the Budget Act to require permanently that a budget resolution cover the budget year and at least the four ensuing fiscal years (for a minimum of five fiscal years).

Table 5 provides information regarding the number of years covered by the budget resolutions agreed to by Congress.

Congress also may revise budget levels for the current year in the budget resolution pursuant to Section 304 of the Budget Act. Congress has adopted 15 first budget resolutions that revised current-year budget levels.

Table 5. Number of Years Covered by Budget Resolutions

Fiscal Year

Budget Resolution

Fiscal Year(s) Covered

Current Fiscal Year Revision

Number of Years Covered, Excluding Current Year

1976

H.Con.Res. 218

1976

1

1977

S.Con.Res. 109

1976-1977

1976

1

1978

S.Con.Res. 19

1978

1

1979

S.Con.Res. 80

1979

1

1980

H.Con.Res. 107

1979-1980

1979

1

1981

H.Con.Res. 307

1980-1983

1980

3

1982

H.Con.Res. 115

1981-1984

1981

3

1983

S.Con.Res. 92

1982-1985

1982

3

1984

H.Con.Res. 91

1983-1986

1983

3

1985

H.Con.Res. 280

1984-1987

1984

3

1986

S.Con.Res. 32

1985-1988

1985

3

1987

S.Con.Res. 120

1987-1989

3

1988

H.Con.Res. 93

1988-1990

3

1989

H.Con.Res. 268

1989-1991

3

1990

H.Con.Res. 106

1990-1992

3

1991

H.Con.Res. 310

1991-1995

5

1992

H.Con.Res. 121

1991-1996

1991

5

1993

H.Con.Res. 287

1993-1997

5

1994

H.Con.Res. 64

1994-1998

5

1995

H.Con.Res. 218

1995-1999

5

1996

H.Con.Res. 67

1996-2002

7

1997

H.Con.Res. 178

1997-2002

6

1998

H.Con.Res. 84

1998-2002

5

1999

2000

H.Con.Res. 68

2000-2009

10

2001

H.Con.Res. 290

2000-2005

2000

5

2002

H.Con.Res. 83

2001-2011

2001

10

2003

2004

H.Con.Res. 95

2003-2013

2003

10

2005

2006

H.Con.Res. 95

2005-2010

2005

5

2007

2008

S.Con.Res. 21

2007-2012

2007

5

2009

S.Con.Res. 70

2008-2013

2008

5

2010

S.Con.Res. 13

2009-2014

2009

5

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

S.Con.Res. 11

2016-2025

10

Sources: U.S. Statutes-at-Large, various volumes, and reports to accompany the budget resolutions.

Notes: This list includes first budget resolutions only. In addition, it includes budget resolutions adopted by both chambers; that is, it does not include budget resolutions adopted by only one chamber.

In addition to the content required by the Budget Act, Section 301(b) lists several other matters that may be included in the budget resolution. Table 6 provides a table indicating selected components included in first budget resolutions for FY1976-FY2016 on which Congress completed action (i.e., the House and Senate agreed).

Table 6. Selected Components Included in Budget Resolutions
Adopted by Congress

Fiscal
Year

Budget Resolution

Budget Reconciliation Directives

Credit Levels

Number of Reserve Fund Provisionsa

Number of Declaratory Statementsb

Number of Procedural Provisionsc

1976

H.Con.Res. 218

0

0

0

1977

S.Con.Res. 109

0

0

0

1978

S.Con.Res. 19

0

1

0

1979

S.Con.Res. 80

0

0

0

1980

H.Con.Res. 107

0

0

0

1981

H.Con.Res. 307

X

X

0

3

1

1982

H.Con.Res. 115

X

X

0

2

1

1983

S.Con.Res. 92

X

X

0

3

6

1984

H.Con.Res. 91

X

X

1d

3

3

1985

H.Con.Res. 280

X

0

1

3

1986

S.Con.Res. 32

X

X

0

7

2

1987

S.Con.Res. 120

X

X

2

8

1

1988

H.Con.Res. 93

X

X

3

3

4

1989

H.Con.Res. 268

X

3

3

1

1990

H.Con.Res. 106

X

X

2

2

1

1991

H.Con.Res. 310

X

X

1

0

1

1992

H.Con.Res. 121

X

5

2

3

1993

H.Con.Res. 287

X

5

8

4

1994

H.Con.Res. 64

X

X

7

29

4

1995

H.Con.Res. 218

X

13

14

4

1996

H.Con.Res. 67

X

X

2

14

5

1997

H.Con.Res. 178

X

X

3

39

3

1998

H.Con.Res. 84

X

X

10

40

3

1999

2000

H.Con.Res. 68

X

7

22

3

2001

H.Con.Res. 290

X

11

44

13

2002

H.Con.Res. 83

X

9

14

5

2003

2004

H.Con.Res. 95

X

8

16

5

2005

2006

H.Con.Res. 95

X

10

8

6

2007

2008

S.Con.Res. 21

X

23

17

9

2009

S.Con.Res. 70

56

13

8

2010

S.Con.Res. 13

X

48

9

11

2011

2012

2013

2014e

2015f

2016

S.Con.Res. 11

X

131

19

29

Sources: U.S. Statutes-at-Large, various volumes, and reports to accompany the budget resolutions.

Notes: This list includes first budget resolutions on which Congress completed action only.

a. For purposes of this table, "reserve fund" provisions refer to any provision establishing procedures to revise budget levels—except adjustments to discretionary spending limits—for certain legislation or if some condition is met.

b. Declaratory statements express, in non-binding terms, the sense of the Congress, the sense of the House, or the sense of the Senate on various issues.

c. Some examples of the procedural provisions include deferred enrollment; automatic second budget resolutions; special budgetary treatment of certain activities, such as the sale of government assets; and more recently, enforcement of pay-as-you-go rules in the Senate and limits on advance appropriations. The number of procedural provisions does not include reconciliation instructions or reserve fund provisions.

d. The FY1984 budget resolution provided for a single deficit-neutral reserve fund for all legislative initiatives included in the Manager's Statement.

e. In lieu of the budget resolution, Section 111 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (BBA, Div. A of P.L. 113-67), enacted on December 26, 2013, provided for enforceable budget levels and other provisions associated with the FY2014 budget resolution. Several procedural provisions, including reserve fund provisions, contained in the separate FY2014 budget resolutions adopted by each chamber were made to have force and effect. For further information, see the text of H.Con.Res. 25 and S.Con.Res. 8 (113th Congress).

f. In lieu of the budget resolution, Sections 115 and 116 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (BBA, Div. A of P.L. 113-67), enacted on December 26, 2013, provided for enforceable budget levels and other provisions associated with the FY2015 budget resolution. Several procedural provisions—including reserve fund provisions, updated by one fiscal year—contained in the separate FY2014 budget resolutions adopted by each chamber were made to have force and effect. For further information, see the text of H.Con.Res. 25 and S.Con.Res. 8 (113th Congress).

The most important of the optional matters is arguably the inclusion of budget reconciliation directives provided by Section 310 of the Budget Act. Budget reconciliation is an optional two-step process Congress may use to bring direct spending, revenue, and debt limit levels into compliance with those set forth in budget resolutions.5 In order to accomplish this, Congress first includes budget reconciliation directives in a budget resolution directing one or more committees in each chamber to recommend changes in statute to achieve the levels of direct spending, revenues, debt limit, or a combination thereof agreed to in the budget resolution. The legislative language recommended by committees then is packaged "without any substantive revision" into one or more budget reconciliation bills as set forth in the budget resolution by the House and Senate Budget Committees. In some instances, a committee may be required to report its legislative recommendations directly to its chamber.

Once the Budget Committees (or individual committees if so directed) report budget reconciliation legislation to their respective chambers, consideration is governed by special procedures.6 These special rules serve to limit what may be included in budget reconciliation legislation, to prohibit certain amendments, and to encourage its completion in a timely fashion.

During the 41-year period since the congressional budget process was established, Congress has included budget reconciliation directives to House and Senate committees in 22 budget resolutions.7 Such directives have resulted in 24 budget reconciliation measures. On four occasions (in 1982, 1986, 1997, and 2006), Congress adopted two budget reconciliation measures in one year. Of the 24 budget reconciliation measures considered by Congress, 20 were signed into law and four were vetoed. Table 7 lists the budget resolutions that contained budget reconciliation directives and the associated reconciliation acts.

Table 7. Budget Resolutions and Associated Reconciliation Acts

Fiscal
Year

Budget Resolution

Fiscal Years Covered by Reconciliation Directives

Associated Reconciliation Acts

Date Enacted (or Vetoed)

1976

H.Con.Res. 466a

1976

Revenue Adjustment Act of 1975
(H.R. 5559)

12-17-1975
(vetoed)

1981

H.Con.Res. 307

1980-1981b

Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1980
(P.L. 96-499)

12-05-1980

1982

H.Con.Res. 115

1981-1984c

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981 (P.L. 97-35)

08-13-1981

1983

S.Con.Res. 92

1983-1985

Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (P.L. 97-248)
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1982 (P.L. 97-253)

09-03-1982
09-08-1982

1984

H.Con.Res. 91

1984-1986

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1983 (P.L. 98-270)

04-18-1984

1986

S.Con.Res. 32

1986-1988

Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985
(P.L. 99-272)

04-07-1986

1987

S.Con.Res. 120

1987-1989

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-509)

10-21-1986

1988

H.Con.Res. 93

1988-1990

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 (P.L. 100-203)

12-22-1987

1990

H.Con.Res. 106

1990 (Senate)
1990-1991 (House)

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989 (P.L. 101-239)

12-19-1989

1991

H.Con.Res. 310

1991-1995

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-508)

11-05-1990

1994

H.Con.Res. 64

1994-1998

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (P.L. 103-66)

08-10-1993

1996

H.Con.Res. 67

1996-2002

Balanced Budget Act of 1995
(H.R. 2491)

12-06-1995
(vetoed)

1997

H.Con.Res. 178

1997-2002

Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996
(P.L. 104-193)

08-22-1996

1998

H.Con.Res. 84

1998-2002

Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (P.L. 105-33)
Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 (P.L. 105-34)

08-05-1997
08-05-1997

2000

H.Con.Res. 68

2000-2009

Taxpayer Refund and Relief Act of 1999
(H.R. 2488)

09-23-1999
(vetoed)

2001

H.Con.Res. 290

2001-2005

Marriage Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2000 (H.R. 4810)

08-05-2000
(vetoed)

2002

H.Con.Res. 83

2001-2011

Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001
(P.L. 107-16)

07-07-2001

2004

H.Con.Res. 95

2003-2013

Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 (P.L. 108-27)

05-28-2003

2006

H.Con.Res. 95

2005-2010
2006-2010

Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (P.L. 109-171)
Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 (P.L. 109-222)

02-08-2006
05-17-2006

2008

S.Con.Res. 21

2007-2012

College Cost Reduction and Access Act
(P.L. 110-84)

09-27-2007

2010

S.Con.Res. 13

2009-2014

Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-152)

03-30-2010

Sources: U.S. Statutes-at-Large, various volumes, and the Legislative Information System (LIS). For further information on budget reconciliation measures, see CRS Report RL33030, The Budget Reconciliation Process: House and Senate Procedures.

Notes: Each budget resolution listed was the first, or sole, budget resolution for the fiscal year, except for FY1976, which was the second budget resolution for that year.

a. There has been an ongoing controversy about whether the directive in this budget resolution was a budget reconciliation directive as set forth in Section 310 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974. The Senate treated it as such and considered the resultant legislation (H.R. 5559, as reported by the Senate Finance Committee, 94th Congress) under the budget reconciliation procedures. The House did not, however, consider and adopt its version of the resultant legislation as a budget reconciliation measure, and thus it presumably did not consider the directive as a budget reconciliation directive. See Floyd M. Riddick and Alan S. Frumin, Riddick's Senate Procedure: Precedents and Practices (rev. ed.), S.Doc. 101-28, 101st Cong., 1st sess. (Washington: GPO, 1992), pp. 622-623.

b. The House and Senate Appropriations Committees were instructed in the budget resolution to submit legislation (e.g., rescissions of previously enacted appropriations) to reduce spending for FY1980.

c. The Senate Appropriations Committee was instructed in the budget resolution to submit legislation to reduce spending for FY1981 (budget authority and outlays) and FY1982-1984 (outlays only).

Beginning with the FY1981 budget resolution, Congress also included amounts for federal credit activities. The 1985 Balanced Budget Act permanently required the inclusion of aggregate and functional levels of direct loan obligations and primary loan guarantee commitments in budget resolutions. The inclusion of federal credit levels, however, was made optional by the Budget Enforcement Act of 1997 (Title X of P.L. 105-33; 111 Stat. 677-712). Of the 31 first budget resolutions adopted by Congress, 18 included federal credit amounts.

Another optional component of budget resolutions has been the inclusion of reserve funds. The reserve fund provisions generally provide for the revision of budget resolution aggregates, functional allocations, and committee allocations if certain deficit-neutral legislation is enacted or some other condition is met. Over the last decade, Congress often has included several reserve funds in budget resolutions (as indicated in Table 6). For instance, the FY2016 budget resolution (S.Con.Res. 11, 114th Congress) included 131 reserve funds.

As an indication of policy intent, Congress has often included declaratory statements in budget resolutions. These nonbinding statements express the sense of Congress, the sense of the House, or the sense of the Senate on various issues. As indicated in Table 6, Congress has included an average of 21 declaratory statements in the last 14 budget resolutions (not including budget resolutions for fiscal years on which the House and Senate separately adopted but did not agree) but an average of only between two and three declaratory statements in the first 18 budget resolutions.

The annual budget resolution also may require a deferred enrollment procedure (see Section 301(b)(3) of the Budget Act), under which all or certain bills providing new budget authority or new entitlement authority for the upcoming fiscal year cannot be enrolled until Congress has completed action on a reconciliation measure (or, prior to FY1987, a reconciliation measure or the second budget resolution). Budget resolutions for FY1981, FY1982, FY1983, and FY1984 contained deferred enrollment provisions.8

Lastly, Congress has included several other procedural provisions in budget resolutions. Under Section 301(b)(4) of the Budget Act, the so-called elastic clause, Congress may "set forth such other matters, and require such other procedures, relating to the budget, as may be appropriate to carry out the purposes of" the Budget Act in the budget resolution. The number of procedural provisions included in budget resolutions is listed in the last column of Table 6. Some of these procedural provisions include deferred enrollment; automatic second budget resolutions; special budgetary treatment of certain activities, such as the sale of government assets; and more recently, enforcement of a pay-as-you-go requirement in the Senate and limits on advance appropriations.

Consideration and Adoption of the Budget Resolution

Floor consideration of the budget resolution differs in the House and Senate. Section 305 of the Budget Act sets forth special procedures for the consideration of the budget resolution, generally to expedite its consideration. The House, however, regularly adopts a special rule, a simple House resolution, setting forth the terms for consideration of the measure. In particular, special rules have been used for more than a decade to limit the offering of amendments to a few major substitutes. Table 8 lists the special rules that provided for the consideration of budget resolutions in the House.

In contrast, floor consideration in the Senate is governed by the procedures set forth in the Budget Act. The procedures generally limit debate and prohibit certain amendments and motions.9

Table 8. Special Rules Providing for the Consideration
of Budget Resolutions in the House

Fiscal Year

Special Rule

Budget Resolution

Date Special Rule
Was Adopteda

Vote

1976

[none]

H.Con.Res. 218

1977

[none]

H.Con.Res. 611

1978

H.Res. 515
[none]

H.Con.Res. 195b H.Con.Res. 214

04-26-1977

400-1

1979

[none]

H.Con.Res. 559

1980

[none]

H.Con.Res. 107

1981

H.Res. 642
H.Res. 649c

H.Con.Res. 307
H.Con.Res. 307

04-23-1980
04-30-1980

261-143
voice

1982

H.Res. 134

H.Con.Res. 115

04-30-1981

328-76

1983

H.Res. 447
H.Res. 496

H.Con.Res. 345b
H.Con.Res. 352

05-21-1982
06-10-1982

voice
339-72

1984

H.Res. 144
H.Res. 243

H.Con.Res. 91
H.Con.Res. 91
(conf. rept.)

03-22-1983
06-23-1983

230-187
voice

1985

H.Res. 476

H.Con.Res. 280

04-04-1984

302-89

1986

H.Res. 177
H.Res. 253

H.Con.Res. 152
S.Con.Res. 32
(conf. rept.)

05-22-1985
08-01-1985

273-141
voice

1987

H.Res. 397
H.Res. 455

H.Con.Res. 296b
H.Con.Res. 337

03-13-1986
05-14-1986

239-168
voice

1988

H.Res. 139
H.Res. 201

H.Con.Res. 93
H.Con.Res. 93
(conf. rept.)

04-08-1987
06-23-1987

241-168
voice

1989

H.Res. 410
H.Res. 461

H.Con.Res. 268
H.Con.Res. 268
(conf. rept.)

03-23-1988
05-26-1988

voice
voice

1990

H.Res. 145

H.Con.Res. 106

05-03-1989

voice

1991

H.Res. 382
H.Res. 488
H.Res. 496d

H.Con.Res. 310
H.Con.Res. 310b
(conf. rept.)
H.Con.Res. 310
(conf. rept.)

04-26-1990
10-04-1990
10-06-1990

voice
339-94
285-105

1992

H.Res. 123
H.Res. 157

H.Con.Res. 121
H.Con.Res. 121
(conf. rept.)

04-16-1991
05-22-1991

392-9
257-164

1993

H.Res. 386
H.Res. 463

H.Con.Res. 287
H.Con.Res. 287
(conf. rept.)

03-04-1992
05-21-1992

239-183
253-160

1994

H.Res. 131
H.Res. 133e
H.Res. 145

H.Con.Res. 64
H.Con.Res. 64
H.Con.Res. 64
(conf. rept.)

03-17-1993
03-18-1993
03-31-1993

voice
251-172
250-172

1995

H.Res. 384
H.Res. 418

H.Con.Res. 218
H.Con.Res. 218
(conf. rept.)

03-10-1994
05-05-1994

245-171
228-168

1996

H.Res. 149
H.Res. 175
H.Res. 309

H.Con.Res. 67
H.Con.Res. 67
(conf. rept.)
H.Con.Res. 122b

05-17-1995
06-29-1995
12-19-1995

225-168
234-180
229-189

1997

H.Res. 435
H.Res. 450

H.Con.Res. 178
H.Con.Res. 178
(conf. rept.)

05-16-1996
06-12-1996

227-196
232-190

1998

H.Res. 152
H.Res. 160

H.Con.Res. 84
H.Con.Res. 84
(conf. rept.)

05-20-1997
06-05-1997

278-142
373-47

1999

H.Res. 455

H.Con.Res. 284

06-04-1998

216-197

2000

H.Res. 131
H.Res. 137

H.Con.Res. 68
H.Con.Res. 68
(conf. rept.)

03-25-1999
04-14-1999

228-194
221-205

2001

H.Res. 446
H.Res. 474

H.Con.Res. 290
H.Con.Res. 290
(conf. rept.)

03-23-2000
04-13-2000

228-194
221-205

2002

H.Res. 100
H.Res. 134f
H.Res. 136

H.Con.Res. 83
H.Con.Res. 83
(conf. rept.)
H.Con.Res. 83
(conf. rept.)

03-28-2000

05-08-2001
05-09-2001

282-130
409-1
218-208

2003

H.Res. 372

H.Con.Res. 353

03-05-2002

222-206

2004

H.Res. 151
H.Res. 191

H.Con.Res. 95
H.Con.Res. 95 (conf. rept.)

03-20-2003
04-11-2003

voice
221-202

2005

H.Res. 574
H.Res. 649

H.Con.Res. 393
S.Con.Res. 95
(conf. rept.)

03-25-2004
05-19-2004

voice
220-204

2006

H.Res. 154
H.Res. 248

H.Con.Res. 95
H.Con.Res. 95
(conf. rept.)

03-16-2005
04-28-2005

228-196
voice

2007

H.Res. 766g
H.Res. 817

H.Con.Res. 376
H.Con.Res. 376

04-06-2006
05-17-2006

225-196
226-193

2008

H.Res. 275h
H.Res. 409

H.Con.Res. 99
S.Con.Res. 21
(conf. rept.)

03-28-2007
05-17-2007

229-197
225-194

2009

H.Res. 1036i
H.Res. 1214

H.Con.Res. 312
S.Con.Res. 70
(conf. rept.)

03-12-2008
05-21-2008

223-195
220-199

2010

H.Res. 305j
H.Res. 316
H.Res. 371

H.Con.Res. 85
H.Con.Res. 85
S.Con.Res. 13
(conf. rept.)

04-01-2009
04-02-2009
04-28-2009

234-179
242-182
234-185

2011k

2012

H.Res. 223

H.Con.Res. 34

04-14-2011

243-181

2013

H.Res. 597

H.Con.Res. 112

03-28-2012

241-184

2014

H.Res. 122

H.Con.Res. 25

03-19-2013

224-189

2015

H.Res. 544

H.Con.Res. 96

04-08-2014

222-194

2016

H.Res. 163

H.Con.Res. 27

03-24-2015

237-180

Source: Legislative Information System (LIS).

Notes: A special rule is a simple resolution reported by the House Rules Committee to provide for consideration of legislation by the House. This list includes first budget resolutions only.

a. No special rules were rejected.

b. The budget resolution was rejected. (See Table 3 in this report.)

c. The special rule provided for technical corrections of H.Res. 642.

d. The special rule provided for consideration of a revised conference report (H.Rept. 101-820); the original conference report (H.Rept. 101-802) was rejected. (See Table 3 in this report.)

e. The special rule provided for further consideration of H.Con.Res. 64.

f. The special rule provided for the recommittal of the conference report to the conference committee; two pages reportedly were missing from the original printed conference report (H.Rept. 107-55).

g. H.Res. 766 provided for debate only.

h. The House also considered and adopted H.Res. 370, which provided for the consideration of S.Con.Res. 21, as amended by the text of H.Con.Res. 99, as adopted by the House, in order to facilitate a conference with the Senate on S.Con.Res. 21. The House adopted H.Res. 370 by a vote of 221-197 on May 8, 2007.

i. The House also considered and adopted H.Res. 1190, which provided for the consideration of S.Con.Res. 70, as amended by the text of H.Con.Res. 312, as adopted by the House, in order to facilitate a conference with the Senate on S.Con.Res. 70. The House adopted H.Res. 1190 by a vote of 214-203 on May 14, 2008.

j. H.Res. 305 provided for debate only.

k. The House did not consider a budget resolution for FY2011. However, in lieu of the budget resolution, the House agreed to a special rule (H.Res. 1500) that, upon its adoption, provided for the adoption of a "budget enforcement resolution" (H.Res. 1493).

Amendments to the Budget Resolution

Amendments in the House

The House has considered an average of almost seven amendments per budget resolution.10 The largest number of amendments considered was 45 in 1979; the largest number agreed to was 11 also in 1979. (The first FY1983 budget resolution also was amended 11 times, but it subsequently was rejected.) Table 9 identifies the number of accepted and rejected amendments to budget resolutions considered in the House. The amending activity in the House during the last few decades is in marked contrast to the early years under the Budget Act. During the first eight years, the House considered an average of 16 amendments per budget resolution, agreeing to an average of four of them. In contrast, during the past 33 years, the House has considered very few amendments to budget resolutions, averaging between two and three per budget resolution and agreeing to even fewer of these. Of the 121 amendments considered by the House during this time period, 5 have been adopted.

Table 9. Number of Amendments to Budget Resolutions Considered in the House

Fiscal Year

Budget Resolution

Amendmentsa

 

 

Adopted

Rejected

Total

Success Rateb

1976

H.Con.Res. 218

3

3

6

50%

1977

H.Con.Res. 611

2

14

16

13%

1978

H.Con.Res. 195c
H.Con.Res. 214

6
2

10
6

16
8

60%
25%

1979

H.Con.Res. 559

3

13

16

19%

1980

H.Con.Res. 107

11

34

45

24%

1981

H.Con.Res. 307

1

10

11

9%

1982

H.Con.Res. 115

2

2

4

50%

1983

H.Con.Res. 345c
H.Con.Res. 352

11
1

27
1

38
2

29%
50%

1984

H.Con.Res. 91

0

0

0

1985

H.Con.Res. 280

0

7

7

0%

1986

H.Con.Res. 152

1

6

7

14%

1987

H.Con.Res. 296c
H.Con.Res. 337

0
0

0
3

0
3


0%

1988

H.Con.Res. 93

1

3

4

25%

1989

H.Con.Res. 268

0

3

3

0%

1990

H.Con.Res. 106

1

4

5

20%

1991

H.Con.Res. 310

0

3

3

0%

1992

H.Con.Res. 121

1

3

4

25%

1993

H.Con.Res. 287

0

3

3

0%

1994

H.Con.Res. 64

0

3

3

0%

1995

H.Con.Res. 218

0

4

4

0%

1996

H.Con.Res. 67
H.Con.Res. 122c

0
0

3
0

3
0

0%

1997

H.Con.Res. 178

0

3

3

0%

1998

H.Con.Res. 84

0

5

5

0%

1999

H.Con.Res. 284

0

2

2

0%

2000

H.Con.Res. 68

0

3

3

0%

2001

H.Con.Res. 290

0

5

5

0%

2002

H.Con.Res. 83

0

4

4

0%

2003

H.Con.Res. 353

0

0

0

2004

H.Con.Res. 95

0

4

4

0%

2005

H.Con.Res. 393

0

4

4

0%

2006

H.Con.Res. 95

0

4

4

0%

2007

H.Con.Res. 376

0

3

3

0%

2008

H.Con.Res. 99

0

3

3

0%

2009

H.Con.Res. 312

0

3

3

0%

2010

H.Con.Res. 85

0

4

4

0%

2011d

2012

H.Con.Res. 34

0

4

4

0%

2013

H.Con.Res. 112

0

6

6

0%

2014

H.Con.Res. 25

0

5

5

0%

2015

H.Con.Res. 96

0

5

5

0%

2016

H.Con.Res. 27

1

5

6

17%

Source: Legislative Information System (LIS).

Notes: This list includes first budget resolutions only. The number of amendments in this table does not include any amendments automatically agreed to upon the adoption of the special rule reported by the House Rules Committee providing for the consideration of the budget resolution.

a. No amendments were withdrawn or ruled out of order.

b. "Success rate" is the percentage of amendments accepted.

c. The budget resolution was rejected. (See Table 3 in this report.)

d. The House did not consider a budget resolution for FY2011.

Contributing to this trend, the House special rule typically has allowed for consideration of only amendments in the nature of a substitute to the budget resolution. For example, between 1983 and 2015 (for the FY1984-FY2016 budget resolutions), 117 of the 121 amendments to the budget resolution made in order by the special rule were amendments in the nature of a substitute. Only two of these 117 amendments in the nature of a substitute were agreed to; those two contained the budget resolution text recommended by the House Budget Committee offered by its chair at the time, Representative William H. Gray III and Representative Tom Price, respectively. Table 10 lists the amendments in the nature of a substitute to the budget resolution made in order by the special rule.

Table 10. Amendments in the Nature of a Substitute to Budget Resolutions Made in Order by a Special Rule in the House

Fiscal Year

Budget Resolution

Amendment Sponsor

Date

Vote

Disposition

1976

H.Con.Res. 218a

1977

H.Con.Res. 611a

1978

H.Con.Res. 195b
H.Con.Res. 214a





1979

H.Con.Res. 559a

1980

H.Con.Res. 107a

1981

H.Con.Res. 307

Obey
Ottinger
Holt
Rousselot
Latta

04-30-1980
04-30-1980
05-01-1980
05-06-1980
05-06-1980

201-213
70-336
164-246
191-218
175-242

rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected

1982

H.Con.Res. 115

Fauntroy
Obey
Latta

05-06-1981
05-06-1981
05-07-1981

69-356
119-303
253-176

rejected
rejected
adopted

1983

H.Con.Res. 345c

Miller (CA)
Obey
Fauntroy
Rousselot
Latta
Aspin
Jones (OK)

05-24-1982
05-24-1982
05-24-1982
05-25-1982
05-27-1982
05-27-1982
05-27-1982

181-225
152-268
86-322
182-242
192-235
137-289
171-253

rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected

 

H.Con.Res. 352

Latta
Jones (OK)

06-10-1982
06-10-1982

220-207
202-225

adopted
rejected

1984

H.Con.Res. 91

Lattad

1985

H.Con.Res. 280

Wirth
Dannemeyer
Roemer
Dixon
McHugh
MacKay
Latta

04-04-1984
04-04-1984
04-04-1984
04-05-1984
04-05-1984
04-05-1984
04-05-1984

1-401
51-354
59-338
76-333
132-284
108-310
107-311

rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected

1986

H.Con.Res. 152

Dannemeyer
Pursell
Leland
Latta

05-22-1985
05-22-1985
05-22-1985
05-23-1985

39-382
87-335
54-361
102-329

rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected

1987

H.Con.Res. 296e

H.Con.Res. 337



Dannemeyer
Leland
Latta



05-15-1986
05-15-1986
05-15-1986



73-338
61-359
145-280



rejected
rejected
rejected

1988

H.Con.Res. 93

Gray (PA)
Gray (PA)
Dannemeyer
Dymally

04-09-1987
04-09-1987
04-09-1987
04-09-1987

230-192
27-394
47-369
56-362

adopted
rejected
rejected
rejected

1989

H.Con.Res. 268

Dannemeyer
Porter
Penny

03-23-1988
03-23-1988
03-23-1988

75-347
64-354
27-394

rejected
rejected
rejected

1990

H.Con.Res. 106

Dannemeyer
Dellums
Kasich
Gephardt

05-04-1989
05-04-1989
05-04-1989
05-04-1989

72-350
81-343
30-393
49-373

rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected

1991

H.Con.Res. 310

Kasich
Dannemeyer
Dellums

04-26-1990
04-26-1990
05-01-1990

106-305
48-354
90-334

rejected
rejected
rejected

1992

H.Con.Res. 121

Dannemeyer
Kasich
Gradison

04-17-1991
04-17-1991
04-17-1991

79-332
114-303
89-335

rejected
rejected
rejected

1993

H.Con.Res. 287

Dannemeyer
Gradison
Towns

03-04-1992
03-04-1992
03-05-1992

60-344
42-370
77-342

rejected
rejected
rejected

1994

H.Con.Res. 64

Kasich
Solomon
Mfume

03-18-1993
03-18-1993
03-18-1993

135-295
20-409
87-335

rejected
rejected
rejected

1995

H.Con.Res. 218

Frank (MA)
Solomon
Mfume
Kasich

03-10-1994
03-10-1994
03-11-1994
03-11-1994

105-313
73-342
81-326
165-243

rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected

1996

H.Con.Res. 67



H.Con.Res. 122f

Gephardt
Neumann
Payne (NJ)

05-18-1995
05-18-1995
05-18-1995

100-325
89-342
56-367

rejected
rejected
rejected

1997

H.Con.Res. 178

Payne (NJ)
Orton
Sabo

05-16-1996
05-16-1996
05-16-1996

63-362
130-295
117-304

rejected
rejected
rejected

1998

H.Con.Res. 84

Doolittle
Brown (CA)
Waters
Kennedy (MA)
Shuster

05-21-1997
05-21-1997
05-21-1997
05-21-1997
05-21-1997

119-313
91-339
72-358
123-306
214-216

rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected

1999

H.Con.Res. 284

Neumann
Spratt

06-05-1998
06-05-1998

158-262
164-257

rejected
rejected

2000

H.Con.Res. 68

Coburn
Minge
Spratt

03-25-1999
03-25-1999
03-25-1999

2-426
134-295
173-250

rejected
rejected
rejected

2001

H.Con.Res. 290

Owens
DeFazio
Stenholm
Sununu
Spratt

03-23-2000
03-23-2000
03-23-2000
03-23-2000
03-23-2000

70-348
61-351
171-243
78-339
184-233

rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected

2002

H.Con.Res. 83

Kucinich
Stenholm
Flake
Spratt

03-28-2001
03-28-2001
03-28-2001
03-28-2001

79-343
204-221
81-341
183-243

rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected

2003

H.Con.Res. 353

2004

H.Con.Res. 95

Hill
Toomey
Cummings
Spratt

03-20-2003
03-20-2003
03-20-2003
03-20-2003

174-254
80-342
85-340
192-236

rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected

2005

H.Con.Res. 393

Cummings
Stenholm
Hensarling
Spratt

03-25-2004
03-25-2004
03-25-2004
03-25-2004

119-302
183-243
116-309
194-232

rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected

2006

H.Con.Res. 95

Hensarling
Watt
Spratt

03-17-2005
03-17-2005
03-17-2005

102-320
134-292
165-264

rejected
rejected
rejected

2007

H.Con.Res. 376

Watt
Hensarling
Spratt

05-17-2006
05-18-2006
05-18-2006

131-294
94-331
184-241

rejected
rejected
rejected

2008

H.Con.Res. 99

Kilpatrick
Woolsey
Ryan

03-29-2007
03-29-2007
03-29-2007

115-312
81-340
160-268

rejected
rejected
rejected

2009

H.Con.Res. 312

Kilpatrick
Lee (CA)
Ryan (WI)

03-13-2008
03-13-2008
03-13-2008

126-292
98-322
157-263

rejected
rejected
rejected

2010

H.Con.Res. 85

Woolsey
Jordan (OH)
Lee (CA)
Ryan (WI)

04-02-2009
04-02-2009
04-02-2009
04-02-2009

84-348
111-322
113-318
137-293

rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected

2011g

2012

H.Con.Res. 34

Cleaver
Cooperh
Grijalva
Garrett
Van Hollen

04-15-2011

04-15-2011
04-15-2011
04-15-2011

103-303

77-347
119-136 (172 present)
166-259

rejected

rejected
rejected
rejected

2013

H.Con.Res. 112

Mulvaney
Cleaver
Cooper
Honda
Garrett
Van Hollen

03-28-2012
03-28-2012
03-28-2012
03-28-2012
03-29-2012
03-29-2012

0-414
107-314
38-382
78-346
136-285
163-262

rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected

2014

H.Con.Res. 25

Mulvaney
Scott (VA)
Grijalva
Woodall
Van Hollen

03-20-2013
03-20-2013
03-20-2013
03-20-2013
03-20-2013

154-261
105-305 (1 present)
84-327 (1 present)
104-132 (171 present)
165-253

rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected

2015

H.Con.Res. 96

Mulvaney
Moore
Grijalva
Woodall
Van Hollen

04-09-2014
04-09-2014
04-09-2014
04-10-2014
04-10-2014

2-413
116-300
89-327
133-291
163-261

rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected

2016

H.Con.Res. 27

Ellison
Butterfield
Stutzman
Van Hollen
Price (GA)
Price (GA)

03-25-2015
03-25-2015
03-25-2015
03-25-2015
03-25-2015
03-25-2015

96-330
120-306
132-294
160-264
105-319
219-208

rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected
rejected
adopted

Source: Legislative Information System (LIS).

Notes: See Table 8 for a list of special rules providing for consideration of budget resolutions in the House. An amendment in the nature of a substitute strikes all text after the resolving clause and replaces it with a different text. This list includes first budget resolutions only. Text of the amendments may be found in the Congressional Record and the report accompanying the special rule.

a. The budget resolution was not considered under a special rule.

b. The budget resolution was considered under an open rule (H.Res. 515); no specific amendments in the nature of a substitute were made in order. H.Con.Res. 195 was rejected. (See Table 3 in this report.)

c. H.Con.Res. 345 was rejected. (See Table 3 in this report.)

d. The special rule (H.Res. 144) made in order an amendment in the nature of a substitute by, and if offered by, Representative Latta, but he did not offer one.

e. The budget resolution was considered under a closed rule (H.Res. 397). H.Con.Res. 296 was rejected. (See Table 3 in this report.)

f. The budget resolution was considered under a closed rule (H.Res. 309). H.Con.Res. 122 was rejected. (See Table 3 in this report.)

g. The House did not consider a budget resolution for FY2011.

h. The special rule (H.Res. 223) made in order an amendment in the nature of a substitute by, and if offered by, Representative Cooper, but he did not offer one.

Amendments in the Senate

In the Senate, the terms of debate and the consideration of amendments are not structured by a special rule, as in the House, but instead are governed by the procedures set forth in Section 305(b) of the Budget Act. Typically, the Senate considers many amendments to the budget resolution, most addressing specific issues instead of proposing a complete substitute as in the House.

During the period between 1975 and 2015, the Senate considered an average of almost 54 amendments per budget resolution, agreeing to an average of 31 of these.11 The largest number of amendments considered was 254 in 2015; the largest number agreed to was 146, also in 2015. Table 11 identifies the number of amendments adopted, rejected, ruled out-of-order, and withdrawn during Senate consideration of budget resolutions. In contrast to the House, the number of amendments considered by the Senate has increased over the last two decades or so. For the last 18 budget resolutions considered on the floor, for example, the Senate considered an average of almost 90 amendments per budget resolution, agreeing to an average of over 56 of these. Amendments have been agreed to in the Senate at a much higher rate compared to the House as well. For instance, in 13 of the past 18 years in which a budget resolution was considered on the floor, the success rate for amendments has equaled or exceeded 60%.

Table 11. Number of Amendments to Budget Resolutions Considered in the Senate

Fiscal
Year

Budget Resolution

Amendments

 

 

Adopted (RC)

Rejected (RC)

Fell on Point of Order (RC)

Withdrawn

Total (RC)

Success Ratea

1976

S.Con.Res. 32

1 (0)

4 (4)

0

0

5 (4)

20%

1977

S.Con.Res. 109

1 (0)

7 (7)

0

0

8 (7)

13%

1978

S.Con.Res. 19

5 (3)

2 (2)

0

0

7 (5)

71%

1979

S.Con.Res. 80

0

10 (10)

0

0

10 (10)

0%

1980

S.Con.Res. 22

5 (4)

12 (12)

0

0

17 (16)

29%

1981

S.Con.Res. 86

12 (6)

30 (28)

0

0

42 (34)

29%

1982

S.Con.Res. 9b

4 (1)

31 (31)

1 (1)

5

41 (33)

10%

 

S.Con.Res. 19

2 (1)

17 (17)

0

1

20 (18)

10%

1983

S.Con.Res. 19

8 (1)

29 (27)

0

0

37 (28)

22%

1984

S.Con.Res. 27

7 (4)

24 (23)

0

0

31 (27)

23%

1985

S.Con.Res. 106

2 (0)

0

0

0

2 (0)

100%

1986

S.Con.Res. 32

15 (12)

24 (24)

0

0

39 (36)

38%

1987

S.Con.Res. 120

13 (5)

7 (7)

0

2

22 (12)

59%

1988

S.Con.Res. 49

5 (3)

8 (8)

0

2

15 (11)

33%

1989

S.Con.Res. 113

8 (4)

4 (4)

0

0

12 (8)

67%

1990

S.Con.Res. 30

23 (2)

2 (2)

0

1

26 (4)

88%

1991

S.Con.Res. 110

1 (0)

0

0

0

1 (0)

100%

1992

S.Con.Res. 29

7 (0)

5 (5)

1 (1)

1

14 (6)

50%

1993

S.Con.Res. 106

15 (5)

3 (3)

2 (2)

1

21 (10)

71%

1994

S.Con.Res. 18

22 (15)

28 (28)

0

0

50 (43)

44%

1995

S.Con.Res. 63

26 (3)

9 (9)

0

4

39 (12)

67%

1996

S.Con.Res. 13

26 (11)

33 (33)

12 (12)

1

72 (56)

36%

1997

S.Con.Res. 57

41 (18)

21 (20)

2 (2)

2

66 (40)

62%

1998

S.Con.Res. 27

39 (6)

12 (12)

1 (1)

11

63 (19)

62%

1999

S.Con.Res. 86

57 (15)

8 (6)

12 (12)

29

106 (33)

54%

2000

S.Con.Res. 20

57 (5)

8 (7)

9 (6)

20

95 (18)

60%

2001

S.Con.Res. 101

38 (10)

10 (10)

5 (5)

3

56 (25)

68%

2002

H.Con.Res. 83c

51 (12)

10 (7)

2 (2)

3

66 (21)

77%

2003

S.Con.Res. 20d

2004

S.Con.Res. 23

44 (13)

35 (35)

2 (2)

1

82 (50)

54%

2005

S.Con.Res. 95

39 (5)

19 (17)

2 (2)

4

64 (24)

61%

2006

S.Con.Res. 18

48 (14)

24 (22)

0

1

73 (36)

66%

2007

S.Con.Res. 83

54 (9)

27 (25)

0

6

87 (34)

62%

2008

S.Con.Res. 21

63 (7)

24 (24)

1 (1)

3

91 (32)

69%

2009

S.Con.Res. 70

88 (16)

20 (20)

4 (4)

1

113 (40)

78%

2010

S.Con.Res. 13

101 (15)

17 (17)

3 (3)

0

121 (35)

83%

2011

S.Con.Res. 60e

2012f

2013g

2014

S.Con.Res. 8

77 (14)

29 (28)

4 (4)

4

114 (46)

68%

2015h

2016

S.Con.Res. 11

146 (31)

20 (20)

6 (6)

82

254 (58)

57%

Source: Legislative Information System (LIS).

Notes: This list includes first budget resolutions only. This table does not include motions to recommit offered during the consideration of the budget resolution. "RC" refers to the number of amendments on which a roll-call vote occurred in relation to the amendment. For purposes of this table, roll-call votes in relation to an amendment to the budget resolution include roll-call votes on agreeing to an amendment, on a motion to table an amendment, and on a motion to waive a point of order against an amendment.

a. "Success rate" is the percentage of amendments accepted.

b. The budget resolution was adopted by the Senate on April 2, 1981, by a vote of 88-10; no further action was taken.

c. The Senate Budget Committee did not mark up or report a budget resolution for FY2002. Instead, the Senate considered the House-passed budget resolution after the Senate Budget Committee was discharged from its consideration.

d. The Senate Budget Committee reported the listed FY2003 budget resolution, but the full Senate did not consider it.

e. The Senate Budget Committee reported the listed FY2011 budget resolution, but the full Senate did not consider it.

f. The Senate did not consider a budget resolution for FY2012; on May 25, 2011, the Senate rejected motions to proceed to four different budget resolutions for FY2012.

g. The Senate did not consider a budget resolution for FY2013; on May 16, 2012, the Senate rejected motions to proceed to five different budget resolutions for FY2013.

h. The Senate did not consider a budget resolution for FY2015.

Timing of Action on the Budget Resolution

The Budget Act sets April 15 as a target date for completing action on the annual budget resolution. Table 12 lists the dates of final adoption of budget resolutions for FY1976-FY2015. During this period, Congress adopted the budget resolution by the target date only six times, most recently in 2003 with the FY2004 budget resolution. Under the original timetable (prior to 1986, the deadline was May 15), Congress adopted the annual budget resolution by the target date twice: in 1975 and 1976. After the target date was changed to April 15 by the 1985 Deficit Control Act, Congress has completed action on the budget resolution by the target date four times: in 1993, 1999, 2000, and 2003. Further, as noted above, Congress did not complete action on a budget resolution for nine fiscal years, most recently for FY2015.

Table 12. Dates of Final Adoption of the Budget Resolution

Fiscal Year

Date Adopted

 

Fiscal Year

Date Adopted

1976

05-14-1975

 

1997

06-13-1996

1977

05-13-1976

 

1998

06-05-1997

1978

05-17-1977

 

1999

[none]

1979

05-17-1978

 

2000

04-15-1999

1980

05-24-1979

 

2001

04-13-2000

1981

06-12-1980

 

2002

05-10-2001

1982

05-21-1981

 

2003

[none]

1983

06-23-1982

 

2004

04-11-2003

1984

06-23-1983

 

2005

[none]

1985

10-01-1984

 

2006

04-28-2005

1986

08-01-1985

 

2007

[none]

1987

06-27-1986

 

2008

05-17-2007

1988

06-24-1987

 

2009

06-05-2008

1989

06-06-1988

 

2010

04-29-2009

1990

05-18-1989

 

2011

[none]

1991

10-09-1990

 

2012

[none]

1992

05-22-1991

 

2013

[none]

1993

05-21-1992

 

2014

[none]

1994

04-01-1993

 

2015

[none]

1995

05-12-1994

 

2016

05-05-2015

1996

06-29-1995

 

 

 

Source: Legislative Information System (LIS).

In those years in which Congress has adopted a budget resolution (that is, not including FY1999, FY2003, FY2005, FY2007, and FY2011 through FY2015), it has adopted the budget resolution an average of 36 days after the target date. The FY1991 budget resolution was adopted the latest, on October 9, 1990, or 177 days after the target date. The earliest adoption of a budget resolution was for FY1994 on April 1, 1993, or 14 days before the target date. Table 13 and Table 14 provide a list of dates related to the consideration and adoption of the budget resolution in the House and the Senate, respectively.

Table 13. Timing of House Action on Budget Resolutions

Fiscal Year

Budget Resolution
(Companion Measure)

Typea

Date Consideration Began

Date of Initial Passage

Date Conference
Report Adopted

1976

H.Con.Res. 218 (S.Con.Res. 32)

H.Con.Res. 466 (S.Con.Res. 76)

first


second

04-30-1975


11-11-1975

05-01-1975


11-12-1975

05-14-1975


12-12-1975

1977

S.Con.Res. 109 (H.Con.Res. 611)

S.Con.Res. 139 (H.Con.Res. 728)

S.Con.Res. 10
(H.Con.Res. 110)

first


second


third

04-27-1976


09-08-1976


02-22-1977

04-29-1976


09-09-1976


02-23-1977

05-13-1976


09-16-1976


03-03-1977

1978

S.Con.Res. 19
(H.Con.Res. 214)

H.Con.Res. 341 (S.Con.Res. 43)

first


second

05-05-1977


09-07-1977

05-05-1977


09-08-1977

05-17-1977


09-15-1977

1979

S.Con.Res. 80
(H.Con.Res. 559)

H.Con.Res. 683 (S.Con.Res. 104)

first


second

05-02-1978


08-15-1978

05-10-1978


08-16-1978

05-17-1978


09-21-1978

1980

H.Con.Res. 107 (S.Con.Res. 22)

S.Con.Res. 53
(H.Con.Res. 186)

first


second

04-30-1979


11-28-1979

05-14-1979


11-28-1979

05-24-1979


b

1981

H.Con.Res. 307 (S.Con.Res. 86)

H.Con.Res. 448 (S.Con.Res. 119)

first


second

04-23-1980


11-18-1980

05-07-1980


11-18-1980

06-12-1980


11-20-1980

1982

H.Con.Res. 115 (S.Con.Res. 19)

S.Con.Res. 50
(H.Con.Res. 230)

first


second

04-30-1981


12-10-1981

05-07-1981


12-10-1981

05-20-1981


c

1983

S.Con.Res. 92
(H.Con.Res. 352)

06-10-1982

06-10-1982

06-22-1982

1984

H.Con.Res. 91
(S.Con.Res. 27)

03-22-1983

03-23-1983

06-23-1983

1985

H.Con.Res. 280 (S.Con.Res. 106)

04-04-1984

04-05-1984

10-01-1984

1986

S.Con.Res. 32
(H.Con.Res. 152)

05-22-1985

05-23-1985

08-01-1985

1987

S.Con.Res. 120 (H.Con.Res. 337)

05-14-1986

05-15-1986

06-26-1986

1988

H.Con.Res. 93
(S.Con.Res. 49)

04-08-1987

04-09-1987

06-23-1987

1989

H.Con.Res. 268 (S.Con.Res. 113)

03-23-1988

03-23-1988

05-26-1988

1990

H.Con.Res. 106 (S.Con.Res. 30)

05-03-1989

05-04-1989

05-17-1989

1991

H.Con.Res. 310 (S.Con.Res. 110)

04-25-1990

05-01-1990

10-08-1990

1992

H.Con.Res. 121 (S.Con.Res. 29)

04-16-1991

04-17-1991

05-22-1991

1993

H.Con.Res. 287 (S.Con.Res. 106)

03-04-1992

03-05-1992

05-21-1992

1994

H.Con.Res. 64
(S.Con.Res. 18)

03-17-1993

03-18-1993

03-31-1993

1995

H.Con.Res. 218 (S.Con.Res. 63)

03-10-1994

03-11-1994

05-05-1994

1996

H.Con.Res. 67
(S.Con.Res. 13)

05-17-1995

05-18-1995

06-29-1995

1997

H.Con.Res. 178 (S.Con.Res. 57)

05-15-1996

05-16-1996

06-12-1996

1998

H.Con.Res. 84
(S.Con.Res. 27)

05-20-1997

05-21-1997

06-05-1997

1999

H.Con.Res. 284 (S.Con.Res. 86)

06-04-1998

06-05-1998

2000

H.Con.Res. 68
(S.Con.Res. 20)

03-25-1999

03-25-1999

04-14-1999

2001

H.Con.Res. 290 (S.Con.Res. 101)

03-23-2000

03-23-2000

04-13-2000

2002

H.Con.Res. 83
(no companion measure)d

03-27-2001

03-28-2001

05-09-2001

2003

H.Con.Res. 353 (S.Con.Res. 100)

03-20-2002

03-20-2002

2004

H.Con.Res. 95
(S.Con.Res. 23)

03-20-2003

03-21-2003

04-11-2003

2005e

S.Con.Res. 95
(H.Con.Res. 393)

03-24-2004

03-25-2004

05-19-2004

2006

H.Con.Res. 95
(S.Con.Res. 18)

03-16-2005

03-17-2005

04-28-2005

2007

H.Con.Res. 376
(S.Con.Res. 83)

04-06-2006

05-18-2006

2008

S.Con.Res. 21
(H.Con.Res. 99)

03-28-2007

03-29-2007

05-17-2007

2009

S.Con.Res. 70
(H.Con.Res. 312)

03-12-2008

03-13-2008

06-05-2008

2010

S.Con.Res. 13
(H.Con.Res. 85)

04-01-2009

04-02-2009

04-29-2009

2011f

(S.Con.Res. 60)

2012

H.Con.Res. 34
(no companion measure)

04-14-2011

04-15-2011

2013

H.Con.Res. 112

03-28-2012

03-29-2012

2014

S.Con.Res. 8
(H.Con.Res. 25)

03-19-2013

03-21-2013

2015

H.Con.Res. 96
(no companion measure)

04-08-2014

04-10-2014

2016

S.Con.Res. 11
(H.Con.Res. 27)

03-24-2015

03-25-2015

04-30-2015

Source: Legislative Information System (LIS).

Notes: Unless otherwise indicated, no date in the conference report column indicates that Congress did not complete action on the budget resolution for that year.

a. For purposes of this table, "type" refers to whether the budget resolution was the first, second, or third for the fiscal year. Originally, the Budget Act provided for the annual adoption of two budget resolutions for a fiscal year and the option of additional budget resolutions. In 1985, the act was amended to eliminate the second budget resolution; the option of additional budget resolutions remains.

b. The House rejected its version of the budget resolution (see Table 3 of this report) and adopted the Senate's version; no conference report was necessary.

c. The House laid its version of the budget resolution on the table by unanimous consent and adopted the Senate's version; no conference report was necessary.

d. The Senate Budget Committee did not mark up or report a budget resolution for FY2002. Instead, the Senate considered the House-passed budget resolution after the Senate Budget Committee was discharged from its consideration.

e. Congress did not complete action on a budget resolution for FY2005. The House agreed to the conference report on S.Con.Res. 95, May 19, 2004; the Senate did not consider it.

f. The House did not consider a budget resolution for FY2011.

Table 14. Timing of Senate Action on Budget Resolutions

Fiscal
Year

Budget Resolution
(Companion Measure)

Typea

Date Consideration Began

Date of Initial Passage

Date Conference
Report Adopted

1976

H.Con.Res. 218 (S.Con.Res. 32)

H.Con.Res. 466 (S.Con.Res. 76)

first


second

04-29-1975


11-19-1975

05-01-1975


11-20-1975

05-14-1975


12-11-1975

1977

S.Con.Res. 109 (H.Con.Res. 611)

S.Con.Res. 139 (H.Con.Res. 728)

S.Con.Res. 10
(H.Con.Res. 110)

first


second


third

04-08-1976


09-08-1976


02-21-1977

04-12-1976


09-09-1976


02-22-1977

05-12-1976


09-15-1976


03-03-1977

1978

S.Con.Res. 19
(H.Con.Res. 214)

H.Con.Res. 341 (S.Con.Res. 43)

first


second

05-02-1977


09-07-1977

05-04-1977


09-09-1977

05-13-1977


09-15-1977

1979

S.Con.Res. 80
(H.Con.Res. 559)

H.Con.Res. 683 (S.Con.Res. 104)

first


second

04-24-1978


08-25-1978

04-26-1978


09-06-1978

05-15-1978


09-23-1978

1980

H.Con.Res. 107 (S.Con.Res. 22)

S.Con.Res. 53
(H.Con.Res. 186)

first


second

04-23-1979


11-16-1979

04-25-1979


11-16-1979

05-23-1979


b

1981

H.Con.Res. 307 (S.Con.Res. 86)

H.Con.Res. 448 (S.Con.Res. 119)

first


second

05-05-1980


11-18-1980

05-12-1980


11-19-1980

06-12-1980


11-20-1980

1982

H.Con.Res. 115 (S.Con.Res. 19)

S.Con.Res. 50
(H.Con.Res. 230)

first


second

05-07-1981


12-08-1981

05-12-1981


12-09-1981

05-21-1981


b

1983

S.Con.Res. 92
(H.Con.Res. 352)

05-14-1982

05-21-1982

06-23-1982

1984

H.Con.Res. 91
(S.Con.Res. 27)

05-02-1983

05-19-1983

06-23-1983

1985

H.Con.Res. 280 (S.Con.Res. 106)

05-18-1984

05-18-1984

09-26-1984

1986

S.Con.Res. 32
(H.Con.Res. 152)

04-25-1985

05-09-1985

08-01-1985

1987

S.Con.Res. 120 (H.Con.Res. 337)

04-21-1986

05-01-1986

06-27-1986

1988

H.Con.Res. 93
(S.Con.Res. 49)

04-28-1987

05-06-1987

06-24-1987

1989

H.Con.Res. 268 (S.Con.Res. 113)

04-11-1988

04-14-1988

06-06-1988

1990

H.Con.Res. 106 (S.Con.Res. 30)

05-02-1989

05-04-1989

05-18-1989

1991

H.Con.Res. 310 (S.Con.Res. 110)

06-14-1990

06-14-1990

10-09-1990

1992

H.Con.Res. 121 (S.Con.Res. 29)

04-23-1991

04-25-1991

05-22-1991

1993

H.Con.Res. 287 (S.Con.Res. 106)

04-07-1992

04-10-1992

05-21-1992

1994

H.Con.Res. 64
(S.Con.Res. 18)

03-17-1993

03-25-1993

04-01-1993

1995

H.Con.Res. 218 (S.Con.Res. 63)

03-22-1994

03-25-1994

05-12-1994

1996

H.Con.Res. 67
(S.Con.Res. 13)

05-18-1995

05-25-1995

06-29-1995

1997

H.Con.Res. 178
(S.Con.Res. 57)

05-15-1996

05-23-1996

06-13-1996

1998

H.Con.Res. 84
(S.Con.Res. 27)

05-20-1997

05-23-1997

06-05-1997

1999

H.Con.Res. 284
(S.Con.Res. 86)

03-27-1998

04-02-1998

2000

H.Con.Res. 68
(S.Con.Res. 20

03-24-1999

03-25-1999

04-15-1999

2001

H.Con.Res. 290
(S.Con.Res. 101)

04-04-2000

04-07-2000

04-13-2001

2002

H.Con.Res. 83
(no companion measure)c

04-02-2001

04-06-2001

05-10-2001

2003

H.Con.Res. 353
(S.Con.Res. 100)

2004

H.Con.Res. 95
(S.Con.Res. 23)

03-18-2003

03-26-2003

04-11-2003

2005

S.Con.Res. 95
(H.Con.Res. 393)

03-08-2004

03-12-2004

2006

H.Con.Res. 95
(S.Con.Res. 18)

03-14-2005

03-17-2005

04-28-2005

2007

H.Con.Res. 376
(S.Con.Res. 83)

03-13-2006

03-16-2006

2008

S.Con.Res. 21
(H.Con.Res. 99)

03-20-2007

03-23-2007

05-17-2007

2009

S.Con.Res. 70
(H.Con.Res. 312)

03-10-2008

03-14-2008

06-04-2008

2010

S.Con.Res. 13
(H.Con.Res. 85)

03-30-2009

04-02-2009

04-29-2009

2011d

S.Con.Res. 60
(no companion measure)

2012e

(H.Con.Res. 34)

2013f

(H.Con.Res. 112)

2014

S.Con.Res. 8
(H.Con.Res. 25)

03-20-2013

03-23-2013

2015

(H.Con.Res. 96)

2016

S.Con.Res. 11
(H.Con.Res. 27)

03-23-2015

03-27-2013

05-05-2015

Source: Legislative Information System (LIS).

Notes: Unless otherwise indicated, no date in the conference report column indicates that Congress did not complete action on the budget resolution for that year.

a. For purposes of this table, "type" refers to whether the budget resolution was the first, second, or third for the fiscal year. Originally, the Budget Act provided for the annual adoption of two budget resolutions for a fiscal year and the option of additional budget resolutions. In 1985, the act was amended to eliminate the second budget resolution; the option of additional budget resolutions remains.

b. The House adopted the Senate's version of the budget resolution; no conference report was necessary.

c. The Senate Budget Committee did not mark up or report a budget resolution for FY2002. Instead, the Senate considered the House-passed budget resolution after the Senate Budget Committee was discharged from its consideration.

d. The Senate Budget Committee reported the listed FY2003 budget resolution, but the full Senate did not consider it.

e. The Senate did not consider a budget resolution for FY2012; on May 25, 2011, the Senate rejected motions to proceed to four different budget resolutions for FY2012.

f. The Senate did not consider a budget resolution for FY2013; on May 16, 2012, the Senate rejected motions to proceed to five different budget resolutions for FY2013.

Modifications to the Procedures and Requirements Pertaining to the Development, Content, and Consideration of the Budget Resolution

Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act of 1978 ("Humphrey-Hawkins Act"; P.L. 95-523; 92 Stat. 1887-1908; October 27, 1978)

  • Called for a period of up to four hours for debate on economic goals and priorities following the presentation of opening floor statements on the budget resolution.

Temporary Increase in the Public Debt Limit (P.L. 96-5; 93 Stat. 8; April 2, 1979)

  • Mandated that the President's budget and the Budget Committees' reported budget resolution for FY1981 and FY1982 be in balance. (Provision was repealed in 1982.)

Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Title II of P.L. 99-177; 99 Stat. 1038-1101; December 12, 1985)12

  • Required Congress to complete action on a budget resolution by April 15 of each year (deadline moved from May 15).
  • Eliminated the requirement that Congress adopt a second budget resolution annually by September 15.
  • Formalized the practice of adopting a three-year budget resolution, with the second and third fiscal years non-binding. (Current law requires budget resolutions to cover at least five fiscal years.)
  • Called for off-budget entities, except Social Security, to be included in the budget resolution and the President's budget.
  • Formalized the practice of including credit authority (direct and guaranteed loans) in the budget resolution.
  • Mandated that neither chamber may consider a budget resolution, amendment to a budget resolution, or conference report on a budget resolution that recommends a deficit amount greater than the applicable maximum deficit amount established in the 1985 Balanced Budget Act.
  • Excluded Social Security from budget totals, except for purposes of calculating the deficit in order to determine if sequestration is required. The budget resolution may contain two deficit totals: one with Social Security and one without.

Budget Enforcement Act (BEA) of 1990 (Title XIII of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990; P.L. 101-508; 104 Stat. 1388-573 through 630; November 5, 1990)13

  • Added language to the Budget Act allowing the option to include pay-as-you-go procedures for the Senate and House in the budget resolution (Sections 301(b)(7) and 301(b)(8)).
  • Required that the budget resolutions for FY1991-FY1995 cover five fiscal years. (Current law permanently requires at least five fiscal years; see BEA of 1997 below.)
  • In the Senate, prohibited the consideration of a reported budget resolution calling for a reduction in Social Security surpluses.
  • Changed deadline for submitting views and estimates reports from "on or before February 25 of each year" to "within 6 weeks after the President submits a budget."
  • Added language to the Budget Act allowing the option of including Social Security outlays and revenues in the budget resolution for purposes of Senate enforcement.
  • In the Senate, created a point of order that prohibits the consideration of any budget resolution that would exceed any of the discretionary spending limits. (Initially, this point of order was added to the Budget Act as a temporary Section (601(b)); the BEA of 1997 permanently added this point of order to the Budget Act as Section 312(b) and applied the point of order to any legislation.)

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (Title XIV of P.L. 103-66; 107 Stat. 683-685; August 10, 1993)

  • Extended through FY1998 the BEA requirement that budget resolutions cover five fiscal years.

Budget Resolution for FY1995 (H.Con.Res. 218; 103rd Congress; May 12, 1994)14

  • Made permanent a temporary modification found in the budget resolutions for FY1993 and FY1994, which applied Section 301(i) to a budget resolution at any stage of consideration. Section 301(i) of the Budget Act prohibits the Senate from considering any reported budget resolution that would decrease the excess of Social Security revenues over Social Security outlays for any of the fiscal years covered by the resolution, subject to a three-fifths waiver requirement. This creates a "firewall" to protect Social Security balances.

Budget Enforcement Act of 1997 (Title X of P.L. 105-33; 111 Stat. 677-712; August 5, 1997)15

  • Permanently required the budget resolution to cover at least five fiscal years.
  • Made optional rather than mandatory the inclusion of total direct loan obligation and total primary loan guarantee commitment levels in the budget resolution and the accompanying report.
  • Modified the optional contents of the budget resolution to include special pay-as-you-go procedures in the Senate pertaining to the use of reserve funds.
  • Allowed the Budget Committees to set an alternative deadline for committees to submit their views and estimates instead of the usual deadline of within six weeks after the President submits a budget.
  • Applied the Senate point of order against a budget resolution recommending a decrease in the projected surplus in the Social Security trust funds to all its legislative stages.

Budget Resolution for FY2000 (H.Con.Res. 68; 106th Congress; April 15, 1999)

  • Created a point of order that prohibited consideration of a revised FY2000 or a FY2001 budget resolution setting forth an on-budget deficit for any fiscal year (i.e., excluding any surplus resulting from the Social Security trust fund). The provision did not apply if the deficit for a fiscal year resulted solely from legislation that made structural programmatic reforms to enhance retirement security.

Budget Resolution for FY2001 (H.Con.Res. 290; 106th Congress; April 13, 2000)

  • Applied the point of order against budget resolutions setting forth an on-budget deficit for any fiscal year (see FY2000 budget resolution) to a revised FY2001 or a FY2002 budget resolution. The provision would not apply if the economy experienced low growth in two consecutive quarters or if a declaration of war was in effect.
  • Specified that amendments that contain predominately "precatory" language, such as sense-of-the-Senate amendments, are not germane, effectively prohibiting such amendments to budget resolutions and reconciliation legislation.

Budget Resolution for FY2004 (H.Con.Res. 95; 108th Congress; April 11, 2003)

  • Extended through September 30, 2008, the three-fifths vote requirement in the Senate to waive and to sustain an appeal of a ruling of the chair on certain points of order specified in Sections 904(c)(2) and 904(d)(3) of the Budget Act.

Budget Resolution for FY2006 (H.Con.Res. 95; 109th Congress; April 28, 2005)

  • Extended through September 30, 2010, the three-fifths vote requirement in the Senate to waive and to sustain an appeal of a ruling of the chair on certain points of order specified in Sections 904(c)(2) and 904(d)(3) of the Budget Act.

House Rule XXI, Clause 7 (H.Res. 6; 110th Congress; January 5, 2007)

  • Created a point of order against the consideration of a budget resolution containing budget reconciliation directives having a net effect of reducing the surplus or increasing the deficit. (Clause was modified at the beginning of the 112th Congress; see below.)

Budget Resolution for FY2008 (S.Con.Res. 21; 110th Congress; May 17, 2007)

  • Extended through September 30, 2017, the three-fifths vote requirement in the Senate to waive and to sustain an appeal of a ruling of the chair on certain points of order specified in Sections 904(c)(2) and 904(d)(3) of the Budget Act.

House Rule XXI, Clause 7 (H.Res. 5; 112th Congress; January 5, 2011)

  • Modified the rule to prohibit the consideration of a budget resolution containing reconciliation directives that would result in budget reconciliation legislation that would cause a net increase in direct spending (i.e., mandatory spending) over the period of the budget resolution.

Separate Order in House for 113th Congress (Section 3(e) of H.Res. 5; 113th Congress; January 3, 2013)

  • Created a requirement that the budget resolution (as well as any amendments thereto and any conference report thereon) include for means-tested direct spending and non-means-tested direct spending the following information: (1) the average growth rate (in terms of outlays) for the 10 years preceding the budget year; (2) estimates under current law for the period covered by the budget resolution; and (3) information on proposed reforms. (This requirement was extended to the 114th Congress by Section 3(h) of H.Res. 5, 114th Congress, January 6, 2015.)

Budget Resolution for FY2016 (S.Con.Res. 11; 114th Congress; May 5, 2015)

  • Extended through September 30, 2025, the three-fifths vote requirement in the Senate to waive and to sustain an appeal of a ruling of the chair on certain points of order specified in Sections 904(c)(2) and 904(d)(3) of the Budget Act.

Author Contact Information

[author name scrubbed], Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process ([email address scrubbed], [phone number scrubbed])

Acknowledgments

Several analysts, including former CRS employees, assisted in compiling the information in this report and contributed to its development. The current author, however, assumes responsibility for its current content.

Key Policy Staff

Area of Expertise

Name

Phone

Email

Congressional budget procedure

[author name scrubbed]

[phone number scrubbed]

[email address scrubbed]

Congressional budget procedure

[author name scrubbed]

[phone number scrubbed]

[email address scrubbed]

Congressional budget procedure

Megan Suzanne Lynch

[phone number scrubbed]

[email address scrubbed]

Congressional budget procedure

[author name scrubbed]

[phone number scrubbed]

[email address scrubbed]

Information research specialist

[author name scrubbed]

[phone number scrubbed]

[email address scrubbed]

Footnotes

1.

For a thorough review of the development and early implementation of the Budget Act, see Allen Schick, Congress and Money: Budgeting, Spending and Taxing (Washington, DC: Urban Institute, 1980).

2.

In 2013, the House and Senate agreed to establish a "Congressional Budget" in statute as an alternative to the budget resolution for FY2014 (Subtitle B, Title I, of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 [Div. A of P.L. 113-67, Dec. 26, 2013]). The statutory provisions are not in the form of a concurrent resolution as provided for in the Budget Act and therefore not treated as a budget resolution for purposes of this report.

3.

In the absence of an agreement on the budget resolution, the House and Senate separately have agreed to "deeming resolution" provisions for budget enforcement purposes. For further information on "deeming resolution" provisions, see CRS Report RL31443, The "Deeming Resolution": A Budget Enforcement Tool.

4.

In two of these years (1979 for FY1980 and 1981 for FY1982), the House adopted the Senate version of the second budget resolution rather than adopting its own; therefore, the chambers did not need to resolve differences between different versions of the second budget resolution for those fiscal years in a conference committee or through an amendment exchange.

5.

For a more detailed discussion of the budget reconciliation process, see CRS Report RL33030, The Budget Reconciliation Process: House and Senate Procedures.

6.

For a brief summary of these procedures, see CRS Report 98-814, Budget Reconciliation Legislation: Development and Consideration, Budget Reconciliation Legislation: Development and Consideration.

7.

The number (21) of budget resolutions containing budget reconciliation directives includes the FY1976 second budget resolution (H.Con.Res. 466) and therefore is not included in Table 5. There has been an ongoing controversy about whether the directive in this budget resolution was a budget reconciliation directive as set forth in Section 310 of the Congressional Budget Act. The Senate treated it as such and considered the resultant legislation (H.R. 5559, as reported by the Senate Finance Committee, 94th Congress) under the budget reconciliation procedures. The House did not, however, consider and adopt its version of the resultant legislation as a budget reconciliation measure, and thus it presumably did not consider the directive as a budget reconciliation directive. See Floyd M. Riddick and Alan S. Frumin, Riddick's Senate Procedure: Precedents and Practices (rev. ed.), S.Doc. 101-28, 101st Cong., 1st sess. (Washington: GPO, 1992), pp. 622-623. The legislation subsequently was adopted by the Senate and House but was vetoed by the President. For further information on these directives, see (1) CRS Congressional Distribution Memorandum, Reconciliation Directives to House Committees in Budget Resolutions for FY1976-FY2005; and (2) CRS Congressional Distribution Memorandum, Reconciliation Directives to Senate Committees in Budget Resolutions for FY1976-FY2005 (available from the author).

8.

The FY1983 budget resolution exempted legislation dealing with certain trust funds from its deferred enrollment provision.

9.

For a brief discussion of these procedures, see CRS Report 98-511, Consideration of the Budget Resolution.

10.

The averages presented in this section are derived from all first budget resolutions considered on the House floor, including those ultimately rejected by the House.

11.

The averages presented in this section are derived from all first budget resolutions considered on the Senate floor. Accordingly, they do not include the budget resolutions for FY2003 and FY2011, which were reported by the Senate Budget Committee but did not receive floor consideration.

12.

For more information on changes made by the 1985 Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act, see CRS Report 86-713, Changes in the Congressional Budget Process Made by the 1985 Balanced Budget Act (P.L. 99-177); and CRS Report 85-1130, Explanation of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 P.L. 99-177 (The Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act), both available from the author.

13.

See CRS Report 90-520, Budget Enforcement Act of 1990: Brief Summary, available from the author.

14.

Although budget resolutions, which are agreed to in the form of a concurrent resolution, do not have the force of law, they can contain changes in congressional budget procedures.

15.

For more information on changes made by the Budget Enforcement Act of 1997, see CRS Report 97-931, Budget Enforcement Act of 1997: Summary and Legislative History.

Лучший частный хостинг