The Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (Titles I-IX of P.L. 93-344, as amended; 2 U.S.C. 601-688) provides for the annual adoption of a concurrent resolution on the budget each year. The congressional budget resolution represents a budget plan for the upcoming fiscal year and at least the following four fiscal years. As a concurrent resolution, it is not presented to the President for his signature and thus does not become law. Instead, when adopted by Congress, the budget resolution serves as an agreement between the House and Senate on a congressional budget plan. As such, it provides the framework for subsequent legislative action on budget matters during each congressional session.
In 32 of the 41 years under the Budget Act, Congress adopted at least one budget resolution for the fiscal year beginning in such year. Congress did not complete action on a budget resolution for nine fiscal years, most recently for FY2015. A second budget resolution for a fiscal year was adopted in each of the first seven years, and a third budget resolution was adopted in one year (for FY1977). Since 1982, Congress has considered only one budget resolution for each fiscal year. Congress initially was required to cover only the upcoming fiscal year in the budget resolution, but over the years Congress has expanded this time frame. Currently, the budget resolution must include at least five fiscal years.
The budget resolution may include budget reconciliation directives instructing one or more committees to recommend legislative changes to meet the direct spending and revenue levels included in the budget resolution. In the past 41 years, Congress included budget reconciliation directives in 22 budget resolutions. Such directives have resulted in 24 budget reconciliation measures and the enactment of 20 of them. (Four budget reconciliation measures have been vetoed.)
The House has considered and adopted fewer amendments to the budget resolution than the Senate. For the last three decades, the House has considered the budget resolutions under special rules that generally have made in order only amendments in the nature of a substitute. Since 1983, the House typically has considered between three and seven such amendments to the budget resolution each year, rejecting all but two of these. In contrast, during the period between 1975 and 2015, the Senate considered an average of almost 54 amendments per budget resolution, agreeing to an average of about 31 of these.
The Budget Act sets April 15 as a target date for completing action on the annual budget resolution. (Prior to 1986, the date was May 15.) During the past 41 years, when Congress has completed action on a budget resolution, Congress adopted the budget resolution by the target date only six times, most recently in 2003 with the FY2004 budget resolution. Budget resolutions have been adopted an average of almost 36 days after the target date.
This report will be updated as warranted.
The Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (Titles I-IX of P.L. 93-344, as amended; 2 U.S.C. 601-688) provides for the annual adoption of a concurrent resolution on the budget each year. The congressional budget resolution represents a budget plan for the upcoming fiscal year and at least the following four fiscal years. As a concurrent resolution, it is not presented to the President for his signature and thus does not become law. Instead, when adopted by Congress, the budget resolution serves as an agreement between the House and Senate on a congressional budget plan. As such, it provides the framework for subsequent legislative action on budget matters during each congressional session.
In 32 of the 41 years under the Budget Act, Congress adopted at least one budget resolution for the fiscal year beginning in such year. Congress did not complete action on a budget resolution for nine fiscal years, most recently for FY2015. A second budget resolution for a fiscal year was adopted in each of the first seven years, and a third budget resolution was adopted in one year (for FY1977). Since 1982, Congress has considered only one budget resolution for each fiscal year. Congress initially was required to cover only the upcoming fiscal year in the budget resolution, but over the years Congress has expanded this time frame. Currently, the budget resolution must include at least five fiscal years.
The budget resolution may include budget reconciliation directives instructing one or more committees to recommend legislative changes to meet the direct spending and revenue levels included in the budget resolution. In the past 41 years, Congress included budget reconciliation directives in 22 budget resolutions. Such directives have resulted in 24 budget reconciliation measures and the enactment of 20 of them. (Four budget reconciliation measures have been vetoed.)
The House has considered and adopted fewer amendments to the budget resolution than the Senate. For the last three decades, the House has considered the budget resolutions under special rules that generally have made in order only amendments in the nature of a substitute. Since 1983, the House typically has considered between three and seven such amendments to the budget resolution each year, rejecting all but two of these. In contrast, during the period between 1975 and 2015, the Senate considered an average of almost 54 amendments per budget resolution, agreeing to an average of about 31 of these.
The Budget Act sets April 15 as a target date for completing action on the annual budget resolution. (Prior to 1986, the date was May 15.) During the past 41 years, when Congress has completed action on a budget resolution, Congress adopted the budget resolution by the target date only six times, most recently in 2003 with the FY2004 budget resolution. Budget resolutions have been adopted an average of almost 36 days after the target date.
This report will be updated as warranted.
The Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (Titles I-IX of P.L. 93-344, as amended; 2 U.S.C. 601-688; hereafter referred to as the "Budget Act") provides for the annual adoption of a concurrent resolution on the budget each year. The congressional budget resolution represents a budget plan for the upcoming fiscal year and at least the following four fiscal years. As a concurrent resolution, it is not presented to the President for his signature and thus does not become law. Instead, when adopted by Congress, the budget resolution serves as an agreement between the House and Senate on a congressional budget plan. As such, it provides the framework for subsequent legislative action on the annual appropriations bills, revenue measures, reconciliation legislation, and any other budgetary legislation. While the programmatic assumptions (i.e., the specific mix of revenue and spending policies that are assumed within the budget levels) are not binding, the totals and committee spending allocations may be enforced through points of order and through the budget reconciliation process (explained below).
This report provides current and historical information on the budget resolution. It provides a list of the budget resolutions adopted and rejected by Congress since implementation of the Budget Act, including the U.S. Statutes-at-Large citations and committee report numbers, and describes their formulation and content. The report provides a table of selected optional components, a list of the budget reconciliation measures developed pursuant to directives contained in budget resolutions, and information on the number of years covered by budget resolutions. It also provides information on the consideration and adoption of budget resolutions, including an identification of the House special rules that provided for consideration of budget resolutions, the amendments in the nature of a substitute to the budget resolution considered in the House, the number and disposition of House and Senate amendments to budget resolutions, and dates of House and Senate action on budget resolutions.
Congress has modified the congressional budget process several times since it was first established in 1974. The Appendix identifies laws, budget resolutions, and other resolutions that modified the procedures and requirements pertaining to the development, content, and consideration of the budget resolution.
As originally enacted, the Budget Act provided for the annual adoption of two budget resolutions for each year.1 The first budget resolution, adopted in the spring, set nonbinding "targets" to guide the consideration of budgetary legislation. The second budget resolution, adopted in the fall (about two weeks before the beginning of the fiscal year), was intended to provide Congress, after considering and possibly completing action on specific budgetary legislation, the opportunity to either reaffirm or revise the budget levels in the first budget resolution. Additional budget resolutions, or revisions to the previous one, could be (and still can be) adopted at any time.
The Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Title II of P.L. 99-177, 99 Stat. 1038-1101; hereafter referred to as the "Deficit Control Act") eliminated the requirement for a second budget resolution beginning in 1986 (for the FY1987 budget resolution). For several preceding years, for FY1983-FY1986, Congress did not adopt a second budget resolution but instead included a provision in the first budget resolution that made the spending and revenue totals in it binding automatically as of the beginning of the fiscal year.
During the 41 years under the Budget Act (1975 to the present), Congress has completed action on 40 budget resolutions, including in some years multiple budget resolutions for a single fiscal year. In 32 of the 41 years, Congress adopted at least one budget resolution for the fiscal year.2 Congress did not complete action on a budget resolution for nine fiscal years, most recently for FY2015.3 Congress also adopted a second budget resolution in seven of the 41 years.4 In 1977, Congress adopted a third budget resolution for FY1977, further revising the budget levels that fiscal year.
Table 1 lists all budget resolutions adopted by Congress, with the House and Senate votes on initial passage and adoption of the conference report. It also includes, in italics, budget resolutions reported or considered in one chamber but not the other for those fiscal years that Congress did not complete action on a budget resolution. The U.S. Statutes-at-Large citations for budget resolutions adopted by Congress are listed in Table 2. (Although concurrent resolutions such as budget resolutions have no statutory authority, they are compiled in a special section of the U.S. Statutes-at-Large.) Table 3 lists the budget resolutions rejected in the House. No budget resolutions have been rejected in the Senate; however, the Senate rejected several motions to proceed to different budget resolutions in 2011 and 2012.
Congress |
Fiscal Year |
Budget Resolution |
Typea |
Initial Passage |
Conference Report |
||
House Vote |
Senate Vote |
House Vote |
Senate Vote |
||||
94th |
1976 |
first |
200-196 |
69-22 |
230-193 |
voice |
|
second |
225-191 |
69-23 |
189-187 |
74-19 |
|||
1977 |
first |
221-155 |
62-22 |
224-170 |
65-29 |
||
second |
227-151 |
55-23 |
234-143 |
66-20 |
|||
95th |
third |
239-169 |
72-20 |
226-173 |
voice |
||
1978 |
first |
213-179 |
56-31 |
221-177 |
54-23 |
||
second |
199-188 |
63-21 |
215-187 |
68-21 |
|||
1979 |
first |
201-197 |
64-27 |
201-198 |
voice |
||
second |
217-178 |
56-18 |
225-162 |
47-7 |
|||
96th |
1980 |
first |
220-184 |
64-20 |
202-196 |
72-17 |
|
second |
206-186 |
57-20 |
— |
— |
|||
1981 |
first |
225-193c |
68-28 |
205-195 |
61-26 |
||
second |
203-191 |
48-46 |
voice |
50-38 |
|||
97th |
1982 |
first |
270-154 |
78-20 |
244-155 |
76-20 |
|
second |
206-200 |
49-48 |
— |
— |
|||
1983 |
— |
219-206 |
49-43 |
210-208 |
51-45 |
||
98th |
1984 |
— |
229-196 |
50-49 |
239-186 |
51-43 |
|
1985 |
— |
250-168 |
41-34 |
232-162 |
voice |
||
99th |
1986 |
— |
258-170 |
voice |
309-119 |
67-32 |
|
1987 |
— |
245-179 |
70-25 |
333-43 |
voice |
||
100th |
1988 |
— |
voice |
56-42 |
215-201 |
53-46 |
|
1989 |
— |
319-102 |
69-26 |
201-181 |
58-29 |
||
101st |
1990 |
— |
263-157 |
68-31 |
241-185 |
63-37 |
|
1991 |
— |
218-208 |
voice |
250-164 |
66-33 |
||
102nd |
1992 |
— |
261-163 |
voice |
239-181 |
57-41 |
|
1993 |
— |
215-201e |
voice |
209-207 |
52-41 |
||
103rd |
1994 |
— |
243-183 |
54-45 |
240-184 |
55-45 |
|
1995 |
— |
223-175 |
57-40 |
220-183 |
53-46 |
||
104th |
1996 |
— |
238-193 |
57-42 |
239-194 |
54-46 |
|
1997 |
— |
226-195 |
53-46 |
216-211 |
53-46 |
||
105th |
1998 |
— |
333-99 |
78-22 |
327-97 |
76-22 |
|
1999f |
— |
216-204 |
57-41 |
— |
— |
||
106th |
2000 |
— |
221-208 |
55-44 |
220-208 |
54-44 |
|
2001 |
— |
211-207 |
51-45 |
220-208 |
50-48 |
||
107th |
2002 |
H.Con.Res. 83 (no companion measure)g |
— |
222-205 |
63-35 |
221-207 |
53-47 |
2003h |
— |
221-209 |
— |
— |
— |
||
108th |
2004 |
— |
215-212 |
56-44 |
216-211 |
51-50 |
|
2005i |
— |
215-212 |
51-45 |
216-213 |
— |
||
109th |
2006 |
— |
218-214 |
51-49 |
214-211 |
52-47 |
|
2007j |
— |
218-210 |
51-49 |
— |
— |
||
110th |
2008 |
— |
216-210 |
52-47 |
214-209 |
52-40 |
|
2009 |
— |
212-207 |
51-44 |
214-210 |
48-45 |
||
111th |
2010 |
— |
233-196 |
55-43 |
233-193 |
53-43 |
|
2011k |
S.Con.Res. 60 (no companion measure) |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
112th |
2012l |
H.Con.Res. 34 (no companion measure) |
— |
235-193 |
— |
— |
— |
2013m |
H.Con.Res. 112 (no companion measure) |
— |
228-191 |
— |
— |
— |
|
113th |
2014n |
— |
221-207 |
50-49 |
— |
— |
|
2015o |
H.Con.Res. 96 (no companion measure) |
— |
219-205 |
— |
— |
— |
|
114th |
2016 |
— |
228-199 |
52-46 |
226-197 |
51-48 |
Source: Legislative Information System (LIS).
Notes: Congress did not complete action on the budget resolutions for the fiscal years in italics; for those years, the concurrent resolution listed was reported by the applicable budget committee and/or was considered by the applicable chamber.
a. For purposes of this table, "type" refers to whether the budget resolution was the first, second, or third for the fiscal year. Originally, the Budget Act provided for the annual adoption of two budget resolutions for a fiscal year and the option of additional budget resolutions. In 1985, the act was amended to eliminate the second budget resolution; the option of additional budget resolutions remains.
b. The House rejected its version of the budget resolution (see Table 3 of this report) and adopted the Senate's version of the budget resolution; no conference report was necessary.
c. The question was divided, with separate votes on Sections 1-5 and 7 and on Section 6 (revised FY1980 budget resolution).
d. The House laid its version of the budget resolution on the table by unanimous consent and adopted the Senate's version of the budget resolution; no conference report was necessary.
e. The question was divided, with separate votes on Sections 1, 2, and 4 and on Section 3 (revised the spending and revenue levels if certain legislation was not enacted into law before conferees on the budget resolution were appointed).
f. Congress did not complete action on the budget resolution for FY1999. In the absence of such budget resolution, the House agreed to H.Res. 477 on June 19, 1998, and H.Res. 5 on January 6, 1999, which provided that, among other things, the House-adopted FY1999 budget resolution (H.Con.Res. 284, 105th Congress) shall have "force and effect" as if it were adopted by Congress. Likewise, the Senate agreed to S.Res. 209 on April 2, 1998, and S.Res. 312 on October 21, 1998, which set forth budget levels enforceable as if they were included in a budget resolution agreed to by Congress.
g. The Senate Budget Committee did not mark up or report a budget resolution for FY2002. Instead, the Senate considered the House-passed budget resolution after the Senate Budget Committee was discharged from its consideration.
h. Congress did not complete action on the budget resolution for FY2003. In the absence of such budget resolution, the House agreed to H.Res. 428 on May 22, 2002, and H.Res. 5 on January 7, 2003, which provided that, among other things, the House-adopted FY2003 budget resolution (H.Con.Res. 353, 107th Congress) shall have "force and effect" as if it were adopted by Congress. The Senate did not take similar action in relation to the FY2003 budget resolution.
i. Congress did not complete action on the budget resolution for FY2005. As indicated, the House agreed to the conference report to S.Con.Res. 95 (H.Rept. 108-498), but the Senate never considered it. In the absence of Senate action, the House agreed to H.Res. 649 (108th Congress) on May 19, 2004, and H.Res. 5 (109th Congress) on January 4, 2005, which provided that, among other things, the conference report to S.Con.Res. 95 (H.Rept. 108-498) shall have "force and effect" as if it was adopted by Congress. As for the Senate, Section 14007 of the Defense Appropriations Act, 2005 (P.L. 108-287), enacted on August 5, 2004, established enforceable FY2005 spending allocations for the Senate Appropriations Committee.
j. Congress did not complete action on the budget resolution for FY2007. In the absence of such budget resolution, the House agreed to H.Res. 818, which provided that, among other things, the House-adopted FY2007 budget resolution (H.Con.Res. 376, 109th Congress) shall have "force and effect" as if it were adopted by Congress. As for the Senate, Section 7035 of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (P.L. 109-234), enacted on June 15, 2006, established enforceable FY2007 spending allocations for the Senate Appropriations Committee.
k. Congress did not complete action on the budget resolution for FY2011. In the absence of such budget resolution, the House agreed to a "budget enforcement resolution" (H.Res. 1493) on July 1, 2010, which provided through the end of the 111th Congress enforceable spending levels for FY2011, among other provisions. At the beginning of the 112th Congress, the House adopted a separate order in H.Res. 5 (Section 3(b)) that provided for the enforcement of budget levels submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the chair of the House Budget Committee (HBC); in addition, on January 25, 2011, the House adopted H.Res. 38, directing the HBC chair to submit such allocations that assume "non-security spending at fiscal year 2008 levels or less." The Senate did not take similar action in relation to the FY2011 budget resolution.
l. Congress did not complete action on the budget resolution for FY2012. In the absence of such budget resolution, the House agreed to H.Res. 287 (112th Congress) on June 1, 2012, which provided that, among other things, the House-adopted FY2012 budget resolution (H.Con.Res. 34) shall have "force and effect" as if it were adopted by Congress. As for the Senate, Section 106 of the Budget Control Act of 2011 (P.L. 112-25), enacted on August 2, 2011, provided for enforceable budget levels as an alternative to a FY2012 budget resolution.
m. Congress did not complete action on the budget resolution for FY2013. In the absence of such budget resolution, the House agreed to H.Res. 614 (112th Congress) on June 1, 2012 (amended by H.Res. 643 on May 8, 2012), and H.Res. 5 (113th Congress) on January 3, 2013, which provided that, among other things, the House-adopted FY2013 budget resolution (H.Con.Res. 112) shall have "force and effect" as if it were adopted by Congress. As for the Senate, Section 106 of the Budget Control Act of 2011 (P.L. 112-25), enacted on August 2, 2011, provided for enforceable budget levels as an alternative to a FY2013 budget resolution.
n. Congress did not complete action on the budget resolution for FY2014. In lieu of such budget resolution, Subtitle B, Title I, of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (BBA, Div. A of P.L. 113-67), enacted on December 26, 2013, provided for enforceable budget levels and other procedural provisions as an alternative to a FY2014 budget resolution. Prior to the enactment of the BBA, the House agreed to H.Res. 243 (113th Congress) on June 4, 2013, which provided that, among other things, the House-adopted FY2014 budget resolution (H.Con.Res. 25) shall have "force and effect" as if it were adopted by Congress. The Senate had not taken any similar action prior to the enactment of the BBA.
o. Congress did not complete action on the budget resolution for FY2015. In lieu of such budget resolution, Subtitle B, Title I, of the BBA of 2013 provided for enforceable budget levels and other procedural provisions as an alternative to a FY2015 budget resolution.
Congress |
Fiscal Year |
Typea |
Budget Resolution |
U.S. Statutes-at-Large Citation |
94th |
1976 |
first |
89 Stat. 1197-1198 |
|
1977 |
first |
90 Stat. 3029-3030 |
||
95th |
1977 |
third |
91 Stat. 1666-1667 |
|
1978 |
first |
91 Stat. 1670-1673 |
||
1979 |
first |
92 Stat. 3870-3872 |
||
96th |
1980 |
first |
93 Stat. 1413-1416 |
|
1981 |
first |
94 Stat. 3655-3668 |
||
97th |
1982 |
first |
95 Stat. 1743-1759 |
|
1983 |
— |
96 Stat. 2647-2661 |
||
98th |
1984 |
— |
97 Stat. 1501-1523 |
|
1985 |
— |
98 Stat. 3484-3498 |
||
99th |
1986 |
— |
99 Stat. 1941-1959 |
|
1987 |
— |
100 Stat. 4354-4370 |
||
100th |
1988 |
— |
101 Stat. 1986-2003 |
|
1989 |
— |
102 Stat. 4875-4886 |
||
101st |
1990 |
— |
103 Stat. 2540-2554 |
|
1991 |
— |
104 Stat. 5163-5181 |
||
102nd |
1992 |
— |
105 Stat. 2414-2433 |
|
1993 |
— |
106 Stat. 5165-5189 |
||
103rd |
1994 |
— |
107 Stat. 2508-2538 |
|
1995 |
— |
108 Stat. 5075-5103 |
||
104th |
1996 |
— |
109 Stat. 996-1030 |
|
1997 |
— |
110 Stat. 4434-4482 |
||
105th |
1998 |
— |
111 Stat. 2710-2760 |
|
1999 |
— |
— |
— |
|
106th |
2000 |
— |
113 Stat. 1968-1999 |
|
2001 |
— |
114 Stat. 3139-3173 |
||
107th |
2002 |
— |
115 Stat. 2486-2516 |
|
2003 |
— |
— |
— |
|
108th |
2004 |
— |
117 Stat. 2910-2942 |
|
2005 |
— |
— |
— |
|
109th |
2006 |
— |
119 Stat. 3633-3658 |
|
2007 |
— |
— |
— |
|
110th |
2008 |
— |
121 Stat. 2590-2633 |
|
2009 |
— |
122 Stat. 5143-5190 |
||
111th |
2010 |
— |
123 Stat. 3506-3550 |
|
2011 |
— |
— |
— |
|
112th |
2012 |
— |
— |
— |
2013 |
— |
— |
— |
|
113th |
2014 |
— |
— |
— |
2015 |
— |
— |
— |
|
114th |
2016 |
— |
Not available |
Source: U.S. Statutes-at-Large, various volumes.
Notes: Although concurrent resolutions such as budget resolutions have no statutory authority, they are compiled in a special section of the U.S. Statutes-at-Large. In this table, no U.S. Statutes-at-Large citation indicates that Congress did not complete action the budget resolution for that fiscal year.
a. For purposes of this table, "type" refers to whether the budget resolution was the first, second, or third for the fiscal year. Originally, the Budget Act provided for the annual adoption of two budget resolutions for a fiscal year and the option of additional budget resolutions. In 1985, the act was amended to eliminate the second budget resolution; the option of additional budget resolutions remains.
Congress |
Fiscal Year |
Budget Resolution |
Date |
Vote |
95th |
1978 |
04-27-1977 |
84-320 |
|
96th |
1980 |
09-19-1979 |
192-213 |
|
97th |
1983 |
05-27-1982 |
159-265 |
|
99th |
1987 |
03-13-1986 |
12-312 |
|
101st |
1991 |
H.Con.Res. 310 |
10-05-1990 |
179-254 |
104th |
1996 |
12-19-1995 |
0-412 |
Source: Legislative Information System (LIS).
Notes: All budget resolutions listed were first budget resolutions, except for FY1980, which was a second budget resolution. The Senate has not rejected a budget resolution; however, the Senate rejected several motions to proceed to different budget resolutions in 2011 and 2012.
a. The House subsequently adopted the Senate's version of the second budget resolution for FY1980 (S.Con.Res. 53).
b. After this conference report (H.Rept. 101-802) was rejected, another conference report to H.Con.Res. 310 (H.Rept. 101-820) was agreed to on October 8, 1990, by a vote of 250-164.
Following the submission of the President's budget in January or February, Congress begins developing its budget resolution. The House and Senate Budget Committees are responsible for developing and reporting the budget resolution.
Within six weeks after the President's budget submission, each House and Senate committee is required to submit its "views and estimates" relating to budget matters under its jurisdiction to its Budget Committee (Section 301(d) of the Budget Act). These views and estimates, often submitted in the form of a letter to the chair and ranking Member of the Budget Committee, typically include comments on the President's budget proposals and estimates of the budgetary impact of any legislation likely to be considered during the current session of Congress. The Budget Committees are not bound by these recommendations. The views and estimates often are printed in the committee report accompanying the resolution in the Senate or compiled in a separate committee print in the House.
The budget resolution was designed to provide a framework to make budget decisions, leaving specific program determinations to the Appropriations Committees and other committees with spending and revenue jurisdiction. In many instances, however, particular program changes are considered when formulating the budget resolution. Program assumptions sometimes are referred to in the reports of the Budget Committees or may be discussed during floor action. Although these program changes are not binding, committees may be strongly influenced by these recommendations when formulating appropriations bills, reconciliation measures, or other budgetary legislation.
Table 4 provides a list of the House, Senate, and conference reports to first budget resolutions reported or considered in either chamber.
Fiscal Year |
Budget Resolution (Companion Measure) |
House Report |
Senate |
Conference Report(s) |
1976 |
H.Rept. 94-145 |
S.Rept. 94-77 |
H.Rept. 94-198 |
|
1977 |
H.Rept. 94-1030 |
S.Rept. 94-731 |
H.Rept. 94-1108 |
|
1978 |
H.Rept. 95-239 |
S.Rept. 95-90 |
H.Rept. 95-291 |
|
1979 |
H.Rept. 95-1055 |
S.Rept. 95-739 |
H.Rept. 95-1173 |
|
1980 |
H.Rept. 96-95 |
S.Rept. 96-68 |
H.Rept. 96-211 |
|
1981 |
H.Rept. 96-857 |
S.Rept. 96-654 |
H.Rept. 96-1051 |
|
1982 |
H.Rept. 97-23 |
S.Rept. 97-49 |
H.Rept. 97-46 |
|
1983 |
H.Rept. 97-597 |
S.Rept. 97-385 |
H.Rept. 97-614 |
|
1984 |
H.Rept. 98-41 |
S.Rept. 98-63 |
H.Rept. 98-248 |
|
1985 |
[none] |
S.Rept. 98-399 |
H.Rept. 98-1079 |
|
1986 |
H.Rept. 99-133 |
S.Rept. 99-15 |
H.Rept. 99-249 |
|
1987 |
H.Rept. 99-598 |
S.Rept. 99-264 |
H.Rept. 99-664 |
|
1988 |
[none] |
[none] |
H.Rept. 100-175 |
|
1989 |
H.Rept. 100-523 |
S.Rept. 100-311 |
H.Rept. 100-658 |
|
1990 |
H.Rept. 101-42 |
S.Rept. 101-20 |
H.Rept. 101-50 |
|
1991 |
H.Rept. 101-455 |
[none] |
H.Rept. 101-820 |
|
1992 |
H.Rept. 102-32 |
S.Rept. 102-40 |
H.Rept. 102-69 |
|
1993 |
H.Rept. 102-450 |
[none] |
H.Rept. 102-529 |
|
1994 |
H.Rept. 103-31 |
S.Rept. 103-19 |
H.Rept. 103-48 |
|
1995 |
H.Rept. 103-428 |
S.Rept. 103-238 |
H.Rept. 103-490 |
|
1996 |
||||
1997 |
||||
1998 |
[none] |
|||
1999 |
— |
|||
2000 |
||||
2001 |
||||
2002 |
H.Con.Res. 83 |
[none] |
||
2003 |
— |
|||
2004 |
S.Prt. 108-19 |
|||
2005 |
S.Prt. 108-365 |
|||
2006 |
S.Prt. 109-18 |
|||
2007 |
S.Prt. 109-57 |
— |
||
2008 |
S.Prt. 110-19 |
|||
2009 |
S.Prt. 110-39 |
|||
2010 |
S.Prt. 111-16 |
|||
2011 |
S.Con.Res. 60 |
— |
S.Prt. 111-45 |
— |
2012 |
H.Con.Res. 34 |
— |
— |
|
2013 |
H.Con.Res. 112 |
— |
— |
|
2014 |
S.Prt. 113-12 |
— |
||
2015 |
H.Con.Res. 96 |
— |
— |
|
2016 |
S.Prt. 114-14 |
Source: Legislative Information System (LIS).
Notes: This list includes first budget resolutions only. In this table, no conference report listed indicates that Congress did not complete action on the budget resolution for that fiscal year.
a. The Senate Budget Committee did not mark up or report a budget resolution for FY2002. Instead, after the Senate began consideration of the House-passed budget resolution, the SBC chair offered an amendment in the nature of a substitute.
Section 301(a) of the Budget Act requires that the budget resolution include the following matters for the upcoming fiscal year and at least the ensuing four fiscal years:
Originally, the Budget Act mandated that budget resolutions cover only the upcoming fiscal year beginning on October 1 (referred to as the budget year). A desire to use the budget resolution as a tool for budget planning and other factors prompted Congress to expand this time frame to include the upcoming fiscal year as well as the two ensuing fiscal years. Congress used the authority provided by the elastic clause of the Budget Act to adopt three-year budget resolutions for the period covering the second budget resolution for FY1980 through the FY1986 budget resolution. The practice of including three fiscal years was formalized by the 1985 Deficit Control Act.
The Budget Enforcement Act (BEA) of 1990 (Title XIII of P.L. 101-508, Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, 104 Stat. 1388-573-1388 through 630) temporarily extended to five fiscal years the period the budget resolution is required to cover. The 1990 BEA provision originally covered five-year periods beginning in FY1991 and continuing through FY1995; this provision was extended to cover the FY1996 through FY1998 budget resolutions in 1993 (Title XIV of P.L. 103-66, Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, 107 Stat. 683-685). As an integral part of Congress's goal of achieving a balanced budget by FY2002, the FY1996 and FY1997 budget resolutions covered seven and six fiscal years, respectively. The Budget Enforcement Act of 1997 (Title X of P.L. 105-33, Balanced Budget Act of 1997, 111 Stat. 677-712) amended the Budget Act to require permanently that a budget resolution cover the budget year and at least the four ensuing fiscal years (for a minimum of five fiscal years).
Table 5 provides information regarding the number of years covered by the budget resolutions agreed to by Congress.
Congress also may revise budget levels for the current year in the budget resolution pursuant to Section 304 of the Budget Act. Congress has adopted 15 first budget resolutions that revised current-year budget levels.
Fiscal Year |
Budget Resolution |
Fiscal Year(s) Covered |
Current Fiscal Year Revision |
Number of Years Covered, Excluding Current Year |
1976 |
1976 |
— |
1 |
|
1977 |
1976-1977 |
1976 |
1 |
|
1978 |
1978 |
— |
1 |
|
1979 |
1979 |
— |
1 |
|
1980 |
1979-1980 |
1979 |
1 |
|
1981 |
1980-1983 |
1980 |
3 |
|
1982 |
1981-1984 |
1981 |
3 |
|
1983 |
1982-1985 |
1982 |
3 |
|
1984 |
1983-1986 |
1983 |
3 |
|
1985 |
1984-1987 |
1984 |
3 |
|
1986 |
1985-1988 |
1985 |
3 |
|
1987 |
1987-1989 |
— |
3 |
|
1988 |
1988-1990 |
— |
3 |
|
1989 |
1989-1991 |
— |
3 |
|
1990 |
1990-1992 |
— |
3 |
|
1991 |
1991-1995 |
— |
5 |
|
1992 |
1991-1996 |
1991 |
5 |
|
1993 |
1993-1997 |
— |
5 |
|
1994 |
1994-1998 |
— |
5 |
|
1995 |
1995-1999 |
— |
5 |
|
1996 |
1996-2002 |
— |
7 |
|
1997 |
1997-2002 |
— |
6 |
|
1998 |
1998-2002 |
— |
5 |
|
1999 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2000 |
2000-2009 |
— |
10 |
|
2001 |
2000-2005 |
2000 |
5 |
|
2002 |
2001-2011 |
2001 |
10 |
|
2003 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2004 |
2003-2013 |
2003 |
10 |
|
2005 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2006 |
2005-2010 |
2005 |
5 |
|
2007 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2008 |
2007-2012 |
2007 |
5 |
|
2009 |
2008-2013 |
2008 |
5 |
|
2010 |
2009-2014 |
2009 |
5 |
|
2011 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2012 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2013 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2014 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2015 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2016 |
2016-2025 |
— |
10 |
Sources: U.S. Statutes-at-Large, various volumes, and reports to accompany the budget resolutions.
Notes: This list includes first budget resolutions only. In addition, it includes budget resolutions adopted by both chambers; that is, it does not include budget resolutions adopted by only one chamber.
In addition to the content required by the Budget Act, Section 301(b) lists several other matters that may be included in the budget resolution. Table 6 provides a table indicating selected components included in first budget resolutions for FY1976-FY2016 on which Congress completed action (i.e., the House and Senate agreed).
Fiscal |
Budget Resolution |
Budget Reconciliation Directives |
Credit Levels |
Number of Reserve Fund Provisionsa |
Number of Declaratory Statementsb |
Number of Procedural Provisionsc |
1976 |
— |
— |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1977 |
— |
— |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1978 |
— |
— |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
1979 |
— |
— |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1980 |
— |
— |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1981 |
X |
X |
0 |
3 |
1 |
|
1982 |
X |
X |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
1983 |
X |
X |
0 |
3 |
6 |
|
1984 |
X |
X |
1d |
3 |
3 |
|
1985 |
— |
X |
0 |
1 |
3 |
|
1986 |
X |
X |
0 |
7 |
2 |
|
1987 |
X |
X |
2 |
8 |
1 |
|
1988 |
X |
X |
3 |
3 |
4 |
|
1989 |
— |
X |
3 |
3 |
1 |
|
1990 |
X |
X |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
1991 |
X |
X |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
1992 |
— |
X |
5 |
2 |
3 |
|
1993 |
— |
X |
5 |
8 |
4 |
|
1994 |
X |
X |
7 |
29 |
4 |
|
1995 |
— |
X |
13 |
14 |
4 |
|
1996 |
X |
X |
2 |
14 |
5 |
|
1997 |
X |
X |
3 |
39 |
3 |
|
1998 |
X |
X |
10 |
40 |
3 |
|
1999 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2000 |
X |
— |
7 |
22 |
3 |
|
2001 |
X |
— |
11 |
44 |
13 |
|
2002 |
X |
— |
9 |
14 |
5 |
|
2003 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2004 |
X |
— |
8 |
16 |
5 |
|
2005 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2006 |
X |
— |
10 |
8 |
6 |
|
2007 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2008 |
X |
— |
23 |
17 |
9 |
|
2009 |
— |
— |
56 |
13 |
8 |
|
2010 |
X |
— |
48 |
9 |
11 |
|
2011 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2012 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2013 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2014e |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2015f |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2016 |
X |
— |
131 |
19 |
29 |
Sources: U.S. Statutes-at-Large, various volumes, and reports to accompany the budget resolutions.
Notes: This list includes first budget resolutions on which Congress completed action only.
a. For purposes of this table, "reserve fund" provisions refer to any provision establishing procedures to revise budget levels—except adjustments to discretionary spending limits—for certain legislation or if some condition is met.
b. Declaratory statements express, in non-binding terms, the sense of the Congress, the sense of the House, or the sense of the Senate on various issues.
c. Some examples of the procedural provisions include deferred enrollment; automatic second budget resolutions; special budgetary treatment of certain activities, such as the sale of government assets; and more recently, enforcement of pay-as-you-go rules in the Senate and limits on advance appropriations. The number of procedural provisions does not include reconciliation instructions or reserve fund provisions.
d. The FY1984 budget resolution provided for a single deficit-neutral reserve fund for all legislative initiatives included in the Manager's Statement.
e. In lieu of the budget resolution, Section 111 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (BBA, Div. A of P.L. 113-67), enacted on December 26, 2013, provided for enforceable budget levels and other provisions associated with the FY2014 budget resolution. Several procedural provisions, including reserve fund provisions, contained in the separate FY2014 budget resolutions adopted by each chamber were made to have force and effect. For further information, see the text of H.Con.Res. 25 and S.Con.Res. 8 (113th Congress).
f. In lieu of the budget resolution, Sections 115 and 116 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (BBA, Div. A of P.L. 113-67), enacted on December 26, 2013, provided for enforceable budget levels and other provisions associated with the FY2015 budget resolution. Several procedural provisions—including reserve fund provisions, updated by one fiscal year—contained in the separate FY2014 budget resolutions adopted by each chamber were made to have force and effect. For further information, see the text of H.Con.Res. 25 and S.Con.Res. 8 (113th Congress).
The most important of the optional matters is arguably the inclusion of budget reconciliation directives provided by Section 310 of the Budget Act. Budget reconciliation is an optional two-step process Congress may use to bring direct spending, revenue, and debt limit levels into compliance with those set forth in budget resolutions.5 In order to accomplish this, Congress first includes budget reconciliation directives in a budget resolution directing one or more committees in each chamber to recommend changes in statute to achieve the levels of direct spending, revenues, debt limit, or a combination thereof agreed to in the budget resolution. The legislative language recommended by committees then is packaged "without any substantive revision" into one or more budget reconciliation bills as set forth in the budget resolution by the House and Senate Budget Committees. In some instances, a committee may be required to report its legislative recommendations directly to its chamber.
Once the Budget Committees (or individual committees if so directed) report budget reconciliation legislation to their respective chambers, consideration is governed by special procedures.6 These special rules serve to limit what may be included in budget reconciliation legislation, to prohibit certain amendments, and to encourage its completion in a timely fashion.
During the 41-year period since the congressional budget process was established, Congress has included budget reconciliation directives to House and Senate committees in 22 budget resolutions.7 Such directives have resulted in 24 budget reconciliation measures. On four occasions (in 1982, 1986, 1997, and 2006), Congress adopted two budget reconciliation measures in one year. Of the 24 budget reconciliation measures considered by Congress, 20 were signed into law and four were vetoed. Table 7 lists the budget resolutions that contained budget reconciliation directives and the associated reconciliation acts.
Fiscal |
Budget Resolution |
Fiscal Years Covered by Reconciliation Directives |
Associated Reconciliation Acts |
Date Enacted (or Vetoed) |
1976 |
1976 |
Revenue Adjustment Act of 1975 |
12-17-1975 |
|
1981 |
1980-1981b |
Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1980 |
12-05-1980 |
|
1982 |
1981-1984c |
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981 (P.L. 97-35) |
08-13-1981 |
|
1983 |
1983-1985 |
Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (P.L. 97-248) |
09-03-1982 |
|
1984 |
1984-1986 |
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1983 (P.L. 98-270) |
04-18-1984 |
|
1986 |
1986-1988 |
Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 |
04-07-1986 |
|
1987 |
1987-1989 |
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-509) |
10-21-1986 |
|
1988 |
1988-1990 |
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 (P.L. 100-203) |
12-22-1987 |
|
1990 |
1990 (Senate) |
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989 (P.L. 101-239) |
12-19-1989 |
|
1991 |
1991-1995 |
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-508) |
11-05-1990 |
|
1994 |
1994-1998 |
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (P.L. 103-66) |
08-10-1993 |
|
1996 |
1996-2002 |
Balanced Budget Act of 1995 |
12-06-1995 |
|
1997 |
1997-2002 |
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 |
08-22-1996 |
|
1998 |
1998-2002 |
Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (P.L. 105-33) |
08-05-1997 |
|
2000 |
2000-2009 |
Taxpayer Refund and Relief Act of 1999 |
09-23-1999 |
|
2001 |
2001-2005 |
Marriage Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2000 (H.R. 4810) |
08-05-2000 |
|
2002 |
2001-2011 |
Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 |
07-07-2001 |
|
2004 |
2003-2013 |
Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 (P.L. 108-27) |
05-28-2003 |
|
2006 |
2005-2010 |
Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (P.L. 109-171) |
02-08-2006 |
|
2008 |
2007-2012 |
College Cost Reduction and Access Act |
09-27-2007 |
|
2010 |
2009-2014 |
Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-152) |
03-30-2010 |
Sources: U.S. Statutes-at-Large, various volumes, and the Legislative Information System (LIS). For further information on budget reconciliation measures, see CRS Report RL33030, The Budget Reconciliation Process: House and Senate Procedures.
Notes: Each budget resolution listed was the first, or sole, budget resolution for the fiscal year, except for FY1976, which was the second budget resolution for that year.
a. There has been an ongoing controversy about whether the directive in this budget resolution was a budget reconciliation directive as set forth in Section 310 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974. The Senate treated it as such and considered the resultant legislation (H.R. 5559, as reported by the Senate Finance Committee, 94th Congress) under the budget reconciliation procedures. The House did not, however, consider and adopt its version of the resultant legislation as a budget reconciliation measure, and thus it presumably did not consider the directive as a budget reconciliation directive. See Floyd M. Riddick and Alan S. Frumin, Riddick's Senate Procedure: Precedents and Practices (rev. ed.), S.Doc. 101-28, 101st Cong., 1st sess. (Washington: GPO, 1992), pp. 622-623.
b. The House and Senate Appropriations Committees were instructed in the budget resolution to submit legislation (e.g., rescissions of previously enacted appropriations) to reduce spending for FY1980.
c. The Senate Appropriations Committee was instructed in the budget resolution to submit legislation to reduce spending for FY1981 (budget authority and outlays) and FY1982-1984 (outlays only).
Beginning with the FY1981 budget resolution, Congress also included amounts for federal credit activities. The 1985 Balanced Budget Act permanently required the inclusion of aggregate and functional levels of direct loan obligations and primary loan guarantee commitments in budget resolutions. The inclusion of federal credit levels, however, was made optional by the Budget Enforcement Act of 1997 (Title X of P.L. 105-33; 111 Stat. 677-712). Of the 31 first budget resolutions adopted by Congress, 18 included federal credit amounts.
Another optional component of budget resolutions has been the inclusion of reserve funds. The reserve fund provisions generally provide for the revision of budget resolution aggregates, functional allocations, and committee allocations if certain deficit-neutral legislation is enacted or some other condition is met. Over the last decade, Congress often has included several reserve funds in budget resolutions (as indicated in Table 6). For instance, the FY2016 budget resolution (S.Con.Res. 11, 114th Congress) included 131 reserve funds.
As an indication of policy intent, Congress has often included declaratory statements in budget resolutions. These nonbinding statements express the sense of Congress, the sense of the House, or the sense of the Senate on various issues. As indicated in Table 6, Congress has included an average of 21 declaratory statements in the last 14 budget resolutions (not including budget resolutions for fiscal years on which the House and Senate separately adopted but did not agree) but an average of only between two and three declaratory statements in the first 18 budget resolutions.
The annual budget resolution also may require a deferred enrollment procedure (see Section 301(b)(3) of the Budget Act), under which all or certain bills providing new budget authority or new entitlement authority for the upcoming fiscal year cannot be enrolled until Congress has completed action on a reconciliation measure (or, prior to FY1987, a reconciliation measure or the second budget resolution). Budget resolutions for FY1981, FY1982, FY1983, and FY1984 contained deferred enrollment provisions.8
Lastly, Congress has included several other procedural provisions in budget resolutions. Under Section 301(b)(4) of the Budget Act, the so-called elastic clause, Congress may "set forth such other matters, and require such other procedures, relating to the budget, as may be appropriate to carry out the purposes of" the Budget Act in the budget resolution. The number of procedural provisions included in budget resolutions is listed in the last column of Table 6. Some of these procedural provisions include deferred enrollment; automatic second budget resolutions; special budgetary treatment of certain activities, such as the sale of government assets; and more recently, enforcement of a pay-as-you-go requirement in the Senate and limits on advance appropriations.
Floor consideration of the budget resolution differs in the House and Senate. Section 305 of the Budget Act sets forth special procedures for the consideration of the budget resolution, generally to expedite its consideration. The House, however, regularly adopts a special rule, a simple House resolution, setting forth the terms for consideration of the measure. In particular, special rules have been used for more than a decade to limit the offering of amendments to a few major substitutes. Table 8 lists the special rules that provided for the consideration of budget resolutions in the House.
In contrast, floor consideration in the Senate is governed by the procedures set forth in the Budget Act. The procedures generally limit debate and prohibit certain amendments and motions.9
Fiscal Year |
Special Rule |
Budget Resolution |
Date Special Rule |
Vote |
1976 |
[none] |
— |
— |
|
1977 |
[none] |
— |
— |
|
1978 |
H.Res. 515 |
04-26-1977 |
400-1 |
|
1979 |
[none] |
— |
— |
|
1980 |
[none] |
— |
— |
|
1981 |
H.Con.Res. 307 |
04-23-1980 |
261-143 |
|
1982 |
04-30-1981 |
328-76 |
||
1983 |
05-21-1982 |
voice |
||
1984 |
H.Con.Res. 91 |
03-22-1983 |
230-187 |
|
1985 |
04-04-1984 |
302-89 |
||
1986 |
H.Con.Res. 152 |
05-22-1985 |
273-141 |
|
1987 |
03-13-1986 |
239-168 |
||
1988 |
H.Con.Res. 93 |
04-08-1987 |
241-168 |
|
1989 |
H.Con.Res. 268 |
03-23-1988 |
voice |
|
1990 |
05-03-1989 |
voice |
||
1991 |
H.Con.Res. 310 |
04-26-1990 |
voice |
|
1992 |
H.Con.Res. 121 |
04-16-1991 |
392-9 |
|
1993 |
H.Con.Res. 287 |
03-04-1992 |
239-183 |
|
1994 |
H.Con.Res. 64 |
03-17-1993 |
voice |
|
1995 |
H.Con.Res. 218 |
03-10-1994 |
245-171 |
|
1996 |
H.Con.Res. 67 |
05-17-1995 |
225-168 |
|
1997 |
H.Con.Res. 178 |
05-16-1996 |
227-196 |
|
1998 |
H.Con.Res. 84 |
05-20-1997 |
278-142 |
|
1999 |
06-04-1998 |
216-197 |
||
2000 |
H.Con.Res. 68 |
03-25-1999 |
228-194 |
|
2001 |
H.Con.Res. 290 |
03-23-2000 |
228-194 |
|
2002 |
H.Con.Res. 83 |
03-28-2000 05-08-2001 |
282-130 |
|
2003 |
03-05-2002 |
222-206 |
||
2004 |
H.Con.Res. 95 |
03-20-2003 |
voice |
|
2005 |
H.Con.Res. 393 |
03-25-2004 |
voice |
|
2006 |
H.Con.Res. 95 |
03-16-2005 |
228-196 |
|
2007 |
H.Con.Res. 376 |
04-06-2006 |
225-196 |
|
2008 |
H.Con.Res. 99 |
03-28-2007 |
229-197 |
|
2009 |
H.Con.Res. 312 |
03-12-2008 |
223-195 |
|
2010 |
H.Con.Res. 85 |
04-01-2009 |
234-179 |
|
2011k |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2012 |
04-14-2011 |
243-181 |
||
2013 |
H.Res. 597 |
H.Con.Res. 112 |
03-28-2012 |
241-184 |
2014 |
H.Res. 122 |
H.Con.Res. 25 |
03-19-2013 |
224-189 |
2015 |
H.Res. 544 |
H.Con.Res. 96 |
04-08-2014 |
222-194 |
2016 |
H.Res. 163 |
H.Con.Res. 27 |
03-24-2015 |
237-180 |
Source: Legislative Information System (LIS).
Notes: A special rule is a simple resolution reported by the House Rules Committee to provide for consideration of legislation by the House. This list includes first budget resolutions only.
a. No special rules were rejected.
b. The budget resolution was rejected. (See Table 3 in this report.)
c. The special rule provided for technical corrections of H.Res. 642.
d. The special rule provided for consideration of a revised conference report (H.Rept. 101-820); the original conference report (H.Rept. 101-802) was rejected. (See Table 3 in this report.)
e. The special rule provided for further consideration of H.Con.Res. 64.
f. The special rule provided for the recommittal of the conference report to the conference committee; two pages reportedly were missing from the original printed conference report (H.Rept. 107-55).
g. H.Res. 766 provided for debate only.
h. The House also considered and adopted H.Res. 370, which provided for the consideration of S.Con.Res. 21, as amended by the text of H.Con.Res. 99, as adopted by the House, in order to facilitate a conference with the Senate on S.Con.Res. 21. The House adopted H.Res. 370 by a vote of 221-197 on May 8, 2007.
i. The House also considered and adopted H.Res. 1190, which provided for the consideration of S.Con.Res. 70, as amended by the text of H.Con.Res. 312, as adopted by the House, in order to facilitate a conference with the Senate on S.Con.Res. 70. The House adopted H.Res. 1190 by a vote of 214-203 on May 14, 2008.
j. H.Res. 305 provided for debate only.
k. The House did not consider a budget resolution for FY2011. However, in lieu of the budget resolution, the House agreed to a special rule (H.Res. 1500) that, upon its adoption, provided for the adoption of a "budget enforcement resolution" (H.Res. 1493).
The House has considered an average of almost seven amendments per budget resolution.10 The largest number of amendments considered was 45 in 1979; the largest number agreed to was 11 also in 1979. (The first FY1983 budget resolution also was amended 11 times, but it subsequently was rejected.) Table 9 identifies the number of accepted and rejected amendments to budget resolutions considered in the House. The amending activity in the House during the last few decades is in marked contrast to the early years under the Budget Act. During the first eight years, the House considered an average of 16 amendments per budget resolution, agreeing to an average of four of them. In contrast, during the past 33 years, the House has considered very few amendments to budget resolutions, averaging between two and three per budget resolution and agreeing to even fewer of these. Of the 121 amendments considered by the House during this time period, 5 have been adopted.
Fiscal Year |
Budget Resolution |
Amendmentsa |
|||
Adopted |
Rejected |
Total |
Success Rateb |
||
1976 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
50% |
|
1977 |
2 |
14 |
16 |
13% |
|
1978 |
6 |
10 |
16 |
60% |
|
1979 |
3 |
13 |
16 |
19% |
|
1980 |
11 |
34 |
45 |
24% |
|
1981 |
1 |
10 |
11 |
9% |
|
1982 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
50% |
|
1983 |
11 |
27 |
38 |
29% |
|
1984 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
— |
|
0 |
7 |
7 |
0% |
||
1986 |
1 |
6 |
7 |
14% |
|
1987 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
— |
|
1988 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
25% |
|
1989 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
0% |
|
1990 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
20% |
|
1991 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
0% |
|
1992 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
25% |
|
1993 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
0% |
|
1994 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
0% |
|
1995 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
0% |
|
1996 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
0% |
|
1997 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
0% |
|
1998 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
0% |
|
1999 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
0% |
|
2000 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
0% |
|
2001 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
0% |
|
2002 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
0% |
|
2003 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
— |
|
2004 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
0% |
|
2005 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
0% |
|
2006 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
0% |
|
2007 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
0% |
|
2008 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
0% |
|
2009 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
0% |
|
2010 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
0% |
|
2011d |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2012 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
0% |
|
2013 |
0 |
6 |
6 |
0% |
|
2014 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
0% |
|
2015 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
0% |
|
2016 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
17% |
Source: Legislative Information System (LIS).
Notes: This list includes first budget resolutions only. The number of amendments in this table does not include any amendments automatically agreed to upon the adoption of the special rule reported by the House Rules Committee providing for the consideration of the budget resolution.
a. No amendments were withdrawn or ruled out of order.
b. "Success rate" is the percentage of amendments accepted.
c. The budget resolution was rejected. (See Table 3 in this report.)
d. The House did not consider a budget resolution for FY2011.
Contributing to this trend, the House special rule typically has allowed for consideration of only amendments in the nature of a substitute to the budget resolution. For example, between 1983 and 2015 (for the FY1984-FY2016 budget resolutions), 117 of the 121 amendments to the budget resolution made in order by the special rule were amendments in the nature of a substitute. Only two of these 117 amendments in the nature of a substitute were agreed to; those two contained the budget resolution text recommended by the House Budget Committee offered by its chair at the time, Representative William H. Gray III and Representative Tom Price, respectively. Table 10 lists the amendments in the nature of a substitute to the budget resolution made in order by the special rule.
Table 10. Amendments in the Nature of a Substitute to Budget Resolutions Made in Order by a Special Rule in the House
Fiscal Year |
Budget Resolution |
Amendment Sponsor |
Date |
Vote |
Disposition |
1976 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
1977 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
1978 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
1979 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
1980 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
1981 |
Obey |
04-30-1980 |
201-213 |
rejected |
|
1982 |
Fauntroy |
05-06-1981 |
69-356 |
rejected |
|
1983 |
Miller (CA) |
05-24-1982 |
181-225 |
rejected |
|
Latta |
06-10-1982 |
220-207 |
adopted |
||
1984 |
Lattad |
— |
— |
— |
|
1985 |
Wirth |
04-04-1984 |
1-401 |
rejected |
|
1986 |
Dannemeyer |
05-22-1985 |
39-382 |
rejected |
|
1987 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
1988 |
Gray (PA) |
04-09-1987 |
230-192 |
adopted |
|
1989 |
Dannemeyer |
03-23-1988 |
75-347 |
rejected |
|
1990 |
Dannemeyer |
05-04-1989 |
72-350 |
rejected |
|
1991 |
Kasich |
04-26-1990 |
106-305 |
rejected |
|
1992 |
Dannemeyer |
04-17-1991 |
79-332 |
rejected |
|
1993 |
Dannemeyer |
03-04-1992 |
60-344 |
rejected |
|
1994 |
Kasich |
03-18-1993 |
135-295 |
rejected |
|
1995 |
Frank (MA) |
03-10-1994 |
105-313 |
rejected |
|
1996 |
Gephardt |
05-18-1995 |
100-325 |
rejected |
|
1997 |
Payne (NJ) |
05-16-1996 |
63-362 |
rejected |
|
1998 |
Doolittle |
05-21-1997 |
119-313 |
rejected |
|
1999 |
Neumann |
06-05-1998 |
158-262 |
rejected |
|
2000 |
Coburn |
03-25-1999 |
2-426 |
rejected |
|
2001 |
Owens |
03-23-2000 |
70-348 |
rejected |
|
2002 |
Kucinich |
03-28-2001 |
79-343 |
rejected |
|
2003 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
2004 |
Hill |
03-20-2003 |
174-254 |
rejected |
|
2005 |
Cummings |
03-25-2004 |
119-302 |
rejected |
|
2006 |
Hensarling |
03-17-2005 |
102-320 |
rejected |
|
2007 |
Watt |
05-17-2006 |
131-294 |
rejected |
|
2008 |
Kilpatrick |
03-29-2007 |
115-312 |
rejected |
|
2009 |
Kilpatrick |
03-13-2008 |
126-292 |
rejected |
|
2010 |
Woolsey |
04-02-2009 |
84-348 |
rejected |
|
2011g |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2012 |
Cleaver |
04-15-2011 |
103-303 |
rejected |
|
2013 |
Mulvaney |
03-28-2012 |
0-414 |
rejected |
|
2014 |
Mulvaney |
03-20-2013 |
154-261 |
rejected |
|
2015 |
Mulvaney |
04-09-2014 |
2-413 |
rejected |
|
2016 |
Ellison |
03-25-2015 |
96-330 |
rejected |
Source: Legislative Information System (LIS).
Notes: See Table 8 for a list of special rules providing for consideration of budget resolutions in the House. An amendment in the nature of a substitute strikes all text after the resolving clause and replaces it with a different text. This list includes first budget resolutions only. Text of the amendments may be found in the Congressional Record and the report accompanying the special rule.
a. The budget resolution was not considered under a special rule.
b. The budget resolution was considered under an open rule (H.Res. 515); no specific amendments in the nature of a substitute were made in order. H.Con.Res. 195 was rejected. (See Table 3 in this report.)
c. H.Con.Res. 345 was rejected. (See Table 3 in this report.)
d. The special rule (H.Res. 144) made in order an amendment in the nature of a substitute by, and if offered by, Representative Latta, but he did not offer one.
e. The budget resolution was considered under a closed rule (H.Res. 397). H.Con.Res. 296 was rejected. (See Table 3 in this report.)
f. The budget resolution was considered under a closed rule (H.Res. 309). H.Con.Res. 122 was rejected. (See Table 3 in this report.)
g. The House did not consider a budget resolution for FY2011.
h. The special rule (H.Res. 223) made in order an amendment in the nature of a substitute by, and if offered by, Representative Cooper, but he did not offer one.
In the Senate, the terms of debate and the consideration of amendments are not structured by a special rule, as in the House, but instead are governed by the procedures set forth in Section 305(b) of the Budget Act. Typically, the Senate considers many amendments to the budget resolution, most addressing specific issues instead of proposing a complete substitute as in the House.
During the period between 1975 and 2015, the Senate considered an average of almost 54 amendments per budget resolution, agreeing to an average of 31 of these.11 The largest number of amendments considered was 254 in 2015; the largest number agreed to was 146, also in 2015. Table 11 identifies the number of amendments adopted, rejected, ruled out-of-order, and withdrawn during Senate consideration of budget resolutions. In contrast to the House, the number of amendments considered by the Senate has increased over the last two decades or so. For the last 18 budget resolutions considered on the floor, for example, the Senate considered an average of almost 90 amendments per budget resolution, agreeing to an average of over 56 of these. Amendments have been agreed to in the Senate at a much higher rate compared to the House as well. For instance, in 13 of the past 18 years in which a budget resolution was considered on the floor, the success rate for amendments has equaled or exceeded 60%.
Budget Resolution |
Amendments |
|||||||
Adopted (RC) |
Rejected (RC) |
Fell on Point of Order (RC) |
Withdrawn |
Total (RC) |
Success Ratea |
|||
1976 |
1 (0) |
4 (4) |
0 |
0 |
5 (4) |
20% |
||
1977 |
1 (0) |
7 (7) |
0 |
0 |
8 (7) |
13% |
||
1978 |
5 (3) |
2 (2) |
0 |
0 |
7 (5) |
71% |
||
1979 |
0 |
10 (10) |
0 |
0 |
10 (10) |
0% |
||
1980 |
5 (4) |
12 (12) |
0 |
0 |
17 (16) |
29% |
||
1981 |
12 (6) |
30 (28) |
0 |
0 |
42 (34) |
29% |
||
1982 |
4 (1) |
31 (31) |
1 (1) |
5 |
41 (33) |
10% |
||
2 (1) |
17 (17) |
0 |
1 |
20 (18) |
10% |
|||
1983 |
S.Con.Res. 19 |
8 (1) |
29 (27) |
0 |
0 |
37 (28) |
22% |
|
1984 |
7 (4) |
24 (23) |
0 |
0 |
31 (27) |
23% |
||
1985 |
2 (0) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 (0) |
100% |
||
1986 |
15 (12) |
24 (24) |
0 |
0 |
39 (36) |
38% |
||
1987 |
13 (5) |
7 (7) |
0 |
2 |
22 (12) |
59% |
||
1988 |
5 (3) |
8 (8) |
0 |
2 |
15 (11) |
33% |
||
1989 |
8 (4) |
4 (4) |
0 |
0 |
12 (8) |
67% |
||
1990 |
23 (2) |
2 (2) |
0 |
1 |
26 (4) |
88% |
||
1991 |
1 (0) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 (0) |
100% |
||
1992 |
7 (0) |
5 (5) |
1 (1) |
1 |
14 (6) |
50% |
||
1993 |
15 (5) |
3 (3) |
2 (2) |
1 |
21 (10) |
71% |
||
1994 |
22 (15) |
28 (28) |
0 |
0 |
50 (43) |
44% |
||
1995 |
26 (3) |
9 (9) |
0 |
4 |
39 (12) |
67% |
||
1996 |
26 (11) |
33 (33) |
12 (12) |
1 |
72 (56) |
36% |
||
1997 |
41 (18) |
21 (20) |
2 (2) |
2 |
66 (40) |
62% |
||
1998 |
39 (6) |
12 (12) |
1 (1) |
11 |
63 (19) |
62% |
||
1999 |
57 (15) |
8 (6) |
12 (12) |
29 |
106 (33) |
54% |
||
2000 |
57 (5) |
8 (7) |
9 (6) |
20 |
95 (18) |
60% |
||
2001 |
38 (10) |
10 (10) |
5 (5) |
3 |
56 (25) |
68% |
||
2002 |
51 (12) |
10 (7) |
2 (2) |
3 |
66 (21) |
77% |
||
2003 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
||
2004 |
44 (13) |
35 (35) |
2 (2) |
1 |
82 (50) |
54% |
||
2005 |
39 (5) |
19 (17) |
2 (2) |
4 |
64 (24) |
61% |
||
2006 |
48 (14) |
24 (22) |
0 |
1 |
73 (36) |
66% |
||
2007 |
54 (9) |
27 (25) |
0 |
6 |
87 (34) |
62% |
||
2008 |
63 (7) |
24 (24) |
1 (1) |
3 |
91 (32) |
69% |
||
2009 |
88 (16) |
20 (20) |
4 (4) |
1 |
113 (40) |
78% |
||
2010 |
101 (15) |
17 (17) |
3 (3) |
0 |
121 (35) |
83% |
||
2011 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
||
2012f |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
2013g |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
2014 |
77 (14) |
29 (28) |
4 (4) |
4 |
114 (46) |
68% |
||
2015h |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
2016 |
146 (31) |
20 (20) |
6 (6) |
82 |
254 (58) |
57% |
Source: Legislative Information System (LIS).
Notes: This list includes first budget resolutions only. This table does not include motions to recommit offered during the consideration of the budget resolution. "RC" refers to the number of amendments on which a roll-call vote occurred in relation to the amendment. For purposes of this table, roll-call votes in relation to an amendment to the budget resolution include roll-call votes on agreeing to an amendment, on a motion to table an amendment, and on a motion to waive a point of order against an amendment.
a. "Success rate" is the percentage of amendments accepted.
b. The budget resolution was adopted by the Senate on April 2, 1981, by a vote of 88-10; no further action was taken.
c. The Senate Budget Committee did not mark up or report a budget resolution for FY2002. Instead, the Senate considered the House-passed budget resolution after the Senate Budget Committee was discharged from its consideration.
d. The Senate Budget Committee reported the listed FY2003 budget resolution, but the full Senate did not consider it.
e. The Senate Budget Committee reported the listed FY2011 budget resolution, but the full Senate did not consider it.
f. The Senate did not consider a budget resolution for FY2012; on May 25, 2011, the Senate rejected motions to proceed to four different budget resolutions for FY2012.
g. The Senate did not consider a budget resolution for FY2013; on May 16, 2012, the Senate rejected motions to proceed to five different budget resolutions for FY2013.
h. The Senate did not consider a budget resolution for FY2015.
The Budget Act sets April 15 as a target date for completing action on the annual budget resolution. Table 12 lists the dates of final adoption of budget resolutions for FY1976-FY2015. During this period, Congress adopted the budget resolution by the target date only six times, most recently in 2003 with the FY2004 budget resolution. Under the original timetable (prior to 1986, the deadline was May 15), Congress adopted the annual budget resolution by the target date twice: in 1975 and 1976. After the target date was changed to April 15 by the 1985 Deficit Control Act, Congress has completed action on the budget resolution by the target date four times: in 1993, 1999, 2000, and 2003. Further, as noted above, Congress did not complete action on a budget resolution for nine fiscal years, most recently for FY2015.
Fiscal Year |
Date Adopted |
Fiscal Year |
Date Adopted |
|
1976 |
05-14-1975 |
1997 |
06-13-1996 |
|
1977 |
05-13-1976 |
1998 |
06-05-1997 |
|
1978 |
05-17-1977 |
1999 |
[none] |
|
1979 |
05-17-1978 |
2000 |
04-15-1999 |
|
1980 |
05-24-1979 |
2001 |
04-13-2000 |
|
1981 |
06-12-1980 |
2002 |
05-10-2001 |
|
1982 |
05-21-1981 |
2003 |
[none] |
|
1983 |
06-23-1982 |
2004 |
04-11-2003 |
|
1984 |
06-23-1983 |
2005 |
[none] |
|
1985 |
10-01-1984 |
2006 |
04-28-2005 |
|
1986 |
08-01-1985 |
2007 |
[none] |
|
1987 |
06-27-1986 |
2008 |
05-17-2007 |
|
1988 |
06-24-1987 |
2009 |
06-05-2008 |
|
1989 |
06-06-1988 |
2010 |
04-29-2009 |
|
1990 |
05-18-1989 |
2011 |
[none] |
|
1991 |
10-09-1990 |
2012 |
[none] |
|
1992 |
05-22-1991 |
2013 |
[none] |
|
1993 |
05-21-1992 |
2014 |
[none] |
|
1994 |
04-01-1993 |
2015 |
[none] |
|
1995 |
05-12-1994 |
2016 |
05-05-2015 |
|
1996 |
06-29-1995 |
Source: Legislative Information System (LIS).
In those years in which Congress has adopted a budget resolution (that is, not including FY1999, FY2003, FY2005, FY2007, and FY2011 through FY2015), it has adopted the budget resolution an average of 36 days after the target date. The FY1991 budget resolution was adopted the latest, on October 9, 1990, or 177 days after the target date. The earliest adoption of a budget resolution was for FY1994 on April 1, 1993, or 14 days before the target date. Table 13 and Table 14 provide a list of dates related to the consideration and adoption of the budget resolution in the House and the Senate, respectively.
Fiscal Year |
Budget Resolution |
Typea |
Date Consideration Began |
Date of Initial Passage |
Date Conference |
1976 |
H.Con.Res. 218 (S.Con.Res. 32) |
first |
04-30-1975 |
05-01-1975 |
05-14-1975 |
1977 |
S.Con.Res. 109 (H.Con.Res. 611) |
first |
04-27-1976 |
04-29-1976 |
05-13-1976 |
1978 |
first |
05-05-1977 |
05-05-1977 |
05-17-1977 |
|
1979 |
S.Con.Res. 80 |
first |
05-02-1978 |
05-10-1978 |
05-17-1978 |
1980 |
first |
04-30-1979 |
05-14-1979 |
05-24-1979 |
|
1981 |
H.Con.Res. 307 (S.Con.Res. 86) |
first |
04-23-1980 |
05-07-1980 |
06-12-1980 |
1982 |
first |
04-30-1981 |
05-07-1981 |
05-20-1981 |
|
1983 |
— |
06-10-1982 |
06-10-1982 |
06-22-1982 |
|
1984 |
— |
03-22-1983 |
03-23-1983 |
06-23-1983 |
|
1985 |
— |
04-04-1984 |
04-05-1984 |
10-01-1984 |
|
1986 |
— |
05-22-1985 |
05-23-1985 |
08-01-1985 |
|
1987 |
— |
05-14-1986 |
05-15-1986 |
06-26-1986 |
|
1988 |
— |
04-08-1987 |
04-09-1987 |
06-23-1987 |
|
1989 |
— |
03-23-1988 |
03-23-1988 |
05-26-1988 |
|
1990 |
— |
05-03-1989 |
05-04-1989 |
05-17-1989 |
|
1991 |
— |
04-25-1990 |
05-01-1990 |
10-08-1990 |
|
1992 |
— |
04-16-1991 |
04-17-1991 |
05-22-1991 |
|
1993 |
— |
03-04-1992 |
03-05-1992 |
05-21-1992 |
|
1994 |
— |
03-17-1993 |
03-18-1993 |
03-31-1993 |
|
1995 |
— |
03-10-1994 |
03-11-1994 |
05-05-1994 |
|
1996 |
— |
05-17-1995 |
05-18-1995 |
06-29-1995 |
|
1997 |
— |
05-15-1996 |
05-16-1996 |
06-12-1996 |
|
1998 |
— |
05-20-1997 |
05-21-1997 |
06-05-1997 |
|
1999 |
— |
06-04-1998 |
06-05-1998 |
— |
|
2000 |
— |
03-25-1999 |
03-25-1999 |
04-14-1999 |
|
2001 |
— |
03-23-2000 |
03-23-2000 |
04-13-2000 |
|
2002 |
H.Con.Res. 83 |
— |
03-27-2001 |
03-28-2001 |
05-09-2001 |
2003 |
— |
03-20-2002 |
03-20-2002 |
— |
|
2004 |
— |
03-20-2003 |
03-21-2003 |
04-11-2003 |
|
2005e |
— |
03-24-2004 |
03-25-2004 |
05-19-2004 |
|
2006 |
— |
03-16-2005 |
03-17-2005 |
04-28-2005 |
|
2007 |
— |
04-06-2006 |
05-18-2006 |
— |
|
2008 |
— |
03-28-2007 |
03-29-2007 |
05-17-2007 |
|
2009 |
— |
03-12-2008 |
03-13-2008 |
06-05-2008 |
|
2010 |
— |
04-01-2009 |
04-02-2009 |
04-29-2009 |
|
2011f |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
2012 |
H.Con.Res. 34 |
— |
04-14-2011 |
04-15-2011 |
— |
2013 |
— |
03-28-2012 |
03-29-2012 |
— |
|
2014 |
— |
03-19-2013 |
03-21-2013 |
— |
|
2015 |
H.Con.Res. 96 |
— |
04-08-2014 |
04-10-2014 |
— |
2016 |
— |
03-24-2015 |
03-25-2015 |
04-30-2015 |
Source: Legislative Information System (LIS).
Notes: Unless otherwise indicated, no date in the conference report column indicates that Congress did not complete action on the budget resolution for that year.
a. For purposes of this table, "type" refers to whether the budget resolution was the first, second, or third for the fiscal year. Originally, the Budget Act provided for the annual adoption of two budget resolutions for a fiscal year and the option of additional budget resolutions. In 1985, the act was amended to eliminate the second budget resolution; the option of additional budget resolutions remains.
b. The House rejected its version of the budget resolution (see Table 3 of this report) and adopted the Senate's version; no conference report was necessary.
c. The House laid its version of the budget resolution on the table by unanimous consent and adopted the Senate's version; no conference report was necessary.
d. The Senate Budget Committee did not mark up or report a budget resolution for FY2002. Instead, the Senate considered the House-passed budget resolution after the Senate Budget Committee was discharged from its consideration.
e. Congress did not complete action on a budget resolution for FY2005. The House agreed to the conference report on S.Con.Res. 95, May 19, 2004; the Senate did not consider it.
f. The House did not consider a budget resolution for FY2011.
Fiscal |
Budget Resolution |
Typea |
Date Consideration Began |
Date of Initial Passage |
Date Conference |
1976 |
H.Con.Res. 218 (S.Con.Res. 32) |
first |
04-29-1975 |
05-01-1975 |
05-14-1975 |
1977 |
S.Con.Res. 109 (H.Con.Res. 611) |
first |
04-08-1976 |
04-12-1976 |
05-12-1976 |
1978 |
S.Con.Res. 19 |
first |
05-02-1977 |
05-04-1977 |
05-13-1977 |
1979 |
S.Con.Res. 80 |
first |
04-24-1978 |
04-26-1978 |
05-15-1978 |
1980 |
H.Con.Res. 107 (S.Con.Res. 22) |
first |
04-23-1979 |
04-25-1979 |
05-23-1979 |
1981 |
H.Con.Res. 307 (S.Con.Res. 86) |
first |
05-05-1980 |
05-12-1980 |
06-12-1980 |
1982 |
H.Con.Res. 115 (S.Con.Res. 19) |
first |
05-07-1981 |
05-12-1981 |
05-21-1981 |
1983 |
— |
05-14-1982 |
05-21-1982 |
06-23-1982 |
|
1984 |
— |
05-02-1983 |
05-19-1983 |
06-23-1983 |
|
1985 |
— |
05-18-1984 |
05-18-1984 |
09-26-1984 |
|
1986 |
— |
04-25-1985 |
05-09-1985 |
08-01-1985 |
|
1987 |
— |
04-21-1986 |
05-01-1986 |
06-27-1986 |
|
1988 |
— |
04-28-1987 |
05-06-1987 |
06-24-1987 |
|
1989 |
— |
04-11-1988 |
04-14-1988 |
06-06-1988 |
|
1990 |
— |
05-02-1989 |
05-04-1989 |
05-18-1989 |
|
1991 |
— |
06-14-1990 |
06-14-1990 |
10-09-1990 |
|
1992 |
— |
04-23-1991 |
04-25-1991 |
05-22-1991 |
|
1993 |
— |
04-07-1992 |
04-10-1992 |
05-21-1992 |
|
1994 |
— |
03-17-1993 |
03-25-1993 |
04-01-1993 |
|
1995 |
— |
03-22-1994 |
03-25-1994 |
05-12-1994 |
|
1996 |
— |
05-18-1995 |
05-25-1995 |
06-29-1995 |
|
1997 |
— |
05-15-1996 |
05-23-1996 |
06-13-1996 |
|
1998 |
— |
05-20-1997 |
05-23-1997 |
06-05-1997 |
|
1999 |
— |
03-27-1998 |
04-02-1998 |
— |
|
2000 |
— |
03-24-1999 |
03-25-1999 |
04-15-1999 |
|
2001 |
— |
04-04-2000 |
04-07-2000 |
04-13-2001 |
|
2002 |
H.Con.Res. 83 |
— |
04-02-2001 |
04-06-2001 |
05-10-2001 |
2003 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
2004 |
— |
03-18-2003 |
03-26-2003 |
04-11-2003 |
|
2005 |
— |
03-08-2004 |
03-12-2004 |
— |
|
2006 |
— |
03-14-2005 |
03-17-2005 |
04-28-2005 |
|
2007 |
— |
03-13-2006 |
03-16-2006 |
— |
|
2008 |
— |
03-20-2007 |
03-23-2007 |
05-17-2007 |
|
2009 |
— |
03-10-2008 |
03-14-2008 |
06-04-2008 |
|
2010 |
— |
03-30-2009 |
04-02-2009 |
04-29-2009 |
|
2011d |
S.Con.Res. 60 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2012e |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
2013f |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
2014 |
— |
03-20-2013 |
03-23-2013 |
— |
|
2015 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
2016 |
— |
03-23-2015 |
03-27-2013 |
05-05-2015 |
Source: Legislative Information System (LIS).
Notes: Unless otherwise indicated, no date in the conference report column indicates that Congress did not complete action on the budget resolution for that year.
a. For purposes of this table, "type" refers to whether the budget resolution was the first, second, or third for the fiscal year. Originally, the Budget Act provided for the annual adoption of two budget resolutions for a fiscal year and the option of additional budget resolutions. In 1985, the act was amended to eliminate the second budget resolution; the option of additional budget resolutions remains.
b. The House adopted the Senate's version of the budget resolution; no conference report was necessary.
c. The Senate Budget Committee did not mark up or report a budget resolution for FY2002. Instead, the Senate considered the House-passed budget resolution after the Senate Budget Committee was discharged from its consideration.
d. The Senate Budget Committee reported the listed FY2003 budget resolution, but the full Senate did not consider it.
e. The Senate did not consider a budget resolution for FY2012; on May 25, 2011, the Senate rejected motions to proceed to four different budget resolutions for FY2012.
f. The Senate did not consider a budget resolution for FY2013; on May 16, 2012, the Senate rejected motions to proceed to five different budget resolutions for FY2013.
Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act of 1978 ("Humphrey-Hawkins Act"; P.L. 95-523; 92 Stat. 1887-1908; October 27, 1978)
Temporary Increase in the Public Debt Limit (P.L. 96-5; 93 Stat. 8; April 2, 1979)
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Title II of P.L. 99-177; 99 Stat. 1038-1101; December 12, 1985)12
Budget Enforcement Act (BEA) of 1990 (Title XIII of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990; P.L. 101-508; 104 Stat. 1388-573 through 630; November 5, 1990)13
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (Title XIV of P.L. 103-66; 107 Stat. 683-685; August 10, 1993)
Budget Resolution for FY1995 (H.Con.Res. 218; 103rd Congress; May 12, 1994)14
Budget Enforcement Act of 1997 (Title X of P.L. 105-33; 111 Stat. 677-712; August 5, 1997)15
Budget Resolution for FY2000 (H.Con.Res. 68; 106th Congress; April 15, 1999)
Budget Resolution for FY2001 (H.Con.Res. 290; 106th Congress; April 13, 2000)
Budget Resolution for FY2004 (H.Con.Res. 95; 108th Congress; April 11, 2003)
Budget Resolution for FY2006 (H.Con.Res. 95; 109th Congress; April 28, 2005)
House Rule XXI, Clause 7 (H.Res. 6; 110th Congress; January 5, 2007)
Budget Resolution for FY2008 (S.Con.Res. 21; 110th Congress; May 17, 2007)
House Rule XXI, Clause 7 (H.Res. 5; 112th Congress; January 5, 2011)
Separate Order in House for 113th Congress (Section 3(e) of H.Res. 5; 113th Congress; January 3, 2013)
Budget Resolution for FY2016 (S.Con.Res. 11; 114th Congress; May 5, 2015)
Author Contact Information
Acknowledgments
Several analysts, including former CRS employees, assisted in compiling the information in this report and contributed to its development. The current author, however, assumes responsibility for its current content.
Area of Expertise |
Name |
Phone |
|
Congressional budget procedure |
[author name scrubbed] |
[phone number scrubbed] |
[email address scrubbed] |
Congressional budget procedure |
[author name scrubbed] |
[phone number scrubbed] |
[email address scrubbed] |
Congressional budget procedure |
Megan Suzanne Lynch |
[phone number scrubbed] |
[email address scrubbed] |
Congressional budget procedure |
[author name scrubbed] |
[phone number scrubbed] |
[email address scrubbed] |
Information research specialist |
[author name scrubbed] |
[phone number scrubbed] |
[email address scrubbed] |
1. |
For a thorough review of the development and early implementation of the Budget Act, see Allen Schick, Congress and Money: Budgeting, Spending and Taxing (Washington, DC: Urban Institute, 1980). |
2. |
In 2013, the House and Senate agreed to establish a "Congressional Budget" in statute as an alternative to the budget resolution for FY2014 (Subtitle B, Title I, of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 [Div. A of P.L. 113-67, Dec. 26, 2013]). The statutory provisions are not in the form of a concurrent resolution as provided for in the Budget Act and therefore not treated as a budget resolution for purposes of this report. |
3. |
In the absence of an agreement on the budget resolution, the House and Senate separately have agreed to "deeming resolution" provisions for budget enforcement purposes. For further information on "deeming resolution" provisions, see CRS Report RL31443, The "Deeming Resolution": A Budget Enforcement Tool. |
4. |
In two of these years (1979 for FY1980 and 1981 for FY1982), the House adopted the Senate version of the second budget resolution rather than adopting its own; therefore, the chambers did not need to resolve differences between different versions of the second budget resolution for those fiscal years in a conference committee or through an amendment exchange. |
5. |
For a more detailed discussion of the budget reconciliation process, see CRS Report RL33030, The Budget Reconciliation Process: House and Senate Procedures. |
6. |
For a brief summary of these procedures, see CRS Report 98-814, Budget Reconciliation Legislation: Development and Consideration, Budget Reconciliation Legislation: Development and Consideration. |
7. |
The number (21) of budget resolutions containing budget reconciliation directives includes the FY1976 second budget resolution (H.Con.Res. 466) and therefore is not included in Table 5. There has been an ongoing controversy about whether the directive in this budget resolution was a budget reconciliation directive as set forth in Section 310 of the Congressional Budget Act. The Senate treated it as such and considered the resultant legislation (H.R. 5559, as reported by the Senate Finance Committee, 94th Congress) under the budget reconciliation procedures. The House did not, however, consider and adopt its version of the resultant legislation as a budget reconciliation measure, and thus it presumably did not consider the directive as a budget reconciliation directive. See Floyd M. Riddick and Alan S. Frumin, Riddick's Senate Procedure: Precedents and Practices (rev. ed.), S.Doc. 101-28, 101st Cong., 1st sess. (Washington: GPO, 1992), pp. 622-623. The legislation subsequently was adopted by the Senate and House but was vetoed by the President. For further information on these directives, see (1) CRS Congressional Distribution Memorandum, Reconciliation Directives to House Committees in Budget Resolutions for FY1976-FY2005; and (2) CRS Congressional Distribution Memorandum, Reconciliation Directives to Senate Committees in Budget Resolutions for FY1976-FY2005 (available from the author). |
8. |
The FY1983 budget resolution exempted legislation dealing with certain trust funds from its deferred enrollment provision. |
9. |
For a brief discussion of these procedures, see CRS Report 98-511, Consideration of the Budget Resolution. |
10. |
The averages presented in this section are derived from all first budget resolutions considered on the House floor, including those ultimately rejected by the House. |
11. |
The averages presented in this section are derived from all first budget resolutions considered on the Senate floor. Accordingly, they do not include the budget resolutions for FY2003 and FY2011, which were reported by the Senate Budget Committee but did not receive floor consideration. |
12. |
For more information on changes made by the 1985 Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act, see CRS Report 86-713, Changes in the Congressional Budget Process Made by the 1985 Balanced Budget Act (P.L. 99-177); and CRS Report 85-1130, Explanation of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 – P.L. 99-177 (The Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act), both available from the author. |
13. |
See CRS Report 90-520, Budget Enforcement Act of 1990: Brief Summary, available from the author. |
14. |
Although budget resolutions, which are agreed to in the form of a concurrent resolution, do not have the force of law, they can contain changes in congressional budget procedures. |
15. |
For more information on changes made by the Budget Enforcement Act of 1997, see CRS Report 97-931, Budget Enforcement Act of 1997: Summary and Legislative History. |