Lack of Free Streaming Metrics Leads to Misinformation
The need for consistent and relevant free streaming metrics is a topic Variety Intelligence Platform has noted since 2020.
Not only is the lack of published metrics for the likes of Pluto TV, Roku Channel, Samsung TV Plus, Tubi and Freevee problematic for FAST channel providers looking to legitimize the medium to attract more advertisers with actual real figures, but it opens the space up to third-party data providers looking to capitalize on the interest in the space.
The problem here is that what ends up published and then cited by industry sources is often erroneous and conveying an inaccurate picture of the FAST market. Recent reports have stated such things as that TelevisaUnivison’s Spanish-only service Vix has several English channels (it doesn’t), which is a perfect example of an issue caused by data-scraping channel names and not checking to see what language they operate in if a channel has the same name in English or Spanish.
Another recent report severely undercounted the number of available FAST channels in the U.S., which was then cited erroneously in other publications. To aid accuracy in the FAST space, we have compiled a breakdown of the number of channels available across major services.
For those curious to know, there were a total of 1,841 channels available in September that were featured on at least one of the 15 services tracked by VIP+.
Then there’s the issue of forecasts. As noted in VIP+’s most recent “Life in the FAST Lane” special report, forecasts for global FAST totals vary wildly. Some seem to be based on countries analysts know, which would explain how a developed nation such as South Korea and a country already embracing FAST in India would be considered to be worth less than Italy in 2027.
Add this to the fact that we have analysts retconning the reasons for the launch of FAST services or channels to suit a narrative versus fact, and it is a very difficult industry on which to gain an accurate picture.
So what can be done? It would be great if, even on a global level, Paramount unrolled Pluto TV’s performance metrics from Paramount+ to show how one of the world’s largest FAST services is performing.
Streaming platform Plex has stepped up to the plate, sharing with VIP+ several global performance metrics comparing the first half of 2023 against 2022. Per Plex, it saw a 54% increase in FAST viewers, which led to a 135% increase in minutes watched, meaning not only are there more viewers but they are watching for longer.
Plex also shared a list of its best-performing global channels, noting that the livestream of the Ion TV network has been its strongest channel in 2023 and is joined by BBC Studios’ Top Gear, PBS Antique Roadshow, Cops, Ion Mystery, Modern Marvels by History, Crime 360 and The Walking Dead Universe. The brandification of FAST is real.
If more platforms and channels could share — standardized — data, it would be a boon to those looking to advertise or otherwise enter the FAST space. It would also mean an end to some of the stats mishaps noted in this article and the subsequent misinformation that always follows.
In an industry thirsty for information, any data released will be seized upon. There’s a due diligence that analysts and data services must carry out (for instance, checking whether the figures are correct) that will help this as well. But hopefully as the FAST market grows and matures, so, too, will the quality of and amount of data on it.