The Talent Compensation Question Hanging Over Netflix Earnings
In this article
With Netflix’s Q3 earnings call set for Thursday, perhaps an analyst might ask co-CEOs Ted Sarandos and Greg Peters about recent rumors that the company is changing the way it pays talent.
Not that the answer would likely be particularly illuminating. Despite reports that the company is shifting its film and TV deals away from the “upfront buyout” structure it pioneered, Netflix leadership insists this is not true.
“We are not changing our compensation model,” Chief Content Officer Bela Bajaria said at Bloomberg’s Screentime conference last week, adding that while “there have been a few bespoke deals on a couple of movies … it’s a very tiny thing that has blown up to this story of [how] we’re changing our business model. We’re not.”
That may be the case, at least for right now, but I hope I can be forgiven for treating this with some skepticism. Remember how vociferously Netflix used to deny it would ever launch advertising on its platform? And Bajaria, in the same breath, even made a point of stressing the company’s “dynamic” nature as a virtue: “We’re willing to pivot and grow and evolve and innovate … I think that’s an amazing thing.”
At issue here is whether Netflix will shift to a compensation model more in line with the way studios traditionally did business in the pre-Netflix era: less money up front in exchange for potential backend payment contingent upon a certain level of success.
We all know the story of how Sarandos & Co. stormed the gates of Hollywood by upending that model, paying vast sums up front — paying, as others have put it, “as if everything was a hit” — to woo A-list talent to its nascent content business.
It would make perfect sense if Netflix were now looking to change that. Having ascended to its dominant position in the entertainment space and with most of its rival content buyers flailing, the streamer obviously possesses the market power needed to slash the prices it pays for movies and TV shows.
This would also fit with the more cost-conscious strategy Netflix has followed since its momentous stock correction of 2022. Company filings show the streamer spent about $7.8 billion on content in the first half of 2024 — up substantially from the same period in strike-impacted 2023 but still down from 2022’s $8.3 billion.
It would fit, too, with Netflix’s larger post-correction strategy, which has carried it, inexorably, toward behaving more like one of the traditional media companies it disrupted.
The similarities may seem superficial — advertising, live sports, reduced film output — but it’s likely that they foreshadow a day when the streamer’s business will more closely resemble a cable company circa 2010 than Netflix circa 2020.
To wit: Ad revenue will continue to grow, subscriber growth will ebb (though that fact will be obscured once the company stops reporting quarterly sub totals next year), and Netflix’s rapid growth will give way to something more stable, or possibly seasonal.
After all, with its password-sharing crackdown now more than a year in the rearview in all its major markets, Netflix is (for real this time) starting to approach the limits of its total addressable market, even with its drive to expand further through marquee programming such as NFL games.
We’re not far from a future where the streamer’s revenue growth will largely come from milking its existing subscribers for cash, both by funneling more users to its ad-supported tier and further hiking subscription prices over time — both of which, of course, it’s already doing.
That slowed-growth future is not necessarily a bad thing, but Wall Street may not see it that way.
As I’ve argued before, Netflix’s decision to shield its subscriber totals from investors was likely driven in no small part by a desire to shield its stock from its subscriber totals. Should user growth slow in quarters and years to come, the streamer’s share price will no longer take a substantial hit based on those numbers, as it has in the past.
In the meantime, the renewed subscriber and revenue growth driven, in large part, by the password crackdown have helped renew investor enthusiasm as well, with Netflix shares now trading at all-time high levels.
That inflated stock price has already sparked some analyst murmurs that Netflix is once again overvalued, though Wall Street remains largely bullish on the company for the time being. Still, it’s all but inevitable that the streamer’s valuation will deflate over time, as the consistent double-digit revenue growth investors have come to expect simply cannot be sustained in the long run.
And that is yet another reason it would make sense for Netflix to drive down the cost of its content and talent deals, in preparation for the day when its margins narrow, its valuation comes back down to earth and its bottom lines are watched more closely. If its execs truly aren’t planning on changing the compensation model now — despite all evidence suggesting otherwise — the day is not far off when they will be.