lynx   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/usdami/333552.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Increasing the Value of Manure for Farmers

Author

Listed:
  • Lim, Teng
  • Massey, Ray
  • McCann, Laura
  • Canter, Timothy
  • Omura, Seabrook
  • Willett, Cammy
  • Roach, Alice
  • Key, Nigel
  • Dodson, Laura
Abstract
Animal manure provides crop nutrients and improves soil quality. However, manure’s nutrient variability and low phosphorus and nitrogen content per unit weight reduce its market value relative to chemical fertilizers. While manure remains an important source of fertilizer in many farming systems, alternative uses are becoming important. Manure can be used to generate renewable energy in the forms of heat, gas, and electricity with further processing, but innovation is required to compete against other renewable and nonrenewable energy sources. Entrepreneurs are also developing markets for fiber found in manure. Environmental policies related to animal farms, meant to protect air and water quality, can both raise manure management costs and increase manure’s value as an energy precursor. This study uses data from the USDA Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS) to describe current manure production, handling, storage, and use. An extensive literature review of manure-related research describes existing and emerging technologies that have the potential to increase the value of manure or reduce manure management costs. The study identifies potential government programs and policies for promoting the adoption of technologies that enhance manure value for farmers.

Suggested Citation

  • Lim, Teng & Massey, Ray & McCann, Laura & Canter, Timothy & Omura, Seabrook & Willett, Cammy & Roach, Alice & Key, Nigel & Dodson, Laura, 2023. "Increasing the Value of Manure for Farmers," USDA Miscellaneous 333552, United States Department of Agriculture.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:usdami:333552
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.333552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/333552/files/ap-109.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.333552?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Stahlman & Laura McCann, 2012. "Technology characteristics, choice architecture, and farmer knowledge: the case of phytase," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 29(3), pages 371-379, September.
    2. Putman, Ben & Thoma, Greg & Burek, Jasmina & Matlock, Marty, 2017. "A retrospective analysis of the United States poultry industry: 1965 compared with 2010," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 107-117.
    3. Giliberto Capano & Michael Howlett, 2020. "The Knowns and Unknowns of Policy Instrument Analysis: Policy Tools and the Current Research Agenda on Policy Mixes," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440199, January.
    4. Thompson, Ethan & Wang, Qingbin & Li, Minghao, 2013. "Anaerobic digester systems (ADS) for multiple dairy farms: A GIS analysis for optimal site selection," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 114-124.
    5. Ramūnas Mieldažys & Eglė Jotautienė & Algirdas Jasinskas, 2019. "The Opportunities of Sustainable Biomass Ashes and Poultry Manure Recycling for Granulated Fertilizers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Konyar, Kazim & Knapp, Keith C., 1990. "Dynamic Regional Analysis Of The California Alfalfa Market With Government Policy Impacts," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 15(01), pages 1-11, July.
    7. Ronald A. Fleming & Bruce Babcock & Erda Wang, 1998. "Resource or Waste? The Economics of Swine Manure Storage and Management," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 20(1), pages 96-113.
    8. Feder, Gershon & Just, Richard E & Zilberman, David, 1985. "Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 33(2), pages 255-298, January.
    9. Anderson, Robert C. & Hilborn, Don & Weersink, Alfons, 2013. "An economic and functional tool for assessing the financial feasibility of farm-based anaerobic digesters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 85-92.
    10. Marc Ribaudo & Nigel Key & Stacy Sneeringer, 2017. "The Potential Role for a Nitrogen Compliance Policy in Mitigating Gulf Hypoxia," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 39(3), pages 458-478.
    11. Yue, Chengyan & Hall, Charles R. & Behe, Bridget K. & Campbell, Benjamin L. & Dennis, Jennifer H. & Lopez, Roberto G., 2010. "Are Consumers Willing to Pay More for Biodegradable Containers Than for Plastic Ones? Evidence from Hypothetical Conjoint Analysis and Nonhypothetical Experimental Auctions," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(4), pages 757-772, November.
    12. Bosch, Darrell J. & Zhu, Minkang & Kornegay, Ervin T., 1997. "Economic Returns From Reducing Poultry Litter Phosphorus With Microbial Phytase," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 29(2), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Cowley, Cortney & Wade Brorsen, B., 2018. "The Hurdles to Greater Adoption of Anaerobic Digesters," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(1), pages 132-157, April.
    14. Tozer, P. R. & Stokes, J. R., 2001. "A multi-objective programming approach to feed ration balancing and nutrient management," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 201-215, March.
    15. Ronald A. Fleming, 1999. "The Economic Impact of Setback Requirements on Land Application of Manure," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 75(4), pages 579-591.
    16. Massey, Raymond E. & Gedikoglu, Haluk, 2021. "Manure application rules and environmental considerations," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    17. Whitt, Christine E. & Todd, Jessica E. & MacDonald, James M., 2020. "America's Diverse Family Farms: 2020 Edition - EIB-220," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 2020, December.
    18. Key, Nigel & Sneeringer, Stacy, 2012. "Carbon Emissions, Renewable Electricity, and Profits: Comparing Policies to Promote Anaerobic Digesters on Dairies," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(2), pages 139-157, August.
    19. Nehring, Richard, 2020. "Fertilizer Rates Increase in the Top 10 Hog States, But Excess Nutrient Levels Are Falling," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 2020, August.
    20. Chowdhury, Raja & Freire, Fausto, 2015. "Bioenergy production from algae using dairy manure as a nutrient source: Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 1112-1121.
    21. MacDonald, James M. & Ribaudo, Marc O. & Livingston, Michael J. & Beckman, Jayson & Huang, Wen, 2009. "Manure Use for Fertilizer and for Energy: Report to Congress," Administrative Publications 292135, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    22. Megan Swindal & Gilbert Gillespie & Rick Welsh, 2010. "Community digester operations and dairy farmer perspectives," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 27(4), pages 461-474, December.
    23. Sunding, David & Zilberman, David, 2001. "The agricultural innovation process: Research and technology adoption in a changing agricultural sector," Handbook of Agricultural Economics, in: B. L. Gardner & G. C. Rausser (ed.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 4, pages 207-261, Elsevier.
    24. Castrodeza, Carmen & Lara, Pablo & Pena, Teresa, 2005. "Multicriteria fractional model for feed formulation: economic, nutritional and environmental criteria," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 76-96, October.
    25. Abdo, Hafez & Ackrill, Rob, 2021. "On-farm anaerobic digestion: A disaggregated analysis of the policy challenges for greater uptake," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    26. Ribaudo, Marc & McCann, Laura M.J., 2012. "Accounting for Transaction Costs in Point/Nonpoint Water Quality Trading Programs in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 123509, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    27. Charles W. Abdalla & Les E. Lanyon & Milton C. Hallberg, 1995. "What We Know About Historical Trends in Firm Location Decisions and Regional Shifts: Policy Issues for an Industrializing Animal Sector," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 77(5), pages 1229-1236.
    28. Stacy Sneeringer & Nigel Key, 2011. "Effects of Size-Based Environmental Regulations: Evidence of Regulatory Avoidance," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 93(4), pages 1189-1211.
    29. Sneeringer, Stacy, 2016. "Comparing Participation in Nutrient Trading by Livestock Operations to Crop Producers in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed," Economic Research Report 249772, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bangalore, Mook & Hochman, Gal & Zilberman, David, 2016. "Policy incentives and adoption of agricultural anaerobic digestion: A survey of Europe and the United States," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 559-571.
    2. Fan, Yubing & McCann, Laura M., 2017. "Farmers’ Adoption of Pressure Irrigation Systems and Scientific Scheduling Practices: An Application of Multilevel Models," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258458, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Guerzoni, Marco & Jordan, Alexander, 2016. "“Cursed is the ground because of you”: Religion, Ethnicity, and the Adoption of Fertilizers in Rural Ethiopia," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201605, University of Turin.
    4. Ahsanuzzaman, & Priyo, Asad Karim Khan & Nuzhat, Kanti Ananta, 2022. "Effects of communication, group selection, and social learning on risk and ambiguity attitudes: Experimental evidence from Bangladesh," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    5. Lim, Krisha & Wichmann, Bruno & Luckert, Martin, 2021. "Adaptation, spatial effects, and targeting: Evidence from Africa and Asia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Colin Vance & Christopher B. Busch, 2011. "The Diffusion of Cattle Ranching and Deforestation – Prospects for a Hollow Frontier in Mexico’s Yucatán," Ruhr Economic Papers 0242, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universität Dortmund, Universität Duisburg-Essen.
    7. Stacy Sneeringer & Nigel Key & Shirley Pon, 2018. "Do Nutrient Management Plans Actually Manage Nutrients? Evidence from a Nationally‐Representative Survey of Hog Producers," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(4), pages 632-652, December.
    8. Tavneet Suri, 2009. "Selection and Comparative Advantage in Technology Adoption," NBER Working Papers 15346, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Villacis, Alexis H. & Bloem, Jeffrey R. & Mishra, Ashok K., 2023. "Aspirations, risk preferences, and investments in agricultural technologies," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    10. Gregory D. Graff & David Roland-Holst & David Zilberman, 2005. "Biotechnology and Poverty Reduction in Developing Countries," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2005-27, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    11. Olarinde, Luke O. & Binam, Joachim & Abdoulaye, Tahirou & Maman, Nouri & Adekunle, Adewale A., 2010. "Adoption of and farmers’ exposure to soil and Water Management (SWMGT) Practices in the Sahel Savanna of West Africa: Average Treatment Effect (ATE) Estimations," 2010 AAAE Third Conference/AEASA 48th Conference, September 19-23, 2010, Cape Town, South Africa 95983, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    12. Beckmann, Volker & Irawan, Evi & Wesseler, Justus, 2006. "The Effect of Farm Labor Organization on IPM Adoption: Empirical Evidence from Thailand," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25711, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Liang Lu & Thomas Reardon & David Zilberman, 2016. "Supply Chain Design and Adoption of Indivisible Technology," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(5), pages 1419-1431.
    14. Kijima, Yoko & Otsuka, Keijiro & Sserunkuuma, Dick, 2011. "An Inquiry into Constraints on a Green Revolution in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Case of NERICA Rice in Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 77-86, January.
    15. Surendran-Padmaja, Subash & Parlasca, Martin C. & Qaim, Matin & Krishna, Vijesh V., 2024. "Private service provision contributes to widespread innovation adoption among smallholder farmers: Laser land levelling technology in northwestern India," Discussion Papers 342427, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    16. Abay Mulatu & Ada Wossink, 2014. "Environmental Regulation and Location of Industrialized Agricultural Production in Europe," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 90(3), pages 509-537.
    17. Pardey, Philip G. & Alston, Julian M. & Ruttan, Vernon W., 2010. "The Economics of Innovation and Technical Change in Agriculture," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 939-984, Elsevier.
    18. Njuki, Eric & Bravo-Ureta, Boris B., 2014. "A Bayesian Approach to Analyzing the Economic Costs of Environmental Regulation in U.S. Dairy Farming," Working Paper series 290098, University of Connecticut, Charles J. Zwick Center for Food and Resource Policy.
    19. Massey, Raymond E. & Gedikoglu, Haluk, 2021. "Manure application rules and environmental considerations," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    20. Sauer, J. & Latacz-Lohmann, U., 2013. "Efficient Innovation in Dairy Production – Empirical Findings for Germany," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 48, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:usdami:333552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.usda.gov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.
    Лучший частный хостинг