lynx   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v1y2016i2p1-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revealing Cultural Ecosystem Services through Instagram Images: The Potential of Social Media Volunteered Geographic Information for Urban Green Infrastructure Planning and Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Paulina Guerrero

    (Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, and Institute of Environmental Planning, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany)

  • Maja Steen Møller

    (Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Anton Stahl Olafsson

    (Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Bernhard Snizek

    (metascapes.org, Denmark)

Abstract
With the prevalence of smartphones, new ways of engaging citizens and stakeholders in urban planning and governance are emerging. The technologies in smartphones allow citizens to act as sensors of their environment, producing and sharing rich spatial data useful for new types of collaborative governance set-ups. Data derived from Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) can support accessible, transparent, democratic, inclusive, and locally-based governance situations of interest to planners, citizens, politicians, and scientists. However, there are still uncertainties about how to actually conduct this in practice. This study explores how social media VGI can be used to document spatial tendencies regarding citizens’ uses and perceptions of urban nature with relevance for urban green space governance. Via the hashtag #sharingcph , created by the City of Copenhagen in 2014, VGI data consisting of geo-referenced images were collected from Instagram, categorised according to their content and analysed according to their spatial distribution patterns. The results show specific spatial distributions of the images and main hotspots. Many possibilities and much potential of using VGI for generating, sharing, visualising and communicating knowledge about citizens’ spatial uses and preferences exist, but as a tool to support scientific and democratic interaction, VGI data is challenged by practical, technical and ethical concerns. More research is needed in order to better understand the usefulness and application of this rich data source to governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Paulina Guerrero & Maja Steen Møller & Anton Stahl Olafsson & Bernhard Snizek, 2016. "Revealing Cultural Ecosystem Services through Instagram Images: The Potential of Social Media Volunteered Geographic Information for Urban Green Infrastructure Planning and Governance," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 1-17.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v1:y:2016:i:2:p:1-17
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v1i2.609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/609
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v1i2.609?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu Liu & Xi Liu & Song Gao & Li Gong & Chaogui Kang & Ye Zhi & Guanghua Chi & Li Shi, 2015. "Social Sensing: A New Approach to Understanding Our Socioeconomic Environments," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 105(3), pages 512-530, May.
    2. Wolfgang G. Stock, 2011. "Informational cities: Analysis and construction of cities in the knowledge society," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(5), pages 963-986, May.
    3. Andersson, Erik & Tengö, Maria & McPhearson, Timon & Kremer, Peleg, 2015. "Cultural ecosystem services as a gateway for improving urban sustainability," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 165-168.
    4. Wolfgang G. Stock, 2011. "Informational cities: Analysis and construction of cities in the knowledge society," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(5), pages 963-986, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paulina Guerrero & Maja Steen Møller & Anton Stahl Olafsson & Bernhard Snizek, 2016. "Revealing Cultural Ecosystem Services through Instagram Images: The Potential of Social Media Volunteered Geographic Information for Urban Green Infrastructure Planning and Governance," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 1-17.
    2. María Verónica Alderete, 2020. "Exploring the Smart City Indexes and the Role of Macro Factors for Measuring Cities Smartness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 147(2), pages 567-589, January.
    3. Stefan Hennemann, 2012. "Evaluating the performance of geographical locations within scientific networks using an aggregation—randomization—re-sampling approach (ARR)," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(12), pages 2393-2404, December.
    4. repec:wbk:wbpubs:15790 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Maurice Baslé, 2021. "Smarter Cities’ Attractiveness. Testing New Criteria or Facets: “Data Scientists” and “Data Platforms”," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(1), pages 268-278, March.
    6. Fietkiewicz Kaja J. & Stock Wolfgang G., 2014. "Cityness and Informativeness of the Emerging Informational Cities in Japan," Creative and Knowledge Society, Sciendo, vol. 4(1), pages 1-13, July.
    7. H. Patricia McKenna, 2020. "Human-Smart Environment Interactions in Smart Cities: Exploring Dimensionalities of Smartness," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Nathalie Vallet & Michelle Bylemans & Inge Somers & Marjan Michels, 2019. "Challenges for SSE-networks supporting local sustainability: lessons-learned of an IEP Site experiment in Mechelen (Belgium)," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 18(2), pages 129-145, December.
    9. Nathalie VALLET & Simon DE NYS-KETELS & Michelle BYLEMANS, 2017. "The Design of IEP Sites: Aiming for an Inclusive Economic Participation of Urban Citizens in Flanders," CIRIEC Working Papers 1704, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    10. Maja Steen Møller & Anton Stahl Olafsson, 2018. "The Use of E-Tools to Engage Citizens in Urban Green Infrastructure Governance: Where Do We Stand and Where Are We Going?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-10, September.
    11. Nathalie Vallet & Michelle Bylemans & Simon De Nys-Ketels, 2017. "An innovative concept on inclusive economic participation: The governance of inclusive economic participation sites in Flemish cities," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(8), pages 818-834, December.
    12. Tandarić, Neven & Ives, Christopher D. & Watkins, Charles, 2022. "From city in the park to “greenery in plant pots”: The influence of socialist and post-socialist planning on opportunities for cultural ecosystem services," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    13. Gregg C. Brill & Pippin M. L. Anderson & Patrick O’Farrell, 2022. "Relational Values of Cultural Ecosystem Services in an Urban Conservation Area: The Case of Table Mountain National Park, South Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-28, April.
    14. Li, Xin & Xie, Qianqian & Jiang, Jiaojiao & Zhou, Yuan & Huang, Lucheng, 2019. "Identifying and monitoring the development trends of emerging technologies using patent analysis and Twitter data mining: The case of perovskite solar cell technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 687-705.
    15. Yang, Xiping & Fang, Zhixiang & Xu, Yang & Yin, Ling & Li, Junyi & Lu, Shiwei, 2019. "Spatial heterogeneity in spatial interaction of human movements—Insights from large-scale mobile positioning data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 29-40.
    16. Werner Liebregts & Pourya Darnihamedani & Eric Postma & Martin Atzmueller, 2020. "The promise of social signal processing for research on decision-making in entrepreneurial contexts," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 589-605, October.
    17. Qian Chen & Tingting Ye & Naizhuo Zhao & Mingjun Ding & Zutao Ouyang & Peng Jia & Wenze Yue & Xuchao Yang, 2021. "Mapping China’s regional economic activity by integrating points-of-interest and remote sensing data with random forest," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(7), pages 1876-1894, September.
    18. Amjad Ali & Marc Audi & Ismail Senturk & Yannick Roussel, 2022. "Do Sectoral Growth Promote CO2 Emissions in Pakistan? Time Series Analysis in Presence of Structural Break," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(2), pages 410-425, March.
    19. Yunzi Yang & Yuanyuan Ma & Hongzan Jiao, 2021. "Exploring the Correlation between Block Vitality and Block Environment Based on Multisource Big Data: Taking Wuhan City as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    20. Bernadett Csurgó & Melanie K. Smith, 2022. "Cultural Heritage, Sense of Place and Tourism: An Analysis of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Rural Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-24, June.
    21. Dou, Yuehan & Zhen, Lin & De Groot, Rudolf & Du, Bingzhen & Yu, Xiubo, 2017. "Assessing the importance of cultural ecosystem services in urban areas of Beijing municipality," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 79-90.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v1:y:2016:i:2:p:1-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.
    Лучший частный хостинг