lynx   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

User talk:Moriwen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Hey @Moriwen if you have time, could you please review Francis Dore that I created a month ago? Sokoreq (talk) 05:59, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Awards for 2024

[edit]

The New Page Reviewer's Iron Award

This award is given in recognition to Moriwen for conducting 631 article reviews in 2024. Thank you so much for all your excellent work. Keep it up! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:11, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pannenkoek2012

[edit]

About 2 minutes ago, you reverted one of my changes onto Pannenkoek2012 and i believe that the reversion wasn't necessary. I just wanted to show the truth because that entire theory was completely debunked. I don't think that I didn't explain why, because I stated that in the first sentence of my reasoning. (TL;DR: the cosmic ray theory is a debunked myth and it shouldnt be on the page) 2600:1700:CC10:2790:FC3C:527D:96C9:DF7 (talk) 22:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Milwaukee Catholic Conference

[edit]

Hey, thanks for taking the time to review my article! I was wondering if you could shed some light on something for me. I noticed a pretty big discrepancy between the grade for the Wisconsin and Sports WikiProject. What makes an article a B-grade for one project and a stub-grade for another? Moserjames79 (talk) 22:45, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Genuinely no idea what happened there, lol. It's obviously not a stub -- let me change that.— Moriwen (talk) 22:47, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thought that was weird, thanks! Moserjames79 (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish mission

[edit]

Hello,

I was looking at the article Fronteras and saw that this quote "visitors can explore the Mission San Ignacio de Cuquiarachi founded in 1645 by the Jesuit missionary Marcos del Río" has no source.

I am trying to map the Spanish missions in the Americas and my map is very close to being completed. I see that you have made/edited a lot of articles relating to the topic, including this one, so I wondered if you would be able to give me any insight on if this statement is true and the location of the mission.

My source says the church is non-extant, but there is an unfinished page from the NPS showing a picture of the church, as well as this quote from the article, so I am conflicted.

Anyway, if you have any information on this, please let me know. Thank you! GoldenArmorYeah (talk) 01:38, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For sure! I hope you post your map somewhere when it's finished; I'd be excited to see it.
I've gotten a lot of use out of Paul M. Roca's Paths of the Padres through Sonora, and it looks like he actually visited the church and took a picture, so it was extant at least as of 1959. His map shows the mission located about five miles west of Fronteras. I can't post the image, obviously, since it's not old enough to be out of copyright, but if it would be helpful and there's a good way to contact you I'm happy to send you a copy privately for your reference.
Here's what Roca has to say about the mission:
Nuestro Padre San Ignacio de Cuquiárachi
Cuquiárachi is not on Río Fronteras, but is about three-quarters of an hour due west of Fronteras on the mesa to the north of the Río Cuquiárachi, an east-flowing stream which joins Río Fronteras a little south of the old presidio. You can also get there from Bacoachi, but you should allow half a day, or more if you get lost. The road is hard to find and harder to follow, and getting lost is easy. The Cuquiárachi valley is cultivated for many miles on either side of the settlement, which means that there are people to ask. Without the people we never would have found the town, since it sits up on the mesa to the north of the road in such a way as to be quite invisible from below. Once you find it, there is a passable but steep road leading up to the plaza, which contains the ancient adobe church, still in use, and a handful of adobe buildings.
Moriwen (talk) 17:51, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not too sure where I would post my map, but I could probably export it as a KMZ file or something. I'll probably finish it sometime after the summer because there are some sites I'd like to ask some people about and some places I need to visit to find that I don't have enough time for yet.
I've heard about Paths of the Padres through Sonora but I unfortunately do not have a copy. It does sort of worry me that some of the churches my source says are non-extant are or were still around. Anyway, thank you for the description! GoldenArmorYeah (talk) 03:06, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I think I have found the church, but it differs from the picture in https://www.nps.gov/tuma/learn/historyculture/nuestro-padred-san-ignacio-de-cuquiarachi.htm in a bell tower being added. Do you think you could send me the image? There's not many images of the church out there and I was thinking it might have been a new addition or maybe a picture from another entrance. GoldenArmorYeah (talk) 06:07, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AFDs

[edit]

Hello, Moriwen,

If you want to continue to nominate articles for AFD discussions, you really need to provide more substantial deletion rationales. Your nominations often only consist of 3 or 4 words which is inadequate. You should provide a history of the article, if it has been deleted before, any policy-based reasons for deletion (using more than abbreviations) and a review of sources that demonstrates that a thorough WP:BEFORE has been done which is your responsibility as the nominator. Without a decent deletion nomination, these AFDs can be closed as procedural Keeps. Please offer the participants more to consider in any future nominations you post. Thank you for your contributions to the project. Liz Read! Talk! 05:16, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to know what to aim for, check out Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Malcolm (Canadian farmer). Dclemens1971 always provides a very thorough deletion nomination that gives participants some points to investigate. Liz Read! Talk! 05:20, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Revision Regarding Office of Gun Violence Prevention

[edit]

An anonymous user had created an edit stating that the official White House website for this was deactivated on January 21, 2025.

This was a true statement. The website gives a 404 error that it cannot be accessed. I'd be happy to send you a screenshot if you haven't seen it for yourself.

Why was this revision removed? MakeitBlunt (talk) 06:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NPP backlog drive

[edit]

Hello. I noticed you've done a significant bit of NPP work in the month of January and you're not listed on the leaderboard of our current backlog drive. It's not too late to sign up here and receive rewards for your contributions during the month. After all, you are deserving of them based on the work you've put in! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:40, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just seen the kerfuffle on Slavery in colonial Spanish America

[edit]

Just seen your warning of the IP editor under mine. I've escalated this to ANI, since it seems to be a clear case of WP:NOTHERE. Lewisguile (talk) 21:41, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for dealing with that! Yeah, seems like the thing to do.— Moriwen (talk) 21:42, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors 2024 Annual Report

[edit]
Guild of Copy Editors Annual Report

Our 2024 Annual Report is now ready for review.

Highlights:

  • Introduction
  • Membership news and election results
  • Summary of Drives, Blitzes and the Requests page
  • Closing words
– Your Guild coordinators
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:37, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This source is not acceptable proof of Brayer's date/place of birth? It had been included as as a reflink. Yours, 65.88.88.56 (talk) 17:58, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are two issues with using the California Birth Index. First, and most importantly, it fails WP:BLPPRIMARY. Second, it assumes that the Jon Brayer in the record is the same Jon Brayer as the article. This has been covered multiple times (in conjunction with websites such as Ancestry.com) at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard.-- Ponyobons mots 18:04, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"Jon"? His name is Patrick. 65.88.88.56 (talk) 18:12, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It was a typo of his middle name. The accuracy of the response remains the same.-- Ponyobons mots 18:34, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Another thing. As a seasoned editor, do you consider this article (Death of Muhammed Shahabaz) notable? (I know I don't.) Just wondering if it should be PRODded or AFDed. Yours, 65.88.88.56 (talk) 18:14, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Лучший частный хостинг