California Proposition 67, Additional 3% Surcharge on Telephone Use for Emergency Medical Services Initiative (2004)
California Proposition 67 | |
---|---|
Election date November 2, 2004 | |
Topic Taxes | |
Status | |
Type Amendment & Statute | Origin Citizens |
California Proposition 67 was on the ballot as a combined initiated constitutional amendment and state statute in California on November 2, 2004. It was defeated.
A "yes" vote supported levying an additional 3% surcharge on telephone calls to provide funding for emergency medical services. |
A "no" vote opposed levying an additional 3% surcharge on telephone calls to provide funding for emergency medical services. |
Election results
California Proposition 67 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
Yes | 3,243,132 | 28.43% | ||
8,165,809 | 71.57% |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Proposition 67 was as follows:
“ | Emergency Medical Services. Funding. Telephone Surcharge. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute. | ” |
Ballot summary
The ballot summary for this measure was:
“ |
| ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Fiscal impact statement
The fiscal impact statement was as follows:
“ |
|
” |
Support
Supporters
- California Healthcare Association
- California Chapter of the American College of Emergency Physicians
Opposition
Opponents
- SBC Communications
- Verizon
- Cingular Wireless
Path to the ballot
In California, the number of signatures required for a combined initiated constitutional amendment and state statute is equal to 8 percent of the votes cast at the preceding gubernatorial election. For a combined initiative filed in 2004, at least 598,105 valid signatures were required.
See also
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.