Steven R. Seibert

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the official's last term in office covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Steven R. Seibert
Image of Steven R. Seibert
Prior offices
Harrison School District Two school board At-large

Personal
Profession
Managing partner

Steven R. Seibert was a member of the Harrison School District Two school board At-large in Colorado. Seibert assumed office in 2013. Seibert left office on December 1, 2021.

Seibert ran for re-election to the Harrison School District Two school board At-large in Colorado. Seibert won in the general election on November 7, 2017.

Biography

Email editor@ballotpedia.org to notify us of updates to this biography.

Seibert's career experience includes working as the managing partner of Jay-Gee Properties. He attended Mesa State College and Pikes Peak Community College.[1]

Elections

2017

See also: Harrison School District Two elections (2017)

Three of the five seats on the Harrison School District Two Board of Education in Colorado were up for nonpartisan general election on November 7, 2017. In his bid for re-election, incumbent Steven R. Seibert faced challengers Joshua Hitchcock, Jeannie Orozco, and Linda Pugh. Seibert won re-election, and Orozco and Pugh won new terms on the board.[2][3]

Results

Harrison School District Two,
At-large General Election, 4-year terms, 2017
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.png Linda Pugh 30.52% 3,579
Green check mark transparent.png Jeannie Orozco 25.42% 2,981
Green check mark transparent.png Steven R. Seibert Incumbent 22.69% 2,661
Joshua Hitchcock 21.36% 2,505
Total Votes 11,726
Source: El Paso County Elections Office, "Official Results: HARRISON SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 DIRECTOR," accessed November 27, 2017

Funding

See also: Campaign finance in the Harrison School District Two election

Seibert began the race with an existing account balance of $735.00 from his previous campaign. He reported $0.00 in contributions and $740.97 in expenditures to Colorado Secretary of State, which left his campaign with $5.97 in debt in the election.[4]

Endorsements

Seibert was endorsed by the Pikes Peak Association of REALTORS® (PPAR).[5]

2013

See also: Harrison School District Two elections (2013)

Seibert ran against four fellow challengers on November 5, 2013.

Results

Harrison School District Two,
At-large General Election, 4-year terms, 2013
Party Candidate Vote % Votes
     Nonpartisan Green check mark transparent.pngJoyce L. Leigh 24.5% 3,213
     Nonpartisan Green check mark transparent.pngDoriena S. Longmire 22.7% 2,986
     Nonpartisan Green check mark transparent.pngSteven R. Seibert 18.8% 2,471
     Nonpartisan Ryan Thompson 18.8% 2,468
     Nonpartisan Aaron Simpson 15.2% 1,998
Total Votes 13,136
Source: El Paso County, Colorado, "2013 Coordinated Election," November 14, 2013

Funding

Seibert reported $735.00 in contributions and $0.00 in expenditures to the Colorado Secretary of State, which left his campaign with $735.00 on hand in the election.[6]

Endorsements

Seibert was endorsed by the HBA Political Action Committee (PAC).[7]

Campaign themes

2013

Seibert participated in the following an interview with The Gazette. The interview questions appear bolded, and Seibert's responses follow below.[1]

What major challenges face your school district and how would you solve them, aside from additional funding?

Hsd2's largest opportunities for improvement continue to be academic improvement and graduation rate. Through pay for performance and the retention of the high performing teachers, we will continue to improve academically. Graduation rates however need to be looked at in a whole new light. If we look at community partnerships, corporate internships, and other vocational avenues we can recapture a large number of students who feel high school and college will simply not benefit them.[8]
—Steven R. Seibert (2013)[1]

With budget constraints in place, what areas would you concentrate on?

Student contact is the number one most vital element to education. All other areas must take the largest budgetary impact first, prior to any program or staff being affected.[8]
—Steven R. Seibert (2013)[1]

This year, voters will decide whether to pass Amendment 66, which would raise $950 million in additional taxes for education. If the amendment passes, how should the money be allocated in your district?

I am truly a proponent of head start and funding schools. I am even in favor of tax increases to fund well defined school programs. I do not believe however Amendment 66 is one of these well defined and strictly accountable measures.[8]
—Steven R. Seibert (2013)[1]

Why don't most districts get beyond 70 percent student proficiency on state assessments?

Books could be written on this subject and not conclusively answer the matter at hand. If I may oversimplify my position on state standards and testing, I would have to refer to the bell curve data collection. We simply expect a small number to fail , a small number to be high functioning, and the rest to fall some where in the middle. 70% is exactly that average students, average by measure of the largest part of their piers. An "A" student is suddenly a failure in a class of geniuses![8]
—Steven R. Seibert (2013)[1]

See also

External links

Footnotes