2016 ballot measure polls

2016 U.S. State Ballot Measures
2017 » « 2015
Overview
Election results
Scorecard
Tuesday Count
Lawsuits
Deadlines
Voter guides
Initiatives filed
Year-end analysis
Part 2: Campaigns
Polls
Media editorials
Part 3: Finances
Contributions
Signature costs
Ballot Measure Monthly
Signature requirements
Have you subscribed yet? Join the hundreds of thousands of readers trusting Ballotpedia to keep them up to date with the latest political news. Sign up for the Daily Brew. Click here to learn more.

2017 polls →

← 2015 polls

The following page consists of polls that were taken about ballot measures that were either certified or proposed for a 2016 ballot. Information on 2016 ballot measure polls is posted as it becomes available. If you have information on a released poll not listed here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

The 35 states that featured statewide measures on the ballot in 2016 are listed below, and polls for all measures for which polling data was found by Ballotpedia staff are listed under each state section.

Legend      Position is ahead and at or over 50%     Position is ahead or tied, but under 50%

Alabama

See also: Alabama 2016 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Alaska

See also: Alaska 2016 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Arizona

See also: Arizona 2016 ballot measures

Arizona Minimum Wage and Paid Time Off, Proposition 206 (2016)

See also: Polls, 2016 ballot measures

• Between August 17 and August 31, 2016, The Arizona Republic, in cooperation with Morrison and Cronkite News, found that 61 percent of those surveyed support Proposition 206. While the newspaper found support across all demographic groups, support was highest amongst Democrats, voters ages 18 to 35 and people with a high-school diploma or less.
• OH Predictive Insights released a poll on October 10, 2016, showing 53 percent of respondents supporting and 40 percent opposing Proposition 206.
• In mid-October 2016, HighGround Public Affairs surveyed 400 likely voters and found support for the initiative to be 54.3 percent amongst respondents.

Arizona Proposition 206
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
HighGround Public Affairs 10/14/2016	54.3%	38.8%	6.9%	+/-4.88	400
OH Predictive Insights 9/28/2016 - 9/30/2016	53.0%	40.0%	7.0%	+/-3.66	718
The Arizona Republic, Morrison, and Cronkite News 8/17/2016 - 8/31/2016	61.0%	31.0%	8.0%	+/-3.4	784
AVERAGES	56.1%	36.6%	7.3%	+/-3.98	634
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Arizona Education Finance Amendment, Proposition 123 (May 2016)

Arizona Education Finance
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
OH Predictive Insights 4/25/2016	59.7%	33.4%	6.9%	+/-3.8	665
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Arizona Marijuana Legalization, Proposition 205 (2016)

See also: Polls, 2016 ballot measures

• In mid-April 2016, a poll commission by opponents of the ballot measure was released to The Arizona Republic. The poll found that a plurality of those surveyed opposed marijuana legalization in Arizona.
• Between August 17 and August 31, 2016, The Arizona Republic, in cooperation with Morrison and Cronkite News, found that 50 percent of those surveyed supported Proposition 205. The poll found that about 64 percent of Democrats and 53 percent of independents in the state favored marijuana legalization, while 56 percent of Republicans opposed it.
• OH Predictive Insights conducted a poll in late August, finding a simple majority in opposition to marijuana legalization. Pollster Mike Noble noted that "for every voter who pulls the lever for Donald Trump this November has a 72 percent likelihood they will vote ‘No’ on legalizing recreational marijuana. Conversely, Hillary Clinton voters have a 57 percent likelihood of voting ‘Yes’ on legalizing recreational marijuana."
• OH Predictive Insights released a poll on October 10, 2016, showing 44 percent of respondents supporting and 49 percent opposing Proposition 205.
• In mid-October 2016, HighGround Public Affairs surveyed 400 likely voters and found 49.8 percent of respondents supporting the initiative.
• The Arizona Republic, Morrison, and Cronkite News released a poll in mid-October 2016 showing 50.4 percent of respondents in support of Proposition 205.
• Data Orbital surveyed 550 likely voters on October 29 and October 30, 2016, and found support for the measure at 45 percent. Opposition was at 51 percent.
• On November 1 and November 2, 2016, Data Orbital surveyed 550 likely voters and found support for Proposition 205 at 48 percent, while opposition was at 47 percent.

Arizona Proposition 205 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Data Orbital 11/01/2016 - 11/02/2016	48.0%	47.0%	4.0%	+/-4.12	550
Data Orbital 10/29/2016 - 10/30/2016	45.0%	51.0%	4.0%	+/-4.12	550
The Arizona Republic, Morrison, and Cronkite News 10/10/2016 - 10/15/2016	50.4%	41.6%	8.0%	+/-4.0	811
HighGround Public Affairs 10/14/2016	49.8%	45.3%	4.9%	+/-4.88	400
Data Orbital 10/11/2016 - 10/12/2016	44.0%	45.0%	11.0%	+/-4.12	500
OH Predictive Insights 9/28/2016 - 9/30/2016	43.0%	47.0%	10.0%	+/-3.66	718
OH Predictive Insights 8/24/2016 - 8/27/2016	40.0%	51.0%	9.0%	+/-3.63	728
The Arizona Republic, Morrison, and Cronkite News 8/17/2016 - 8/31/2016	50.0%	40.0%	10.0%	+/-3.4	784
The Arizona Republic 4/11/2016 - 4/14/2016	43.0%	49.0%	8.0%	+/-4.0	500
AVERAGES	45.91%	46.32%	7.66%	+/-3.99	615.67
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Arkansas

See also: Arkansas 2016 ballot measures

Arkansas Medical Marijuana Amendment, Issue 6 (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• Public Opinion Strategies polled 600 Arkansans in June 2016. The firm found support to be around 63 percent and opposition to be around 35 percent.
• In mid-September 2016, Talk Business & Politics-Hendrix College conducted a poll that asked about Issue 6. The poll found a plurality, but not a majority, in support of Issue 6.
• On October 21, 2016, Talk Business & Politics-Hendrix College surveyed 463 likely voters on Issue 6. Opponents had a five-point lead over supporters in the poll.
• The Arkansas Poll, housed at the University of Arkansas, surveyed 800 adults in late October 2016 on Issue 6. The poll found support for the measure at 50 percent.

Arkansas Issue 6 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
The Arkansas Poll (University of Arkansas) 10/18/2016 - 10/25/2016	50.0%	43.0%	6.0%	+/-3.5	800
Talk Business & Politics-Hendrix College 10/21/2016	45.0%	50.0%	5.0%	+/-4.6	463
Talk Business & Politics-Hendrix College 9/15/2016 - 9/17/2016	49.0%	43.0%	8.0%	+/-3.4	831
Public Opinion Strategies 6/2/2016 - 6/6/2016	63.0%	35.0%	2.0%	+/-4.0	600
AVERAGES	51.75%	42.75%	5.25%	+/-3.88	673.5
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

• Talk Business & Politics-Hendrix College conducted a poll of 751 likely voters asking about the general issue of medical marijuana. The question was not specific to Issue 6 or Issue 7. The survey found support to be around 58 percent.

Support for Medical Marijuana in Arkansas
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Talk Business & Politics-Hendrix College 6/21/2016	58.0%	34.0%	8.0%	+/-3.6	751
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Arkansas Gubernatorial Power When Governor is Absent from State, Issue 2 (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• On October 21, 2016, Talk Business & Politics-Hendrix College surveyed 463 likely voters and found 52 percent of respondents supporting Issue 2.

Arkansas Issue 2 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Talk Business & Politics-Hendrix College 10/21/2016	52.0%	23.5%	24.5%	+/-4.6	463
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Arkansas Removal of Cap on State-Issued Bonds, Issue 3 (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• On October 21, 2016, Talk Business & Politics-Hendrix College surveyed 463 likely voters and found 35 percent of respondents supporting and 30 percent opposing Issue 3.

Arkansas Issue 3 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Talk Business & Politics-Hendrix College 10/21/2016	35.0%	30.0%	35.0%	+/-4.6	463
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

California

See also: California 2016 ballot measures

California Proposition 58, Non-English Languages Allowed in Public Education (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• In September 2016, The Field Poll/IGS Poll surveyed 484 registered voters on Proposition 58 using the official ballot title and found support around 69 percent. However, when the interviewers told 459 different voters that Proposition 58 would repeal the "English-only" provision of Proposition 227, support dropped to 31 percent and opposition increased to 51 percent.
• In mid October 2016, CALSPEAKS surveyed 622 likely voters on Proposition 58. Support among respondents was 59 percent.
• The Field Poll/IGS Poll surveyed 1,498 likely voters between October 25 and October 31, 2016, and found support for the measure at 68 percent.

Polls with margins of error

California Proposition 58 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
CALSPEAKS 10/7/2016 - 10/13/2016	59.0%	21.0%	21.0%	+/-7.0	622
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Polls without margins of error

Note: The Field Poll/IGS Poll does not report a margin of error because "[polls] conducted online using an opt-in panel do not easily lend themselves to the calculation of sampling error estimates as are traditionally reported for random sample telephone surveys."

California Proposition 58 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Sample size
The Field Poll/IGS Poll 10/25/2016 - 10/31/2016	68.0%	27.0%	5.0%	1,498
The Field Poll/IGS Poll 9/7/2016 - 9/13/2016	69.0%	14.0%	17.0%	484
AVERAGES	68.5%	20.5%	11%	991
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 61, Drug Price Standards (2016)

See also: Polls, 2016 ballot measures

• In July 2016, Tulchin Research surveyed Californians on Proposition 61. Tulchin Research found 73 percent of respondents in support and 13 percent in opposition. There was not a major difference between Republicans and Democrats in the poll. About 77 percent of Democrats and 70 percent of Republicans supported the measure.
• In early September 2016, the USC Dornsife and Los Angeles Times joint poll found 66 percent of respondents in support of and 23 percent in opposition to Proposition 61.
• A Field Poll/IGS Poll surveyed 943 registered voters in September 2016 and found support for Proposition 61 to be 50 percent. The largest demographic gap was between age cohorts, with 64 percent of people 18-29 and 47 percent of people 65 and over supporting the measure.
• The Hoover Institution and YouGov surveyed 1,250 likely voters between October 4 and October 14, 2016. Support for the measure was 51 percent. The poll disaggregated respondents into four racial/ethnic groups. Blacks had the strongest support for the initiative at 76 percent. Asians supported it at a rate of 53 percent. Whites and Hispanics supported Proposition 61 at rates of 50 percent.
• The Field Poll/IGS Poll surveyed 1,498 likely voters between October 25 and October 31, 2016, and found support for the measure at 47 percent.

Polls with margins of error

California Proposition 61 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Hoover Institution/YouGov 10/4/2016 - 10/14/2016	51.0%	24.0%	25.0%	+/-3.28	1,250
USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times 9/1/2016 - 9/8/2016	66.0%	23.0%	12.0%	+/-3.0	1,912
Tulchin Research 7/21/2016 - 7/24/2016	73.0%	13.0%	14.0%	+/-3.46	800
AVERAGES	63.33%	20%	17%	+/-3.25	1,320.67
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Polls without margins of error

Note: The Field Poll/IGS Poll does not report a margin of error because "[polls] conducted online using an opt-in panel do not easily lend themselves to the calculation of sampling error estimates as are traditionally reported for random sample telephone surveys."

California Proposition 61 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Sample size
The Field Poll/IGS Poll 10/25/2016 - 10/31/2016	47.0%	47.0%	6.0%	1,498
The Field Poll/IGS Poll 9/7/2016 - 9/13/2016	50.0%	16.0%	34.0%	943
AVERAGES	48.5%	31.5%	20%	1,220.5
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 63, Background Checks for Ammunition Purchases and Large-Capacity Ammunition Magazine Ban (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• In mid August 2016, California Counts found a large majority of respondents in support of Proposition 63. The firm found 93 percent of Democrats, 62 percent of independents, and 60 percent of Republicans in support of the measure.
• A USC Dornsife and Los Angeles Times joint poll found support for Proposition 63 to be around 64 percent in early September 2016.
• A Field Poll/IGS Poll surveyed 483 voters and found support for Proposition 63 at 60 percent. There was a 20-point gap between the genders in terms of support, with 70 percent of women and 50 percent of men favoring the initiative.
• SurveyUSA asked 712 Californians about Proposition 63 in September 2016. About 63 percent of respondents supported the measure. Only 42 percent of gun-owners support it, while 72 percent of non-owners did.
• In mid October 2016, CALSPEAKS surveyed 622 likely voters on Proposition 63. Support among respondents was 72 percent.
• SuveyUSA found 63 percent of respondents supporting the initiative in mid October 2016.
• In late October 2016, USC Dornsife and Los Angeles Times surveyed 1,500 registered voters on Proposition 63 and found support at 58 percent and opposition at 35 percent.
• The Field Poll/IGS Poll surveyed 1,498 likely voters between October 25 and October 31, 2016, and found support for the measure at 59 percent.

Polls with margins of error

California Proposition 63 (2016)
Poll	Yes	No	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times 10/22/2016 - 10/30/2016	58.0%	35.0%	7.0%	+/-2.3	1,500
SurveyUSA 10/13/2016 - 10/15/2016	63.0%	27.0%	10.0%	+/-3.6	725
CALSPEAKS 10/7/2016 - 10/13/2016	72.0%	20.0%	8.0%	+/-7.0	622
SurveyUSA 9/8/2016 - 9/11/2016	63.0%	29.0%	9.0%	+/-3.6	712
USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times 9/1/2016 - 9/8/2016	64.0%	28.0%	8.0%	+/-2.0	1,879
California Counts 8/15/2016 - 8/25/2016	77.0%	22.0%	2.0%	+/-4.0	915
AVERAGES	66.17%	26.83%	7.33%	+/-3.75	1,058.83
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Polls without margins of error

Note: The Field Poll/IGS Poll does not report a margin of error because "[polls] conducted online using an opt-in panel do not easily lend themselves to the calculation of sampling error estimates as are traditionally reported for random sample telephone surveys."

California Proposition 63 (2016)
Poll	Yes	No	Undecided	Sample size
The Field Poll/IGS Poll 10/25/2016 - 10/31/2016	59.0%	38.0%	3.0%	1,498
The Field Poll/IGS Poll 9/7/2016 - 9/13/2016	60.0%	30.0%	10.0%	483
AVERAGES	59.5%	34%	6.5%	990.5
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 64, Marijuana Legalization (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

Polls with margins of error

California Proposition 64 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times 10/22/2016 - 10/30/2016	58.0%	37.0%	5.0%	+/-2.3	1,500
Public Policy Institute of California 10/14/2016 - 10/23/2016	55.0%	38.0%	6.0%	+/-4.3	1,016
SurveyUSA 10/13/2016 - 10/15/2016	51.0%	40.0%	9.0%	+/-3.7	725
Hoover Institution/YouGov 10/4/2016 - 10/14/2016	56.0%	34.0%	10.0%	+/-3.28	1,250
CALSPEAKS 10/7/2016 - 10/13/2016	60.0%	30.0%	10.0%	+/-7.0	622
Public Policy Institute of California 9/9/2016 - 9/18/2016	60.0%	36.0%	4.0%	+/-3.5	1,702
SurveyUSA 9/8/2016 - 9/11/2016	52.0%	40.0%	8.0%	+/-3.7	712
USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times 9/1/2016 - 9/8/2016	58.0%	34.0%	8.0%	+/-2.0	1,879
California Counts 8/15/2016 - 8/24/2016	71.0%	26.0%	3.0%	+/-4.0	915
Probolsky Research 8/5/2016 - 8/8/2016	61.8%	34.9%	3.3%	+/-3.1	1,020
Probolsky Research 2/11/2016 - 2/14/2016	59.9%	36.7%	3.4%	+/-3.1	1,000
AVERAGES	58.43%	35.15%	6.34%	+/-3.63	1,121.91
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Polls without margins of error

Note: The Field Poll/IGS Poll does not report a margin of error because "[polls] conducted online using an opt-in panel do not easily lend themselves to the calculation of sampling error estimates as are traditionally reported for random sample telephone surveys."

California Proposition 64 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Sample size
The Field Poll/IGS Poll 10/25/2016 - 10/31/2016	57.0%	40.0%	3.0%	1,498
The Field Poll/IGS Poll 9/7/2016 - 9/13/2016	60.0%	31.0%	9.0%	942
AVERAGES	58.5%	35.5%	6%	1,220
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Descriptions of polls

• In February 2016, Probolsky Research found 59.9 percent of respondents favoring marijuana legalization in California. Support was highest among voters aged 18 to 34 at 79.7 percent.
• Probolsky Research surveyed voters in early August 2016. Over 61 percent of respondents supported Proposition 64. Support was highest among Democratic men, at 81.2 percent, compared to Democratic women at 63.5 percent. Republican men supported it at 51.4 percent, compared to Republican women at 38.3 percent.
• California Counts found support for Proposition 64 at a high 71 percent in mid August 2016. At 81 percent, Latinos supported the measure at a higher rate than whites, at 62 percent, or blacks, at 68 percent.
• A USC Dorsife and Los Angeles Times joint poll found support for Proposition 64 to be around 58 percent in early September 2016.
• In September 2016, SurveyUSA revealed support at 52 percent. The firm found that as income increased, support for the initiative decreased. Support was at approximately 60 percent among individuals with incomes under $40 thousand, 56 percent among people earning between $40 and $80 thousand, and only 44 percent among those with incomes over $80 thousand.
• A Field Poll/IGS Poll found support around 60 percent. Of the regions surveyed, support for Proposition 64 was strongest in Los Angeles County.
• In mid September 2016, the Public Policy Institute of California found support for Proposition 64 to be around 60 percent.
• In mid October 2016, CALSPEAKS surveyed 622 likely voters on Proposition 64. Support among respondents was 60 percent.
• The Hoover Institution and YouGov surveyed 1,250 likely voters between October 4 and October 14, 2016. Support for the measure was 56 percent.
• SurveyUSA found 51 percent of likely voters in favor of Proposition 64 in mid October 2016.
• The Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) surveyed 1,016 likely voters in mid- to late October 2016 and found support at 55 percent. PPIC broke respondents down into three ethnic categories, "White," "Latino," and "Other." Latinos in the sample had the least favorable view, at 47 percent, of Proposition 64. Respondents classified as “Other” had supported the measure 65 to 29 percent. Whites favored the measure 55 to 39 percent.
• In late October 2016, USC Dorsife and the Los Angeles Times surveyed 1,500 registered voters on Proposition 64. The poll found support at 58 percent.
• The Field Poll/IGS Poll surveyed 1,498 likely voters between October 25 and October 31, 2016, and found support for the measure at 57 percent.

California Proposition 56, Tobacco Tax Increase (2016)

See also: Polls, 2016 ballot measures

• A USC Dornsife and Los Angeles Times joint poll found support at 63 percent for Proposition 56 in early September 2016.
• In September 2016, SurveyUSA surveyed voters on Proposition 56. Approximately 60 percent of respondents supported the initiative. Asking respondents about their demographic, political, and lifestyle characteristics, SurveyUSA found that 54 percent of smokers opposed the initiative. Of all the other groups surveyed, at least 50 percent supported the measure.
• A Field Poll/IGS Poll surveyed 943 likely voters and found support for Proposition 56 to be 53 percent. The biggest demographic difference was between age cohorts, with 79 percent of persons 18-29 and 46 percent of persons 65 and over supporting the measure.
• In mid September 2016, the Public Policy Institute of California found support for Proposition 56 to be around 59 percent.
• CALSPEAKS surveyed 622 likely voters on Proposition 56 in mid October 2016. Support among respondents was 62 percent.
• In mid October 2016, SurveyUSA found support for the initiative around 57 percent and opposition to the initiative around 35 percent.
• The Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) surveyed 1,016 likely voters in mid- to late October 2016 and found support at 46 percent. PPIC broke respondents down into three racial/ethnic categories, "White," "Latino," and "Other." Latinos in the sample had the most favorable view, at 80 percent, of Proposition 56. Whites had the least favorable view, at 49 percent. Respondents classified as "Other" favored the measure 65 to 28 percent.
• The Field Poll/IGS Poll surveyed 1,498 likely voters between October 25 and October 31, 2016, and found support for the measure at 55 percent.

Polls with margins of error

California Proposition 56 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Public Policy Institute of California 10/14/2016 - 10/23/2016	56.0%	38.0%	6.0%	+/-4.3	1,016
SurveyUSA 10/13/2016 - 10/15/2016	57.0%	35.0%	7.0%	+/-3.7	752
CALSPEAKS 10/7/2016 - 10/13/2016	62.0%	26.0%	12.0%	+/-7.0	622
Public Policy Institute of California 9/9/2016 - 9/18/2016	59.0%	36.0%	5.0%	+/-3.5	1,702
SurveyUSA 9/8/2016 - 9/11/2016	60.0%	33.0%	7.0%	+/-3.7	712
USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times 9/1/2016 - 9/8/2016	63.0%	32.0%	6.0%	+/-3.0	1,912
AVERAGES	59.5%	33.33%	7.17%	+/-4.2	1,119.33
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Polls without margins of error

Note: The Field Poll/IGS Poll does not report a margin of error because "[polls] conducted online using an opt-in panel do not easily lend themselves to the calculation of sampling error estimates as are traditionally reported for random sample telephone surveys."

California Proposition 56 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Sample size
The Field Poll/IGS Poll 10/25/2016 - 10/31/2016	55.0%	43.0%	2.0%	1,498
The Field Poll/IGS Poll 9/7/2016 - 9/13/2016	53.0%	40.0%	7.0%	943
AVERAGES	54%	41.5%	4.5%	1,220.5
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 60, Condoms in Pornographic Films (2016)

See also: Polls, 2016 ballot measures

• A joint USC Dornsife - Los Angeles Times poll found 55 percent of respondents in support of Proposition 60 in early September 2016. The poll illustrated a large gender gap in positions, with 64 percent of women supporting the measure and 44 percent of men supporting it.
• In mid October 2016, CALSPEAKS surveyed 622 likely voters on Proposition 60. Support among respondents was 50 percent.

California Proposition 60 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
CALSPEAKS 10/7/2016 - 10/13/2016	50.0%	31.0%	19.0%	+/-7.0	622
USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times 9/1/2016 - 9/8/2016	55.0%	32.0%	13.0%	+/-2.0	1,909
AVERAGES	52.5%	31.5%	16%	+/-4.5	1,265.5
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 59, Overturn of Citizens United Act Advisory Question (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• In mid October 2016, CALSPEAKS surveyed 622 likely voters on Proposition 59. Support among respondents was 47 percent and opposition was 19 percent.

California Proposition 59 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
CALSPEAKS 10/7/2016 - 10/13/2016	47.0%	19.0%	34.0%	+/-7.0	622
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 52, Continued Hospital Fee Revenue Dedicated to Medi-Cal Unless Voters Approve Changes (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• In mid October 2016, CALSPEAKS surveyed 622 likely voters on Proposition 52. Support among respondents was 50 percent.
• The Field Poll/IGS Poll surveyed 1,498 likely voters between October 25 and October 31, 2016, and found support for the measure at 66 percent.

Polls with margins of error

California Proposition 52 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
CALSPEAKS 10/7/2016 - 10/13/2016	50.0%	18.0%	32.0%	+/-7.0	622
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Polls without margins of error

Note: The Field Poll/IGS Poll does not report a margin of error because "[polls] conducted online using an opt-in panel do not easily lend themselves to the calculation of sampling error estimates as are traditionally reported for random sample telephone surveys."

California Proposition 66 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Sample size
The Field Poll/IGS Poll 10/25/2016 - 10/31/2016	66.0%	29.0%	5.0%	1,498
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 50, Legislator Suspension Amendment (June 2016)

California Legislator Suspension Amendment, Proposition 50 (June 2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Hoover Institution Golden State Poll 5/4/16 - 5/16/16	60%	14%	26%	+/-3.47	1,196
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 54, Public Display of Legislative Bills Prior to Vote (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• In mid October 2016, CALSPEAKS surveyed 622 likely voters on Proposition 54. Support among respondents was 66 percent.

California Proposition 54 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
CALSPEAKS 10/7/2016 - 10/13/2016	66.0%	9.0%	25.0%	+/-7.0	622
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 67, Plastic Bag Ban Veto Referendum (2016)

See also: Polls, 2016 ballot measures

• In October 2014, a USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times poll found nearly 60 percent of Californians in favor of the bag ban. Approximately 43 percent of those surveyed said their biggest concern with the ban was that it was "just more government regulation and overreach."
• In mid October 2016, CALSPEAKS surveyed 622 likely voters on Proposition 67. Support among respondents was 45 percent.

California Proposition 67 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
CALSPEAKS 10/7/2016 - 10/13/2016	45.0%	39.0%	16.0%	+/-7.0	622
USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times 10/22/2014 - 10/29/2014	59.0%	34.0%	7.0%	+/-2.9	1,537
AVERAGES	52%	36.5%	11.5%	+/-4.95	1,079.5
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 51, Public School Facility Bonds (2016)

See also: Polls, 2016 ballot measures

• Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin, Metz & Associates surveyed Californians on a statewide $9 billion school bond in December 2014. A majority of Democrats, independents, Republican women, and Republicans ages 18 to 49 supported the measure.
• In mid September 2016, the Public Policy Institute of California found support for Proposition 51 to be around 47 percent.
• In mid October 2016, CALSPEAKS surveyed 622 likely voters on Proposition 51. Support among respondents was 56 percent.
• The Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) surveyed 1,017 likely voters in mid- to late October 2016 and found support at 46 percent. PPIC broke respondents down into three racial/ethnic categories, "White," "Latino," and "Other." Latinos in the sample had the most favorable view, at 64 percent, of Proposition 51. Whites had the least favorable view, at 40 percent. Around 54 percent of those classified as "Other" supported the measure.

California Proposition 51 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Public Policy Institute of California 10/14/2016 - 10/23/2016	46.0%	41.0%	12.0%	+/-4.3	1,017
CALSPEAKS 10/7/2016 - 10/13/2016	56.0%	21.0%	23.0%	+/-7.0	622
Public Policy Institute of California 9/9/2016 - 9/18/2016	47.0%	43.0%	10.0%	+/-3.5	1,702
Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin, Metz & Associates 12/01/2014 - 12/07/2014	63.0%	33.0%	4.0%	+/-3.3	860
AVERAGES	53%	34.5%	12.25%	+/-4.53	1,050.25
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

• The Public Policy Institute of California asked respondents about their support for a statewide school bond. However, the amount was not specified nor was the proposition mentioned in the question. Without these specifications, the institute found 76 percent of respondents in favor and 21 percent opposed to a bond.

California Support for Statewide School Bond (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Public Policy Institute of California 4/03/2016–4/12/2016	76.0%	21.0%	3.0%	+/-3.5	1,703
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 62, Repeal of the Death Penalty (2016)

See also: Polls, 2016 ballot measures

• A USC Dornsife and Los Angeles Times joint poll found a slim simple majority opposing Proposition 62, with 51 percent against and 40 percent in favor, in early September 2016.
• SurveyUSA reported that 52 percent of Californians surveyed opposed Proposition 62. African-Americans were the only demographic group in which a simple majority supported the measure. A majority of people identifying as a "strong Democrat" or "very liberal" also supported it.
• In September 2016, The Field Poll/IGS Poll surveyed 942 registered voters and found support for Proposition 62 to be 48 percent. Democrats supported the measure at 63 percent, independents at 53 percent, and Republicans at 21 percent.
• CALSPEAKS surveyed 622 likely voters on Proposition 62 in mid-October 2016. Support among respondents was 37 percent.
• The Hoover Institution and YouGov surveyed 1,250 likely voters between October 4 and October 14, 2016. Support for the measure was 42 percent.
• In mid-October 2016, SurveyUSA found support for the initiative around 35 percent and opposition to the measure around 53 percent.
• In late October 2016, USC Dornsife and the Los Angeles Times surveyed 1,500 registered voters and found 43 percent favoring and 46 percent opposing Proposition 62.
• The Field Poll/IGS Poll surveyed 1,498 likely voters between October 25 and October 31, 2016, and found support for the measure at 51 percent.

Polls with margins of error

California Proposition 62 (2016)
Poll	Favor	Oppose	Undecided/Abstaining	Margin of error	Sample size
USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times 10/22/2016 - 10/30/2016	43.0%	46.0%	11.0%	+/-2.3	1,500
SurveyUSA 10/13/2016 - 10/15/2016	35.0%	53.0%	12.0%	+/-3.7	725
Hoover Institution/YouGov 10/4/2016 - 10/14/2016	42.0%	43.0%	15.0%	+/-3.28	1,250
CALSPEAKS 10/7/2016 - 10/13/2016	37.0%	45.0%	18.0%	+/-7.0	622
SurveyUSA 9/8/2016 - 9/11/2016	36.0%	52.0%	12.0%	+/-3.7	712
USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times 9/1/2016 - 9/8/2016	40.0%	51.0%	9.0%	+/-3.0	1,909
AVERAGES	38.83%	48.33%	12.83%	+/-3.83	1,119.67
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Polls without margins of error

Note: The Field Poll/IGS Poll does not report a margin of error because "[polls] conducted online using an opt-in panel do not easily lend themselves to the calculation of sampling error estimates as are traditionally reported for random sample telephone surveys."

California Proposition 62 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Sample size
The Field Poll/IGS Poll 10/25/2016 - 10/31/2016	51.0%	45.0%	4.0%	1,498
The Field Poll/IGS Poll 9/7/2016 - 9/13/2016	48.0%	37.0%	15.0%	942
AVERAGES	49.5%	41%	9.5%	1,220
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

• The Field Poll surveyed Californians in December 2015 and January 2016 on their support for two initiatives related to capital punishment. About 47 percent of respondents favored the provisions of Proposition 62, while 48 percent preferred the provisions of Proposition 66. The former initiative would replace the death penalty with life imprisonment without parole, and the latter initiative would speed up the execution process.

California Proposition 62 (2016) and California Proposition 66 (2016)
Poll	Favor Proposition 66	Favor Proposition 62	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Field Poll 12/15/2015 - 1/3/2016	48%	47%	5%	+/-3.2	1,003
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 53, Voter Approval Requirement for Revenue Bonds above $2 Billion (2016)

See also: Polls, 2016 ballot measures

• The Public Policy Institute of California asked residents about their support for "requiring statewide voter approval for revenue bonds" in mid January 2016. Approximately 70 percent of respondents said they supported a voter-approval requirement. The issue was supported most strongly by Republicans in comparison to independents and Democrats.

California Proposition 53 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
The Public Policy Institute of California 1/10/2016 - 1/19/2016	70.0%	22.0%	8.0%	+/-3.5	1,704
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 66, Death Penalty Procedures (2016)

See also: Polls, 2016 ballot measures

• In September 2016, The Field Poll/IGS Poll surveyed 942 registered voters and found support for Proposition 66 to be 35 percent. Most voters were undecided on the measure.
• In mid October 2016, CALSPEAKS surveyed 622 likely voters on Proposition 66. Support among respondents was 51 percent.
• The Hoover Institution and YouGov surveyed 1,250 likely voters between October 4 and October 14, 2016. Support for the measure was 38 percent.
• In late October 2016, USC Dornsife and the Los Angeles Times surveyed 1,500 registered voters and found 35 percent favoring and 63 percent opposing Proposition 66.
• The Field Poll/IGS Poll surveyed 1,498 likely voters between October 25 and October 31, 2016, and found support for the measure at 48 percent.

Polls with margins of error

California Proposition 66 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times 10/22/2016 - 10/30/2016	35.0%	43.0%	22.0%	+/-2.3	1,500
Hoover Institution/YouGov 10/4/2016 - 10/14/2016	38.0%	24.0%	38.0%	+/-3.28	1,250
CALSPEAKS 10/7/2016 - 10/13/2016	51.0%	20.0%	29.0%	+/-7.0	622
AVERAGES	41.33%	29%	29.67%	+/-4.19	1,124
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Polls without margins of error

Note: The Field Poll/IGS Poll does not report a margin of error because "[polls] conducted online using an opt-in panel do not easily lend themselves to the calculation of sampling error estimates as are traditionally reported for random sample telephone surveys."

California Proposition 66 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Sample size
The Field Poll/IGS Poll 10/25/2016 - 10/31/2016	48.0%	42.0%	10.0%	1,498
The Field Poll/IGS Poll 9/7/2016 - 9/13/2016	35.0%	23.0%	42.0%	942
AVERAGES	41.5%	32.5%	26%	1,220
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

• The Field Poll surveyed Californians in December 2015 and January 2016 on their support for two initiatives related to capital punishment. About 47 percent of respondents favored the provisions of Proposition 62, while 48 percent preferred the provisions of Proposition 66. The former initiative would replace the death penalty with life imprisonment without parole, and the latter initiative would speed up the execution process.

California Proposition 62 (2016) and California Proposition 66 (2016)
Poll	Favor Proposition 66	Favor Proposition 62	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Field Poll 12/15/2015 - 1/3/2016	48%	47%	5%	+/-3.2	1,003
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 55, Extension of the Proposition 30 Income Tax Increase (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• In April 2016, the Public Policy Institute of California asked residents their opinion on "extending for 12 years the tax increase on earnings over $250,000 to fund education and health care." About 64 percent of respondents supported the extension. The institute found that 82 percent of Democrats, 62 percent of independents, and 32 percent of Republicans supported the measure.
• In late August 2016, a PACE and USC Rossier joint poll found support nearing 70 percent. People ages 18 to 24 had the highest rate of support at 84 percent.
• A USC Dornsife and Los Angeles Times joint poll found that 57 percent of respondents supported Proposition 55, while only 35 percent opposed it.
• A Field Poll/IGS Poll surveyed 967 likely voters and found that 60 percent supported Proposition 55. Democrats supported the measure at 82 percent, independents at 62 percent, and Republicans at 26 percent.
• In mid September 2016, the Public Policy Institute of California found support for Proposition 55 to be around 54 percent.
• In mid October 2016, CALSPEAKS surveyed 622 likely voters on Proposition 55. Support among respondents was 58 percent.
• The Hoover Institution and YouGov surveyed 1,250 likely voters between October 4 and October 14, 2016. Support for the measure was 59 percent.
• The Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) surveyed 1,013 likely voters in mid- to late October 2016 and found support at 59 percent. PPIC broke respondents down by age cohorts. The youngest cohort, 18 to 34 years old, supported the measure 81 to 12 percent. The oldest cohort, 55 years old and older, supported the measure 50 to 37 percent.
• The Field Poll/IGS Poll surveyed 1,498 likely voters between October 25 and October 31, 2016, and found support for the measure at 59 percent.

Polls with margins of error

California Proposition 55 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Public Policy Institute of California 10/14/2016 - 10/23/2016	59.0%	31.0%	10.0%	+/-4.3	1,013
Hoover Institution/YouGov 10/4/2016 - 10/14/2016	59.0%	29.0%	23.0%	+/-3.28	1,250
CALSPEAKS 10/7/2016 - 10/13/2016	58.0%	21.0%	21.0%	+/-7.0	622
Public Policy Institute of California 9/9/2016 - 9/18/2016	54.0%	38.0%	8.0%	+/-3.5	1,702
USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times 9/1/2016 - 9/8/2016	57.0%	35.0%	8.0%	+/-3.0	1,912
PACE/USC Rossier Poll 8/28/2016 - 8/30/2016	69.0%	25.0%	6.0%	+/-2.83	1,202
The Public Policy Institute of California 4/3/2016 - 4/12/2016	64.0%	32.0%	4.0%	+/-3.5	1,703
AVERAGES	60%	30.14%	11.43%	+/-3.92	1,343.43
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Polls without margins of error

Note: The Field Poll/IGS Poll does not report a margin of error because "[polls] conducted online using an opt-in panel do not easily lend themselves to the calculation of sampling error estimates as are traditionally reported for random sample telephone surveys."

California Proposition 55 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Sample size
The Field Poll/IGS Poll 10/25/2016 - 10/31/2016	59.0%	38.0%	3.0%	1,498
The Field Poll/IGS Poll 9/7/2016 - 9/13/2016	60.0%	30.0%	10.0%	967
AVERAGES	59.5%	34%	6.5%	1,232.5
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 57, Parole for Non-Violent Criminals and Juvenile Court Trial Requirements (2016)

See also: Polls, 2016 ballot measures

• In mid-August 2016, California Counts surveyed Californians on Proposition 57. The firm found 72 percent of respondents in support. About 80 percent of Democrats, 69 percent of independents, and 56 percent of Republicans supported the measure.
• In September 2016, a USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times poll found that 66 percent of respondents were in favor of Proposition 57.
• A Field Poll/IGS Poll surveyed 484 likely voters and found support for Proposition 57 to be 60 percent. Support was 78 percent among Democrats, 54 percent among independents, and 47 percent among Republicans.
• In mid-October 2016, CALSPEAKS surveyed 622 likely voters on Proposition 57. Support among respondents was 61 percent.
• In late October 2016, USC Dornsife and the Los Angeles Times released a poll showing 57 percent of respondents supporting Proposition 57.
• The Field Poll/IGS Poll surveyed 1,498 likely voters between October 25 and October 31, 2016, and found support for the measure at 64 percent.

Polls with margins of error

California Proposition 57 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times 10/22/2016 - 10/30/2016	57.0%	31.0%	12.0%	+/-2.4	1,382
CALSPEAKS 10/7/2016 - 10/13/2016	61.0%	16.0%	23.0%	+/-7.0	622
USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times 9/1/2016 - 9/8/2016	66.0%	26.0%	8.0%	+/-3.0	1,912
California Counts 8/15/2016 - 8/25/2016	72.0%	21.0%	7.0%	+/-4.0	915
AVERAGES	64%	23.5%	12.5%	+/-4.1	1,207.75
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Polls without margins of error

Note: The Field Poll/IGS Poll does not report a margin of error because "[polls] conducted online using an opt-in panel do not easily lend themselves to the calculation of sampling error estimates as are traditionally reported for random sample telephone surveys."

California Proposition 57 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Sample size
The Field Poll/IGS Poll 10/25/2016 - 10/31/2016	64.0%	32.0%	4.0%	1,498
The Field Poll/IGS Poll 9/7/2016 - 9/13/2016	60.0%	21.0%	19.0%	484
AVERAGES	62%	26.5%	11.5%	991
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Colorado

See also: Colorado 2016 ballot measures

Colorado $12 Minimum Wage, Amendment 70 (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• In late August 2016, Magellan Strategies conducted a poll and found 55 percent of respondents supporting Amendment 70. The partisan divide on the issue was steep, with 83 percent of Democrats, 60 percent of independents, and 24 percent of Republicans supporting Amendment 70.
• Colorado Mesa University, Rocky Mountain PBS, and Franklin & Marshall College released a poll in September 2016 indicating that support for the initiative was around 58 percent.
• Magellan Strategies surveyed 500 likely voters on November 1 and November 2, 2016, and found 54 percent of respondents supporting Amendment 70.

Colorado Amendment 70 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Magellan Strategies 11/01/2016 - 11/02/2016	54.0%	43.0%	3.0%	+/-4.38	500
Colorado Mesa University, Rocky Mountain PBS, and Franklin & Marshal College 9/14/2016 - 9/18/2016	58.0%	36.0%	7.0%	+/-5.1	540
Magellan Strategies 8/29/2016 - 8/31/2016	55.0%	42.0%	3.0%	+/-4.4	500
AVERAGES	55.67%	40.33%	4.33%	+/-4.63	513.33
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Colorado Proposition 106, Physician-Assisted Death Initiative (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• Colorado Mesa University, Rocky Mountain PBS, and Franklin & Marshal College surveyed 540 registered voters in September 2016 on Proposition 106. The poll found 70 percent of respondents favoring and 22 percent opposing the measure.

Colorado Proposition 106 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Colorado Mesa University, Rocky Mountain PBS, and Franklin & Marshal College 9/14/2016 - 9/18/2016	70.0%	22.0%	8.0%	+/-5.1	540
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Colorado Presidential Primary Election, Proposition 107 (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• In late August 2016, Magellan Strategies surveyed 500 likely voters on Proposition 107. The firm found 54 percent of respondents supporting the initiative. Young voters, between 18 and 34 years of age, had the highest rate of support at 69 percent.

Colorado Presidential Primary Election, Proposition 107 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Magellan Strategies 8/29/16 - 8/31/16	54%	36%	10%	+/-4.38	500
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Colorado Creation of ColoradoCare System, Amendment 69 (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• In late August 2016, Magellan Strategies surveyed 500 likely voters on Amendment 69. Of the respondents surveyed, 27 percent supported and 65 percent opposed Amendment 69. Democrats were most favorable towards the measure, with 41 percent in support and 45 percent in opposition.
• Colorado Mesa University, Rocky Mountain PBS, and Franklin & Marshal College surveyed 540 registered voters in mid-September 2016 and found support for Amendment 69 around 30 percent.

Colorado Amendment 69 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Colorado Mesa University, Rocky Mountain PBS, and Franklin & Marshal College 9/14/2016 - 9/18/2016	30.0%	56.0%	14.0%	+/-5.1	540
Magellan Strategies 8/29/2016 - 8/31/2016	27.0%	65.0%	8.0%	+/-4.38	500
AVERAGES	28.5%	60.5%	11%	+/-4.74	520
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Florida

See also: Florida 2016 ballot measures

Florida Medical Marijuana Legalization, Amendment 2 (2016)

Note: Constitutional amendments in Florida require a 60 percent supermajority for approval.

Florida Medical Marijuana (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
St. Leo University 10/22/16 - 10/26/16	71.3%	21.6%	7.1%	+/-3	1,028
People United for Medical Marijuana/Anzalone Liszt Grove Research 10/17/2016 - 10/20/2016	74%	22%	4%	+/-3.59	800
Public Opinion Research Laboratory 9/27/2016 - 10/4/2016	77%	18%	4%	+/-3.8	668
Florida Chamber of Commerce/Cherry Communications 9/15/16 - 9/20/16	73%	22%	5%	+/-4	617
St. Leo University 9/10/16 - 9/16/16	68.8%	31.2%	0%	+/-4.5	502
Anzalone Liszt Research 7/17/16 - 7/21/16	77%	20%	3%	+/-3.1	1,000
News 13/Bay News 9 June 2016	68%	18%	13%	+/-2.3	1,678
Gravis Marketing 5/17/16 - 5/18/16	69%	23%	8%	+/-2.0	2,542
Quinnipiac University Poll 4/27/16 - 5/6/16	80%	16%	3%	+/-3.0	1,051
Bendixen & Amandi International 5/1/16 - 5/4/16	61%	36%	3%	+/-4.0	600
Mason-Dixon Polling & Research 3/7/16 - 3/9/16	71%	23%	6%	+/-4.0	625
News 13/Bay News 9 3/4/16 - 3/6/16	61%	21%	18%	+/-2.2	1,961
Public Policy Polling Poll 2/24/16 - 2/25/16	65%	28%	7%	+/-3.1	1,012
Quinnipiac University Poll 3/17/15 - 3/28/15	84%	14%	2%	+/-3.0	1,087
Gravis Marketing 1/28/15 - 1/29/15	64%	26%	10%	+/-4.0	693
AVERAGES	70.94%	22.65%	6.21%	+/-3.31	1,057.6
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Florida Solar Energy Subsidies and Personal Solar Use, Amendment 1 (2016)

See also: Polls, 2016 ballot measures

Florida Amendment 1 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Other	Margin of error	Sample size
St. Leo University 10/22/16 - 10/26/16	59.8%	27.9%	12.3%	+/-3	1,028
Civis Analytics 10/20/2016 - 10/25/2016	51.2%	38.2%	10.7%	+/-5	528
Civis Analytics 9/29/2016 - 10/9/2016	71.6%	12.7%	15.8%	+/-5	528
Florida Chamber of Commerce/Cherry Communications 9/15/16 - 9/20/16	66%	16%	18%	+/-4	617
Mason-Dixon Polling & Research 3/7/16 - 3/9/16	64%	18%	18%	+/-4.0	625
Hill Research Consultants Poll 2/16/2016 - 2/18/2016	73%	15%	12%	+/-4.0	607
AVERAGES	64.27%	21.3%	14.47%	+/-4.17	655.5
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Florida Property Tax Exemptions for Senior Citizens, Amendment 5 (2016)

Florida Amendment 5 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
St. Leo University 10/22/16 - 10/26/16	72.1%	10.5%	17.4%	+/-3	1,028
Florida Chamber of Commerce/Cherry Communications 9/15/16 - 9/20/16	80%	9%	11%	+/-4	617
AVERAGES	76.05%	9.75%	14.2%	+/-3.5	822.5
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Florida Property Tax Exemptions for Renewable Energy Equipment, Amendment 4 (August 2016)

In August 2016, StPetePolls.org conducted a survey in which respondents were asked two questions, one regarding Amendment 4, and the question was as follows:

“

How do you plan to vote on proposed Florida Constitutional Amendment 4, which will allow tax exemptions on the installation of solar or renewable energy devices?

”

Florida Property Tax Exemptions for Renewable Energy Equipment, Amendment 4 (August 2016)
Poll	Yes	No	Unsure	Margin of error	Sample size
StPetePolls.org 8/2/16	56.4%	16.4%	27.2%	+/-1.3	5,358
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Florida Tax Exemptions for Disabled First Responders, Amendment 3 (2016)

Florida Amendment 3 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
St. Leo University 10/22/16 - 10/26/16	75.4%	13.4%	11.2%	+/-3	1,028
Florida Chamber of Commerce/Cherry Communications 9/15/16 - 9/20/16	85%	7%	8%	+/-4	617
AVERAGES	80.2%	10.2%	9.6%	+/-3.5	822.5
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Georgia

See also: Georgia 2016 ballot measures

Georgia Replacement of the Judicial Qualifications Commission, Amendment 3 (2016)

Georgia Amendment Three (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Survey USA 10/25/2016-10/27/2016	36%	23%	41%	+/-4.1	800
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Georgia Authorization of the State Government to Intervene in Failing Local Schools, Amendment 1 (2016)

Georgia Amendment 1
Poll	Yes	No	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Survey USA 10/25/2016-10/27/2016	29%	54%	18%	+/-4.1	800
Atlanta Journal Constitution/ABT SRBI 10/17/2016 - 10/20/2016	34%	59%	8%	+/-3.9	1,003
Landmark/Rosetta Stone 10/18/2016	34%	44%	22%	+/-4	600
AVERAGES	32.33%	52.33%	16%	+/-4	801
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Hawaii

See also: Hawaii 2016 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Idaho

See also: Idaho 2016 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Illinois

See also: Illinois 2016 ballot measures

Illinois Transportation Taxes and Fees Lockbox Amendment (2016)

See also: Polls, 2016 ballot measures

• The Paul Simon Public Policy Institute conducted a poll from September 27 to October 2, 2016, and found support for the amendment to be 80 percent.

Illinois Transportation Taxes and Fees Lockbox Amendment (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Paul Simon Public Policy Institute 9/27/2016 - 10/2/2016	80.0%	13.0%	7.0%	+/-3.3	865
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Indiana

See also: Indiana 2016 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Kansas

See also: Kansas 2016 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Louisiana

See also: Louisiana 2016 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Maine

See also: Maine 2016 ballot measures

Maine Question 5, Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative (2016)

Maine Question 5, Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
University of New Hampshire Survey Center 10/20/16 - 10/25/16	49%	31%	20%	+/-3.6	761
Portland Press Herald/University of New Hampshire Survey Center 9/15/16 - 9/20/16	48%	29%	23%	+/-4.3	513
Maine People's Resource Center 3/5/16 - 3/8/16	57.9%	29.8%	12.3%	+/-4.15	557
AVERAGES	51.63%	29.93%	18.43%	+/-4.02	610.33
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Maine Background Checks for Gun Sales, Question 3 (2016)

Maine Background Checks for Gun Sales, Question 3 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
University of New Hampshire Survey Center 10/20/16 - 10/25/16	52%	43%	5%	+/-3.6	761
Portland Press Herald/University of New Hampshire Survey Center 9/15/16 - 9/20/16	61%	33%	6%	+/-4.3	509
Maine People's Resource Center 3/5/16 - 3/8/16	66.2%	25.5%	8.3%	+/-4.15	557
AVERAGES	59.73%	33.83%	6.43%	+/-4.02	609
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

A company called Pan Atlantic SMS Group conducted a poll of 403 Maine residents between March 11 and March 16, 2013. One of the questions in the poll asked if the respondent supported mandatory background checks on all potential gun buyers. This question did not reference this particular initiative proposal. Out of the total, 89.6 percent of respondents said they did favor mandatory background checks in Maine, 7.9 percent said they were opposed, and 2.4 percent said they did not know.

Maine Tax on Incomes Exceeding $200,000 for Public Education, Question 2 (2016)

Maine Tax on Incomes Exceeding $200,000 for Public Education, Question 2 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
University of New Hampshire Survey Center 10/20/16 - 10/25/16	57%	34%	9%	+/-3.6	761
Portland Press Herald/University of New Hampshire Survey Center 9/15/16 - 9/20/16	60%	32%	8%	+/-4.3	506
AVERAGES	58.5%	33%	8.5%	+/-3.95	633.5
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Maine Minimum Wage Increase, Question 4 (2016)

Maine Minimum Wage Increase, Question 4 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
University of New Hampshire Survey Center 10/20/16 - 10/25/16	57%	35%	8%	+/-3.6	761
Portland Press Herald/University of New Hampshire Survey Center 9/15/16 - 9/20/16	60%	28%	12%	+/-4.3	513
AVERAGES	58.5%	31.5%	10%	+/-3.95	637
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

The Maine People's Resource Center conducted a poll of 452 likely voters in Portland, Maine, between August 22 and August 24, 2015. One of the questions in the poll was: "In November of next year, there will likely be a ballot initiative that would raise the statewide minimum wage in Maine to $9 per hour in 2017 and by $1 each year after that until it is $12 in 2020. It would then increase at the same rate as the cost of living. If the vote were held today would you vote yes or no on this referendum?" Of the respondents, 76 percent said they would vote "yes," 17.7 percent said they would vote "no," and 6.3 percent were undecided.

A company called Critical Insights conducted a poll of 600 potential Maine voters between September 24 and September 30, 2015. One of the questions in the poll was: "Do you support or oppose an increase in minimum wage in the State of Maine?" This question did not reference this particular initiative proposal or a specific minimum wage increase amount. Out of the total, 68 percent of respondents said they did favor an increase in the minimum wage in Maine, 22 percent said they were opposed, and 10 percent said they did not know.

Maine Marijuana Legalization, Question 1 (2016)

Maine Marijuana Legalization, Question 1 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
University of New Hampshire Survey Center 10/20/16 - 10/25/16	50%	41%	9%	+/-3.6	761
Portland Press Herald/University of New Hampshire Survey Center 9/15/16 - 9/20/16	53%	38%	10%	+/-4.3	505
Maine People's Resource Center 3/5/16 - 3/8/16	53.8%	42.4%	3.8%	+/-4.15	557
AVERAGES	52.27%	40.47%	7.6%	+/-4.02	607.67
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Maryland

See also: Maryland 2016 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Massachusetts

See also: Massachusetts 2016 ballot measures

Massachusetts Minimum Size Requirements for Farm Animal Containment, Question 3 (2016)

Massachusetts Question 3
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Western New England University 10/23/2016-11/2/2016	64%	25%	9%	+/-4.5	470
Suffolk University/Boston Globe 10/24/2016-10/26/2016	62.4%	24.6%	1.2%	+/-4.4	500
WBUR/MassInc 10/13/2016 - 10/16/2016	66%	28%	7%	+/-4.4	502
Western New England University Polling Institute 9/24/2016 - 10/3/2016	61%	26%	12%	+/-5	467
WBUR/MassInc 9/7/2016 - 9/10/2016	66%	25%	9%	+/-4.4	506
WBZ/UMass Amherst 9/15/2016 - 9/20/2016	75%	14%	11%	+/-4.3	700
AVERAGES	65.73%	23.77%	8.2%	+/-4.5	524.17
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Note: The margin of error for the WBZ/UMass Amherst poll was found in a separate CBS article.

Note: The margin of error for the Suffolk University/Boston Globe poll was found in a separate article.

Massachusetts Authorization of a Second Slots Location, Question 1 (2016)

Massachusetts Question 1
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Western New England University 10/23/2016-11/2/2016	34%	47%	18%	+/-4.5	470
Suffolk University/Boston Globe 10/24/2016-10/26/2016	29.6%	56.6%	13.2%	+/-4.4	500
WBUR/MassInc 10/13/2016 - 10/16/2016	34%	58%	8%	+/-4.4	502
Western New England University Polling Institute 9/24/2016 - 10/3/2016	34%	44%	21%	+/-5	467
WBUR/MassInc 9/7/2016 - 9/10/2016	37%	52%	11%	+/-4.4	506
WBZ/UMass Amherst 9/15/2016 - 9/20/2016	44%	35%	22%	+/-4.3	700
AVERAGES	35.43%	48.77%	15.53%	+/-4.5	524.17
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Note: The margin of error for the WBZ/UMass Amherst poll was found in a separate CBS article.

Note: The margin of error for the Suffolk University/Boston Globe poll was found in a separate article.

Massachusetts Authorization of Additional Charter Schools and Charter School Expansion, Question 2 (2016)

Massachusetts Charter School Expansion
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Western New England University 10/23/2016-11/2/2016	40%	49%	10%	+/-4.5	470
Suffolk University/Boston Globe 10/24/2016-10/26/2016	45.4%	45.4%	8.6%	+/-4.4	500
WBUR/MassInc 9/7/2016 - 9/10/2016	41%	48%	11%	+/-4.4	506
WBZ/UMass Amherst 9/15/2016 - 9/20/2016	49%	39%	12%	+/-4.3	700
Suffolk University/Boston Globe 5/2/2016 - 5/5/2016	50.0%	33.0%	16.0%	+/-4.4	500
Western New England University 4/1/2016 - 4/10/2016	51.0%	26.0%	23.0%	+/-4.0	497
Mass Inc Polling Group 3/12/2016 - 3/17/2016	73.0%	21.0%	6.0%	+/-4.9	403
UMass Amherst 2/19/2016 - 2/25/2016	51.0%	23.0%	26.0%	+/-4.1	891
AVERAGES	50.05%	35.55%	14.08%	+/-4.38	558.38
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Note: The margin of error for the WBZ/UMass Amherst poll was found in a separate CBS article.

Note: The margin of error for the Suffolk University/Boston Globe poll was found in a separate article.

Massachusetts Marijuana Legalization, Question 4 (2016)

The following polls were conducted in 2014 and 2016 about the issue of marijuana legalization in general. They made no reference to this particular initiative.

Massachusetts Marijuana Legalization
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Western New England University 10/23/2016-11/2/2016	62%	33%	4%	+/-4.5	470
Suffolk University/Boston Globe 10/24/2016-10/26/2016	48.8%	42.4%	7.8%	+/-4.4	500
WBUR/MassInc 10/13/2016 - 10/16/2016	55%	40%	5%	+/-4.4	502
Western New England University Polling Institute 9/24/2016 - 10/3/2016	55%	39%	5%	+/-5	467
WBUR/MassInc 9/7/2016 - 9/10/2016	50%	45%	5%	+/-4.4	506
WBZ/UMass Amherst 9/28/2016	53%	40%	7%	+/-4.3	700
Gravis Marketing/Jobs First 7/12/2016 - 7/13/2016	41.0%	51.0%	9.0%	+/-3.3	901
Suffolk University/Boston Globe 5/2/2016 - 5/5/2016	43.0%	46%	11.0%	+/-4.4	500
Western New England University 4/1/2016 - 4/10/2016	57.0%	35.0%	7.0%	+/-4.0	497
UMass Amherst 2/19/2016 - 2/25/2016	53.0%	40.0%	7.0%	+/-4.1	891
WBUR 3/14/2014 - 3/16/2014	48.0%	41.0%	11.0%	+/-4.4	500
MassINC Polling Group 5/16/2014 - 5/18/2014	49.0%	42.0%	9.0%	+/-4.4	503
AVERAGES	51.23%	41.2%	7.32%	+/-4.3	578.08
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Note: The margin of error for the Suffolk University/Boston Globe poll was found in a separate article.

Minnesota

See also: Minnesota 2016 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Missouri

See also: Missouri 2016 ballot measures

Missouri 60 Cent Cigarette Tax, Constitutional Amendment 3 (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• National Research Inc. surveyed 600 likely voters in July 2016 and found 53 percent of respondents supporting Amendment 3.
• In late-October 2016, Mason-Dixon Polling & Research surveyed 625 voters and found 43 percent of respondents supporting the amendment.

Missouri Amendment 3 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Mason-Dixon Polling & Research 10/24/2016 - 10/26/2016	43.0%	49.0%	8.0%	+/-4.0	625
National Research Inc. 7/23/2016 - 7/25/2016	53.0%	29.0%	18.0%	+/-4.0	600
AVERAGES	48%	39%	13%	+/-4	612.5
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Missouri State and Judicial Campaign Contribution Limits, Constitutional Amendment 2 (2016)

See also: Polls, 2016 ballot measures

• In late-September 2016, Remington Research Group surveyed 1,279 likely Missouri voters on Amendment 2. Approximately 64 percent of respondents supported the measure, while 24 percent opposed it.
• In late-October 2016, Mason-Dixon Polling & Research surveyed 625 voters and found 76 percent of respondents supporting the amendment.

Missouri Amendment 2 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Mason-Dixon Polling & Research 10/24/2016 - 10/26/2016	76.0%	15.0%	9.0%	+/-4.0	625
Remington Research Group 9/26/2016 - 9/27/2016	64.0%	24.0%	22.0%	+/-3.0	1,279
AVERAGES	70%	19.5%	15.5%	+/-3.5	952
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Missouri Prohibition on Extending Sales Tax to Previously Untaxed Services, Constitutional Amendment 4 (2016)

See also: Polls, 2016 ballot measures

• In October 2016, Remington Research Group surveyed 1,588 likely voters and found 49 percent of respondents opposed to Amendment 4.

Missouri Amendment 4 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Remington Research Group 10/4/2016 - 10/5/2016	23.0%	49.0%	27.0%	+/-2.64	1,588
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Missouri 23 Cent Cigarette Tax, Proposition A (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• In late-October 2016, Mason-Dixon Polling & Research surveyed 625 voters and found 39 percent of respondents supporting Proposition A.

Missouri Proposition A (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Mason-Dixon Polling & Research 10/24/2016 - 10/26/2016	39.0%	54.0%	7.0%	+/-4.0	625
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Missouri Voter ID Requirement, Constitutional Amendment 6 (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• In late-October 2016, Mason-Dixon Polling & Research surveyed 625 voters and found 68 percent of respondents supporting Amendment 6.

Missouri Amendment 6 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Mason-Dixon Polling & Research 10/24/2016 - 10/26/2016	68.0%	30.0%	2.0%	+/-4.0	625
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Montana

See also: Montana 2016 ballot measures

Montana I-177, Animal Trap Restrictions on Public Land Initiative (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• Mason-Dixon Polling and Research surveyed 1,003 registered voters on Initiative 177. Sixty-three percent of respondents said they planned to vote "No" on the measure.

Montana Initiative 177 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Mason-Dixon Polling and Research 10/10/16 - 10/12/16	24.0%	63.0%	13.0%	+/-3.2	1,003
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Montana Marsy's Law Crime Victims Rights Initiative, CI-116 (2016)

See also: Polls, 2016 ballot measures

• In July 2016, Moore Information sampled 500 Montana voters and found that 79 percent of them supported and 12 percent opposed Constitutional Initiative 116.

Montana CI-116 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Moore Information 7/24/2016 - 7/25/2016	79.0%	12.0%	9.0%	+/-4.0	500
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Montana Medical Marijuana Initiative, I-182 (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

Mason-Dixon Polling and Research surveyed 1,003 registered voters on Initiative 182. Support for the measure was 44 percent. A majority of Democrats and plurality of independents backed Initiative 182. Over 70 percent of Republicans opposed the initiative. The question that Mason-Dixon Polling asked respondents was:

“

Ballot Initiative I-182 would allow for wide use of medical marijuana. If you were voting today, would you vote 'Yes' to approve the initiative, or 'No' to reject the initiative?

”

Some individuals criticized the question that Mason-Dixon Polling asked. Paul Harstad of Harstad Strategic Research, which conducted a poll for the support campaign, said the question's wording was "biased and dramatically oversimplified, and there’s no resemblance to the ballot summary that will be available to all voters."

Harstad Strategic Research conducted a poll of 805 likely voters between September 20 and September 25, 2016. The question that Harstad Strategic Research asked was:

“

It amends the Montana Medical Marijuana Act. It allows a treating physician to certify medical marijuana for a patient diagnosed with chronic pain or P.T.S.D. as a “debilitating medical condition.” Licensing requirements, fees and prohibitions are detailed for medical marijuana dispensaries and labs. It repeals the limit of three patients per licensed provider, and allows hiring employees to cultivate and dispense medical marijuana. It repeals the requirement that physicians who certify 25 or more patients be referred to the board of medical examiners. And it removes the authority of law enforcement to conduct unannounced inspections of medical marijuana facilities – and requires State annual inspections. Now, if the election were held today on this ballot initiative, would you vote yes or no?

”

Montana Initiative 182 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Sample size
Harstad Strategic Research 9/20/16 - 9/25/16	59.0%	32.0%	9.0%	805
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Mason-Dixon Polling and Research surveyed 1,003 registered voters on Initiative 182. Support for the measure was 44 percent. A majority of Democrats and plurality of independents backed Initiative 182. Over 70 percent of Republicans opposed the initiative. The question that Mason-Dixon Polling asked respondents was:

“

Ballot Initiative I-182 would allow for wide use of medical marijuana. If you were voting today, would you vote 'Yes' to approve the initiative, or 'No' to reject the initiative?

”

Some individuals criticized the question that Mason-Dixon Polling asked. Paul Harstad of Harstad Strategic Research, which conducted a poll for the support campaign, said the question's wording was "biased and dramatically oversimplified, and there’s no resemblance to the ballot summary that will be available to all voters."

Montana Initiative 182 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Mason-Dixon Polling and Research 10/10/16 - 10/12/16	44.0%	51.0%	5.0%	+/-3.2	1,003
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Nebraska

See also: Nebraska 2016 ballot measures

Nebraska Death Penalty Repeal, Referendum 426 (2016)

Nebraska Referendum 426
Poll	Retain	Repeal	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Global Marketing Research Services 8/7/2016 - 8/10/2016	30.3%	58.3%	11.3%	+/-4.0	600
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

A poll conducted by Prism Surveys on behalf of the ACLU of Nebraska in March 2015 showed that 58.5 percent of Nebraska voters support alternatives to the death penalty, while 30 percent support the death penalty over alternatives. The poll surveyed 2,129 Nebraskans and had a margin of error of 2.12 percent.

Nevada

See also: Nevada 2016 ballot measures

Nevada Legislature to Minimize Regulations on the Energy Market and Eliminate Legal Energy Monopolies, Question 3 (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• In July 2016, KTNV-TV 13 Action News and Rasmussen Reports surveyed 750 likely voters. Of those surveyed, 69 percent supported Question 3.
• In August 2016, the Suffolk University Poll found support for the initiative amongst likely voters to be 70 percent.
• Suffolk University Poll surveyed 500 likely voters in late September 2016. Of the respondents surveyed, 72 percent supported the measure.
• In late September 2016, Bendixen & Amandi International found 68 percent of likely voters in support of Question 3. Of the demographic groups surveyed, 18-34 year olds and Hispanics had the most favorable view of the measure.
• In late October 2016, Bendixen & Amandi International surveyed 800 likely voters on Question 4 and found support for the measure at 61 percent. Respondents who had a positive view of Hillary Clinton (D) favored the initiative 65 to 16 percent. Respondents who had a positive view of Donald Trump (R) favored the initiative 56 to 30 percent.

Nevada Question 3 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Bendixen & Amandi International 10/20/2016 - 10/23/2016	61.0%	22.0%	16.0%	+/-3.5	800
Bendixen & Amandi International 9/27/2016 - 9/29/2016	68.0%	14.0%	18.0%	+/-3.5	800
Suffolk University Poll 9/27/2016 - 9/29/2016	72.0%	12.0%	16.0%	+/-4.4	500
Suffolk University Poll 8/15/2016 - 8/17/2016	70.0%	12.0%	18.0%	+/-4.4	500
KTNV-TV 13 Action News/Rasmussen 7/29/2016 - 7/31/2016	69.0%	11.0%	20.0%	+/-4.0	750
AVERAGES	68%	14.2%	17.6%	+/-3.96	670
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Nevada Medical Equipment Sales Tax Exemption, Question 4 (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• Bendixen & Amandi International conducted a poll in late September 2016 and found 60 percent of respondents in support of Question 4.

Nevada Question 4 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Bendixen & Amandi International 9/27/2016 - 9/29/2016	60.0%	21.0%	19.0%	+/-3.15	800
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Nevada Background Checks for Gun Purchases, Question 1 (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• In July 2016, KTNV-TV 13 Action News and Rasmussen Reports polled 750 likely voters on Question 1. About 66 percent of respondents supported the measure and 25 opposed it. In Clark County, support was stronger at 71 percent.
• A Suffolk University Poll conducted in mid-August 2016 found 61 percent of respondents in support of and 26 percent opposed to Question 1.
• In late September 2016, Suffolk University Poll found support for the measure to be approximately 66 percent. Opposition was around 25 percent.
• Bendixen & Amandi International found 58 percent of their 800 respondents in support of the measure in late September 2016. Disaggregating the results by party affiliation, the pollster found that 73 percent of Democrats, 64 percent of independents, and 39 percent of Republicans in their sample supported Question 1.
• KTNV-TV 13 Action News and Rasmussen Reports polled 826 likely voters between October 20 and October 22, 2016. The poll showed that 59 percent of respondents supported Question 1.
• In late October 2016, Bendixen & Amandi International surveyed 800 likely voters on Question 1 and found support for the measure at 54 percent. Respondents who had a positive view of Hillary Clinton (D) favored the initiative 73 to 18 percent. Respondents who had a positive view of Donald Trump (R) opposed the initiative 65 to 28 percent.

Nevada Question 1 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Bendixen & Amandi International 10/20/2016 - 10/23/2016	54.0%	38.0%	8.0%	+/-3.5	800
KTNV-TV 13 Action News/Rasmussen 10/20/2016 - 10/22/2016	59.0%	34.0%	7.0%	+/-3.5	826
Bendixen & Amandi International 9/27/2016 - 9/29/2016	58.0%	32.0%	10.0%	+/-3.5	800
Suffolk University Poll 9/27/2016 - 9/29/2016	66.0%	25.0%	9.0%	+/-4.4	500
Suffolk University Poll 8/15/2016 - 8/17/2016	61.0%	26.0%	13.0%	+/-4.4	500
KTNV-TV 13 Action News/Rasmussen 7/22/2016 - 7/24/2016	66.0%	28.0%	7.0%	+/-5.0	750
AVERAGES	60.67%	30.5%	9%	+/-4.05	696
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Nevada Marijuana Legalization, Question 2 (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• In July 2016, KTNV-TV 13 Action News and Rasmussen Polls found 50 percent of respondents supporting and 41 percent opposing Question 2. The measure was viewed favorably by a majority of Democrats, young voters, African-Americans, and Hispanics. A majority of Republicans and respondents over 65 years old viewed Question 2 unfavorably.
• A Suffolk University Poll showed support under 50 percent in August 2016.
• KTNV-TV 13 Action News and Rasmussen Polls found support for the initiative to be around 53 percent in September 2016. Opposition to Question 2 was 39 percent.
• In late September 2016, a Suffolk University Poll indicated that support for Question 2 was around 57 percent.
• A Bendixen & Amandi International poll conducted in late September 2016 found support for Question at 47 percent and opposition at 46 percent. Of the demographic variables analyzed, the gap between age cohorts was the largest, with 68 percent of people 18-34 and 32 percent of people 65 and over supporting the initiative.
• KTNV-TV 13 Action News and Rasmussen Reports polled 826 likely voters between October 20 and October 22, 2016. The poll showed that 53 percent of respondents supported Question 2.
• In late October 2016, Bendixen & Amandi International surveyed 800 likely voters on Question 2 and found support for the measure at 47 percent. Respondents who had a positive view of Hillary Clinton (D) favored the initiative 53 to 33 percent. Respondents who had a positive view of Donald Trump (R) opposed the initiative 58 to 35 percent.

Nevada Question 2 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Bendixen & Amandi International 10/20/2016 - 10/23/2016	47.0%	43.0%	11.0%	+/-3.5	800
KTNV-TV 13 Action News/Rasmussen 10/20/2016 - 10/22/2016	53.0%	41.0%	6.0%	+/-3.5	826
Bendixen & Amandi International 9/27/2016 - 9/29/2016	47.0%	46.0%	7.0%	+/-3.5	800
Suffolk University Poll 9/27/2016 - 9/29/2016	57.0%	33.0%	10.0%	+/-4.4	500
KTNV-TV 13 Action News/Rasmussen 9/16/2016 - 9/18/2016	53.0%	39.0%	8.0%	+/-4.0	800
Suffolk University Poll 8/15/2016 - 8/17/2016	48.0%	43.0%	9.0%	+/-4.4	500
KTNV-TV 13 Action News/Rasmussen 7/22/2016 - 7/24/2016	50.0%	41.0%	9.0%	+/-4.0	750
AVERAGES	50.71%	40.86%	8.57%	+/-3.9	710.86
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

New Jersey

See also: New Jersey 2016 ballot measures

New Jersey Allowance for Casinos in Two Additional Counties, Public Question 1 (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• A Monmouth University Poll found respondents split on Question 1, with 48 percent in support and 48 percent against, in May 2016. Support and opposition varied by region, with northern state residents more supportive of the plan than central or southern state residents.
• In June 2016, Fairleigh Dickinson University and PublicMind found opposition growing and support shrinking since the Monmouth University Poll in May. Opposition was approximately 50 percent.
• A September 2016 Rutgers-Eagleton Poll showed support at 35 percent, with 33 percent of Democrats and 40 percent of Republicans supporting Question 1.
• In late September 2016, Stockton University found a 41 percentage point gap between respondents opposing and respondents supporting Question 1. Supporter was 27 percent and opposition was 68 percent.
• In mid-October 2016, Fairleigh Dickinson University and PublicMind surveyed 848 registered voters on Question 1. Opposition was at 70 percent. The top two reasons that voters opposed the amendment were perceptions that the "state has enough casinos" and expansion would hurt Atlantic City.
• Stockton University surveyed 678 likely voters between October 27 and November 2, 2016, on Question 1. Opposition among respondents was 71 percent, the highest recorded in a poll.

New Jersey Question 1 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Stockton University Poll 10/27/2016 - 11/2/2016	24.0%	71.0%	5.0%	+/-3.75	678
Fairleigh Dickinson University/PublicMind 10/12/2016 - 10/16/2016	24.0%	70.0%	6.0%	+/-3.6	848
Stockton University Poll 9/20/2016 - 9/21/2016	27.0%	68.0%	5.0%	+/-3.9	638
Rutgers-Eagleton Poll 9/6/2016 - 9/10/2016	35.0%	58.0%	7.0%	+/-3.8	735
Fairleigh Dickinson University/PublicMind 6/22/2016 - 6/26/2016	42.0%	50.0%	8.0%	+/-3.8	712
Monmouth University 5/23/2016 - 5/27/2016	48.0%	48.0%	4.0%	+/-3.7	806
AVERAGES	33.33%	60.83%	5.83%	+/-3.76	736.17
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

• In February 2016, a Rutgers-Eagleton Poll asked residents about their support for permitting casinos outside Atlantic City. The poll was not specific to Question 1. It found 44 percent of respondents in favor of and 49 percent against adding new casinos beyond Atlantic City.

Support for Casinos Outside Atlantic City
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Rutgers-Eagleton Poll 2/18/2016 - 2/23/2016	44.0%	49.0%	7.0%	+/-3.9	801
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

New Jersey Dedication of All Gas Tax Revenue to Transportation, Public Question 2 (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• In June 2016, Fairleigh Dickinson University and PublicMind surveyed registered voters and found 51 percent of respondents in support of Question 2.
• Stockton University surveyed 678 likely voters between October 27 and November 2, 2016, on Question 1. Support among respondents was 63 percent.

New Jersey Question 2 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Stockton University Poll 10/27/2016 - 11/2/2016	63.0%	33.0%	4.0%	+/-3.75	678
Fairleigh Dickinson University/PublicMind 6/22/2016 - 6/26/2016	51.0%	34.0%	15.0%	+/-3.8	712
AVERAGES	57%	33.5%	9.5%	+/-3.78	695
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

New Mexico

See also: New Mexico 2016 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

North Carolina

See also: North Carolina 2016 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

North Dakota

See also: North Dakota 2016 ballot measures

North Dakota Medical Marijuana Legalization, Initiated Statutory Measure 5 (2016)

A poll conducted in 2014 by the University of North Dakota College of Business and Public Administration found that 47 percent of respondents supported the legalization of medical marijuana, while 41 percent were opposed, and 9 percent were neutral to the legalization of medical marijuana. The poll surveyed 505 North Dakotans who indicated they were likely to vote and had a margin of error of 5 percent. While this poll is related to the general issue of medical marijuana in North Dakota, as of August 2016, Ballotpedia has not found polls specific to this initiative. If you know of a poll that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

North Dakota Marsy's Law Crime Victim Rights, Initiated Constitutional Measure 3 (2016)

North Dakota Crime Victim Rights (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Moore Information 7/24/16 - 7/25/16	72%	16%	12%	+/-4.0	500
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Oklahoma

See also: Oklahoma 2016 ballot measures

Oklahoma Rehabilitative Programs Fund Initiative, State Question 781 (2016)

The Oklahoman commissioned a poll of 398 likely voters from SoonerPoll in late July of 2016. The poll showed that 75 percent of likely voters supported State Question 780 and that 71 percent supported State Question 781.

Oklahoma Right to Farm Amendment, State Question 777 (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

Oklahoma State Question 777 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
SoonerPoll 10/18/2016 - 10/20/2016	37.0%	49.0%	14.0%	+/-4.26	400
SoonerPoll 10/5/2016 - 10/6/2016	49.0%	36.0%	15.0%	+/-4.88	400
AVERAGES	43%	42.5%	14.5%	+/-4.57	400
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Oklahoma Death Penalty, State Question 776 (2016)

The following poll was conducted about State Question 776. The poll was conducted through a combination of cell phone calls, landline calls, and an online panel.

Oklahoma State Question 776 (2016)
Poll	Strongly support	Somewhat support	Undecided	Somewhat oppose	Strongly oppose	Margin of error	Sample size
Sooner Poll - Commissioned by The Oklahoman July 2016	47.6%	24.4%	7.7%	9.7%	10.7%	+/-4.91	398
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Oklahoma Public Money for Religious Purposes, State Question 790 (2016)

• The Sooner Poll found a plurality opposed to Question 790 in late July 2016. However, 25 percent of respondents were undecided.

Oklahoma State Question 790 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Sample size
Sooner Poll 7/25/2016 - 7/29/2016	32.0%	43.0%	25.0%	400
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Oklahoma Reclassification of Some Drug and Property Crimes as Misdemeanors, State Question 780 (2016)

The Oklahoman commissioned a poll of 398 likely voters from SoonerPoll in late July of 2016. The poll showed that 75 percent of likely voters supported State Question 780 and that 71 percent supported State Question 781.

Oregon

See also: Oregon 2016 ballot measures

Oregon Measure 99, Outdoor School Lottery Fund Initiative (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• An icitizen poll conducted in early September 2016 found support for Measure 99 around 69 percent.

Oregon Outdoor School Lottery Fund, Measure 99 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
icitizen 9/2/16 - 9/7/16	69.0%	19.0%	12.0%	+/-4.00	610
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Oregon Measure 96, Portion of Lottery Proceeds for Support of Veterans Amendment (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• An icitizen poll conducted in early September 2016 found 83 percent of respondents supporting Measure 96.

Oregon Portion of Lottery Proceeds for Support of Veterans, Measure 96 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
icitizen 9/2/16 - 9/7/16	83.0%	8.0%	9.0%	+/-4.00	610
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Oregon Measure 97, Business Tax Increase Initiative (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• In early September 2016, DMH Research found 60 percent of respondents in favor of and 20 percent opposed to Measure 97.
• An icitizen poll conducted in early September 2016 estimated support for Measure 97 to be around 59 percent and opposition to be approximately 21 percent.
• Between September 29 and October 1, 2016, Hoffman Research conducted a poll and found lower support for Measure 97 than prior polls, with support at 41 percent and opposition at 47 percent.
• A mid-October 2016 poll conducted by SurveyUSA found support at a low 28 percent. A significant number of respondents, about 29 percent, were undecided. The groups for which over 50 percent of respondents supported Measure 97 were Democrats, people who described their ideology as “very liberal,” and people who view education as a top issue this election.
• In mid October, DMH Research surveyed 600 voters and found 49 percent of respondents opposing and 45 percent supporting Measure 97.
• Riley Research Associates found support for Measure 97 around 46 percent during the first two weeks of October. Democrats had the highest level of support for the initiative at 70 percent. Republicans had the highest opposition to the measure at 77 percent.
• DHM Research surveyed 504 voters for FOX 12 in late October 2016. The poll found support at 40 percent and opposition at 53 percent.

Oregon Measure 97 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
FOX 12-DHM Research 10/24/2016 - 10/29/2016	40.0%	53.0%	7.0%	+/-4.4	504
Riley Research Associates 10/4/2016 - 10/14/2016	46.0%	47.0%	7.0%	+/-3.97	608
DMH Research 10/6/2016 - 10/13/2016	45.0%	49.0%	6.0%	+/-4.0	600
SurveyUSA 10/10/2016 - 10/12/2016	28.0%	44.0%	29.0%	+/-3.9	800
Hoffman Research 9/29/2016 - 10/1/2016	41.0%	47.0%	12.0%	+/-4.0	605
icitizen 9/2/16 - 9/7/16	59.0%	21.0%	20.0%	+/-4.0	610
DMH Research 9/1/16 - 9/6/16	60.0%	30.0%	10.0%	+/-4.3	517
AVERAGES	45.57%	41.57%	13%	+/-4.08	606.29
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Oregon Measure 98, State Funding for Dropout Prevention and College Readiness Initiative (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• An icitizen poll conducted in early September 2016 found 64 percent of respondents supporting Measure 98.
• Tulchin Research surveyed 600 likely voters in late October 2016 on Measure 98 and found support at 59 percent.

Oregon State Funding for Dropout Prevention and College Readiness, Measure 98 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Tulchin Research 10/20/2016 - 10/25/2016	59.0%	26.0%	14.0%	+/-4.00	600
icitizen 9/2/2016 - 9/7/2016	64.0%	19.0%	17.0%	+/-4.00	610
AVERAGES	61.5%	22.5%	15.5%	+/-4	605
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Oregon Measure 100, Wildlife Trafficking Prevention Initiative (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• An incitizen poll conducted in early September 2016 showed 85 percent of respondents in support of Measure 100.

Oregon Wildlife Trafficking Prevention, Measure 100 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
icitizen 9/2/16 - 9/7/16	85.0%	7.0%	8.0%	+/-4.00	610
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Oregon Measure 95, Public University Diversification of Investments Amendment (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• An icitizen poll conducted in early September 2016 found 47 percent of respondents undecided on Measure 95.

Oregon Public University Diversification of Investments, Measure 95 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
icitizen 9/2/16 - 9/7/16	29.0%	24.0%	47.0%	+/-4.00	610
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Oregon Measure 94, Elimination of Mandatory Judicial Retirement Age Amendment (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

• In early September 2016, icitizen surveyed 610 Oregonians and found 53 percent in opposition to Measure 94.

Oregon Elimination of Mandatory Judicial Retirement Age, Measure 94 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
icitizen 9/2/16 - 9/7/16	33.0%	53.0%	14.0%	+/-4.00	610
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Pennsylvania

See also: Pennsylvania 2016 ballot measures

Pennsylvania Judicial Retirement Age Amendment (2016)

See also: 2016 ballot measure polls

The Franklin & Marshall College Poll surveyed 813 registered voters between September 28 and October 2, 2016. Respondents were randomly divided into three clusters, with each cluster receiving different wording regarding the judicial retirement age amendment. The first cluster received the wording that appeared on the November 8, 2016, ballot:

“

[Question 1] Shall the Pennsylvania Constitution be amended to require that justices of the Supreme Court, judges, and magisterial district judges be retired on the last day of the calendar year in which they attain the age of 75 years?

”

Of the respondents in the first cluster, 64 percent supported, 28 percent opposed, and seven percent were undecided on the measure.

The second cluster received the wording that was to be found on the April 26, 2016, primary ballot:

“

[Question 2] Shall the Pennsylvania Constitution be amended to require that justices of the Supreme Court, judges and justices of the peace (known as magisterial district judges) be retired on the last day of the calendar year in which they attain the age of 75 years, instead of the current requirement that they be retired on the last day of the calendar year in which they attain the age of 70?

”

Of the respondents in the second cluster, 45 percent supported, 47 percent opposed, and seven percent were undecided on the measure.

The third cluster received an alternative wording for the amendment:

“

[Question 3]The Pennsylvania Constitution currently requires that justices of the Supreme Court, judges, and magisterial district judges retire on the last day of the calendar year they turn 70 years of age. Should the state Constitution be amended to allow these judges to serve in office until they are 75 years of age?

”

Of the respondents in the third cluster, 37 percent supported, 61 percent opposed, and two percent were undecided on the measure.

Pennsylvania Judicial Retirement Age Amendment (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided
Franklin & Marshall College Question 1 9/28/2016 - 10/02/2016	64.0%	28.0%	7.0%
Franklin & Marshall College Question 2 9/28/2016 - 10/02/2016	45.0%	47.0%	7.0%
Franklin & Marshall College Question 3 9/28/2016 - 10/02/2016	37.0%	61.0%	2.0%
AVERAGES	48.67%	45.33%	5.33%
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Rhode Island

See also: Rhode Island 2016 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

South Dakota

See also: South Dakota 2016 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Utah

See also: Utah 2016 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Virginia

See also: Virginia 2016 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Washington

See also: Washington 2016 ballot measures

Washington Minimum Wage Increase, Initiative 1433 (2016)

See also: Polls, 2016 ballot measures

• In August 2016, Elway Poll released data showing 57 percent of respondents in support of and 31 percent opposed to Initiative 1433. About 12 percent were undecided on the measure.
• KOMO News and Strategies 360 released a poll in early October 2016 showing support for Initiative 1433 at 61.8 percent. Opposition was around 26.6 percent.
• YouGov conducted a poll in mid-October 2016 and found 62 percent of respondents supporting Initiative 1433.

Note: YouGov pressed "undecided" respondents to select a position. Respondents were also allowed to skip the question. In the poll table below, "undecided" respondents are those who chose to skip the question.

• In October 2016, Elway Poll surveyed 502 registered voters. Supporters claimed 58 percent of respondents, while opponents claimed 31 percent. Undecided voters composed 11 percent of the sample.

Washington Initiative 1433 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Elway Poll 10/20/2016 - 10/22/2016	58.0%	31.0%	11.0%	+/-4.5	502
YouGov 10/6/2016 - 10/13/2016	62.0%	36.0%	2.0%	+/-4.4	750
KOMO News/Strategies 360 9/29/2016 - 10/3/2016	61.8%	26.6%	1.6%	+/-4.4	500
Elway Poll 8/9/2016 - 8/8/2013	57.0%	31.0%	12.0%	+/-4.5	500
AVERAGES	59.7%	31.15%	6.65%	+/-4.45	563
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Washington State-Provided Campaign Financing Funded by a Non-Resident Sales Tax, Initiative 1464 (2016)

See also: Polls, 2016 ballot measures

• In August 2016, Elway Poll released data showing 34 percent of respondents in support of and 23 percent opposed to Initiative 1464. About 43 percent were undecided on the measure.
• In October 2016, Elway Poll surveyed 502 registered voters. Supporters claimed 34 percent of respondents, while opponents claimed 23 percent. Undecided voters composed 43 percent of the sample.

Washington Initiative 1464 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Elway Poll 10/20/2016 - 10/22/2016	36.0%	23.0%	41.0%	+/-4.5	502
Elway Poll 8/9/2016 - 8/8/2013	34.0%	23.0%	43.0%	+/-4.5	500
AVERAGES	35%	23%	42%	+/-4.5	501
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Washington Carbon Emission Tax and Sales Tax Reduction, Initiative 732 (2016)

See also: Polls, 2016 ballot measures

• In August 2016, Elway Poll released data showing 34 percent of respondents in support of and 37 percent opposed to Initiative 732. About 30 percent were undecided on the measure. In Seattle, 51 percent supported the initiative.
• KOMO News and Strategies 360 released a poll in early October 2016 showing support for Initiative 732 at 42 percent. Opposition was around 36.8 percent.
• YouGov conducted a poll in mid-October 2016 and found 51 percent of respondents supporting Initiative 732.

Note: YouGov pressed "undecided" respondents to select a position. Respondents were also allowed to skip the question. In the poll table below, "undecided" respondents are those who chose to skip the question.

• In October 2016, Elway Poll surveyed 502 registered voters. Supporters claimed 40 percent of respondents, while opponents claimed 32 percent. Undecided voters composed 28 percent of the sample.

Washington Initiative 732 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Elway Poll 10/20/2016 - 10/22/2016	40.0%	32.0%	28.0%	+/-4.5	502
YouGov 10/6/2016 - 10/13/2016	51.0%	44.0%	5.0%	+/-4.4	750
KOMO News/Strategies 360 9/29/2016 - 10/3/2016	42.0%	36.8%	21.2%	+/-4.4	500
Elway Poll 8/9/2016 - 8/8/2013	34.0%	37.0%	30.0%	+/-4.5	500
AVERAGES	41.75%	37.45%	21.05%	+/-4.45	563
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Washington Individual Gun Access Prevention by Court Order, Initiative 1491 (2016)

See also: Polls, 2016 ballot measures

• In August 2016, Elway Poll released data showing 64 percent of respondents in support of and 18 percent opposed to Initiative 1491. About 18 percent were undecided on the measure.
• KOMO News and Strategies 360 released a poll in early October 2016 showing support for Initiative 1491 at 78.6 percent. Opposition was around 17 percent.
• YouGov conducted a poll in mid-October 2016 and found 70 percent of respondents supporting Initiative 1491.

Note: YouGov pressed "undecided" respondents to select a position. Respondents were also allowed to skip the question. In the poll table below, "undecided" respondents are those who chose to skip the question.

• In October 2016, Elway Poll surveyed 502 registered voters. Supporters claimed 67 percent of respondents, while opponents claimed 18 percent. Undecided voters composed 15 percent of the sample.

Washington Initiative 1464 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Elway Poll 10/20/2016 - 10/22/2016	67.0%	18.0%	15.0%	+/-4.5	502
YouGov 10/6/2016 - 10/13/2016	70.0%	29.0%	1.0%	+/-4.4	750
KOMO News/Strategies 360 9/29/2016 - 10/3/2016	78.6%	17.0%	4.4%	+/-4.4	500
Elway Poll 8/9/2016 - 8/8/2013	64.0%	18.0%	18.0%	+/-4.5	500
AVERAGES	69.9%	20.5%	9.6%	+/-4.45	563
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Washington Advisory Question about the Rights of Corporations and Money as Free Speech, Initiative 735 (2016)

See also: Polls, 2016 ballot measures

• In August 2016, Elway Poll released data showing 43 percent of respondents in support of and 21 percent opposed to Initiative 735. About 36 percent were undecided on the measure.
• In October 2016, Elway Poll surveyed 502 registered voters. Supporters claimed 48 percent of respondents, while opponents claimed 18 percent. Undecided voters composed 36 percent of the sample.

Washington Initiative 735 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Elway Poll 10/20/2016 - 10/22/2016	48.0%	18.0%	34.0%	+/-4.5	502
Elway Poll 8/9/2016 - 8/8/2013	43.0%	21.0%	36.0%	+/-4.5	500
AVERAGES	45.5%	19.5%	35%	+/-4.5	501
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Washington Increased Penalties for Crimes Against Vulnerable Individuals, Initiative 1501 (2016)

See also: Polls, 2016 ballot measures

• In August 2016, Elway Poll released data showing 74 percent of respondents in support of and six percent opposed to Initiative 1501. About 20 percent were undecided on the measure.
• In October 2016, Elway Poll surveyed 502 registered voters. Supporters claimed 72 percent of respondents, while opponents claimed 9 percent. Undecided voters composed 19 percent of the sample.

Washington Initiative 1501 (2016)
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Elway Poll 10/20/2016 - 10/22/2016	72.0%	9.0%	19.0%	+/-4.5	502
Elway Poll 8/9/2016 - 8/8/2016	74.0%	6.0%	20.0%	+/-4.5	500
AVERAGES	73%	7.5%	19.5%	+/-4.5	501
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Wyoming

See also: Wyoming 2016 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Measures that did not make the ballot

The section below lists polls for measures that were proposed, but that did not make the ballot in 2016. For polling data about measures that were certified for 2016 ballots, see the section above. Ballotpedia does not comprehensively cover polling for measures that did not make the ballot. The polls listed below are about a small selection of proposed measures that did not make the ballot.

Massachusetts

Ending Common Core Initiative

See also: Massachusetts Ending Common Core Education Standards Initiative

Massachusetts Removal of Common Core
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
UMass Amherst 2/19/2016 - 2/25/2016	53.0%	22.0%	25.0%	+/-4.1	891
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Taxing the Wealthy for Education and Transportation Funding

See also: Massachusetts Income Tax for Education and Transportation Amendment

Massachusetts Tax the Wealthy for Education and Transportation Funding
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
UMass Amherst 2/19/2016 - 2/25/2016	62.0%	30.0%	9.0%	+/-4.1	891
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Michigan

Marijuana Legalization Initiative

See also: Michigan Marijuana Legalization Initiative

Michigan Marijuana Legalization
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
EPIC-MRA 12/10/2014 - 12/14/2014	50.0%	46.0%	4.0%	+/-4.0	600
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

New Mexico

Marijuana Legalization Amendment

See also: New Mexico Marijuana Legalization Amendment

Arizona Marijuana Legalization Poll
Poll	Support	Oppose	Margin of error	Sample size
Research & Polling Inc. 1/8/2016 - 1/13/2016	61%	34%	+/-5	406
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Ohio

Medical Marijuana Amendment

See also: Ohio Medical Cannabis Amendment

Ohio Medical Cannabis
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
Marijuana Policy Project 2/17/2016 - 2/18/2016	74.0%	22.0%	4.0%	+/-3.8	672
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Oregon

Minimum Wage Initiative

See also: Oregon $15 Minimum Wage Initiative

Oregon $15 Minimum Wage
Poll	Support	Oppose	Undecided	Margin of error	Sample size
GBA Strategies 1/12/2015 - 1/14/2015	54.0%	38.0%	8.0%	+/-3.5	800
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Utah

Medical Marijuana Legalization Initiative

See also: Utah Medical Marijuana Legalization Initiative

A survey of 624 Utah residents asked if they favored or opposed legalizing marijuana for medicinal purposes.

Utah Medical Marijuana Poll
Poll	Definitely favor	Somewhat favor	Don't know	Somewhat oppose	Definitely oppose	Margin of error	Sample size
Dan Jones & Associates November 5-14, 2015	35%	26%	2%	11%	25%	+/-3.92	624
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

The poll also indicated the following demographic-specific results:

• About 61 percent of respondents 45 or older were in favor of legalization.
• Among respondents aged 18-24, 51 percent were in favor, and 46 percent were opposed.
• "Very active" mormons oppose legalization 50-48.
• Catholics support legalization 82-18.
• Protestants support legalization 65-30

• Among the non-religious, 87 percent favor legalization, and 7 percent oppose it.
• Republicans favor legalization 49-48.
• Democrats favor legalization 86-13.
• Independents favor legalization 65-32.

See also

• 2016 ballot measures
• Potential 2016 ballot measures