Carolyn Berger

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Carolyn Berger

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png


Prior offices
Delaware Supreme Court

Education

Bachelor's

University of Rochester, 1969

Graduate

Boston University School of Education, 1971

Law

Boston University School of Law, 1976


Carolyn Berger was an associate justice of the five member Delaware Supreme Court. She was appointed to the court by Governor Thomas Carper on July 22, 1994.[1] Berger was the first female to serve on the court. In June 2014, she announced her retirement, effective September 1, 2014.[2]

Education

Berger earned her undergraduate degree from the University of Rochester in 1969. She received a master's degree in elementary education in 1971 from the Boston University School of Education and her J.D. degree from the Boston University School of Law in 1976.[1]

Career

Awards and associations

Awards

  • Honorary Doctor of Laws, Widener University School of Law [1]

Associations

  • Associate member, Board of Bar Examiners
  • Former president, Milton & Hattie Kutz Home
  • Former vice-president, Milton & Hattie Kutz Home
  • Member, Community Advisory Council of the Junior League of Wilmington
  • Board of directors, Jewish Federation
  • Board of directors, Delaware Region National Conference of Christians & Jews [1]

Political ideology

See also: Political ideology of State Supreme Court Justices

In October 2012, political science professors Adam Bonica and Michael Woodruff of Stanford University attempted to determine the partisan ideology of state supreme court justices. They created a scoring system in which a score above 0 indicated a more conservative-leaning ideology, while scores below 0 were more liberal.

Berger received a campaign finance score of -0.55, indicating a liberal ideological leaning. This was more liberal than the average score of -0.35 that justices received in Delaware.

The study was based on data from campaign contributions by the judges themselves, the partisan leaning of those who contributed to the judges' campaigns, or, in the absence of elections, the ideology of the appointing body (governor or legislature). This study was not a definitive label of a justice, but an academic summary of various relevant factors.[4]

See also

External links

Footnotes