Alabama Right to Hunt and Fish, Amendment 5 (2014)
| ||||||||||||
|
The Alabama Right to Hunt and Fish, Amendment 5 was on the November 4, 2014 ballot in Alabama as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment, where it was approved.
The measure was designed to "clarify that the people have the right to hunt, fish, and harvest wildlife subject to reasonable regulations that promote conservation and management of fish and wildlife and preserve the future of hunting and fishing."[1] The measure was known in the Alabama Legislature as House Bill 322.[2]
With Amendment 5's approval, it became the 892nd amendment to the 1901 version of the Alabama Constitution.[3]
Election results
Below are the official, certified election results:
Alabama Amendment 5 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
789,777 | 79.84% | |||
No | 199,483 | 20.16% |
Election results via: Alabama Secretary of State
Text of measure
Ballot title
The official ballot title of this measure appeared as follows:[4]
“ |
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, to amend Amendment 597, now appearing as Section 36.02 of the Official Recompilation of the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, as amended, to clarify that the people have the right to hunt, fish, and harvest wildlife subject to reasonable regulations that promote conservation and management of fish and wildlife and preserve the future of hunting and fishing. (Proposed by Act 2014-286) |
” |
Ballot summary
The full ballot summary was as follows:[6]
“ | Amendment 5 proposes an amendment known as the “Sportsperson’s Bill of Rights.”
If Amendment 5 IS PASSED, it would clarify that the people of Alabama have the right to hunt, fish and harvest wildlife, including the use of traditional methods. This right would be subject to reasonable regulations to conserve wildlife and preserve the future of hunting and fishing. Amendment 5 would not affect current laws relating to eminent domain, trespass, or property rights. It would also make hunting and fishing by the public the preferred means of managing and controlling wildlife in Alabama. If Amendment 5 IS DEFEATED, the people of Alabama would still have the right to hunt and fish using traditional methods, but that right may be limited by existing or future laws and regulations. Also, the State Constitution would not state that hunting and fishing by the public is the preferred means of managing and controlling wildlife in Alabama. No source of funding is required for this law. The measure will have no impact on taxes. The Constitutional authority for passage of this Amendment is set forth in Sections 284, 285, and 287 of the Constitution of Alabama of 1901. These sections outline the way a constitutional amendment may be put to the people of the State for a vote. [5] |
” |
Constitutional changes
Alabama Constitution |
---|
Preamble |
Articles |
I • II • III • IV • V • VI • VII • VIII • IX • X • XI •XII •XIII •XIV • XV • XVI • XVII • XVIII |
Local Provisions |
Amendment 5 amended Amendment 597 of the Alabama Constitution to read as follows, with the underlined text added and the stricken text eliminated:[2]
"(a) "(b) This amendment shall be known as the "Sportsperson's Bill of Rights.""[5] |
Support
Organizations
- National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund (NRA-PVF)[7]
Arguments
The National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund (NRA-PVF) supported Amendment 5. Chris W. Cox, chairman of the NRA-PVF, issued a statement endorsing Amendment 5 and Amendment 3, saying,
“ | Amendment 5 would protect Alabama's hunting traditions from well-funded extremist groups that seek to ban hunting. These amendments are critical to protect the constitutional freedoms of law-abiding gun owners and sportsmen in Alabama. On behalf of the NRA’s five million members, the NRA-PVF is proud to endorse Statewide Ballot Amendments 3 and 5. I urge all Alabama NRA members, gun owners and sportsmen to vote ‘Yes’ on Amendments 3 and 5 on November 4.[5] | ” |
—Chris W. Cox[7] |
HB 322 "Yes" votes
The following Alabama legislators voted in favor of putting Amendment 5 on the ballot:[8][9]
- Note: A yes vote on HB 322 merely referred the question to voters and did not necessarily mean these legislators approved of the stipulations laid out in Amendment 5.
Senate
- Sen. Gerald Allen (R-21)
- Sen. Billy Beasley (D-28)
- Sen. Scott Beason (R-17)
- Sen. Roger Bedford (D-6)
- Sen. Dick Brewbaker (R-25)
- Sen. Paul Bussman (R-4)
- Sen. Linda Coleman (D-20)
- Sen. Gerald Dial (R-13)
- Sen. Jerry Fielding (R-11)
- Sen. Vivian Davis Figures (D-33)
- Sen. Rusty Glover (R-34)
- Sen. Bill Hightower (R-35)
- Sen. Jimmy Holley (R-31)
- Sen. Bill Holtzclaw (R-2)
- Sen. Tammy Irons (D-1)
- Sen. Marc Keahey (D-22)
- Sen. Del Marsh (R-12)
- Sen. Shadrack McGill (R-8)
- Sen. Arthur Orr (R-3)
- Sen. Trip Pittman (R-32)
- Sen. Greg Reed (R-5)
- Sen. Quinton T. Ross, Jr. (D-26)
- Sen. Paul Sanford (R-7)
- Sen. Clay Scofield (R-9)
- Sen. Bobby Singleton (D-24)
- Sen. Harri Anne Smith (I-29)
- Sen. Rodger Smitherman (D-18)
- Sen. Bryan Taylor (R-30)
- Sen. J.T. Waggoner (R-16)
- Sen. Cam Ward (R-14)
- Sen. Tom Whatley (R-27)
- Sen. Phil Williams (R-10)
House
- Rep. Alan Baker (R-66)
- Rep. Mike Ball (R-10)
- Rep. George C. Bandy (D-83)
- Rep. Richard Baughn (R-14)
- Rep. Paul Beckman (R-88)
- Rep. Elaine Beech (D-65)
- Rep. Marcel Black (D-3)
- Rep. Daniel Boman (D-16)
- Rep. Alan C. Boothe (R-89)
- Rep. Barbara B. Boyd (D-32)
- Rep. Napoleon Bracy, Jr. (D-98)
- Rep. DuWayne Bridges (R-38)
- Rep. K.L. Brown (R-40)
- Rep. Greg Burdine (D-1)
- Rep. James E. Buskey (D-99)
- Rep. Mack Butler (R-30)
- Rep. Mac Buttram (R-12)
- Rep. Jim Carns (R-48)
- Rep. Donnie Chesteen (R-87)
- Rep. Adline Clarke (D-97)
- Rep. Steve Clouse (R-93)
- Rep. Merika Coleman (D-57)
- Rep. Terri Collins (R-8)
- Rep. David Colston (D-69)
- Rep. Randy Davis (R-96)
- Rep. Paul DeMarco (R-46)
- Rep. Dickie Drake (R-45)
- Rep. Allen Farley (R-15)
- Rep. Joe Faust (R-94)
- Rep. Chad Fincher (R-102)
- Rep. Craig Ford (D-28)
- Rep. Berry Forte (D-84)
- Rep. Victor Gaston (R-100)
- Rep. Juandalynn Givan (D-60)
- Rep. Lynn Greer (R-2)
- Rep. Todd Greeson (R-24)
- Rep. Dexter Grimsley (D-85)
- Rep. Micky Hammon (R-4)
- Rep. Alan Harper (R-61)
- Rep. Ed Henry (R-9)
- Rep. Mike Hill (R-41)
- Rep. Mike Holmes (R-31)
- Rep. Mike Hubbard (R-79)
- Rep. Steve Hurst (R-35)
- Rep. Jamie Ison (R-101)
- Rep. Ken Johnson (R-7)
- Rep. Wayne Johnson (R-22)
- Rep. Mike Jones (R-92)
- Rep. Richard J. Laird (I-37)
- Rep. Paul Lee (R-86)
- Rep. Richard J. Lindsey (D-39)
- Rep. Wes Long (R-27)
- Rep. Lawrence McAdory (D-56)
- Rep. A.J. McCampbell (D-71)
- Rep. Jim McClendon (R-50)
- Rep. Mary Sue McClurkin (R-43)
- Rep. Mac McCutcheon (R-25)
- Rep. Steve McMillan (R-95)
- Rep. John Merrill (R-62)
- Rep. Mike Millican (R-17)
- Rep. Barry Moore (R-91)
- Rep. Johnny M. Morrow (D-18)
- Rep. Becky Nordgren (R-29)
- Rep. Jim Patterson (R-21)
- Rep. Arthur Payne (R-44)
- Rep. Dimitri Polizos (R-74)
- Rep. Bill Poole (R-63)
- Rep. Kerry Rich (R-26)
- Rep. Bill Roberts (R-13)
- Rep. John Robinson (D-23)
- Rep. Oliver Robinson (D-58)
- Rep. John W. Rogers, Jr. (D-52)
- Rep. Howard Sanderford (R-20))
- Rep. Rod Scott (D-55)
- Rep. David Sessions (R-105)
- Rep. Randall Shedd (R-11)
- Rep. Harry Shiver (R-64)
- Rep. David Standridge (R-34)
- Rep. Allen Treadaway (R-51)
- Rep. Mark Tuggle (R-81)
- Rep. Lesley Vance (R-80)
- Rep. Kurt Wallace (R-42)
- Rep. April Weaver (R-49)
- Rep. Margie Wilcox (R-104)
- Rep. Dan Williams (R-5)
- Rep. Jack Williams (R-47)
- Rep. Phil Williams (R-6)
- Rep. Randy Wood (R-36)
- Rep. Greg Wren (R-75)
Opposition
HB 322 "No" votes
The following state legislators voted against placing HB 322 on the ballot:[8][9]
- Note: A no vote on HB 322 meant that a legislator did not want to refer the question to voters and did not necessarily mean these legislators disapproved of the stipulations laid out in Amendment 5.
Senate
- Sen. Hank Sanders (D-23)
House
- Rep. Laura Hall (D-19)
- Rep. Patricia Todd (D-54)
Media editorial positions
Opposition
- The Dothan Eagle said,
“ | Alabamians can hunt and fish in accordance with state laws and regulations now, in the absence of a constitutional amendment.
Our recommendation: Vote no.[5] |
” |
—Dothan Eagle[10] |
- The Montgomery Advertiser said,
“ | Amendments 1, 3 and 5 represent the worst sort of political game playing and should be roundly rejected by voters...Amendment 5 states that Alabamians have the right to hunt and fish, subject to conservation regulations. If that sounds familiar, it's because the constitution already says "All persons shall have the right to hunt and fish in this state in accordance with law and regulations."
These three amendments address non-issues. They add nothing to the rights of Alabamians or to the common good of our state. May we see a wave of "No" votes on Amendments 1, 3 and 5.[5] |
” |
—Montgomery Advertiser[11] |
- The Gadsden Times said,
“ | A threat must exist that we didn’t know about. Amendment 5 would clarify that Alabama citizens have the right to hunt, fish and harvest wildlife, subject to reasonable regulations. Given that the Alabama Constitution already contains a Sportsperson’s Bill of Rights and there’s no known movement to ban hunting in the state, this amendment reeks of being nothing more than political pandering. It should be shot down.[5] | ” |
—Gadsden Times[12] |
Path to the ballot
- See also: Amending the Alabama Constitution
According to Article 18 of the Alabama Constitution, both houses of the Alabama State Legislature were required to pass the bill by a three-fifths or 60 percent vote, in order to send it to the statewide election ballot. Since the amendment was approved by a simple majority of the electorate, it became part of the constitution.[13]
The Alabama House approved HB 322 on March 13, 2014, by a vote of 90 to 2. The Senate followed suit on April 3, 2014, with a vote of 32 to 1.[13]
House vote
March 13, 2014 House vote
Alabama HB 322 House vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
90 | 97.83% | |||
No | 2 | 2.17% |
Senate vote
April 3, 2014 Senate vote
Alabama HB 322 Senate vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
32 | 96.97% | |||
No | 1 | 3.03% |
See also
- Alabama 2014 ballot measures
- 2014 ballot measures
- List of Alabama ballot measures
- Alabama Legislature
Additional reading
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ Alabama Secretary of State, "Draft: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO APPEAR ON THE BALLOT IN THE 2014 GENERAL ELECTION NOT OFFICIAL – SUBJECT TO CORRECTION," accessed August 7, 2014
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Alabama Legislature, "HB 322 full text," accessed October 9, 2014
- ↑ 1901 Alabama Constitution
- ↑ Alabama Secretary of State, "PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO APPEAR ON THE BALLOT STATEWIDE," accessed September 8, 2014
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid<ref>
tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid<ref>
tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid<ref>
tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid<ref>
tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ Alabama State Legislature Fair Ballot Commission, "2013-2014 Statewide Constitutional Amendments Ballot Statements," accessed September 8, 2014
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 NRA-PVF, "NRA Endorses Pro-Gun and Pro-Hunting Statewide Ballot Amendments in Alabama," September 25, 2014
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 OpenStates.org, "Senate Vote on HB 322 (Apr 3, 2014)," accessed October 11, 2014
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 OpenStates.org, "House Vote on HB 322 (Mar 13, 2014)," accessed October 11, 2014
- ↑ Dothan Eagle, "Our view: Most amendment ballot measures are unnecessary," November 2, 2014
- ↑ Montgomery Advertiser, "Only two amendments deserve passing," October 17, 2014
- ↑ Gadsden Times, "Our view: Only one amendment should pass," November 1, 2014
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 OpenStates.org, "Alabama 2013 Regular Session: HB 322," accessed August 7, 2014
State of Alabama Montgomery (capital) | |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |