Zachary Gibson

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the individual's last campaign covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Zachary Gibson
Image of Zachary Gibson
Elections and appointments
Last election

November 8, 2022

Contact

Zachary Gibson (Republican Party) ran for election for judge of the Harris County Criminal Court at Law No. 4 in Texas. He lost in the general election on November 8, 2022.

Gibson completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2022. Click here to read the survey answers.

Elections

2022

See also: Municipal elections in Harris County, Texas (2022)

General election

General election for Harris County Criminal Court at Law No. 4

Incumbent Shannon Baldwin defeated Zachary Gibson in the general election for Harris County Criminal Court at Law No. 4 on November 8, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Shannon Baldwin
Shannon Baldwin (D) Candidate Connection
 
50.7
 
535,821
Image of Zachary Gibson
Zachary Gibson (R) Candidate Connection
 
49.3
 
521,359

Total votes: 1,057,180
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for Harris County Criminal Court at Law No. 4

Incumbent Shannon Baldwin advanced from the Democratic primary for Harris County Criminal Court at Law No. 4 on March 1, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Shannon Baldwin
Shannon Baldwin Candidate Connection
 
100.0
 
137,462

Total votes: 137,462
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for Harris County Criminal Court at Law No. 4

Zachary Gibson advanced from the Republican primary for Harris County Criminal Court at Law No. 4 on March 1, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Zachary Gibson
Zachary Gibson Candidate Connection
 
100.0
 
132,763

Total votes: 132,763
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Campaign themes

2022

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Zachary Gibson completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2022. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Gibson's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

I am a 2008 graduate of Baylor University. In 2012, I received my law degree from St. Mary’s University School of Law where I received the Marianist Green Award for Community Spirit and Cooperation for my outstanding work in the Criminal Justice Clinic.

Since 2016, I have had the privilege of serving as a prosecutor with the Harris County DA’s Office. As a prosecutor, I have handled many cases in Texas’s courts of appeals. I have developed a vast knowledge of criminal law, and I will make use of that as a judge. I am running for judge because I want to make the criminal justice system in Harris County better. Current judges have put the pursuit of bail “reform” and showing empathy to criminals over public safety and the best interests of our community. If elected, I will always follow the law. The people of Harris County are hard-working, welcoming, and law abiding, and it has been a privilege to make this my home. You represent the best of America, and you deserve better than the current judiciary. Being a judge who serves you would be the honor of my life. I ask for your vote!

  • Community safety will always be considered when making any bail determinations if I become judge. State statute requires this, and if a judge does not do this, then he is breaking the law.
  • A punishment should fit the crime. “Punishment” has become a dirty word for some, but the law fully allows for this. For first offenders and those with mitigating factors, punishment might want to focus more on reforming a person to give him a second chance. However, sometimes a punishment will be made purposefully unpleasant for an offender—usually a repeat offender or someone who has shown a disdain for others’ safety. This is done so that he and others will be incentivized not to do it again, and so that he will feel society’s disapproval toward him for what he did. I will decide which punishment is most appropriate from the full range of punishment on a case-by-case basis.
  • Judges are to apply the law. The law does have some value judgments, such as the fact that community safety should be considered in bail determinations. These values are supplied by statute or by caselaw, not sociology or shifting notions of what the law ought to be. Most of what a judge does is to apply the law. If the State has a better legal argument, then the State wins. If the defense has the better legal argument, then he wins. The courtroom is not the place for a judge to put his thumb on the scale so that a judge achieves his desired result. If I win, County Court-at-Law 4 will be a court of law—nothing more, and certainly nothing less.
In meeting with people of all backgrounds, it has become apparent that faith in our court system in Harris County is at all-time low. I decided to run for judge because if elected, I want to do my part to restore respect for the courthouse.

Courts—and especially criminal courts—should be seen as serious, solemn places by everyone in our community. Law-abiding citizens, prosecutors, crime victims, and defendants should see courts as places where serious and lawful consequences are on the table for those who break the law.
Criminal defendants should also view courts as places where their rights can be vindicated. Defendants should feel free to plead not guilty and put the State to its burden of proof. A defendant should not be required to wait years for a trial.
When a trial happens, the State should be allowed to introduce competent, relevant, and legally obtained evidence of a defendant’s guilt without the Court working to undermine the State’s case. Defendants should also feel free to present relevant, competent evidence in their defense. The jury then decides.

In short, the criminal law is a balance between protecting the due-process rights of the defendant and society’s right to lawful retribution for those who break our community’s standards of conduct. If I become judge, I will work hard to keep the balance true.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

See also


External links

Footnotes