Washington Initiative 2109, Repeal Capital Gains Tax Initiative (2024)
Washington I-2109 | |
---|---|
Election date November 5, 2024 | |
Topic Taxes | |
Status | |
Type State statute | Origin Citizens |
Washington Initiative 2109, the Repeal Capital Gains Tax Initiative, was on the ballot in Washington as an Initiative to the Legislature, a type of indirect initiated state statute, on November 5, 2024. It was defeated.
A "yes" vote supported repealing the capital gains excise tax imposed on long-term capital assets by individuals with capital gains over $250,000. |
A "no" vote opposed repealing the capital gains excise tax imposed on long-term capital assets by individuals with capital gains over $250,000. |
Election results
Washington Initiative 2109 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
Yes | 1,364,510 | 35.89% | ||
2,437,419 | 64.11% |
Overview
What would Initiative 2109 have done?
- See also: Text of measure
This initiative would have repealed the 7% capital gains excise tax imposed on sales and exchanges of long-term capital assets by individuals with capital gains over $250,000. Examples of sales that would have been subject to the tax included stocks, bonds, business interests, or other investments and tangible assets.[1]
The Washington State Legislature passed legislation creating the capital gains tax in 2021. It took effect on January 1, 2022, with the first payments due on April 18, 2023. Revenue from the tax was set to be deposited in the education legacy trust account and the common school construction account.[2]
As of 2024, the following sales were exempt from the capital gains tax in Washington:[3]
- real estate;
- assets in certain retirement accounts;
- interests in privately held entities when the capital gain or loss is attributable to real estate owned by the entity;
- assets sold under the imminent threat of condemnation;
- assets used in a business that are depreciable or qualify for being expensed;
- timber, timberlands, and dividends from real estate investment trusts from timber or timberlands;
- commercial fishing privileges and
- goodwill from the sale of a franchised auto dealership.
In 2023, the Washington State Supreme Court ruled that the capital gains tax was an excise tax and did not violate the constitutional prohibition on income taxes.[4]
What did supporters and opponents say about the measure?
- See also: Support and Opposition
Initiative sponsor State Rep. Jim Walsh (R) said, "Washington has a long tradition, both legal and cultural, of prohibiting a state income tax. This tradition reflects the common-sense principle that a state tax on capital gains is a type of state income tax. ... Every other state that has a capital gains tax considers it an income tax. The federal government considers the capital gains tax an income tax. Our state Supreme Court wrote an eccentric opinion saying otherwise and the US Supreme Court said the people of WA must fix that mess ourselves. With I-2109, the people are fixing it. Critics may lazily — and falsely — argue that I-2109 benefits only a few ‘rich’ people. However, the truth is that it benefits everyone in Washington. Our state’s economic and technological growth hub status has been attributed to the absence of a capital gains income tax, fostering job creation and generating tens of billions of dollars in wealth. It’s a shame to discard that advantage. I-2109 aims to restore it, protecting our competitive edge."
Invest in WA Now, which opposed the initiative, said it would "[take] more than $5 billion from child care and education over the next 6 years. This initiative is bankrolled by a mega-millionaire trying to buy himself a tax break – by taking $900 million a year from students, child care providers, schools, and more. We can’t let that happen. Washingtonians support the capital gains tax to fund education. The capital gains tax is just on Wall Street stock profits larger than $250,000. Only 4,000 people paid the tax last year, but that sent nearly $900 million to expand childcare, provide more early learning, and repair our schools."
How did this initiative get on the ballot?
- See also: Path to the ballot and Let's Go Washington 2024 initiatives
Let's Go Washington, led by State Rep. Jim Walsh (R-19) and conservative donor Brian Heywood, sponsored six Initiatives to the Legislature. The Democratic-controlled state legislature enacted three of the initiatives into law. Legislative Republicans were unanimous in their support for the three initiatives, while Democrats were divided. The legislature took no action on the other three initiatives, so they were placed on the 2024 ballot for voter approval or rejection.
From 1912, when the state’s initiative process was established, to 2023, six Initiatives to the Legislature (ITLs) received legislative approval. With three approved in 2024, the total increased to nine, a 50% increase.
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for the initiative is below:[1]
“ | Initiative Measure No. 2109 concerns taxes. This measure would repeal an excise tax imposed on the sale or exchange of certain long-term capital assets by individuals who have annual capital gains of over $250,000. This measure would decrease funding for K-12 education, higher education, school construction, early learning, and childcare
Should this measure be enacted into law? Yes [ ] No [ ] [5] |
” |
Ballot summary
The ballot summary for the initiative is below:[1]
“ | This measure would repeal an excise tax imposed on the sale or exchange of certain long-term capital assets by individuals who have annual capital gains of over $250,000. | ” |
Full text
The full text of the measure can be read below.
Readability score
- See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2024
Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The attorney general wrote the ballot language for this measure.
The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 9, and the FRE is 48. The word count for the ballot title is 58.
The FKGL for the ballot summary is grade level 15, and the FRE is 36. The word count for the ballot summary is 28.
Support
Let's Go Washington sponsored the initiative, including five others targeting the 2024 ballot.[6]
Supporters
Officials
- State Rep. Jim Walsh (R)
Organizations
Individuals
Arguments
Opposition
No on 2109 led the campaign in opposition to the initiative.
Opponents
Organizations
- Civic Ventures
- Invest in Washington Now
- League of Women Voters of Washington
- Moms Rising Together
- Permanent Defense
- Washington Progress Fund
Arguments
Media editorials
- See also: 2024 ballot measure media endorsements
Support
Ballotpedia did not identify any media editorials in support of Initiative 2109. If you are aware of one, please send an email with a link to editor@ballotpedia.org.
Opposition
Campaign finance
Let's Go Washington and Taxpayers Accountability Alliance registered to support the initiative. The committees also registered to support the two other initiatives (Initiative 2124 and 2117) on the 2024 ballot.[7]
No on 2109 Committee, Defend Washington, and Stop Greed registered to oppose the initiative. Stop Greed also registered to oppose the two other initiatives (Initiative 2124 and 2117) on the 2024 ballot and Defend Washington registered to oppose all four 2024 initiatives.[7]
Since the committees are registered to support or oppose multiple measures, it is impossible to distinguish between funds spent on each individual measure. When PACs contribute to other PACs, Ballotpedia subtracts the funds from the contributing PAC's finances to avoid double counting funds.
Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Support | $16,072,340.11 | $1,368,649.57 | $17,440,989.68 | $13,795,447.01 | $15,164,096.58 |
Oppose | $8,499,654.27 | $1,228,457.37 | $9,728,111.64 | $8,507,082.16 | $9,735,539.53 |
Total | $24,571,994.38 | $2,597,106.94 | $27,169,101.32 | $22,302,529.17 | $24,899,636.11 |
Support
The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committees in support of Initiative 2109.[8]
Committees in support of Initiative 2109 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Committee | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures |
Let's Go Washington | $16,071,240.11 | $1,367,857.73 | $17,439,097.84 | $13,752,922.21 | $15,120,779.94 |
Taxpayers Accountability Alliance | $1,100.00 | $791.84 | $1,891.84 | $42,524.80 | $43,316.64 |
Total | $16,072,340.11 | $1,368,649.57 | $17,440,989.68 | $13,795,447.01 | $15,164,096.58 |
Donors
Donors to the support campaigns were as follows:[8]
Donor | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions |
---|---|---|---|
Brian Heywood | $5,176,000.00 | $1,231,347.40 | $6,407,347.40 |
BIAW Member Services Corporation | $500,000.00 | $0.00 | $500,000.00 |
Lawrence Hughes | $400,000.00 | $0.00 | $400,000.00 |
Kemper Holdings, LLC | $350,000.00 | $0.00 | $350,000.00 |
Phil Scott | $250,000.00 | $0.00 | $250,000.00 |
Opposition
The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committees in opposition to Initiative 2109.[8]
Committees in opposition to Initiative 2109 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Committee | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures |
Defend Washington | $5,219,744.00 | $572,028.93 | $5,791,772.93 | $5,241,042.31 | $5,813,071.24 |
No on 2109 Committee | $3,267,282.27 | $655,825.28 | $3,923,107.55 | $3,253,918.33 | $3,909,743.61 |
Stop Greed | $12,628.00 | $603.16 | $13,231.16 | $12,121.52 | $12,724.68 |
Total | $8,499,654.27 | $1,228,457.37 | $9,728,111.64 | $8,507,082.16 | $9,735,539.53 |
Donors
Donors to the opposition campaigns were as follows:[8]
Donor | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions |
---|---|---|---|
SEIU 775 Ballot Fund | $1,000,000.00 | $0.00 | $1,000,000.00 |
Washington Education Association | $374,000.00 | $133,473.09 | $507,473.09 |
National Education Association | $500,000.00 | $0.00 | $500,000.00 |
Nicolas Hanauer | $500,000.00 | $0.00 | $500,000.00 |
Washington Federation of State Employees | $500,000.00 | $0.00 | $500,000.00 |
SEIU Initiative Fund | $425,000.00 | $0.00 | $425,000.00 |
Invest in Washington Now | $95,000.00 | $269,295.99 | $364,295.99 |
Methodology
To read Ballotpedia's methodology for covering ballot measure campaign finance information, click here.
Polls
- See also: 2024 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
Washington Initiative 2109, Repeal Capital Gains Tax Initiative (2024) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cascade PBS/Elway Poll | 10/8/2024-10/12/2024 | 401 LV | ± 5% | 29% | 56% | 15% |
Question: "Initiative 2109 concerns taxes. This measure would repeal an excise tax imposed on the sale or exchange of certain long-term capital assets by individuals who have annual capital gains of over $250,000. This measure would decrease funding for K-12 education, higher education, school construction, early learning, and childcare. As things stand today, do you intend to vote Yes to repeal the capital gains tax, No to keep the capital gains tax, or UNDECIDED?" | ||||||
Cascade PBS/Elway Poll | 9/3/2024-9/6/2024 | 403 RV | ± 5% | 30% | 52% | 18% |
Question: "Initiative 2109 concerns taxes. This measure would repeal an excise tax imposed on the sale or exchange of certain long-term capital assets by individuals who have annual capital gains of over $250,000. This measure would decrease funding for K-12 education, higher education, school construction, early learning, and childcare. As things stand today, how are you inclined to vote?" | ||||||
Cascade PBS/Elway Poll | 5/13/2024-5/16/2024 | 403 RV | ± 5% | 47% | 36% | 17% |
Question: "Initiative 2019 concerns the state’s new capital gains tax. If passed, it would repeal an excise tax imposed on the sale or exchange of certain long-term capital assets by individuals who have annual capital gains of over $250,000. As things stand today, how are you inclined to vote?" | ||||||
Crosscut Elway | 12/26/2023-12/28/2023 | 403 RV | ± 5% | 57% | 29% | 15% |
Question: "The following are some proposals that the legislature is expected to discuss in the coming weeks. As I read each of these items, please indicate whether you Favor, Strongly Favor, Oppose or Strongly oppose each one. ... Repeal the state’s new capital gains tax." | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
Background
Washington prohibition on income tax
Washington does not have a personal or corporate income tax.[9]
Under Article VII of the Washington Constitution, which was adopted by voters in 1930, all taxes must be uniform within the same class of property and property includes "everything, whether tangible or intangible, subject to ownership."
In 1932, voters approved an initiative, known as Initiative 69, which was designed to create a graduated income tax for education funding. The Washington State Supreme Court, in landmark decision Culliton v. Chase, overturned the initiative as unconstitutional, finding that it violated the constitution's prohibition on graduated income taxes.[10]
Washington capital gains tax (2021)
A capital gains tax was passed by the Washington State Legislature in 2021. Senate Bill 5096 was approved along partisan lines with Democrats in favor and Republicans opposed. It took effect on January 1, 2022, with the first payments coming due on April 18, 2023.[3][11]
A capital gains tax is a tax on profits from the sale of investments. Sales subject to the tax in Washington include sales of stocks, bonds, business interests, or other investments and tangible assets.[12]
In 2023, which is the first year that the tax was collected, the tax generated $890 million in revenue. Revenue from the capital gains tax is deposited in the Education Legacy Trust account, created in 2005, which is used for K-12 and higher education funding and early learning and childcare programs.[12][13]
The following sales are exempted from the capital gains tax:[3]
- real estate;
- assets in certain retirement accounts;
- interests in privately held entities when the capital gain or loss is attributable to real estate owned by the entity;
- assets sold under the imminent threat of condemnation;
- assets used in a business that are depreciable or qualify for being expensed;
- timber, timberlands, and dividends from real estate investment trusts from timber or timberlands;
- commercial fishing privileges and
- goodwill from the sale of a franchised auto dealership.
Quinn v. Washington
Chris Quinn and other Washington residents filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the capital gains tax, arguing that it was an unconstitutional income tax rather than an excise tax. Washington does not have an individual or corporate income tax. Plaintiffs argued that if the tax was found to be an excise tax, then it violates the U.S. Constitution's dormant commerce clause. In March 2022, the Douglas County Superior Court ruled that the capital gains excise tax was unconstitutional. The state appealed the ruling to the Washington Supreme Court, which ruled 7-2 to reverse the lower court's ruling and upheld the tax as a constitutional excise tax on March 24, 2023.[14] The state supreme court found that "The capital gains tax is appropriately characterized as an excise [tax] because it is levied on the sale or exchange of capital assets, not on capital assets or gains themselves.”[15]
Capital gains tax rates by state
Washington is one of 42 states that tax capital gains. Eight states do not tax capital gains. In the 42 states that tax capital gains, the rate ranges from 2.50% in Arizona to 13.3% in California.[16]
See also
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Washington Secretary of State, "Proposed Initiatives to the 2024 Legislature," accessed September 22, 2023
- ↑ Washington Department of Revenue, "Capital gains tax," accessed February 9, 2024
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Washington Department of Revenue, "Capital gains tax," accessed February 9, 2024
- ↑ RSM US, "Washington Supreme Court upholds capital gains tax," accessed February 23, 2024
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Let's Go Washington, "Home," accessed December 14, 2023
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 [https://www.pdc.wa.gov/political-disclosure-reporting-data/browse-search-data/committees?ballot_number=2109 Washington Public Disclosure Commission, "Committee search," accessed March 14, 2024
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedfinance
- ↑ Washington Department of Revenue, "Income tax," accessed February 23, 2024
- ↑ MRSC.org, "Culliton v. Chase, 174 Wash. 363, 25 P.2d 81 (1933)," accessed February 23, 2024
- ↑ LegiScan, "Senate Bill 5096 (2021)," accessed February 9, 2024
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 Washington State Legislature, "Senate Bill 5096 final bill report," accessed February 9, 2024
- ↑ Washington State Standard, "Estimates show capital gains tax repeal draining billions from Washington budget," accessed March 14, 2023
- ↑ SCOTUS Blog, "Washington residents challenge state’s effort to tax long-term capital gains," accessed February 9, 2024
- ↑ RSM US, "Washington Supreme Court upholds capital gains tax," accessed February 23, 2024
- ↑ SmartAsset, "2024 capital gains tax rates by state," accessed March 14, 2024
- ↑ Chronline, "Group submits 857,000 signatures to repeal capital gains tax and ban new income tax in Washington," accessed December 22, 2023
- ↑ Washington Secretary of State, "Secretary Hobbs notifies Legislature of initiative no. 2109 certification," accessed January 24, 2024
- ↑ The Center Square, "Lawsuit challenging warning labels on WA initiatives in court this week," accessed June 6, 2024
- ↑ Washington State Legislature, "House Bill 1876 (2022)," accessed June 6, 2024
- ↑ Salt Lake Tribune, "Lawmakers ignoring ballot initiatives violates Utahns’ constitutional rights, Utah Supreme Court rules in redistricting case," accessed July 11, 2024
- ↑ Washington Secretary of State, “Frequently Asked Questions on Voting by Mail,” accessed April 20, 2023
- ↑ 23.0 23.1 Washington Secretary of State, "Voter Eligibility," accessed April 20, 2023
- ↑ Washington State Legislature, "Voter registration deadlines," accessed April 20, 2023
- ↑ 25.0 25.1 25.2 The Hill, "Wash. gov signs universal voter registration law," March 20, 2018
- ↑ Washington Secretary of State, "Washington State Voter Registration Form," accessed November 2, 2024
- ↑ Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
- ↑ Washington State Legislature, "RCW 29A.40.160," accessed April 20, 2023
State of Washington Olympia (capital) | |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |