Washington Initiative 960, Supermajority Approval for Tax Increases Measure (2007)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Washington Initiative 960

Flag of Washington.png

Election date

November 6, 2007

Topic
Supermajority requirements and Taxes
Status

ApprovedApproved

Type
Initiative to the People
Origin

Citizens



Washington Initiative 960 was on the ballot as an initiative to the people in Washington on November 6, 2007. It was approved.

It was repealed by the state legislature in 2023, abolishing the requirement for advisory votes on tax measures.

A "yes" vote supported requiring a two-thirds vote in the legislature and a public ten-year cost projection for tax and fee increases, referendums for certain tax hikes, and non-binding advisory votes for legislative increases not subject to a referendum vote, alongside other modifications to the tax code.

A "no" vote opposed requiring a two-thirds vote in the legislature and a public ten-year cost projection for tax and fee increases, referendums for certain tax hikes, and non-binding advisory votes for legislative increases not subject to a referendum vote, alongside other modifications to the tax code.


Aftermath

Washington Senate Bill 5082 of 2023

See also: Changes in 2023 to laws governing ballot measures

Senate Bill 5082 repealed the requirement for statewide advisory vote requirement for tax increases established by Initiative 960.[1]

SB 5082 Vote Senate House
Yes No NV Yes No NV
Total 30 18 1 54 43 1
Democratic 29 0 0 54 3 1
Republican 1 18 1 0 40 0

State Sen. Patty Kuderer (D-48) said, "Advisory votes are non-binding referendums that do not carry any legal weight. They have no real impact on policymaking. These votes only pollute our ballots with anti-tax propaganda specifically designed to instill distrust in government—and they do it on our most fundamental sanctuary of democracy, the ballot."[2]

Washington Senate Republican Caucus issued a statement, which said, "The last time taxes were on the ballot in 2021, voters wanted them repealed. Proponents of taking away advisory votes argue that they are confusing or that voters get frustrated because the taxes they disapprove of aren’t reversed. Maybe the answer is to actually listen to the voters instead of taking their voice away? Democracy in on the ballot when it comes to advisory votes and the will of the people."[3]

Brown v. Owen

On February 29, 2008, Senate Majority Leader Lisa Brown and Democratic lawmakers initiated a legal challenge to the initiative's two-thirds majority requirement for tax increases as unconstitutional and undemocratic.[4] Republican State Senator Joseph Zarelli challenged the assertion that the requirement was unconstitutional or undemocratic, stating, "The people clearly supported it. This is what they wanted. Do we honor the democratic process, or do we get to pick and choose?"[5]

On September 9, 2008, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of "Lisa Brown v. Brad Owen." On March 5, 2009, the Supreme Court denied Brown's petition, stating that issuing the wit requested would violate the separation of powers doctrine. Justice Barbara Madsen, when the case was heard, signaled this outcome by saying, "The court plunging headfirst into the legislative process, that's a concern I have."[6][7]

Suspension of Initiative 960

See also: Legislative alteration

By 2010, Initiative 960 passed the two-year threshold before which legislators were restricted from amending or repealing the initiative's provisions. Tim Eyman proposed Initiative 1053 which was designed to implement a permanent two-thirds supermajority requirement for all tax raises in the future. The initiative was approved, but later overturned.

In January 2010, Democrats, who were in the majority in the legislature, said they planned to suspend Initiative 960 "to make way for tax increases to help close a $2.6 billion state budget gap and stave off severe cuts to state services."[8] On February 4, State Senator Margarita Prentice introduced Senate Bill 6843, which was written to repeal the initiative.[9][10][11] On February 17, 2010, the House approved the temporary suspension of the initiative after a 51-47 vote.[12] Shortly thereafter the Senate voted 26-21 in favor of suspending the initiative.[13][14] Gov. Chris Gregoire signed the 16-month suspension of some provisions of Initiative 960 on February 25, 2010.[15]

2013 Washington Supreme Court ruling

On February 28, 2013, the Washington Supreme Court issued its ruling on League of Educ. Voters v. State and, in doing so, declared legislation requiring a supermajority vote for tax legislation unconstitutional. The challenge was initially filed against Initiative 1053, but is part of a larger issue concerning similar initiatives beginning in 1993 with Initiative 601.

The court found such supermajority requirements to be in violation of Washington Constitution, Article II, Section 22, which states that no bill shall become law unless a majority of each chamber votes in favor of it. The court's ruling concludes with,

Our holding today is not a judgment on the wisdom of requiring a supermajority for the passage of tax legislation. Such judgment is left to the legislative branch of our government. Should the people and the legislature still wish to require a supermajority vote for tax legislation, they must do so through constitutional amendment, not through legislation.

[16][17][18]

Washington Supreme Court


Election results

Washington Initiative 960

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

816,792 51.24%
No 777,125 48.76%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Initiative 960 was as follows:

Initiative Measure No. 960 concerns tax and fee increases imposed by state government.

This measure would require two-thirds legislative approval or voter approval for tax increases, legislative approval of fee increases, certain published information on tax-increasing bills, and advisory votes on taxes enacted without voter approval.

Should this measure be enacted into law?

Full Text

The full text of this measure is available here.


Background

History of advisory votes in Washington

See also: Washington Rules for Approving Tax Increases, Initiative 960 (2007)

Initiative 960, which was sponsored by Tim Eyman and approved by voters in 2007, requires statewide advisory questions whenever the legislature passes a bill that increases tax revenue.

Thirty-eight (38) advisory votes required by Initiative 960 have been on the statewide ballot in Washington from 2012 through 2021. A majority of voters were in favor of maintaining 10 of the tax increases. In the other 28 cases, a majority of voters were in favor of repealing the tax increases in question.


Washington tax advisory votes
Year Measure Topic Maintain vote % Repeal vote %
2021 Advisory Vote 38 Tax on the premiums of captive insurers 42.85% 57.15%
2021 Advisory Vote 37 Tax on capital gains above $250,000 to fund education and child services 38.95% 61.05%
2021 Advisory Vote 36 Telephone tax to fund behavioral health and suicide prevention services 46.11% 53.89%
2020 Advisory Vote 35 Business and occupation tax on commercial airplane manufacturers 45.53% 54.47%
2020 Advisory Vote 34 Business and occupation tax and surcharge 37.99% 62.01%
2020 Advisory Vote 33 Heavy equipment rental tax 40.40% 59.60%
2020 Advisory Vote 32 Carryout bag tax 38.77% 61.23%
2019 Advisory Vote 31 International investment management services tax 56.75% 43.25%
2019 Advisory Vote 30 Tour operator/travel agent tax 44.19% 55.81%
2019 Advisory Vote 29 Excise tax on real property 35.20% 64.80%
2019 Advisory Vote 28 Nonresident sales tax exemption limits 55.29% 44.71%
2019 Advisory Vote 27 Petroleum products tax 39.22% 60.78%
2019 Advisory Vote 26 Online retail sales tax 44.77% 55.23%
2019 Advisory Vote 25 Financial institution tax 44.62% 55.38%
2019 Advisory Vote 24 Business activities tax 37.35% 62.65%
2019 Advisory Vote 23 E-cig/vaping tax 66.91%% 33.09%
2019 Advisory Vote 22 Paint tax 37.97% 62.03%
2019 Advisory Vote 21 Surcharge on timber products 41.10% 58.90%
2019 Advisory Vote 20 Tax on wages 37.08% 62.92%
2018 Advisory Vote 19 Crude oil tax 46.47% 53.53%
2017 Advisory Vote 18 State property tax 40.95% 59.05%
2017 Advisory Vote 17 Business and occupation tax 37.66% 62.34%
2017 Advisory Vote 16 Commercial fishing fees 45.59% 54.41%
2016 Advisory Vote 15 Alternative fuel tax excemption 40.10% 59.90%
2016 Advisory Vote 14 Dental plan tax 30.86% 69.14%
2015 Advisory Vote 13 Manufacturer tax preferences 36.59% 63.41%
2015 Advisory Vote 12 Gas tax increase 35.63% 64.37%
2015 Advisory Vote 11 Medical marijuana fee 58.73% 41.27%
2015 Advisory Vote 10 Oil spill prevention tax 51.32% 48.68%
2014 Advisory Vote 9 Leasehold excise tax 55.27% 44.73%
2014 Advisory Vote 8 Agricultural tax on marijuana 54.41% 45.59%
2013 Advisory Vote 7 Estate tax 51.23% 48.77%
2013 Advisory Vote 6 Retaill sales tax exemption 47.74% 52.26%
2013 Advisory Vote 5 Insurance premium tax 39.52% 60.48%
2013 Advisory Vote 4 Aircraft excise tax 53.54% 46.46%
2013 Advisory Vote 3 Leasehold excise tax 52.47% 47.53%
2012 Advisory Vote 2 Pollution liability insurance 45.00% 55.00%
2012 Advisory Vote 1 Omnibus tax preference 43.10% 56.90%

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing the initiative process in Washington

In Washington, proponents needed to collect a number of signatures for an Initiative to the People.

Futurewise and Service Employees International Union (SEIU) 775 went to court in June 2007 to block the measure from the ballot.[19] On September 7, 2007, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of Initiative 960 staying on the ballot.[20]

See also


External links

Footnotes

  1. Washington State Legislature, "Senate Bill 5082," accessed April 24, 2023
  2. MyNorthwest, "Washington House passes bill to eliminate advisory votes on tax increases," April 10, 2023
  3. Washington Senate Republican Caucus, "Democracy on the Ballot: SB 5082 & SB 5209," accessed April 22, 2023
  4. Seattle Times: "Liquor tax defeat lays groundwork for I-960 challenge," Feb. 29, 2008
  5. Seattle Times: "Liquor tax defeat lays groundwork for I-960 challenge," Feb. 29, 2008
  6. Seattle Post-Intelligencer: "Wash. Supreme Court hears tax limits case," Sept. 9, 2008
  7. Evergreen Freedom Foundation, "Lisa Brown v. Brad Owen"
  8. Seattle Times, "Eyman will push to restore tax barrier," January 12, 2010
  9. Washington Votes, Washington Senate Bill 6843
  10. Seattle Times, "Senate Democrats propose bill to make it easier to raise taxes," February 3, 2010
  11. Text of SB 6843
  12. The Seattle Times, "State House approves I-960 suspension," February 18, 2010
  13. Associated Press, "Wash. Legislature OKS suspension of I-960," February 22, 2010
  14. The Spokesman-Review, "State senate approves I-960 suspension for the third time," February 22, 2010
  15. The Spokesman-Review, "Gregoire signs I-960 suspension," February 24, 2010
  16. Associated Press,"State Supreme Court strikes down two-thirds vote for tax hikes," February 28, 2013
  17. League of Educ. Voters v. State 87425-5 (2013)
  18. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  19. Eyman's I-960 should be invalidated, Seattle PI
  20. Seattle Post-Intelligencer: "Court says Eyman measure can go on ballot," Sept. 8, 2007