PCI Consultants, Inc.

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Petition Companies
Clipboard128.png

PCI Consultants, Inc. (also known as Progressive Campaigns, Inc. or PCI) is a company that offers signature gathering services to ballot initiative campaigns.

About

PCI Consultants was founded in 1992 by Angelo Paparella and is based in Los Angeles, California. On its website, PCI Consultants said, "With over 20 years of experience, we’ve obtained over 65 million signatures, securing ballot placement for over 350 initiatives, referendums, and candidate nominations. We’ve developed a national network of professionals, allowing us to assist clients across the country."[1][2]

Petition drives

The following ballot measures appeared on the ballot after the sponsoring campaign committee hired PCI Consultants, Inc. to collect signatures. Since 2016, 14 ballot measures appeared on the ballot after the sponsoring committee(s) hired PCI Consultants, Inc. to gather signatures. Of the 14 measures that appeared on the ballot, nine were approved and five were defeated. Sponsoring committees paid an average of $1,666,414.41 in total for PCI Consultants, Inc.'s signature gathering services per ballot measure.

Measures on the ballot (2016-2021)

Year Measure Measure description Total cost Signatures required CPRS Outcome
2016 California Proposition 60 Require the use of condoms in pornographic films $1,409,273.68 365,880 $3.85 Defeatedd
2016 California Proposition 61 Prescription drug price regulations $1,355,765.65 365,880 $3.36 Defeatedd
2016 California Proposition 62 Repeal the death penalty $3,192,775.30 365,880 $8.73 Defeatedd
2016 California Proposition 63 Background checks for ammunition purchases $2,228,384.05 365,880 $6.09 Approveda
2016 Florida Amendment 2 Physician-prescribed marijuana $2,773,476.49 683,149 $4.06 Approveda
2016 Oklahoma State Question 780 Reclassifies some drug and property crimes as misdemeanors $544,706.05 65,987 $8.25 Approveda
2016 Oklahoma State Question 781 Funds rehabilitation programs with funds from SQ 780 $544,706.05 65,987 $8.25 Approveda
2016 Washington Initiative 1433 Increase the state minimum wage to $13.50 by 2020 $516,270.25 246,372 $2.10 Approveda
2016 Washington Initiative 1464 New campaign finance laws and regulations $1,407,967.00 246,372 $5.71 Defeatedd
2016 Washington Initiative 1501 Increase criminal identity theft penalties $1,208,731.55 246,372 $4.91 Approveda
2016 Washington Initiative 1491 Risk protection orders regarding firearms access $1,365,074.90 246,372 $5.54 Approveda
2017 Ohio Issue 2 State to purchase drugs at prices no more than what the VA pays $1,867,206.70 184,354 $10.13 Defeatedd
2018 Florida Amendment 4 Restores the right to vote for most people with prior felony convictions upon completion of their sentences $3,890,759.12 766,200 $5.08 Approveda
2018 Washington Initiative 940 Requires specific trainings for law enforcement and changes the standards for use of deadly force $1,024,704.92 259,622 $3.95 Approveda

This chart was last updated after statewide ballot measure elections in 2021.

Ballot initiative signature costs

See also: Laws governing the initiative process and Analysis of signature costs in past years

The cost of getting an initiative before voters varies widely by state and by initiative proposal. The requirements and restrictions imposed by state law form a major factor in the expense of an initiative signature petition effort.

Higher signature requirements are a straightforward example of a reason an initiative petition campaign might be more expensive in one state than in another. Other restrictions that can make a difference in the cost of a petition campaign include:

  • Distribution requirements - It is easier and less expensive to collect a lot of signatures in one very populous area than a small number of signatures from lots of smaller, less-populated areas.
  • Pay-per-signature bans - Paying signature gatherers by signature is one of the most cost-efficient ways to fund signature gathering efforts.
  • Restrictions on circulators - Restricting who can collect signatures limits competition between petition companies and professional signature gatherers.
  • Initiative petition circulation periods - If proponents have less time to collect signatures, the process can be more expensive.

Measuring the cost

See also: Analysis of signature costs in past years

Ballotpedia uses two ways to measure the cost of an initiative or veto referendum petition drive.

  1. According to the total cost of gathering the required signatures to put the initiative or veto referendum on the ballot
  2. According to the total cost divided by the number of signatures required to qualify the measure for the ballot or Cost Per Required Signature (CPRS)

Total cost: The total cost depends on all of the factors that can make a petition effort more or less expensive, including the population of the state and the state's signature requirements. This measurement does not necessarily indicate how difficult it is to run a signature petition campaign in a state relative to other states or how hard and expensive it is to collect a given valid signature. It takes into consideration the population and signature requirements for a state. For example, the average total cost of a successful initiative petition drive in California in 2016 was just over $2.9 million, while in Oklahoma the average total cost was about $870,000. Initiatives in California, however, require over four times as many signatures and affect 10 times as many people.

Cost Per Required Signature (CPRS): The cost per required signature cuts out the variable of a state's signature requirements and shows the cost for each signature needed to qualify the measure for the ballot. This second measurement is a better indication of how difficult it is to run a signature petition campaign in a given state relative to other states. For example, the average CPRS in California in 2016 was $6.20 while the average CPRS in Oklahoma was $9.59, but the average total petition cost was $2.9 million in California and about $870,000 in Oklahoma.

From the perspective of a national organization or proponents of a national agenda, this means that a lower CPRS generally means that a campaign could potentially affect more people and achieve more political influence per dollar spent, while the total petition cost might dictate in which states the campaign could actually afford to launch a successful petition drive.

Recent news

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Progressive Campaigns, Inc.. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

See also


External links

Footnotes