2020 presidential candidates on Janus v. AFSCME

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search



2020 presidential candidates on the issues

AbortionAffordable Care Act • Border securityCharter schools and voucher programsChinaClimate changeCoronavirus recoveryCriminal justiceDACA and DreamersEconomyEducationEnergy and environmental issuesForeign policyGun regulationHealthcareImmigrationImmigration enforcementImpeachmentMedicare for AllMiddle East and North AfricaMinimum wageNAFTA and USMCANorth KoreaPaid leavePolicingPrescription drug costsRussiaSocial SecurityStudent loan debtSouth and Central America • Supreme Court vacancyTariffsTaxesTrade

Presidential election
Republican Party Donald Trump

Democratic Party Joe Biden
Green Party Howie Hawkins
Libertarian Party Jo Jorgensen

This page includes statements from the 2020 presidential candidates on Janus v. AFSCME. These statements were compiled from each candidate's official campaign website, editorials, speeches, and interviews. Click the following links for policy statements about related issues: labor policy, public-sector unions, unionization and organization, and the right to strike.

The candidates featured on this page are the 2020 presidential nominees from the Democratic, Republican, Libertarian, and Green parties.

Republican Party Donald Trump
Democratic Party Joe Biden
Green Party Howie Hawkins
Libertarian Party Jo Jorgensen

Janus v. AFSCME

Republican candidates

Donald Trump

On Twitter, Donald Trump said the following about Janus v. AFSCME: "Supreme Court rules in favor of non-union workers who are now, as an example, able to support a candidate of his or her choice without having those who control the Union deciding for them." [source, as of 2018-06-27]

Roque De La Fuente

Rocque de la Fuente's campaign website does not include a statement about Janus v. AFSCME. [source, as of 2020-03-09]

Bill Weld

Bill Weld's campaign website does not include a statement about Janus v. AFSCME. [source, as of 2020-03-09]

Democratic candidates

Joe Biden

Joe Biden's campaign website does not include a statement about Janus v. AFSCME. [source, as of 2020-03-02]

Tulsi Gabbard

Tulsi Gabbard's campaign website does not include a statement about Janus v. AFSCME. [source, as of 2020-03-09]

Bernie Sanders

In a statement on the Supreme Court case Janus v. AFSCME, Bernie Sanders said, "To nobody’s surprise the U.S. Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, sided with big money interests and against the needs of working people. Make no mistake about it: this decision is a direct assault on working families all over America."

Sanders continued, "What the Koch brothers and other billionaires understand is that if they can destroy the trade union movement in America, it will make it even more difficult for workers to earn decent wages and benefits. Further, as the political power of working people is diminished, it will be much easier for corporate America and the Trump Administration to dismantle Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, the Veterans Administration, the Postal Service, public education and virtually every law that has benefitted working people over the past 80 years. While today’s ruling is a major setback for working families, we must redouble our efforts to make it easier, not harder, to join a union. We cannot rebuild the disappearing middle class without revitalizing the trade union movement." [source, as of 2018-06-27]


Other policy pages

Abortion

Criminal justice

Economy

Education

Energy and environmental issues

Foreign policy

Gun regulation

Healthcare

Immigration

Impeachment

Labor

Trade


Footnotes