Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
Figure 37 ‘ig. 9. The self-reflective mechanism consists of two structures, (1) the object-level, nd (2) the meta-level, whereby 1 — 2 is an asymmetric relation monitoring, anc »— 1 is an asymmetric relation control. Both form the information flow between the wo levels; monitoring informs the meta-level and allows the meta-level to be updated. Jepending on the meta-level, the object-level is controlled, i.e., to initiate, maintain, wr terminate object-level cognitive activities like information retrieval or other dialogue .ctions. LO VEL HAVE ALY VOU UC VEL, SUL Ee}: ZL ALULIUOUUULY CAUVOTUD AVPIVALLILY to multi-strategy dialogue management, see [64] for example. The main point is that we can maintain a model of the dialogue environmen on the meta-level which contains the context model, gets access to the mul timodal sensory input, and also contains self-reflective information. We calle such a model an introspective view, see figure[L0] An introspective view emerge from monitoring the object level—the correct interpretation of available sensor: inputs and the combination of this information with prior knowledge and expe riences. We can use this knowledge to implement a dialogue reaction behaviou (cf. [34], p. 194f) that can be called intuitive since the object level control fulfill intuitive functions, i.e., the initiation, maintenance, or termination of object level cognitive activities; our intuition controls our object-level behaviour b formulating dialogue goals and triggering dialogue actions.