lynx   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

issues2000    

Background on Jobs


Jobs issues in 2024 election cycle

Post-COVID unemployment

Unemployment hit record levels during the COVID pandemic -- peaking at 14.8% unemployment in April 2020. That unemployment rate is higher than the peak during the Great Recession -- 10.0% in Ocotber 2009 -- but lower than the peak during the Great Depression -- 24.7% in 1933. However, unemployment recuperated quickly after the COVID pandemic -- falling to a nearly-normal rate of 6.2% by Feb. 2021 -- the recuperation from the Great Recession and the Great Depression took years to reach nearly normal.

The post-pandemic recovery was fast because the massive unemployment was due to temporary closures rather than any underlying systemic economic problems. Workplaces accommodated "work-from-home," which has become the post-pandemic norm, and numerous other accommodations. The new normal work-from-home led to millions of people moving to the suburbs since they no longer had to commute -- leading to a massive increase in housing prices. Accommodations included moving to other states -- the most charming political TV ad of the 2024 election cycle featured Governor Kristi Noem dressed as an electrician to lure out-of-state residents to move to South Dakota, claiming that "South Dakota stayed open for business during the pandemic; now we've got more jobs than people."

Soft Landing

Biden/Harris claimed that their administration fixed COVID unemployment without a recession -- called a "soft landing" -- trickier to pull off, but not nearly as charming as Governor Noem in an eletrician's hat. Biden/Harris deserved credit for accomplishing a "soft landing" with both tolerable inflation and tolerable unemployment -- but they didn't get that credit. Pundits certainly cared about a balanced "soft landing" -- but people cared about inflation much more.

In particular, Biden/Harris accomplished the low-unemployment half of the "soft landing" by stimulus spending that enhanced employment -- ARPA and the IRA -- which inevitably led to inflation. Yes, it was well-balanced -- but Trump successfully labeled ARPA and IRA as "inflationary," and voters believed Trump because it was true.

Unionization

Had there not been post-COVID unemployment to deal with, unionization is what the Democrats wanted to talk about. The Republicans didn't participate in this discussion, except to oppose unionization: The "next step" for unionization in 2024 was the "PRO Act" (Protecting the Right to Organize). The largest American labor union called the PRO Act "the most significant worker empowerment legislation since the Great Depression." The PRO Act was cosponsored by 219 members of Congress -- that 's just about every Democrat in Congress, plus several Republicans -- but in January 2025, it will "die in Committee." That demonstates the degree of opposition -- despite very high support, the opponents killed it.

Re-shoring

Trump/Vance didn't participate in discussins about unions because their job policy was about re-shoring industries from offshore:

Jobs issues in 2020 election cycle

Minimum Wage

Green jobs

Unemployment rate

Foreign trade and import regulations are covered on the Free Trade page.
Corporate welfare issues are covered on the Government Reform page.
Earned-income Tax Credits are covered on the Tax Reform page.

Click for Amazon books on Jobs Click for references and citations
  • Pew Research Center, "When it comes to raising the minimum wage, most of the action is in cities and states, not Congress," by Drew DeSilver, 2/24/20
  • CNBC, "House passes bill to hike the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour, by Jacob Pramuk, 7/18/2019
  • Small Business Chronicle, "Problems With Minimum Wage", by Fred Decker, March 12, 2019
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics, "Measuring Green Jobs," download Oct. 2020
  • Scientific American, "Would a Green New Deal Add or Kill Jobs?," by Marilyn A. Brown & Majid Ahmadi, December 17, 2019
  • Investor's Business Daily, "The Rotten Green New Deal Will Transform U.S. In Worst Way", by Stephen Moore, 02/01/2019
  • The Balance, "Why Zero Unemployment Isn't as Good as It Sounds," by Kimberly Amadeo, August 30, 2020
  • Vox.com, "The NAIRU, explained: why economists don't want unemployment to drop too low," by Matthew Yglesias, Nov 14, 2014
Other candidates on Jobs: Background on other issues:
2024 Presidential Nominees:
Pres.Joe Biden (Democratic incumbent)
V.P.Kamala Harris (Democratic nominee)
Chase Oliver (Libertarian Party)
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. (Independent)
Dr.Jill Stein (Green Party)
Pres.Donald Trump (Republican nominee)
Sen.JD Vance (Republican V.P. nominee)
Gov.Tim Walz (Democratic V.P. nominee)
Dr.Cornel West (People's Party)

2024 Presidential primary contenders:
Gov.Doug Burgum (R-ND)
Gov.Chris Christie (R-NJ)
Gov.Ron DeSantis (R-FL)
Larry Elder (R-CA)
Rep.Will Hurd (R-FL)
Gov.Nikki Haley (R-SC)
Gov.Asa Hutchinson (R-AR)
Perry Johnson (R-IL)
Mayor Steve Laffey (R-RI)
V.P.Mike Pence (R-IN)
Rep.Dean Phillips (D-MN)
Vivek Ramaswamy (R-)
Sen.Tim Scott (R-SC)
Secy.Corey Stapleton (R-MT)
Mayor Francis Suarez (R-FL)
Marianne Williamson (D-CA)

2024 Presidential primary also-ran's or never-ran's:
Ryan Binkley (R-TX)
Howie Hawkins (Green Party)
Joe Maldonado (Libertarian Party)
Sen.Bernie Sanders (D-VT)
Kanye West (Birthday Party)
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland_Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology
War & Peace
Welfare
Лучший частный хостинг